RESUMEN
Corticosteroid-based drugs are widely used in the general population to treat several acute and chronic inflammatory conditions. However, the therapeutic efficacy of these drugs is often accompanied by severe psychiatric adverse effects through a yet unknown mechanism. To further complicate this situation, therapeutic strategies to counteract psychotic symptoms associated with these agents have yet to be devised. We report a case of a young white male Jehovah's Witness admitted to the psychiatry ward of the Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy. At admission, the patient presented with psychomotor agitation, auditory hallucinations, and thought disturbances, resulting in the working diagnosis of a manic episode with psychotic features. During the 16 days of his hospital admission, the patient was treated with antipsychotic medications (aripiprazole and haloperidol) and with benzodiazepines (lorazepam), and he achieved a complete remission of all psychotic symptoms. While his psychiatric history was negative, his medical records revealed a recent discharge from the infectious disease ward with a diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis treated with intravenous betamethasone. Thus, at discharge, a diagnosis of steroid-induced psychosis was made. In conclusion, our findings are suggestive of a potential role played by corticosteroids in the development of psychotic symptoms, for which routine screening protocols and therapeutic guidelines are still lacking.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Trastornos Psicóticos , Enfermedad Aguda , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Aripiprazol , Deluciones/inducido químicamente , Deluciones/tratamiento farmacológico , Haloperidol , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Psicóticos/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Importance: Although plenty of data exist regarding clinical manifestations, course, case fatality rate, and risk factors associated with mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), long-term respiratory and functional sequelae in survivors of COVID-19 are unknown. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of lung function anomalies, exercise function impairment, and psychological sequelae among patients hospitalized for COVID-19, 4 months after discharge. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study at an academic hospital in Northern Italy was conducted among a consecutive series of patients aged 18 years and older (or their caregivers) who had received a confirmed diagnosis of severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection severe enough to require hospital admission from March 1 to June 29, 2020. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed via reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction testing, bronchial swab, serological testing, or suggestive computed tomography results. Exposure: Severe COVID-19 requiring hospitalization. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome of the study was to describe the proportion of patients with a diffusing lung capacity for carbon monoxide (Dlco) less than 80% of expected value. Secondary outcomes included proportion of patients with severe lung function impairment (defined as Dlco <60% expected value); proportion of patients with posttraumatic stress symptoms (measured using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised total score); proportion of patients with functional impairment (assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery [SPPB] score and 2-minute walking test); and identification of factors associated with Dlco reduction and psychological or functional sequelae. Results: Among 767 patients hospitalized for severe COVID-19, 494 (64.4%) refused to participate, and 35 (4.6%) died during follow-up. A total of 238 patients (31.0%) (median [interquartile range] age, 61 [50-71] years; 142 [59.7%] men; median [interquartile range] comorbidities, 2 [1-3]) consented to participate to the study. Of these, 219 patients were able to complete both pulmonary function tests and Dlco measurement. Dlco was reduced to less than 80% of the estimated value in 113 patients (51.6%) and less than 60% in 34 patients (15.5%). The SPPB score was suggested limited mobility (score <11) in 53 patients (22.3%). Patients with SPPB scores within reference range underwent a 2-minute walk test, which was outside reference ranges of expected performance for age and sex in 75 patients (40.5%); thus, a total of 128 patients (53.8%) had functional impairment. Posttraumatic stress symptoms were reported in a total of 41 patients (17.2%). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that at 4 months after discharge, respiratory, physical, and psychological sequelae were common among patients who had been hospitalized for COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Trastornos Respiratorios/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Anciano , COVID-19/patología , COVID-19/psicología , COVID-19/virología , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente , Rendimiento Físico Funcional , Trastornos Respiratorios/virología , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , SARS-CoV-2 , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/virología , Factores de Tiempo , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19RESUMEN
Mounting evidence has shown that the risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS) is substantially overlapping in the diagnostic subgroups of psychiatric disorders. While it is widely acknowledged that patients receiving antipsychotic medications are at higher risk of MetS than antipsychotic-naive ones, the association between antidepressants and MetS is still debated. The goal of our mini review was to analyse the relationship among depressive symptoms, antidepressant use and the occurrence of MetS. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, reference lists and journals, using the following search string: ((("Mental Disorders"[Mesh]) AND "Metabolic Syndrome"[Mesh]) AND "Antidepressive Agents"[Mesh]), and retrieved 36 records. Two reviewers independently assessed records and the mini review eventually included the data extracted from 8 studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of the selected studies. Overall, the results of the mini review seem to support the association among depressive symptoms, antidepressants therapy and MetS. Except for H1-R high-affinity ones, the relationship between antidepressants and MetS still needs to be clarified. Considering the widespread prescription of antidepressants, both on behalf of psychiatrists and primary care physicians, further research on this topic is recommended.