CILP1 as a biomarker for right ventricular maladaptation in pulmonary hypertension.

The aim of our study was to analyse the protein expression of cartilage intermediate layer protein (CILP)1 in a mouse model of right ventricular (RV) pressure overload and to evaluate CILP1 as a biomarker of cardiac remodelling and maladaptive RV function in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH).Pulmonary artery banding was performed in 14 mice; another nine mice underwent sham surgery. CILP1 protein expression was analysed in all hearts using Western blotting and immunostaining. CILP1 serum concentrations were measured in 161 patients (97 with adaptive and maladaptive RV pressure overload caused by PH; 25 with left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy; 20 with dilative cardiomyopathy (DCM); 19 controls without LV or RV abnormalities)In mice, the amount of RV CILP1 was markedly higher after banding than after sham. Control patients had lower CILP1 serum levels than all other groups (p<0.001). CILP1 concentrations were higher in PH patients with maladaptive RV function than those with adaptive RV function (p<0.001), LV pressure overload (p<0.001) and DCM (p=0.003). CILP1 showed good predictive power for maladaptive RV in receiver operating characteristic analysis (area under the curve (AUC) 0.79). There was no significant difference between the AUCs of CILP1 and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (AUC 0.82). High CILP1 (cut-off value for maladaptive RV of ≥4373 pg·mL-1) was associated with lower tricuspid annular plane excursion/pulmonary artery systolic pressure ratios (p<0.001) and higher NT-proBNP levels (p<0.001).CILP1 is a novel biomarker of RV and LV pathological remodelling that is associated with RV maladaptation and ventriculoarterial uncoupling in patients with PH.

Five-year follow-up of patients who underwent everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold implantation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate very long-term results after unrestricted everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) implantation. BACKGROUND: Previous randomized studies mainly included selected patients differing from those seen during daily routine and long-term data from all-comers registries are sparse. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing BRS implantation were included in this observational, single center study. Clinical follow-up was conducted up to 5 years. Endpoint of interest was the composite of target lesion failure (TLF), including target-vessel myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization and cardiac death. Furthermore, ARC-defined scaffold thrombosis (ScT) were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 176 patients with a median age of 64 (55 - 72) years were analyzed, of which 59.6% presented an acute coronary syndrome. A total of 183 mainly complex lesions (55.8%) were treated. At 5 years, the rate for TLF was 21.6%. Definite or probable ScT rate was 4.1%. The rate of ScT within the first year was 2.8% and afterwards 1.2%. Notably, no ScT was seen later than 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Although this real-world registry displays high rates of clinical events during long-term follow-up, no ScT was seen after 2 years.

Prospective validation of an acoustic-based system for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease in a high-prevalence population.

Recent guidelines recommend a risk-adjusted, non-invasive work-up in patients presenting with chest discomfort to exclude coronary artery disease (CAD). However, a risk-adjusted diagnostic approach remains challenging in clinical practice. An acoustic detection device for analyzing micro-bruits induced by stenosis-generated turbulence in the coronary circulation has shown potential for ruling out CAD in patients with low-to-intermediate likelihood. We examined the diagnostic value of this acoustic detection system in a high-prevalence cohort. In total, 226 patients scheduled for clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography (ICA) were prospectively enrolled at two centers and examined using a portable, acoustic detection system. The acoustic analysis was performed in double-blinded fashion prior to quantitative ICA and following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). An acoustic detection result (CAD score) was obtained in 94% of all patients. The mean baseline CAD score was 41.2 ± 11.9 in patients with obstructive CAD and 33.8 ± 13.4 in patients without obstructive CAD (p < 0.001). ROC analysis revealed an AUC of 0.661 (95% CI 0.584-0.737). Sensitivity was 97.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 91.5-99.7%), specificity was 14.5% (CI 9.0-21.7%), negative predictive value was 90.5% (CI 69.6-98.8%), and positive predictive value was 41.7% (CI 34.6-49.0%). Following PCI, the mean CAD score decreased from 40.5 ± 11.2 to 38.3 ± 13.7 (p = 0.039). Using an acoustic detection device identified individuals with CAD in a high-prevalence cohort with high sensitivity but relatively low specificity. The negative predictive value was within the predicted range and may be of value for a fast rule-out of obstructive CAD even in a high-prevalence population.

Impact of preprocedural TIMI flow on clinical outcome in low-risk patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Results from the ATLANTIC study.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to analyze the impact of the preprocedural thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow on clinical outcome in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that the TIMI flow 0/1 prior to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with a poor clinical outcome. However, it is unclear whether the same is true in patients with ongoing STEMI of less than 6 hr duration, rapid reperfusion, and modern guideline-adherent therapy. METHODS: The ATLANTIC study compared prehospital versus inhospital treatment with ticagrelor in patients with acute STEMI. For this analysis, patients were divided into three groups according to the preprocedural TIMI flow grade of the infarct vessel: TIMI 0/1, TIMI 2, and TIMI 3. RESULTS: From a total of 1,680 patients, 1,113 had TIMI 0/1, 279 TIMI 2, and 288 TIMI 3 flow before primary PCI. At 30 days, the composite ischemic endpoint (5.5, 2.9, and 2.1%, p < .05) and all-cause death (3.0, 1.4, and 2.1%, p = .30) were highest in patients with TIMI flow 0/1. After adjustment, preprocedural TIMI flow <3 (versus 3) was not an independent predictor of major adverse ischemic events within 30 days (odds ratio 1.89, 95% confidence interval 0.74-4.85). However, definite stent thrombosis occurred only in patients with initial TIMI flow 0/1 (1.0%). Among these patients, those with prehospital administration of ticagrelor were less often affected (0.3% vs. 1.3%, p < .05). CONCLUSION: In this post-hoc analysis, preprocedural TIMI flow was not independently associated with a higher rate of adverse ischemic events.

Association of 25-hydroxy vitamin D level with the blood pressure response to a maximum exercise test among professional indoor athletes.

PURPOSE: Low vitamin D levels have been associated with elevated blood pressure (BP) in the general population. However, whether there is an association of vitamin D insufficiency with BP changes during maximum exercise in athletes is currently unclear. METHODS: A total of 120 male professional indoor athletes (age 26 ± 5 years) were examined. BP was measured at rest and during a graded cycling test. We assessed the BP response (BPR) during maximum exercise and the respective load. BP and BPR (peak-baseline BP) were analysed with respect to 25-OH vitamin D levels, with levels < 30 ng/mL defining vitamin D insufficiency. RESULTS: 35 athletes were classified as being vitamin D insufficient. BP was not different between sufficient and insufficient vitamin D groups (122 ± 10/75 ± 7 vs. 120 ± 12/77 ± 9 mmHg). At maximum exercise, however, systolic BP (198 ± 17 vs. 189 ± 19, p = 0.026) and the pulse pressure (118 ± 18 vs. 109 ± 21 mmHg, p = 0.021) were higher in the sufficient group; the BPR was not different between groups (76 ± 20/5 ± 6 vs. 69 ± 22/3 ± 6 mmHg, p = 0.103). Athletes with sufficient levels had a higher maximum power output (3.99 ± 0.82 vs. 3.58 ± 0.78 W/kg, p = 0.015) and achieved higher workloads (367 ± 78 vs. 333 ± 80 W, p = 0.003). The workload-adjusted BPR (maximum systolic BP/MPO) was not different between athletes with sufficient and insufficient vitamin D levels (51 ± 10 vs. 56 ± 14 mmHg × kg/W, p = 0.079). CONCLUSION: Athletes with sufficient vitamin D achieved a higher maximum systolic BP and a higher maximum power output. The workload-adjusted BPR was not different between groups, which suggests that this finding reflects a better performance of athletes with sufficient vitamin D.

Fractional flow reserve and frequency of PCI in patients with coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been validated in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) but has not yet been verified under specific conditions such as heart failure or microvascular dysfunction. The aim of the present study was to examine the influence of specific patient comorbidities on FFR values and thus the frequency of PCI in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis. METHODS: A total of 652 patients with CAD and intermediate coronary stenosis who were assessed for FFR were included in this retrospective study. In a subgroup analysis, specific comorbidities such as heart failure with non-ST-segment-elevated acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), heart failure, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation (AF), and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) were considered. RESULTS: In all lesions with an FFR ≤ 0.80 (n = 227/808, 28.1%), PCI was performed using drug-eluting stents. Pathological FFR values (FFR ≤ 0.80) before PCI were most frequently observed in the left anterior descending artery (LAD; n = 168/418, 39.9%) followed by the right coronary artery (RCA; n = 37/178, 20.7%) and the left circumflex artery (LCX; 22/223, 9.8%). The comorbidities NSTE-ACS (p = 0.28), heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; p = 0.63), heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; p = 0.3719), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.177), or LVH (p = 0.407) had no major impact on the occurrence of pathological FFR values; there was also no association between FFR and the occurrence of lesions in the different target vessels. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of pathological FFR values, most frequently documented in the LAD, was the same in patients with or without HFrEF, HFpEF, diabetes mellitus, AF, and LVH, demonstrating that these comorbidities did not influence FFR values and, thus, the indication for PCI.

Patients at low surgical risk as defined by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score undergoing isolated interventional or surgical aortic valve implantation: in-hospital data and 1-year results from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY).

AIMS: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the standard treatment for patients with severe aortic valve stenosis at high surgical risk and may be considered for patients with intermediate risk. During the last few years, an increasing number of patients with low surgical risk have been treated with TAVI. In this study, low-risk patients undergoing isolated TAVI or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) were analysed using data from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY). METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score of <4% undergoing TAVI or SAVR in 2014 and 2015 were evaluated. A total of 20 549 low surgical risk patients remained for further analysis, comprising 14 487 surgical patients and 6062 TAVI patients. Since TAVI patients were significantly older and had significantly more co-morbidities, a weighted propensity score model was used to compare SAVR and TAVI patients for in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients showed a significantly higher in-hospital and 30-day survival than SAVR patients (in hospital survival TAVI vs. SAVR: 98.5% vs. 97.3%; P = 0.003; 30-day survival TAVI vs. SAVR: 98.1% vs. 97.1%; P = 0.014). At 1 year, survival rates did not differ significantly (survival TAVI vs. SAVR: 90.0% vs. 91.2%; P = 0.158). CONCLUSION: In this first GARY analysis of low-risk patients, weighted comparison showed similar 1-year survival for TAVI and SAVR and higher in-hospital survival for TAVI patients.

Patients at Intermediate Surgical Risk Undergoing Isolated Interventional or Surgical Aortic Valve Implantation for Severe Symptomatic Aortic Valve Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is increasingly being used for treatment of severe aortic valve stenosis in patients at intermediate risk for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Currently, real-world data comparing indications and clinical outcomes of patients at intermediate surgical risk undergoing isolated TAVR with those undergoing SAVR are scarce. METHODS: We compared clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with intermediate surgical risk (Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 4%-8%) who underwent isolated TAVR or conventional SAVR within the prospective, all-comers German Aortic Valve Registry. RESULTS: A total of 7613 patients at intermediate surgical risk underwent isolated TAVR (n=6469) or SAVR (n=1144) at 92 sites in Germany between 2012 and 2014. Patients treated by TAVR were significantly older (82.5±5.0 versus 76.6±6.7 years, P<0.001) and had higher risk scores (logistic EuroSCORE [European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation]: 21.2±12.3% versus 14.2±9.5%, P<0.001; Society of Thoracic Surgeons score: 5.6±1.1 versus 5.2±1.0, P<0.001). Multivariable analyses revealed that advanced age, coronary artery disease, New York Heart Association class III/IV, pulmonary hypertension, prior cardiac decompensation, elective procedure, arterial occlusive disease, no diabetes mellitus, and a smaller aortic valve area were associated with performing TAVR instead of SAVR (all P<0.001). Unadjusted in-hospital mortality rates were equal for TAVR and SAVR (3.6% versus 3.6%, P=0.976), whereas unadjusted 1-year mortality was significantly higher in patients after TAVR (17.5% versus 10.8%, P<0.001). After propensity score matching, the difference in 1-year mortality between patients with TAVR and SAVR was no longer significant (17.1% versus 15.7%, P=0.59). CONCLUSIONS: Patients at intermediate risk undergoing TAVR differ significantly from those treated with SAVR with regard to age and baseline characteristics. Isolated TAVR and SAVR were associated with an in-hospital mortality rate of 3.6%. In the propensity score analysis, there was no significant difference in 1-year mortality between patients with TAVR and SAVR.

OCT-assessment of scaffold resorption: Analysis of strut intensity by a new resorption index for poly-l-lactic acid bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze individual differences in resorption of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BRS) through optical coherence tomography (OCT) analysis and to identify factors potentially influencing the resorption process. METHODS: Between April 2016 and July 2017 clinically driven invasive coronary angiography and OCT examinations were performed in 36 patients who had previously been treated with a total of 48 BRS (ABSORB BVS, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA). For each scaffold, a new BRS-RESORB-INDEX (BRI) was calculated. RESULTS: The mean time interval since implantation was 789 ± 321 days. In OCT, BRS struts remained detectable in all 48 BRS. Normalized light intensity as a marker for the resorption of BRS struts increased with time in a linear fashion (Spearman Rho: p < .001, correlation coefficient = .90; R2 [linear] = .91). Multivariable analysis identified diabetes (BRI of patients with diabetes vs. patients without diabetes: 0.34 ± 0.13 vs. 0.58 ± 0.22; p = .002) and presence of Peri-strut low intensity areas (PSLIA, BRI of 10 patients with PSLIA vs. 26 patients without PSLIA: 0.44 ± 0.21 vs. 0.61 ± 18; p = .027) as independent predictors for a prolonged BRS resorption, whereas the resorption rate in ACS patients (STEMI, NSTEMI, and unstable angina; n = 13) was significantly higher as compared to patients without ACS (0.62 ± 0.17 vs. 0.43 ± 0.24; p = .012). CONCLUSION: In humans, BRS resorption rate is significantly influenced by numerous factors. Our data suggest that diabetes and PSLIA are associated with a prolonged resorption process, whereas in ACS patients, BRS resorption appears to be significantly faster.

Predictive value of preprocedural procalcitonin for short- and long-term mortality after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Current risk scores used for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) do not reliably predict adverse events after TAVI. Procalcitonin (PCT) is associated with increased atherosclerotic burden and adverse outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. The aim of our study is to assess the predictive value of preprocedural serum PCT levels in comparison with established risk scores in TAVI patients. A total of 243 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI at our institution were included prospectively in the study and 230 of these patients participated in the follow-up 1 year after TAVI. The primary endpoints were mortality at 30 days and 1 year. Multivariable analysis revealed that preprocedural PCT was the only independent predictor of 30-day mortality (HR 2.84; 95% CI 1.59-5.06; p < 0.001) and 1-year mortality (HR 1.90; 95% CI 1.17-3.11; p = 0.01), whereas high-sensitivity C-reactive protein showed no association with procedural outcomes. The results of ROC analysis showed good predictive power of PCT for both outcomes (AUC 0.75; p = 0.0003 for 30-day mortality and AUC 0.71; p < 0.0001 for 1-year mortality). An optimal cut-off value for PCT of 0.06 ng/ml for short- and long-term mortality was determined with the Youden index. A significantly higher mortality rate was observed in the high-PCT group (≥ 0.06 ng/ml) based on Kaplan-Meier analysis (log rank = 12.1; p = 0.001 at 30 days and log rank = 14.2; p = 0.0002 at 1 year). Patients in the high-PCT group also had a considerably worse clinical pro6file. In conclusion, preprocedural PCT is an independent predictor of 30-day and 1-year mortality after TAVI. In particular, a cut-off value of 0.06 ng/ml discriminates patients at higher risk of mortality within 30 days and 1 year of TAVI.

A multicenter post-marketing evaluation of the Elixir DESolve® Novolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold system: First results from the DESolve PMCF study.

OBJECTIVES: To date, experience with bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) that elute agents other than everolimus is limited. Thus, a post-marketing clinical follow-up study was conducted to evaluate the continued safety and effectiveness of the DESolve® NOVOLIMUS™ Eluting BRS as treatment for patients with stable coronary artery disease. BACKGROUND: The DESolve BRS combines a poly-l-lactide-based backbone with a biodegradable polylactide-based polymer and Novolimus, a macrocyclic lactone mTOR inhibitor. METHODS: One hundred and two patients (mean age 62 years, 77.5% male) were enrolled at 10 European sites. Comparison of baseline and post-procedural angiographic assessment was performed, and a device-oriented composite endpoint (comprising cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization) and rate of scaffold thrombosis at 12 months were examined. RESULTS: The device was successfully delivered and deployed in 98.2% (107/109) of the lesions, with two failures to cross the lesion. A total of 100 patients (109 lesions) were treated with a DESolve BRS. Post-procedural angiographic assessment indicated an in-scaffold acute gain of 1.54 ± 0.44 mm, with a reduction in % diameter stenosis from 61.00 ± 11.29 to 12.69 ± 0.44. At 12 months, the device-oriented composite endpoint had occurred in 3.0% (3/100) of patients, with 1.0% (1/100) experiencing scaffold thrombosis and myocardial infarction and 3.0% (3/100) undergoing target lesion revascularization. There were no cardiac deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Results through 12 months indicate that the DESolve BRS is a safe and effective treatment for coronary lesions, though larger, long-term prospective studies are needed.

Overlapping implantation of bioresorbable novolimus-eluting scaffolds: an observational optical coherence tomography study.

Overlapping implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds is frequently necessary, but its influence on vessel and scaffold structure has not been thoroughly analyzed previously. The aim of this study was to analyze the acute effects of overlapping implantation on BRS as determined by optical coherence tomography (OCT). A total of 38 patients with de novo coronary artery stenoses who underwent OCT in the context of implantation of novolimus-eluting BRS (DESolve, Elixir Medical Corporation, Sunnyvale, California, USA) were investigated. In 15 patients, overlapping implantation of two BRS was performed, while 23 patients with implantation of one single BRS served as the control group. OCT data were retrospectively analyzed regarding acute scaffold implantation results. There were no significant differences between the overlap and control group in terms of residual in-scaffold area stenosis, scaffold area, mean or minimal lumen area, eccentricity index, incomplete scaffold apposition area or malapposition. While strut fracture was slightly more frequent in BRS with overlap its incidence was low overall. In patients with overlapping BRS, overlap segments did not display smaller lumen areas than segments without overlap (mean lumen area overlap: 8.16 ± 2.97 mm2 vs. no overlap: 7.70 ± 2.55 mm2; p = 0.71; minimal lumen area overlap: 6.83 ± 2.71 mm2 vs. no overlap: 6.17 ± 2.58 mm2; p = 0.37). Acute mechanical performance of novolimus-eluting BRS is not impaired by overlapping implantation. It can be assumed that vessel expansion compensates for the double scaffold layer in the overlap area resulting in a similar lumen area in overlap areas and in those with a single strut layer.

Incidence and Clinical Impact of Stroke Complicating Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Results From the German TAVI Registry.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as a safe and effective treatment for patients with severe, symptomatic aortic valve stenosis at high surgical risk over the last years. However, besides its minimal invasive character, TAVI still is an invasive procedure usually performed in a population, carrying a substantial risk for vascular complications, like stroke. Stroke is known to be a rare but serious complication of transvascular interventions in clinical practice, which is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Despite broad clinical research in many fields of TAVI over the last years, only sparse data still exist on the incidence and clinical risk factors of stroke complicating TAVI in clinical practice today. METHODS: We analyzed data of 1.413 TAVIs, which were enrolled at 30 sites into the prospective and multicenter German TAVI Registry from January 2009 until June 2010. RESULTS: The overall incidence of cerebrovascular events complicating TAVI was 3.2% (n = 45/1.413) in a real-world population today. 40% of all cerebrovascular events were classified as transient ischemic attacks (TIA) with symptoms lasting < 24 hr (18/45) and 60% were classified as stroke with symptoms persisting > 24 hr (27/45). All strokes complicating TAVI of 50% were classified as major strokes leading to notable disability in patients, who survive this complication (Modified Ranking Scale 3-6). In-hospital mortality rate in patients with stroke/TIA was 28.9%, compared to 6.9% in patients without stroke/TIA and 1-year mortality rate 46.7% versus 18.6%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, prior stroke and renal impairment were found as the only independent predictors for stroke complicating TAVI. CONCLUSIONS: Stroke complicating TAVI is a serious complication with a clinically relevant incidence even in daily practice leading to a fivefold increase in 30-day-mortality rate, as well as a significant increase in morbidity and disability in patients, who survive this devastating complication. Further research is needed to identify risk factors and ways to reduce stroke after TAVI. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Long-term verification of functional and structural renal damage after renal sympathetic denervation.

Previous studies of renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) excluded patients with impaired renal function to avoid potential RSD-related renal damage. Measurement of the highly sensitive biomarkers neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) has shown that RSD does not aggravate renal damage during the early post-procedural period. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of RSD on blood pressure (BP) reduction and renal function after a long-term follow-up. A total of 62 consecutive patients undergoing RSD were included in this study. Serum NGAL and KIM-1 were collected prior to RSD and at 24 hr, 48 hr, and 3 months after RSD. BP measurements, antihypertensive medication use, and safety events were followed over a three-year period. Follow-up data were available over 36.9[±3.4] months in 47 of 62 (75.8%) of the initially included patients. At this time point a significant systolic BP reduction of 23 mm Hg (P > 0.001) was documented, and there were no significant changes in serum creatinine (P = 0.14), blood urea nitrogen (P = 0.33), or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (P = 0.2) values. There were also no significant changes documented in patients with impaired renal function (eGFR < 45 mL/min) during the early post- procedural period or the long-term follow-up (P = 0.34). The results of the present study show a sustained effect of RSD on BP reduction after a three-year follow-up, and there was no evidence of renal failure. These results provide verification of the long-term safety and effectiveness of RSD, even in patients with impaired renal function. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Use and outcome of thrombus aspiration in patients with primary PCI for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results from the multinational Euro Heart Survey PCI Registry.

The clinical benefit of thrombus aspiration (TA) in patients presenting with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not well defined. Furthermore, there is a large variation in the use of TA in real-world registries. Between 2005 and 2008, a total of 7146 consecutive patients with acute STEMI undergoing primary PCI were prospectively enrolled into the PCI Registry of the Euro Heart Survey Programme. For the present analysis, patients treated additionally with TA (n = 897, 12.6 %) were compared with those without TA (n = 6249, 87.4 %). Patients with hemodynamic instability at initial presentation (15.1 vs. 11.0 %; p < 0.001) and resuscitation prior to PCI (10.4 vs. 7.4 %; p = 0.002) were more frequently treated with TA. TIMI flow grade 0/1 before PCI was more often found among those with TA (73.5 vs. 58.6 %; p < 0.001). After adjustment for confounding factors in the propensity score analysis, TA was not associated with improved in-hospital survival (risk difference -1.1 %, 95 % confidence interval -2.7 to 0.6 %). In this European real-world registry, the rate of TA use was low. Hemodynamically unstable patients were more likely to be treated with TA. Consistent with the results of the TASTE study and the TOTAL trial, TA was not associated with a significant reduction in short-term mortality.

Use and outcome of radial versus femoral approach for primary PCI in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock: results from the ALKK PCI registry.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the use and outcome of radial versus femoral access in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in clinical practice. BACKGROUND: The radial approach for PCI in patients with STEMI has been suggested to have a lower rate of complications and bleeding and to improve prognosis compared with the femoral approach. However, there still is a large regional and national variation in its use. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2012 a total of 17,865 patients with STEMI without cardiogenic shock undergoing primary PCI were prospectively enrolled in the observational German PCI registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft leitende kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK). Transfemoral (TF) access was used in 15,270 (85.5%), transradial (TR) access in 2,530 (14.2%), and other access in 65 (0.3%) patients. In this analysis, 10,264 patients from 20 centers that had performed at least 5 TR-PCI for STEMI were included. This study compared TR-PCI (n = 2,454 23.9%) with TF-PCI (n = 7,810, 76.1%). RESULTS: Procedural success was high in both cohorts. Hospital mortality (1.8 vs. 5.1%, P < 0.001) and vascular access complications (0.3 vs. 1.8%, P < 0.001%) were lower in the TR group. In the multivariate analysis radial access was associated with an improved in-hospital survival rate (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.35-0.65). CONCLUSIONS: The radial approach for PCI can be performed with excellent procedural success in selected STEMI patients and is associated with a lower rate of vascular access complications and hospital mortality.

Implantation of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds in a diabetic all-comers population.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is associated with aggressive atherosclerosis, leading to an increased risk of in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis. Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) are a new technology for the treatment of coronary lesions that might be beneficial due to their dissolving character, especially in diabetic patients. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate feasibility and mid-term clinical outcome of the implantation of PLLA-based, everolimus-eluting BRS for the treatment of coronary lesions in a diabetic all-comers population. METHODS: All patients of an all-comers registry with diabetes eligible for BRS implantation were included. Outcome parameters were target vessel failure (TVF), major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including target lesion revascularization (TLR), cardiac death, and myocardial infarction. Follow-up was conducted via telephone and/or office visit. RESULTS: A total of 120 diabetic patients were included. Of all diabetics, 35.0% had insulin-dependent diabetes, and all other patients were treated with oral antidiabetics or dietary modification. The median age was 67 (59-72) years and 26.7% were female. Patients underwent coronary angiography due to acute coronary syndrome in 50.8%. Of 127 lesions, 60.6% were B2/C lesions according to ACC/AHA classification. The 6-month rates of TVF, TLR, and MACE were 8.9, 2.7, and 8.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This evaluation confirms reasonable clinical outcome of bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in a high-risk diabetic population with predominately complex lesions during daily clinical practice. Nevertheless, long-term data are required for final evaluation.

Aortic Valve Repair Results in Better 1-Year Survival Than Replacement: Results From German Aortic Valve Registry.

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve (AV) repair is an evolving surgical strategy in the treatment of nonelderly adults with aortic regurgitation. We aimed to determine the 1-year outcome after AV repair vs surgical AV replacement (sAVR) using real-world data from the German Aortic Valve Registry. METHODS: A total of 8076 aortic regurgitation patients (mean age, 59.1 ± 15.0 years; 76% men; mean The Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, 1.3 ± 1.1), who underwent AV surgical procedures between 2011 and 2015, were identified from German Aortic Valve Registry. The AV was repaired in 2327 patients (29%), and the remaining 5749 patients (71%) underwent sAVR. A weighted propensity score model, including the variables of age, sex, and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, was used to correct for baseline differences between AV repair and sAVR cohorts. The primary end point was 1-year survival after AV repair vs sAVR. Secondary end points were freedom from cardiac events and AV reinterventions. RESULTS: Survival at 1 year was 97.7% (95% CI, 97.0%-98.5%) in the AV repair cohort vs 96.4% (95% CI, 95.9%-96.9%) in the propensity score-weighted sAVR cohort (log-rank P < .001). Cox regression revealed a significant advantage of AV repair vs sAVR (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.90; P < .0001) on 1-year survival, which was independent of age. Cardiac event-free survival at 1 year was 85.7% (95% CI, 483.8%-87.7%) in the AV repair group vs 81.7% (95% CI, 80.7%-82.9%) in the sAVR group (log-rank P < .001). AV reintervention was required in 38 AV repair patients (1.6%) compared with 1.6% in the sAVR cohort (P = .59). CONCLUSIONS: AV repair surgery, whenever intraoperatively feasible, is associated with a significantly better 1-year survival and 1-year cardiac event-free survival compared with sAVR.

Comparison of contemporary transcatheter heart valve prostheses: data from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY).

BACKGROUND: Various second-generation transcatheter heart valve (THV) prostheses with high clinical efficacy and safety are available, but there is limited large-scale data available comparing their hemodynamic performance and clinical implications. OBJECTIVE: To compare the hemodynamic performance and short-term clinical outcome of four second-generation THV prostheses. METHODS: 24,124 patients out of the German Aortic Valve Registry who underwent transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) (Evolut™ R n = 7028, Acurate neo™ n = 2922, Portico n = 878 and Sapien 3 n = 13,296) were included in this analysis. Propensity-score weighted analysis was performed to control for differences in age, left ventricular function, STS score and sex. Primary endpoint was survival at one-year, secondary endpoints were 30 days survival, pre-discharge transvalvular gradients, paravalvular leakage and peri-procedural complications. RESULTS: Thirty-day and one-year survival were not significantly different between the four patient groups. Transvalvular gradients in Evolut™ R and Acurate neo™ were significantly lower as compared to Portico and Sapien 3 at hospital discharge. This difference exists across all annulus sizes. Paravalvular leakage ≥ II occurred significantly less often in the Sapien 3 group (1.2%, p < 0.0001). Rate of severe procedural complications was low and comparable in all groups. Permanent pacemaker implantation rate at one year was lowest in the ACUARATE neo group (13.0%) and highest in the Evolut™ R group (21.9%). CONCLUSION: Albeit comparable short-term clinical outcomes there are certain differences regarding hemodynamic performance and permanent pacemaker implantation rate between currently available THV prostheses which should be considered for individual prosthesis selection.

Development and validation of explainable machine learning models for risk of mortality in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: TAVI risk machine scores.

Aims: Identification of high-risk patients and individualized decision support based on objective criteria for rapid discharge after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are key requirements in the context of contemporary TAVI treatment. This study aimed to predict 30-day mortality following TAVI based on machine learning (ML) using data from the German Aortic Valve Registry. Methods and results: Mortality risk was determined using a random forest ML model that was condensed in the newly developed TAVI Risk Machine (TRIM) scores, designed to represent clinically meaningful risk modelling before (TRIMpre) and in particular after (TRIMpost) TAVI. Algorithm was trained and cross-validated on data of 22 283 patients (729 died within 30 days post-TAVI) and generalisation was examined on data of 5864 patients (146 died). TRIMpost demonstrated significantly better performance than traditional scores [C-statistics value, 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI)] [0.74; 0.83] compared to Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) with C-statistics value 0.69; 95%-CI [0.65; 0.74]). An abridged (aTRIMpost) score comprising 25 features (calculated using a web interface) exhibited significantly higher performance than traditional scores (C-statistics value, 0.74; 95%-CI [0.70; 0.78]). Validation on external data of 6693 patients (205 died within 30 days post-TAVI) of the Swiss TAVI Registry confirmed significantly better performance for the TRIMpost (C-statistics value 0.75, 95%-CI [0.72; 0.79]) compared to STS (C-statistics value 0.67, CI [0.63; 0.70]). Conclusion: TRIM scores demonstrate good performance for risk estimation before and after TAVI. Together with clinical judgement, they may support standardised and objective decision-making before and after TAVI.