Correlation between IPSET-t risk at diagnosis and subsequent hemorrhage in patients with essential thrombocythemia; a single institution experience.

Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by an increased risk of thrombotic and hemorrhagic events, that represent the leading causes of mortality and morbidity. Currently, while thrombotic risk is assessed through the IPSET-t and r-IPSET scores, there is no specific prognostic tool used to predict hemorrhagic risk in ET. The aim of the study was to define incidence and risk factors connected to hemorrhagic events by retrospectively analyzing 308 ET patients diagnosed between 1996 and 2022 at the Division of Hematology of Udine and treated according to the current international guidelines. According to molecular status, 193 patients (62.7%) were JAK2 mutated, 66 (21.4%) had a CALR mutation, 14 (4.5%) had a MPL mutation, 21 patients (6.8%) were "triple negative," and 14 patients (4.5%) were not evaluable. According to IPSET-t score, 49.7% patients were at high, 24.3% at intermediate, and 26.0% at low-risk, respectively. Twelve (3.9%) patients experienced bleeding at ET diagnosis, while 24 (7.8%) had at least one hemorrhagic event during follow-up at a median time of 103 months (range: 1-309). Forty hemorrhagic events were totally recorded and defined as minor in 22 cases, moderate in 11 cases, and severe in 7 cases. Cumulative incidence (CI) of hemorrhage at 10 and 20 years was 6.0% and 12.0%, respectively. A statistically significant correlation between hemorrhagic risk and IPSET-t score emerged: 10 years hemorrhage CI was 3.2% for low-risk, 2.9% for intermediate-risk, and 9.8% for high-risk patients, respectively (p=0.002). We found no correlation between hemorrhagic risk and gender or mutational status. Results of our study highlight the validity of IPSET-t score in predicting individual hemorrhagic risk among ET patients, suggesting a possible role of IPSET-t scoring system as a global evaluator for vascular events in ET patients.

Antibody, cell-mediated response and infection susceptibility in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (allo-SCT) have reduced responses to vaccines due to immunosuppressive status linked to GvHD prophylaxis and treatment. In our study, we compared humoral responses to anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine, and infection onset, according to patients and transplant features; we also evaluated cellular response in patients without seroconversion. METHODS: We tested antibodies titer after second and third vaccine doses. Antibodies were detected through an immune-enzymatic assay. In a patients' subgroup without seroconversion, we tested cell-mediated responses evaluating interferon-gamma release by T-lymphocytes exposed to virus spike protein. RESULTS: Seroconversion rate increased from 66% at 30 days to 81% at 90 days after the second dose; it was 97% at 150 days after the third dose. We found a significant association between seroconversion after the second dose and two variables: shorter interval between allo-SCT and vaccination; ongoing immunosuppression. Twelve of 19 patients (63%) without antibodies after the second dose did not show cellular responses. Nineteen percent of patients developed SARS-CoV-2 infection after the third dose, with favorable outcome in all cases. Patients within 12 months after allo-SCT showed a significantly higher infection risk. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that an interval shorter than 12 months between allo-SCT and first vaccine dose and/or ongoing immunosuppression were associated with humoral and cellular response deficiency after two doses. Third dose induced an increased and sustained humoral response in the majority of patients. However, patients within 1 year after allo-SCT remained at higher infection risk and may be candidate for prophylaxis with anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies.

Stem Cells mobilization and collection in allogeneic related and unrelated donors: a single center experience with focus on plerixafor.

INTRODUCTION: Poor CD34 + cells mobilization in allogeneic donors could affect transplant outcome. In a subgroup of patient mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone is unsatisfactory, and Plerixafor could be used to enhance CD34 + cells release from bone marrow niche. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center, cohort study on healthy allogeneic donors both related and unrelated, treated by Udine Transfusion Center over the last 10 years (2012-2022). In the 195 allogeneic donors treated we analyzed age, sex, body weight, BMI, comorbidities, G-CSF dosage and even baseline white blood cell count as possible predictor of insufficient CD34 + cells mobilization on day 5. In the subgroup of related donors we evaluated even baseline CD34 + cells (measured before mobilization start). Processed donor blood volume, collection efficiency and apheresis product were examined. Additionally a comparative analysis was conducted between G-CSF alone treated donors and poor mobilizing ones, in which Plerixafor was administered at a dose of 0.24 mg/kg as a pre-emptive or rescue agent. RESULTS: In 9 donors, due to poor mobilization (defined as CD34 + < 20/µL or estimated yield < 1 ×106 kg/recipient body weight), the use of plerixafor was necessary. PLX at a dose of 0.24 mg/kg was administered 5 h before collection, inducing an average increase of 5.1 (1.7-12.6) in CD34 + circulating cells. In this subgroup of patients, BMI and weight were significantly lower (p = 0.03). Interestingly, baseline CD34 + cells (measured before the onset of mobilization) also seems to predict poor mobilization (p = 0.003). In donors additionally treated with Plerixafor compared to those who received G-CSF alone, collection efficiency was higher (p = 0.02) and CD34 + cells collected were comparable (p = 0.2). Side effects related to the administration of plerixafor, if they occurred, were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Plerixafor is a safe and effective drug in the rescue and prevention of poor mobilization. New prospective studies on allogeneic donors should be performed to increase the treatable population to avoid inadequate collection and mobilization. New laboratory predictors such as baseline CD34 + cells should be investigated in larger cohorts and then used as early screening.

Sex Differences in Adverse Effects of Antiseizure Medications in Adults with Epilepsy: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Sex differences in epilepsy have been described in prevalence, seizure propensity and response to treatment. Therefore, taking into account sex-based differences in epilepsy is important for both diagnostic purposes and therapeutic considerations. However, little is known about sex differences in adverse effects of antiseizure medications (ASMs). OBJECTIVES: We performed a systematic review searching for sex differences in adverse effects of ASMs in adult persons with epilepsy (PWE) as part of a wider project aimed to assess sex-based differences in efficacy and adverse effects of ASMs in PWE. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature search in the PubMed database. The search was conducted with no restriction on publication date, and all results up to April 2020 were included. We included articles written in English, Italian, Spanish, or French that evaluated adverse effects of one or more ASMs in PWE, with specific mention of the two sexes. When appropriate, Newcastle-Ottawa or Jadad scales were used to assess study quality. RESULTS: Of 5164 identified studies, only 167 considered sex in the analysis and were therefore included. Significant sex-related differences were found in 58 of those studies. We found a consistently higher frequency of cutaneous adverse effects in females; higher risk of developing general adverse effects on different ASMs in females; stronger risk of adverse effects on bone metabolism in females, mainly on treatment with enzyme-inducing ASMs; a concordant higher risk of visual field loss was noted in males on vigabatrin; an overall worse lipid profile in males; as well as higher leptin levels and higher body mass index in females treated with various ASMs. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis has identified some important sex differences in the adverse effects of ASMs. Clinicians should be aware of these differences when informing patients about the risks associated with ASM treatment in PWE.

Taking action on climate change: Testimonials and position statement from the International League Against Epilepsy Climate Change Commission.

The release of the 2021 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report makes clear that human activities have resulted in significant alterations in global climate. There is no doubt that climate change is upon us; chronic global warming has been punctuated by more frequent extreme weather events. Humanity will have to mitigate climate change and adapt to these changing conditions or face dire consequences. One under-appreciated aspect of this global crisis is its impact on healthcare, particularly people with epilepsy and temperature-sensitive seizures. As members of the inaugural International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Climate Change Commission, we recount the personal motivations that have led each team member to decide to take action, in the hope that our journeys as ordinary clinicians and scientists will help persuade others that they too can act to foster change within their spheres of influence.

The impact of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) on seizure course in people with and without epilepsy.

Objective: To elucidate the effects of single and paired-pulse TMS on seizure activity at electrographic and clinical levels in people with and without epilepsy. Methods: A cohort of 35 people with epilepsy, two people with alternating hemiplegia of childhood (AHC) with no epilepsy, and 16 healthy individuals underwent single or paired-pulse TMS combined with EEG. Clinical records and subject interviews were used to examine seizure frequency four weeks before and after TMS. Results: There were no significant differences in seizure frequency in any subject after TMS exposure. There was no occurrence of seizures in healthy individuals, and no worsening of hemiplegic attacks in people with AHC. Conclusions: No significant changes in seizure activity were found before or after TMS. Significance: This study adds evidence on the safety of TMS in people with and without epilepsy with follow-up of four weeks after TMS.

Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) in the COVID-19 pandemic era: A systematic review with individual patients' analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) resemble epileptic seizures but are not due to underlying epileptic activity and in some cases coexist alongside epilepsy. We described the clinical characteristics of patients with PNES as reported in the literature from the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated differences between patients with a diagnosis made immediately before the pandemic (pPNES) and those newly diagnosed during it (nPNES). METHODS: A systematic search with individual patient analysis of PNES cases published since the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak was performed. Differences between pPNES and nPNES were analyzed using Chi-square or Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Eleven articles were included, with 133 patients (106 pPNES and 27 nPNES). In the pPNES group, PNES frequency increased during the pandemic in 20/106 patients, whereas in 78/106, the frequency remained stable or decreased. nPNES was associated with higher risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection and epilepsy diagnosis, whereas psychiatric comorbidities were less frequent. CONCLUSIONS: During the pandemic, most patients with pPNES remained stable or improved, whereas nPNES was associated with a lower burden of psychiatric comorbidities. These intriguing findings suggest that, at least in some patients, the COVID-19 pandemic may not necessarily lead to worsening in the frequency of PNES and quality of life.

Parasomnias, sleep-related movement disorders and physiological sleep variants in focal epilepsy: A polysomnographic study.

PURPOSE: The link existing between epilepsy and sleep is widely recognized. However, little is known about the prevalence and the clinical consequences of the comorbidity between focal epilepsy and sleep disorders, especially those sleep phenomena classified as isolated symptoms or normal variants. Objective of the study was to evaluate the frequency of sleep disorders and physiological sleep variants in a group of adult patients with focal epilepsy as compared to healthy controls by means of nocturnal polysomnography. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study in the Neurological Clinic of the University of Catania in adult patients with a diagnosis of focal epilepsy and in a group of control subjects. All subjects underwent an overnight polysomnography. The following sleep disorders were considered: NREM-related parasomnias; REM-related parasomnias; sleep-related movement disorders; isolated symptoms or normal variants. RESULTS: 100 patients [mean age 30.3 ±â€¯14.7 years, 40 men] and 62 controls [mean age 36.4 ±â€¯15.9, 20 men] were studied. A significant higher percentage of sleep disorders was recorded in patients as compared to controls (73 % vs 48.4 %; p = 0.002). In particular, we found a higher frequency of periodic limb movements (PLM) (20 % vs 4.8 %; p = 0.007), bruxism (20 % vs 4.8 %; p = 0.007) and neck myoclonus (22 % vs 4.8 %; p = 0.003). Moreover, alternating limb muscle activation was associated with sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy (OR = 7.9; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Sleep disorders and physiological sleep variants are common in adult patients with focal epilepsy.