Preoperative portal vein or portal and hepatic vein embolization: DRAGON collaborative group analysis.

BACKGROUND: The extent of liver resection for tumours is limited by the expected functional reserve of the future liver remnant (FRL), so hypertrophy may be induced by portal vein embolization (PVE), taking 6 weeks or longer for growth. This study assessed the hypothesis that simultaneous embolization of portal and hepatic veins (PVE/HVE) accelerates hypertrophy and improves resectability. METHODS: All centres of the international DRAGON trials study collaborative were asked to provide data on patients who had PVE/HVE or PVE on 2016-2019 (more than 5 PVE/HVE procedures was a requirement). Liver volumetry was performed using OsiriX MD software. Multivariable analysis was performed for the endpoints of resectability rate, FLR hypertrophy and major complications using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) statistics, regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: In total, 39 patients had undergone PVE/HVE and 160 had PVE alone. The PVE/HVE group had better hypertrophy than the PVE group (59 versus 48 per cent respectively; P = 0.020) and resectability (90 versus 68 per cent; P = 0.007). Major complications (26 versus 34 per cent; P = 0.550) and 90-day mortality (3 versus 16 per cent respectively, P = 0.065) were comparable. Multivariable analysis confirmed that these effects were independent of confounders. CONCLUSION: PVE/HVE achieved better FLR hypertrophy and resectability than PVE in this collaborative experience.

R0 resection following chemo (radio)therapy improves survival of primary inoperable pancreatic cancer patients. Interim results of the German randomized CONKO-007± trial.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy is the standard in patients with initially nonmetastatic unresectable pancreatic cancer. Additional surgery is in discussion. The CONKO-007 multicenter randomized trial examines the value of radiotherapy. Our interim analysis showed a significant effect of surgery, which may be relevant to clinical practice. METHODS: One hundred eighty patients received induction chemotherapy (gemcitabine or FOLFIRINOX). Patients without tumor progression were randomized to either chemotherapy alone or to concurrent chemoradiotherapy. At the end of therapy, a panel of five independent pancreatic surgeons judged the resectability of the tumor. RESULTS: Following induction chemotherapy, 126/180 patients (70.0%) were randomized to further treatment. Following study treatment, 36/126 patients (28.5%) underwent surgery; (R0: 25/126 [19.8%]; R1/R2/Rx [n = 11/126; 6.1%]). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly better for patients with R0 resected tumors (median DFS and OS: 16.6 months and 26.5 months, respectively) than for nonoperated patients (median DFS and OS: 11.9 months and 16.5 months, respectively; p = 0.003). In the 25 patients with R0 resected tumors before treatment, only 6/113 (5.3%) of the recommendations of the panel surgeons recommended R0 resectability, compared with 17/48 (35.4%) after treatment (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Tumor resectability of pancreatic cancer staged as unresectable at primary diagnosis should be reassessed after neoadjuvant treatment. The patient should undergo surgery if a resectability is reached, as this significantly improves their prognosis.

Consensus on definition and severity grading of lymphatic complications after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of lymphatic complications after kidney transplantation varies considerably in the literature. This is partly because a universally accepted definition has not been established. This study aimed to propose an acceptable definition and severity grading system for lymphatic complications based on their management strategy. METHODS: Relevant literature published in MEDLINE and Web of Science was searched systematically. A consensus for definition and a severity grading was then sought between 20 high-volume transplant centres. RESULTS: Lymphorrhoea/lymphocele was defined in 32 of 87 included studies. Sixty-three articles explained how lymphatic complications were managed, but none graded their severity. The proposed definition of lymphorrhoea was leakage of more than 50 ml fluid (not urine, blood or pus) per day from the drain, or the drain site after removal of the drain, for more than 1 week after kidney transplantation. The proposed definition of lymphocele was a fluid collection of any size near to the transplanted kidney, after urinoma, haematoma and abscess have been excluded. Grade A lymphatic complications have a minor and/or non-invasive impact on the clinical management of the patient; grade B complications require non-surgical intervention; and grade C complications require invasive surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: A clear definition and severity grading for lymphatic complications after kidney transplantation was agreed. The proposed definitions should allow better comparisons between studies.

ANTECEDENTES: La incidencia de complicaciones linfáticas tras el trasplante renal (post-kidney-transplantation lymphatic, PKTL) varía considerablemente en la literatura. Esto se debe en parte a que no se ha establecido una definición universalmente aceptada. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo proponer una definición aceptable para las complicaciones PKTL y un sistema de clasificación de la gravedad basado en la estrategia de tratamiento. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de la literatura relevante en MEDLINE y Web of Science. Se logró un consenso para la definición y la clasificación de gravedad de las PKTL entre veinte centros de trasplante de alto volumen. RESULTADOS: En 32 de los 87 estudios incluidos se definía la linforrea/linfocele. Sesenta y tres artículos describían como se trataban las PKTL, pero ninguno calificó la gravedad de las mismas. La definición propuesta para la linforrea fue la de un débito diario superior a 50 ml de líquido (no orina, sangre o pus) a través del drenaje o del orificio cutáneo tras su retirada, más allá del 7º día postoperatorio del trasplante renal. La definición propuesta para linfocele fue la de una colección de líquido de tamaño variable adyacente al riñón trasplantado, tras haber descartado un urinoma, hematoma o absceso. Las PKTL de grado A fueron aquellas con escaso impacto o que no requirieron tratamiento invasivo; las PKTL de grado B fueron aquellas que precisaron intervención no quirúrgica y las PKTL de grado C aquellas en que fue necesaria la reintervención quirúrgica. CONCLUSIÓN: Se propone una definición clara y una clasificación de gravedad basada en la estrategia de tratamiento de las PKTLs. La definición propuesta y el sistema de calificación en 3 grados son razonables, sencillos y fáciles de comprender, y servirán para estandarizar los resultados de las PKTL y facilitar las comparaciones entre los diferentes estudios.

Mortality after liver surgery in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Mortality rates after liver surgery are not well documented in Germany. More than 1000 hospitals offer liver resection, but there is no central regulation of infrastructure requirements or outcome quality. METHODS: Hospital mortality rates after liver resection were analysed using the standardized hospital discharge data (Diagnosis-Related Groups, ICD-10 and German operations and procedure key codes) provided by the Research Data Centre of the Federal Statistical Office and Statistical Offices of the Länder in Wiesbaden, Germany. RESULTS: A total of 110 332 liver procedures carried out between 2010 and 2015 were identified. The overall hospital mortality rate for all resections was 5·8 per cent. The mortality rate among 17 574 major hepatic procedures was 10·4 per cent. Patients who had surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) had the lowest mortality rate among those with malignancy (5·5 per cent), followed by patients with gallbladder cancer (7·1 per cent), hepatocellular carcinoma (9·3 per cent) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (11·0 per cent). Patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma had the highest mortality rate (14·6 per cent). The mortality rate for extended hepatectomy was 16·2 per cent and the need for a biliodigestive anastomosis increased this to 25·5 per cent. Failure to rescue after complications led to mortality rates of more than 30 per cent in some subgroups. There was a significant volume-outcome relationship for CRLM surgery in very high-volume centres (mean 26-60 major resections for CRLMs per year). The mortality rate was 4·6 per cent in very high-volume centres compared with 7·5 per cent in very low-volume hospitals (odds ratio 0·60, 95 per cent c.i. 0·42 to 0·77; P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: This analysis of outcome data after liver resection in Germany suggests that hospital mortality remains high. There should be more focused research to understand, improve or justify factors leading to this result, and consideration of centralization of liver surgery.

ANTECEDENTES: En Alemania, los datos de mortalidad después de la cirugía no están bien documentados. En más de 1.000 hospitales se realizan resecciones hepáticas, pero no existe una regulación central de los prerrequisitos estructurales necesarios y de la calidad de los resultados. MÉTODOS: Las tasas de mortalidad hospitalaria relacionadas con las resecciones hepáticas se analizaron utilizando los datos estandarizados del alta hospitalaria (Diagnóstico de grupos relacionados, DRG), la clasificación internacional de enfermedades 10 (ICD10) y la clave de procedimientos y operaciones (códigos OPS) proporcionados por el RDC de la Oficina Federal de Estadística y Oficinas de Estadística de Länder en Wiesbaden, Alemania. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron un total de 110.332 procedimientos hepáticos (de 2010 a 2015). La tasa global de mortalidad hospitalaria para todas las resecciones fue del 5,8%. Las resecciones hepáticas mayores (n = 15.333) presentaron una mortalidad del 10,4%. Los pacientes con metástasis hepáticas colorrectales (colorectal liver metastases, CRLM) tuvieron la mortalidad más baja de entre los pacientes con neoplasias malignas (5,5%), seguidos de los pacientes con cáncer de vesícula biliar (7,1%), colangiocarcinoma intrahepático (intrahepatic colangiocarcinoma, iCC) (11,0%) y carcinoma hepatocelular (hepatocellular carcinoma, HCC) (9,3%). Los pacientes con colangiocarcinoma extrahepático (extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, eCC) presentaron la mortalidad más alta (14,6%). Las hepatectomías extendidas (16,2%) y la necesidad de una anastomosis biliodigestiva (biliodigestive anastomosis, BDA) aumentaron la mortalidad a un 25,5%. La falta de solución de algunas complicaciones llevó a tasas de mortalidad de más del 30% en algunos subgrupos. Hubo una relación significativa volumen-resultado para las CRLM en centros de alto volumen (25,3 a 59,7 resecciones mayores/año; razón de oportunidades, odds ratio, OR 0,60, i.c. del 95%: 0,42-0,77; P < 0,001), lo que resultó en una disminución en las tasas de mortalidad de 7,5/6,4/7,5/6,5% a 4,6%. CONCLUSIÓN: El análisis de los resultados después de la resección hepática en Alemania muestra una alta mortalidad hospitalaria inesperada. Este análisis indica la necesidad de efectuar una investigación más específica para comprender, mejorar o justificar los factores que determinan estos hallazgos.

Secondary technical resectability of colorectal cancer liver metastases after chemotherapy with or without selective internal radiotherapy in the randomized SIRFLOX trial.

BACKGROUND: Secondary resection of initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) can prolong survival. The added value of selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) to downsize lesions for resection is not known. This study evaluated the change in technical resectability of CRLM with the addition of SIRT to FOLFOX-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Baseline and follow-up hepatic imaging of patients who received modified FOLFOX (mFOLFOX6: fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin) chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab (control arm) versus mFOLFOX6 (with or without bevacizumab) plus SIRT using yttrium-90 resin microspheres (SIRT arm) in the phase III SIRFLOX trial were reviewed by three or five (of 14) expert hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons for resectability. Reviewers were blinded to one another, treatment assignment, extrahepatic disease status, and information on clinical and scanning time points. Technical resectability was defined as at least 60 per cent of reviewers (3 of 5, or 2 of 3) assessing a patient's liver metastases as surgically removable. RESULTS: Some 472 patients were evaluable (SIRT, 244; control, 228). There was no significant baseline difference in the proportion of technically resectable liver metastases between SIRT (29, 11·9 per cent) and control (25, 11·0 per cent) arms (P = 0·775). At follow-up, significantly more patients in both arms were deemed technically resectable compared with baseline: 159 of 472 (33·7 per cent) versus 54 of 472 (11·4 per cent) respectively (P = 0·001). More patients were resectable in the SIRT than in the control arm: 93 of 244 (38·1 per cent) versus 66 of 228 (28·9 per cent) respectively (P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: Adding SIRT to chemotherapy may improve the resectability of unresectable CRLM.

ANTECEDENTES: La resección secundaria de metástasis hepáticas de cáncer colorrectal (colorectal cancer liver metastases, CRLM) inicialmente irresecables puede prolongar la supervivencia. Se desconoce el valor añadido de la radioterapia interna selectiva (selective internal radiation therapy, SIRT). Este estudio evaluó el cambio en la resecabilidad técnica de las CRLM secundario a la adición de SIRT a una quimioterapia tipo FOLFOX. MÉTODOS: Las pruebas de radioimagen basales y durante el seguimiento de pacientes tratados con un régimen FOLFOX modificado (mFOLFOX6: fluorouracilo, leucovorina, oxaliplatino) ± bevacizumab (grupo control) versus mFOLFOX6 (± bevacizumab) más SIRT usando microesferas de resina de yttrium-90, en el ensayo de fase III SIRFLOX, fueron revisadas por 3-5 (de 14) cirujanos expertos hepatobiliares para determinar la resecabilidad. Los expertos efectuaron la revisión de forma ciega unos respecto a otros en relación con la asignación al tratamiento, estado de la enfermedad extra-hepática y situación clínica en el momento del estudio radiológico. La resecabilidad técnica se definió como ≥ 60% de revisores evaluando las metástasis del paciente como quirúrgicamente resecables. RESULTADOS: Fueron evaluables un total de 472 pacientes (control, n = 228; SIRT, n = 244). No hubo diferencias significativas basales en la proporción de metástasis hepáticas técnicamente resecables entre SIRT (29/244; 11,9%) y el grupo control (25/228; 11,0%: P = 0,775). Durante el seguimiento y en ambos brazos de tratamiento, un número significativamente mayor de pacientes se consideraron técnicamente resecables en comparación con la situación basal (54/472 (11,4%) basal y 159/472 (33,7%) al seguimiento). Hubo más pacientes resecables en el grupo SIRT que en el control (93/244 (38,1%) y 66/228 (28,9%); P < 0,001, respectivamente). CONCLUSIÓN: La adición de SIRT a la quimioterapia puede mejorar la resecabilidad de las CRLM irresecables.

Consensus in determining the resectability of locally progressed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma - results of the Conko-007 multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: One critical step in the therapy of patients with localized pancreatic cancer is the determination of local resectability. The decision between primary surgery versus upfront local or systemic cancer therapy seems especially to differ between pancreatic cancer centers. In our cohort study, we analyzed the independent judgement of resectability of five experienced high volume pancreatic surgeons in 200 consecutive patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Pretherapeutic CT or MRI scans of 200 consecutive patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer were evaluated by 5 independent pancreatic surgeons. Resectability and the degree of abutment of the tumor to the venous and arterial structures adjacent to the pancreas were reported. Interrater reliability and dispersion indices were compared. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-four CT scans and 6 MRI scans were evaluated and all parameters were evaluated by all surgeons in 133 (66.5%) cases. Low agreement was observed for tumor infiltration of venous structures (κ = 0.265 and κ = 0.285) while good agreement was achieved for the abutment of the tumor to arterial structures (interrater reliability celiac trunk κ = 0.708 P < 0.001). In patients with vascular tumor contact indicating locally advanced disease, surgeons highly agreed on unresectability, but in patients with vascular tumor abutment consistent with borderline resectable disease, the judgement of resectability was less uniform (dispersion index locally advanced vs. borderline resectable p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Excellent agreement between surgeons exists in determining the presence of arterial abutment and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The determination of resectability in borderline resectable patients is influenced by additional subjective factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT:2009-014476-21 (2013-02-22) and NCT01827553 (2013-04-09).

Is it safe to perform rectal anastomosis in gynaecological debulking surgery without a diverting stoma?

AIM: Colorectal resection is frequently performed during cytoreductive surgery for gynaecological malignancy. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of colorectal anastomosis, and especially low rectal anastomosis, in the absence of a protective stoma in patients with gynaecological cancer and peritoneal metastasis. METHOD: Patient data were retrospectively collected from a database for gynaecological cancer procedures carried out between January 2013 and July 2015. All patients who underwent a colorectal resection during cytoreduction were included in the study. The primary outcome was anastomotic leakage in the presence or absence of a diverting stoma. Secondary outcome parameters were complications and reoperations. RESULTS: In the period of study, 43 major colorectal procedures were performed on 37 women. The most common colorectal procedure was low rectal resection (n = 22; 59%) followed by anterior rectal resection (n = 7; 19%) and sigmoid resection (n = 4; 11%). Five (14%) patients underwent Hartmann's procedure. In three (8%) patients, a diverting loop ileostomy was created. CONCLUSION: Low rectal resection during debulking procedures for gynaecological cancers with peritoneal carcinomatosis can safely be performed by an experienced surgeon without a diverting stoma.

PATIENTS' SAFETY AND FEASIBILITY OF INTRAVENOUS URAPIDIL IN THE PRETREATMENT OF PHEOCHROMOCYTOMA PATIENTS IN A NORMAL WARD SETTING - AN ANALYSIS OF 20 CONSECUTIVE CASES.

CONTEXT: The intravenously administered selective α1 antagonist urapidil represents an alternative to phenoxybenzamine in the preoperative treatment of pheochromocytoma patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the blood pressure changes in pheochromocytoma patients with urapidil pretreatment with special regards to the need for interventions in order to estimate the safety of this treatment in a normal ward setting. DESIGN: The medical records of all patients who underwent adrenalectomy for PCC were reviewed retrospectively. Systolic blood pressure values >180mmHg were defined as hypertensive episodes and systolic blood pressure values < 50mmHg as hypotensive episodes. Episodes of blood pressure instabilities were considered significant and recorded as intervention if they led to a direct action. RESULTS: Twenty consecutive patients who received urapidil pretreatment were enrolled in this retrospective study. Preoperatively, a median of 9 blood pressure measurements per day have been performed on the ward. A total of 2 episodes of hypertension occurred, and 1 episode of hypotension has been recorded. In the period from 25-72 hours postoperatively the median number of blood pressure measurements was 5 per 24 hours. The blood pressure deviations led to a total of 3 interventions for hypertension in 1 (5%) patients and 5 interventions for hypotension in 3 (15%) patients. All interventions could be managed on the normal ward, without the need to transfer the patient to an ICU. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous urapidil can safely be administered on a normal ward without putting patients at risk. Intensive monitoring beyond 24 hours postoperatively was not necessary, the blood pressure measurements during the shift on a normal ward were sufficient for maintaining patients' safety.

Renal Function in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients Receiving Different Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus Regimens-The DIAMOND Study.

UNLABELLED: DIAMOND: multicenter, 24-week, randomized trial investigating the effect of different once-daily, prolonged-release tacrolimus dosing regimens on renal function after de novo liver transplantation. Arm 1: prolonged-release tacrolimus (initial dose 0.2mg/kg/day); Arm 2: prolonged-release tacrolimus (0.15-0.175mg/kg/day) plus basiliximab; Arm 3: prolonged-release tacrolimus (0.2mg/kg/day delayed until Day 5) plus basiliximab. All patients received MMF plus a bolus of corticosteroid (no maintenance steroids). PRIMARY ENDPOINT: eGFR (MDRD4) at Week 24. Secondary endpoints: composite efficacy failure, BCAR and AEs. Baseline characteristics were comparable. Tacrolimus trough levels were readily achieved posttransplant; initially lower in Arm 2 versus 1 with delayed initiation in Arm 3. eGFR (MDRD4) was higher in Arms 2 and 3 versus 1 (p = 0.001, p = 0.047). Kaplan-Meier estimates of composite efficacy failure-free survival were 72.0%, 77.6%, 73.9% in Arms 1-3. BCAR incidence was significantly lower in Arm 2 versus 1 and 3 (p = 0.016, p = 0.039). AEs were comparable. Prolonged-release tacrolimus (0.15-0.175mg/kg/day) immediately posttransplant plus basiliximab and MMF (without maintenance corticosteroids) was associated with lower tacrolimus exposure, and significantly reduced renal function impairment and BCAR incidence versus prolonged-release tacrolimus (0.2mg/kg/day) administered immediately posttransplant. Delayed higher-dose prolonged-release tacrolimus initiation significantly reduced renal function impairment compared with immediate posttransplant administration, but BCAR incidence was comparable.

Improved survival in liver transplant recipients receiving prolonged-release tacrolimus in the European Liver Transplant Registry.

This study was a retrospective analysis of the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) performed to compare long-term outcomes with prolonged-release tacrolimus versus tacrolimus BD in liver transplantation (January 2008-December 2012). Clinical efficacy measures included univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors influencing graft and patient survival at 3 years posttransplant. Efficacy measures were repeated using propensity score-matching for baseline demographics. Patients with <1 month of follow-up were excluded from the analyses. In total, 4367 patients (prolonged-release tacrolimus: n = 528; BD: n = 3839) from 21 European centers were included. Tacrolimus BD treatment was significantly associated with inferior graft (risk ratio: 1.81; p = 0.001) and patient survival (risk ratio: 1.72; p = 0.004) in multivariate analyses. Similar analyses performed on the propensity score-matched patients confirmed the significant survival advantages observed in the prolonged-release tacrolimus- versus tacrolimus BD-treated group. This large retrospective analysis from the ELTR identified significant improvements in long-term graft and patient survival in patients treated with prolonged-release tacrolimus versus tacrolimus BD in primary liver transplant recipients over 3 years of treatment. However, as with any retrospective registry evaluation, there are a number of limitations that should be considered when interpreting these data.

Survival of patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases treated with FOLFOX/cetuximab or FOLFIRI/cetuximab in a multidisciplinary concept (CELIM study).

BACKGROUND: Initially, unresectable colorectal liver metastases can be resected after response to chemotherapy. While cetuximab has been shown to increase response and resection rates, the survival outcome for this conversion strategy needs further evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with technically unresectable and/or ≥5 liver metastases were treated with FOLFOX/cetuximab (arm A) or FOLFIRI/cetuximab (arm B) and evaluated with regard to resectability every 2 months. Tumour response and secondary resection data have been reported previously. A final analysis of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was carried out in December 2012. RESULTS: Between December 2004 and March 2008, 56 patients were randomised to arm A, 55 to arm B. The median OS was 35.7 [95% confidence interval (CI) 27.2-44.2] months [arm A: 35.8 (95% CI 28.1-43.6), arm B: 29.0 (95% CI 16.0-41.9) months, HR 1.03 (95% CI 0.66-1.61), P = 0.9]. The median PFS was 10.8 (95% CI 9.3-12.2) months [arm A: 11.2 (95% CI 7.2-15.3), arm B: 10.5 (95% CI 8.9-12.2) months, HR 1.18 (95% CI 0.79-1.74), P = 0.4]. Patients who underwent R0 resection (n = 36) achieved a better median OS [53.9 (95% CI 35.9-71.9) months] than those who did not [21.9 (95% CI 17.1-26.7) months, P < 0.001]. The median disease-free survival for R0 resected patients was 9.9 (95% CI 5.8-14.0) months, and the 5-year OS rate was 46.2% (95% CI 29.5% to 62.9%). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms a favourable long-term survival for patients with initially sub-optimal or unresectable colorectal liver metastases who respond to conversion therapy and undergo secondary resection. Both FOLFOX/FOLFIRI plus cetuximab, appear to be appropriate regimens for 'conversion' treatment in patients with K-RAS codon 12/13/61 wild-type tumours. Thus, liver surgery can be considered curative or alternatively as an additional 'line of therapy' in those patients who are not cured. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT00153998, www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Randomized controlled multicenter trial on the effectiveness of the collagen hemostat Sangustop® compared with a carrier-bound fibrin sealant during liver resection (ESSCALIVER study, NCT00918619).

BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in liver surgery over the past decades, hemostasis during hepatic resections remains challenging. This multicenter randomized study compares the hemostatic effect of a collagen hemostat vs. a carrier-bound fibrin sealant after hepatic resection. METHODS: Patients scheduled for elective liver resection were randomized intraoperatively to receive either the collagen hemostat (COLL) or the carrier-bound fibrin sealant (CBFS) for secondary hemostasis. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with hemostasis after 3 min. Secondary parameters were the proportions of patients with hemostasis after 5 and 10 min, the total time to hemostasis, and the complication rates during a 3 months follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 128 patients were included. In the COLL group, 53 out of 61 patients (86.9 %) achieved complete hemostasis within 3 min after application of the hemostat compared to 52 out of 65 patients (80.0 %) in the CBFS group. The 95 % confidence interval for this difference [-6.0 %, 19.8 %] does not include the lower noninferiority margin (-10 %). Thus, the COLL treatment can be regarded as noninferior to the comparator. The proportions of patients with hemostasis after 3, 5, and 10 min were not significantly different between the two study arms. Postoperative mortality and morbidity were similar in both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The collagen hemostat is as effective as the carrier-bound fibrin sealant in obtaining secondary hemostasis during liver resection with a comparable complication rate.

Self-expandable metal stent for malignant colonic obstruction: outcome in proximal vs. left sided tumor localization.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of through-the-scope (TTS) implanted self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) comparing left-sided vs. proximal placement with regard to complications and outcome in palliation of malignant colorectal obstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients were consecutively retrospectively enrolled to this study between January 2009 and February 2012 due to impending or prevalent complete malignant colorectal obstruction. TTS applicable uncovered nitinol SEMS with unique flexible properties were used (Taewoong Medical, South Korea). Left-sided obstruction (aboral from the left flexure) was compared to proximal (from the ileo-cecal valve to the left flexure) localization. All patients have been discussed in the interdisciplinary tumor conference and the recommendation to treat by endoscopic stent placement was given in consensus. RESULTS: A total of 15 patients was enrolled to this study (10 male and 5 female; mean age 68.3 ± 15.4 years, range 48 - 94), five patients with obstructions located in the proximal hemicolon whereas ten patients had a left-sided malignancy. Technical success was achieved in all cases and there was no early complication noticed. Three late complications included tumor overgrowth (n = 1), stent occlusion (1), and dislocation (1). Stent-in-stent insertion achieved, again, clinical success. The site of SEMS implantation (proximal vs. left colon) had no impact on patient outcome or complication rate. SEMS patency duration was 269.8 ± 175.2 days (range 30 - 570) and mean survival of the patients was 305.1 ± 279.3 days (range 16 - 990). CONCLUSION: TTS application of flexible, non-covered SEMS seems to be safe and effective for palliation of malignant colorectal obstruction independent of localization of the tumor in the colon.

[Diagnosis of and therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma]. / Diagnostik und Therapie des hepatozellulären Karzinoms.

The interdisciplinary guidelines at the S3 level on the diagnosis of and therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) constitute an evidence- and consensus-based instrument that is aimed at improving the diagnosis of and therapy for HCC since these are very challenging tasks. The purpose of the guidelines is to offer the patient (with suspected or confirmed HCC) adequate, scientifically based and up-to-date procedures in diagnosis, therapy and rehabilitation. This holds not only for locally limited or focally advanced disease but also for the existence of recurrences or distant metastases. Besides making a contribution to an appropriate health-care service, the guidelines should also provide the foundation for an individually adapted, high-quality therapy. The explanatory background texts should also enable non-specialist but responsible colleagues to give sound advice to their patients concerning specialist procedures, side effects and results. In the medium and long-term this should reduce the morbidity and mortality of patients with HCC and improve their quality of life.

Radiofrequency ablation combined with systemic treatment versus systemic treatment alone in patients with non-resectable colorectal liver metastases: a randomized EORTC Intergroup phase II study (EORTC 40004).

BACKGROUND: This study investigates the possible benefits of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with non-resectable colorectal liver metastases. METHODS: This phase II study, originally started as a phase III design, randomly assigned 119 patients with non-resectable colorectal liver metastases between systemic treatment (n = 59) or systemic treatment plus RFA ( ± resection) (n = 60). Primary objective was a 30-month overall survival (OS) rate >38% for the combined treatment group. RESULTS: The primary end point was met, 30-month OS rate was 61.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 48.2-73.9] for combined treatment. However, 30-month OS for systemic treatment was 57.6% (95% CI 44.1-70.4), higher than anticipated. Median OS was 45.3 for combined treatment and 40.5 months for systemic treatment (P = 0.22). PFS rate at 3 years for combined treatment was 27.6% compared with 10.6% for systemic treatment only (hazard ratio = 0.63, 95% CI 0.42-0.95, P = 0.025). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.8 months (95% CI 11.7-22.1) and 9.9 months (95% CI 9.3-13.7), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first randomized study on the efficacy of RFA. The study met the primary end point on 30-month OS; however, the results in the control arm were in the same range. RFA plus systemic treatment resulted in significant longer PFS. At present, the ultimate effect of RFA on OS remains uncertain.

Cationic liposomal paclitaxel plus gemcitabine or gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel embedded in cationic liposomes (EndoTAG™-1; ET) is an innovative agent targeting tumor endothelial cells. This randomized controlled phase II trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of ET in combination with gemcitabine (GEM) in advanced pancreatic cancer (PDAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease were randomly assigned to receive weekly GEM 1000 mg/m(2) or GEM plus twice-weekly ET 11, 22 or 44 mg/m(2) for 7 weeks. After a safety run-in of 100 patients, a second cohort continued treatment. End points included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response and safety. RESULTS: Two hundred and twelve patients were randomly allocated to the study and 200 were treated (80% metastatic, 20% locally advanced). Adverse events were manageable and reversible. Transient thrombocytopenia and infusion reactions with chills and pyrexia mostly grade 1 or 2 occurred in the ET groups. Disease control rate after the first treatment cycle was 43% with GEM and 60%, 65% and 52% in the GEM + ET cohorts. Median PFS reached 2.7 compared with 4.1, 4.6 and 4.4 months, respectively. Median OS was 6.8 compared with 8.1, 8.7 and 9.3 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of advanced PDAC with GEM + ET was generally well tolerated. GEM + ET showed beneficial survival and efficacy. A randomized phase III trial should confirm this positive trend.

Differentiation between benign and malignant adrenal mass using contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

PURPOSE: Adrenal masses can be detected by ultrasound with high sensitivity and specificity. The aim of the present study was to evaluate CEUS in a large patient population using CEUS patterns identified in a previous pilot study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 116 adrenal masses were evaluated by ultrasound, including CEUS with the contrast agent Sonovue®. The dynamic of contrast enhancement (CE) was analyzed using time-intensity curves. The time of the first CE in the adrenal mass was used to define four CEUS patterns: pattern I = early arterial CE, pattern II = arterial CE, pattern III = late CE, pattern IV = no CE. In addition, all patients received CT/MRI and hormonal testing. In suspicious cases biopsy or adrenalectomy was performed. RESULTS: CEUS patterns I&II were seen in all patients with primary or secondary malignant lesions of the adrenal gland (n = 16). The sensitivity and specificity of CEUS for the diagnosis of malignant adrenal mass were 100 % (CI [75;100]) and 67 % (CI [56;75]), respectively. Overall histology was available as a reference method for 40 adrenal masses. In 68 % of histologically diagnosed adrenal masses, MRI/CT and CEUS were congruent concerning the characterization of malignant versus benign adrenal mass. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound may be a useful method in the diagnostic work-up of adrenal mass with excellent sensitivity for the diagnosis of malignancy.

[Procurement of abdominal organs]. / Abdominale Organentnahme.

Solid organ transplantation is frequently carried out in this society. Under these circumstances the basic principles are altruistic organ donation and abidance by the law, which are regulated by the German Transplantation Act and by directives of the Federal Medical Council from which process instructions of the German Organ Transplantation Foundation are derived. The organ allocation is carried out by the Eurotransplant International Foundation (ET) located in Leiden, the Netherlands. Organ procurement is an essential component of the process of organ donation. This article highlights the procedure for harvesting of abdominal organs and also nonsurgical issues in the process of organ donation.