Optimizing Perioperative Outcomes with Selective Bowel Resection Following an Algorithm Based on Preoperative Imaging for Bowel Endometriosis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To validate the algorithm for selective bowel surgery based on preoperative imaging by comparing the perioperative outcomes of patients who undergo each type of bowel surgery for deep bowel disease, and secondarily to evaluate the incidence, factors, and subsequent outcomes when the actual procedure performed deviated from the preoperative surgical plan. DESIGN: Retrospective study comparing 3 surgical interventions in an intention-to-treat analysis. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Women with significant pain (visual analog scale [VAS] >7) who were diagnosed with bowel endometriosis from preoperative imaging and underwent laparoscopic surgery for bowel endometriosis at a large referral center between 2014 and 2017. INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic shaving, disc resection, or full-segment resection and reanastomosis of bowel endometriosis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 172 patients (mean age, 36.6 ± 5.2 years) underwent bowel surgery for endometriosis (n = 30 shaving, 71 disc, and 71 segmental resection). Total operative time was similar in the 3 group, but the mean length of hospital stay was longer in the segmental group (5.3 ± 1.0 days) compared with the disc group (4.6 ± 0.9 days) and the shaving group (3.8 ± 1.5 days) (p = .001). The surgical procedure was performed as planned according to the clinical algorithm in 86.5% of patients. Adherence to the proposed clinical algorithm resulted in a low incidence of overall complications (8.7% of total complications, 4.6% of minor complications, and 3.5% of major complications). The incidence of minor complications was higher in the segmental group (9.9%) compared with the discoid group (1.4%) and the shaving group (0%) (p = .0236), whereas the incidence of major complications were similar across the 3 groups (3.3%, 2.8%, and 4.2%, respectively; p = .899). There was a significantly higher frequency of pseudomembranous colitis in the segmental resection group (7 patients; 9.9%) compared with the discoid group (n = 1; 1.4%) and shaving group (0%) (p = .04). Owing to discrepancies between preoperative imaging and intraoperative findings after dissection and mobilization, deviation from the planned procedure occurred in a total of 25 of 172 cases (14.5%), with a less extensive procedure actually performed in 21 of 25 (84%) of the deviated cases. One of the 4 cases (25%) that involved a more extensive procedure resulted in a major complication of rectovaginal fistula. CONCLUSION: Selective bowel resection algorithm provides a systematic approach to the surgical management of patients with bowel endometriosis. Adherence to the surgical plan according to the preoperative imaging and criteria outlined in the algorithm can be accomplished in the majority of patients; however, the surgical team should be aware that upstaging or downstaging may be required, depending on the intraoperative findings. When feasible, the team should opt for a less extensive procedure to avoid complications associated with more radical surgery.

Endometriosis and its correlation with carcinoid tumor of the appendix: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of appendiceal endometriosis ranges from 0.4% to 22%. The carcinoid tumor is the most common neoplasm of the appendix, with incidence ranging from 0.3% to 0.9%. Appendix lesions develop in up to 22% of women with deep infiltrative endometriosis. Even though these are most likely endometriosis, carcinoid tumors should always be considered. The aim of this review was to assess the prevalence of appendiceal carcinoid tumors and appendiceal endometriosis in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery, its association with endometriosis, and related symptoms. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We included retrospective and prospective studies that assessed women who underwent appendicectomy in the past 20 years for appendiceal endometriosis and/or appendix carcinoid tumor confirmed by histological analysis. Results were reported as relative and absolute frequencies. Due to the heterogeneity of included studies, a statistical analysis (meta-analysis) was not performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The prevalence of appendiceal endometriosis was 15.2% in patients who underwent surgery for pelvic endometriosis and 11.4% in those who underwent benign gynecological surgery. Conversely, carcinoid tumors of the appendix were present in 2.4% of endometriosis patients and 1.3% of other benign gynecological surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of carcinoid tumors in patients with endometriosis are the same as in the general population. Given the risk of a malignant appendiceal tumor, in all gynecological surgeries, especially those for endometriosis, the appendix should be inspected and removed if it has an abnormal appearance.