[Prostate cancer: Quality assessment of clinical management in the Midi-Pyrenean region in 2011]. / Cancer de la prostate : qualité de la prise en charge en Midi-Pyrénées en 2011.

OBJECTIVES: Assessing the quality of the clinical management of prostate cancer in the Midi-Pyrenean region in 2011. METHODS: The study population was randomly selected among new cases of prostate cancer presented in Multidisciplinary Team Meeting (MTM) in 2011. The indicators defined with the professionals have evaluated the quality of the diagnostic care, when treatment started and at the time of the MTM. RESULTS: Six hundred and thirty-three new patients were included (median age at diagnosis=69years, min: 48; max: 93). In diagnostic period, 92% of patients had a prostate biopsy. Performing a pelvic MRI, an abdomino-pelvic CT and bone scintigraphy concerned respectively 53%, 55% and 61% of intermediate or high-risk patients. The Gleason score, surgical margins and pathological stage were included in over 98% patient records treated by radical prostatectomy. A PSA assay in 3months after prostatectomy was found in 59% of surgical patients. The MTM was performed before treatment to 83% of patients. About three-quarters of surgical patients with stage pT≥3 or pN1 or with no healthy margins were discussed in MTM after surgery. CONCLUSION: Most of the studied indicators reach a high level. However, the lower level of realization of complementary examinations may question about their real place, accessibility and traceability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Adherence to consensus-based diagnosis and treatment guidelines in adult soft-tissue sarcoma patients: a French prospective population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs) are rare tumors with varied histological presentations. Management and treatment are thus complex, but crucial for patient outcomes. We assess adherence to adult STS management guidelines across two French regions (10% of the French population). We also report standardized incidence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: STS patients diagnosed from 1 November 2006 to 31 December 2007 were identified from pathology reports, medical hospital records, and cancer registries. Guideline adherence was assessed by 23 criteria (validated by Delphi consensus method), and age and sex-standardized incidence rates estimated. Associations between patient, treatment, and institutional factors and adherence with three major composite criteria relating to diagnostic imaging and biopsy as well as multidisciplinary team (MDT) case-review are reported. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-four patients were included (57.7% male, mean age 60.8 years). Practices were relatively compliant overall, with over 70% adherence for 10 criteria. Three criteria with perfect Delphi consensus had low adherence: receiving histological diagnosis before surgery, adequacy of histological diagnosis (adherence around 50% for both), and MDT discussion before surgery (adherence <30%). Treatment outside of specialized centers was associated with lower adherence for all three composite criteria, and specific tumor sites and/or features were associated with lower adherence for diagnostic imaging, methods, and MDT meetings. STS standardized incidence rates were 4.09 (European population) and 3.33 (World) /100 000 inhabitants. CONCLUSIONS: Initial STS diagnosis and treatment across all stages (imaging, biopsy, and MDT meetings) need improving, particularly outside specialized centers. Educational interventions to increase surgeon's sarcoma awareness and knowledge and to raise patients' awareness of the importance of seeking expert care are necessary.

[Completeness and quality of multidisciplinary team meetings: the example of prostate cancer in the Mid-Pyrenees region]. / Exhaustivité et qualité des réunions de concertation pluridisciplinaire: l'exemple des cancers prostatiques en Midi-Pyrénées.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the completeness of the examination of cancer patient cases in a multidisciplinary team meeting (MDTM), to study the factors that can affect this examination and to assess the quality of the MDTM concerning prostate cancer in Tarn. METHODS: Completeness was estimated by comparing the database of the Tarn cancer registry containing all the inhabitants of this department for whom prostate cancer was diagnosed in 2007 with the list of patients living in Tarn whose cases were discussed during a Midi-Pyrénées MDTM. Determinants of the case discussion in MDTM were studied from data collected in medical records (age, stage at diagnosis, PSA level, Gleason score, treatment). The MDTM quality study (delay in management, whether the case was seen before or after treatment, required elements for MDTM, clinical data, conformity between suggested treatment and guidelines, adequacy between suggested and performed treatments) was based on the MDTM forms retrieved from the DCO and from medical records. RESULTS: Four hundred and fifty-nine patients were re-examined. The pretherapeutic passage rate within three months after diagnosis was 56.2%. The probability of a discussion in MDTM decreased for people over 85 years of age (OR=0.10) compared with the 70-74 year-old people and it increased for the N+M+ (OR=4.23) compared with the T1-T2. Patients for whom radiotherapy was considered were presented more frequently than the others. The MDTM quality was studied based on 220 DCO forms. The patient's physician attended the MDTM in 65% of the cases, 97% of the suggested treatments were consistent with the guidelines and 90% of the performed treatments complied with the suggested treatment. CONCLUSION: The discussion rate in MDTM has not reached the 100% planned by the first "plan cancer" yet, but when a MDTM was carried out, its compliance and adequacy were high. While seniors' cases require interdisciplinarity because of a complicated management, they were less discussed in MDTM.

Are there variations in adherence to colorectal cancer clinical guidelines depending on treatment place and recommendation novelty? The French EvaCCoR observational study.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown clinical practices variation between centers in colorectal cancer (CRC) management. After the implementation of national cancer plans, we tested for differences in center and patients' socioeconomic position (SEP)-related variation in CRC guidelines. METHODS: All patients aged 18 years and over, cared for a first CRC in 2010 in Southwest of France. We used mixed effect model to test for center-related heterogeneity (CRH) in recommendation, from the oldest to the more recent: (1) at least 12 lymph nodes analysed for stage II, (2) the prescription of adjuvant chemotherapy stage III and (3) the assessment of CRC molecular phenotype regarding KRAS status for stage IV. Patients' SEP was approached by an ecological social deprivation index. RESULTS: We found: higher adherence for the oldest than for the most recent recommendations; no CRH in recommendation No. 2 but lower adherence in academic centers; a CRH for recommendations No. 1 and 3; no SEP-related differences in clinical practices. CONCLUSION: Results showed that older recommendations have higher adherence but did not support increasing influence of centers characteristics and CRH as recommendations are more recent.

Multidisciplinary team meeting and EUSOMA quality indicators in breast cancer care: A French regional multicenter study.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluate breast cancer (BC) pathway at a regional level including public, private and university institutions. We assessed the quality of multidisciplinary team meetings (MTM) and compliance with a panel of European high-quality indicators (EUSOMA QIs). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter (n = 20) study in the largest health care region in France. Between January and April 2015, we included all patients discussed at an MTM after a diagnosis of BC (n = 619). We analyzed quality of MTM by assessing the quorum, the reliability of data transcription and the exhaustivity of pre-therapeutic MTM. We then analyzed the compliance with a selected panel of 16 EUSOMA QIs. RESULTS: During MTM discussion, data were more than 95% consistent with medical records for 9/11 items. Pre-operative tumor histology (90.6%) and post-operative resection margins (84.3%) were the least concordant between medical records and MTM. Minimum standards as defined by EUSOMA were reached for 11/16 QIs, but not reached for pathology reports in non-invasive BC (78.2%), proportion of exclusive sentinel lymph node biopsies in patients with clinically negative axilla (85.2%), performing adjuvant chemotherapy (76.6%), and proportion of patients discussed in pre-therapeutic and post-operative MTM (63.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In this multicentric study evaluating the quality of BC care with a representative sample of institutions, compliance with EUSOMA indicators was satisfactory for all type of institutions. However, too few patients were discussed in pre-therapeutic MTM (especially in non-university hospitals 43.7% [39.4-48.1]) versus 88.7% for others [82.2-95.1]) and data transcription was likely responsible for up to 15% of discordance.

[Surgical management and outcomes of lung cancer in women - results from the Epithor database]. / Particularités de la prise en charge chirurgicale du cancer bronchique chez la femme. Données de la base nationale Epithor.

INTRODUCTION: Rates of lung cancer in women have been increasing continually for several years. The basic surgical management of this condition is the same in both sexes but a number of differences are apparent. METHODS: We analysed data entered onto the Epithor database between June 2002 and June 2006 concerning 8535 surgical resections performed in primary lung cancer. RESULTS: 22.5 percent of patients were women. They were significantly younger (59.6 years vs 62.7 years) and had a lower BMI (24.7 kg x m(-2) vs 25.5 kg x m(-2)). They were in a better physical condition in terms of American Society of Anaesthesiology score and performance status, with better preserved lung function and fewer co-morbidities (1.8 vs 2.1) compared to men. The percentage of adenocarcinomas was higher in women and a higher proportion had early stage disease. 30 day mortality was three times as high in men who also experienced much greater post-operative morbidity. Multivariate analysis revealed an odds ratio of 0.49 (95% CI 0.3-0.8) for mortality and 0.54 (95% CI 0.4-0.6) for morbidity in women compared to men. CONCLUSION: Women with lung cancer have less risk of post-operative morbidity and mortality than men. These data suggest that they might be able to benefit from more aggressive perioperative therapy.

Medical and non-medical determinants of prostate cancer management: a population-based study.

Non-medical factors influencing treatment choices in prostate cancer are not well understood. We carried out a population-based study to obtain information on the management of prostate cancer patients. Our study population consisted of 1000 men diagnosed during 1995 from five French cancer registries. We looked at the main treatments performed in the year following diagnosis. Multivariate analysis was used to describe the determinants of the various treatment choices, simultaneously taking into account medical and non-medical factors. The probability of treatment by radical prostatectomy (RP) was 3 times higher in the Tarn area, whereas in the Calvados area the probability of treatment by radiotherapy was almost 6 times higher. The private sector favoured radical prostatectomy and hormonal therapy. In France, as in other developed countries, the initial treatment of prostate cancer varies greatly according to non-medical factors. This type of investigation, if carried out regularly, would make it possible to evaluate changes in practice patterns.

[Lip, oral cavity and pharynx cancers in France: incidence, mortality and trends (period 1975-1995)]. / Les cancers de la lèvre, de la cavité buccale et du pharynx en France: incidence, mortalité et tendance (période 1975-1995).

With 10,882 estimated new cases in 1995 in France, lip, oral cavity and pharynx tumours rank 4th, representing 8.1% of all cancers in men. They are less frequent in women, with a sex ratio of 7. Based on the French cancer registries data which cover 13% of the metropolitan territory in 2000, both incidence and mortality increased until early 1980s to decrease thereafter. The main hypothesis proposed to explain the French leadership world-wide for these tumours deals with alcohol and tobacco consumption. Important differences observed between several areas within Europe, for some subsites, in connection with age or sex, are pointing toward the need of new studies about environment and/or genetics. Until now, comparisons between countries were made at the level of lip, oral cavity and pharynx category as a whole or by large subgroups. In this work we attempt to establish more accurate statistics, in order to comply with the situation of this cancer in France. Present results should encourage the scientific community to conduct site specific epidemiological studies.