Early percutaneous coronary intervention, platelet inhibition with eptifibatide, and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. PURSUIT Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists prevent the composite end point of death or myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with acute coronary syndromes. There is uncertainty about whether this effect is confined to patients who have percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) and whether PCIs further prevent death or MI in patients already treated with GP IIb/IIIa antagonists. METHODS AND RESULTS: PURSUIT patients were treated with the GP IIb/IIIa antagonist eptifibatide or placebo; PCIs were performed according to physician practices. In 2253 of 9641 patients (23.4%), PCI was performed by 30 days. Early (<72 hours) PCI was performed in 1228 (12.7%). In 34 placebo patients (5.5%) and 10 treated with eptifibatide (1.7%) (P=0.001), MI preceded early PCI. In patients censored for PCI across the 30-day period, there was a significant reduction in the primary composite end point in eptifibatide patients (P=0.035). Eptifibatide reduced 30-day events in patients who had early PCI (11.6% versus 16.7%, P=0.01) and in patients who did not (14.6% versus 15.6%, P=0.23). After adjustment for PCI propensity, there was no evidence that eptifibatide treatment effect differed between patients with or without early PCI (P for interaction=0.634). PCI was not associated with a reduction of the primary composite end point but was associated with a reduced (nonspecified) composite of death or Q-wave MI. This association disappeared after adjustment for propensity for early PCI. CONCLUSIONS: Eptifibatide reduced the composite rates of death or MI in PCI patients and those managed conservatively.

Clinical significance of thrombocytopenia during a non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. The platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in unstable angina: receptor suppression using integrilin therapy (PURSUIT) trial experience.

BACKGROUND: The significance of thrombocytopenia in patients experiencing an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has not been examined systematically. We evaluated this condition in a large non-ST-elevation ACS clinical trial, with particular interest paid to its correlation with clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients presenting without persistent ST elevation during an ACS were randomized to receive a double-blind infusion of the platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor eptifibatide or placebo in addition to other standard therapies including heparin and aspirin. The primary end point was death/nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) at 30 days, whereas bleeding and stroke were the main safety outcomes. Thrombocytopenia (nadir platelet count <100x10(9)/L or <50% of baseline) occurred in 7.0% of enrolled patients. The time to onset was a median of 4 days in both treatment arms. Patients with thrombocytopenia were older, weighed less, were more likely nonwhite, and had more cardiac risk factors. These patients experienced significantly more bleeding events: they were more than twice as likely to experience moderate/severe bleeding after adjustment for confounders. Univariably, ischemic events (stroke, MI, and death) occurred significantly (P<0.001) more frequently in patients with thrombocytopenia; multivariable regression modeling preserved this association with death/nonfatal MI at 30 days. Neither the use of heparin or eptifibatide was found to independently increase thrombocytopenic risk. CONCLUSIONS: Although causality between thrombocytopenia and adverse clinical events could not be established definitively, thrombocytopenia was highly correlated with both bleeding and ischemic events, and the presence of this condition identified a more-at-risk patient population.

Stroke in patients with acute coronary syndromes: incidence and outcomes in the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in unstable angina. Receptor suppression using integrilin therapy (PURSUIT) trial. The PURSUIT Investigators.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of stroke in patients with acute coronary syndromes has not been clearly defined because few trials in this patient population have been large enough to provide stable estimates of stroke rates. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied the 10 948 patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation who were randomly assigned to placebo or the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor eptifibatide in the Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy (PURSUIT) trial to determine stroke rates, stroke types, clinical outcomes in patients with stroke, and independent baseline clinical predictors for nonhemorrhagic stroke. Stroke occurred in 79 (0.7%) patients, with 66 (0.6%) nonhemorrhagic, 6 intracranial hemorrhages, 3 cerebral infarctions with hemorrhagic conversion, and 4 of uncertain cause. There were no differences in stroke rates between patients who received placebo and those assigned high-dose eptifibatide (odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals 0.82 [0.59, 1.14] and 0.70 [0.49, 0.99], respectively). Of the 79 patients with stroke, 17 (22%) died within 30 days, and another 26 (32%) were disabled by hospital discharge or 30 days, whichever came first. Higher heart rate was the most important baseline clinical predictor of nonhemorrhagic stroke, followed by older age, prior anterior myocardial infarction, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, and diabetes mellitus. These factors were used to develop a simple scoring nomogram that can predict the risk of nonhemorrhagic stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Stroke was an uncommon event in patients with acute coronary syndromes in the PURSUIT trial. These strokes are, however, associated with substantial morbidity and mortality rates. The majority of strokes were of nonhemorrhagic causes. Eptifibatide was not associated with an increase in intracranial hemorrhage, and no significant effect on nonhemorrhagic stroke was observed. We developed a useful nomogram for assigning baseline nonhemorrhagic stroke risk in this patient population.

Management of patients with acute coronary syndromes in the United States by platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition. Insights from the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in unstable angina: receptor suppression using integrilin therapy (PURSUIT) trial.

BACKGROUND: A multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy, PURSUIT) demonstrated that the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist eptifibatide reduced the incidence of death or myocardial infarction among patients with acute ischemic syndromes without ST-segment elevation. Because of expected differences in practice patterns, a prospectively planned analysis of outcomes as a function of regions of the world was performed. The current study provides a detailed assessment of eptifibatide among the subgroup of patients enrolled within the United States. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients presenting with chest pain within the previous 24 hours and ischemic ECG changes or creatine kinase-MB elevation were eligible for enrollment. Of the 10 948 patients randomized worldwide, 4035 were enrolled within the United States. Patients were allocated to placebo or eptifibatide infusion for up to 72 to 96 hours. Other medical therapies and revascularization strategies were at the discretion of the treating physician. Eptifibatide reduced the rate of the primary end point of death or myocardial infarction by 30 days from 15.4% to 11.9% (P=0.003) among patients in the United States. The treatment effect was achieved early and maintained over a period of 6 months (18.9% versus 15.2%; P=0.004). Bleeding events were more common in patients receiving eptifibatide but were predominantly associated with invasive procedures. The magnitude of clinical benefit from eptifibatide was greater among patients in the United States than elsewhere in the world. CONCLUSIONS: Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade with eptifibatide reduces the incidence of death or myocardial infarction among patients treated for acute ischemic syndromes without ST-segment elevation within the United States.

Peripheral vascular complications in the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I).

OBJECTIVES: In-hospital peripheral vascular complications of balloon angioplasty were compared with those of directional atherectomy in the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I) to identify patients at risk and evaluate costs and outcomes. BACKGROUND: The incidence, costs and outcomes of peripheral vascular complications after coronary intervention have not been fully characterized as a function of randomly assigned therapy. METHODS: At 35 sites in the United States and Europe, 1,012 patients were randomized. Peripheral vascular complications were defined as the composite of pulse loss, pseudoaneurysm, hematoma > 4 cm in diameter or groin hemorrhage necessitating blood transfusion. Logistic models were derived to 1) predict these complications from baseline and procedural characteristics, 2) test the relevance of randomization assignment, and 3) assess their impact on hospital costs and long-term outcomes. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients (6.6%) developed peripheral vascular complications, of whom 15 (22.4%) required a blood transfusion, 14 (20.9%) underwent vascular surgery, and 2 (3.0%) died. Both in-hospital deaths occurred in patients with peripheral vascular complications. There was no difference in composite peripheral vascular complication rates among patients randomized to angioplasty or atherectomy. Greater age, female gender, postprocedural heparin and intraaortic balloon counterpulsation were predictive of increased risk. In a representative 60% subset, mean hospital costs increased from $9,583 in patients without to $18,350 in those with peripheral vascular complications (p = 0.0001). The unadjusted mortality rate at 1 year was 7.5% for patients with peripheral vascular complications compared with 1.1% for all others (p = 0.0001). These complications identified patients at greater risk of death, myocardial infarction or repeat revascularization at 30 days and 1 year. The atherectomy group had a trend toward more frequent deaths and myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Directional atherectomy and balloon angioplasty had similar in-hospital peripheral vascular complication rates. Female gender, greater age, postprocedural heparin and intraaortic balloon counterpulsation were predictive of higher risk. The twofold increase in cost and sevenfold increase in long-term deaths highlight the need to prevent these periprocedural events and monitor patients closely.

Abrupt closure: the CAVEAT I experience. Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the incidence and consequences of abrupt closure in a series of patients undergoing directional coronary atherectomy versus percutaneous coronary angioplasty. BACKGROUND: Abrupt closure with coronary angioplasty has been associated with adverse outcome. The results from the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT) I, a randomized trial of coronary angioplasty versus directional coronary atherectomy, were analyzed. METHOD: This multicenter trial enrolled 1,012 patients from 1991 to 1992. All records from patients with abrupt closure, which was coded as a discrete complication, were reviewed. RESULTS: Abrupt closure occurred in 60 patients (5.9%) and was associated with a significantly longer hospital stay (median 8 vs. 3 days). Severe proximal target vessel tortuosity was more common in patients with abrupt closure (20.3% vs. 11.6%, p = 0.046), as was preexistent coronary artery thrombus (30.5% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.02). Abrupt closure was associated with a marked increase in subsequent complications (myocardial infarction 46.7% vs. 2.1%, emergency bypass surgery 38.3% vs. 0.32%, death 33% vs. 0%) and occurred more frequently in the directional coronary atherectomy group (8.0% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.005). In the coronary angioplasty group, the occlusion usually occurred at the target lesion (91%), presumably related to the effects of barotrauma. In the directional coronary atherectomy group, the site of the occlusion was the target lesion in only 58% (p = 0.045). The remaining occlusions related to problems with the technique (guide catheter or nose cone trauma), reflecting the fact that directional coronary atherectomy is a more complex procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Abrupt closure remains the principal determinant of adverse outcome after percutaneous procedures for the treatment of coronary artery disease. Although abrupt closure is more common with directional atherectomy than angioplasty, the sequelae are similar.

Effect of subintimal resection on initial outcome and restenosis for native coronary lesions and saphenous vein graft disease treated by directional coronary atherectomy. A report from the CAVEAT I and II investigators. Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine whether the depth of tissue resection affected either immediate outcome or subsequent restenosis in patients treated by directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) in the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT) I and II studies. BACKGROUND: The relation between the depth of tissue resection, immediate outcome and subsequent restenosis in lesions treated with DCA has been controversial. METHODS: In CAVEAT I, 412 patients undergoing DCA had tissue samples available for analysis by the core laboratory, whereas in CAVEAT II, 113 patients had vein graft tissue specimens available. RESULTS: Subintimal deep arterial wall resection was demonstrated in 169 patients (41%) in CAVEAT I and 40 (35%) in CAVEAT II. The depth of tissue resection did not affect initial procedural outcome in either CAVEAT I or CAVEAT II, nor did it affect subsequent restenosis rates at 6 months in native coronary lesions (CAVEAT I, 50.8% for intimal resection vs. 51.2% for subintimal resection). In patients treated with vein graft disease (CAVEAT II), restenosis rates varied; when resection was limited to the intima, a restenosis rate of 40.4% was documented, whereas in patients with subintimal resection, the restenosis rate was 57.1%. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.144). CONCLUSIONS: This combined randomized series of DCA for treatment of primary native coronary artery and vein graft stenoses with quantitative coronary angiography and core laboratory pathologic assessment resolves the controversy created by previous experimental and clinical data regarding deep vessel wall resection and immediate and longer outcome. Directional atherectomy with deep arterial wall resection as practiced in these studies is safe and does not jeopardize initial success rates. More important, deep wall resection is not associated with significantly increased restenosis rates.

Influence of a randomized clinical trial on practice by participating investigators: lessons from the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT). CAVEAT I and II Investigators.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether the results of the first Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I) influenced subsequent practice patterns among the investigators. BACKGROUND: CAVEAT-I demonstrated that directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) resulted in higher rates of early complications at a higher cost and with no clinical benefit. We sought to determine whether these results influenced subsequent use of procedures among CAVEAT-I investigators. METHODS: We compared the results of a week-long registry of all coronary interventions performed at 35 CAVEAT-I sites in 1994 with those of a similar registry obtained in 1992 before the trial, the results of which were published in 1993. For control purposes, the use of procedures was studied at 24 additional sites to provide insight into practice at hospitals not participating in the trial. A total of 1,465 interventions were analyzed. RESULTS: Ninety-four percent of CAVEAT-I sites responded. Utilization rates differed between CAVEAT-I and CAVEAT-I follow-up (p < 0.001). Balloon angioplasty decreased from 83.8% to 68.5%, DCA increased slightly from 10.7% to 14.1%, and the use of other devices increased from 5.4% to 17.5%. Stand-alone balloon use was more prevalent at nonparticipating control sites than at sites that took part in CAVEAT-I (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Paradoxically, despite the negative findings of CAVEAT-I, there was a noteworthy trend toward an increase in the use of DCA and other devices at CAVEAT-I sites. Our findings suggest that among investigators in the trial, there may have been a lack of influence of trial data on clinical practice patterns 1 year after publication of the results. Ethics of protocol: Both CAVEAT I and II were approved by the Institutional Review Board at each study site.

Characteristics and consequences of myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT).

OBJECTIVES: We examined the results of the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT) to determine the characteristics and consequences of creatine kinase (CK) and creatine kinase, MB myocardial isoenzyme fraction (CK-MB) elevations after percutaneous coronary intervention. BACKGROUND: Enzyme elevations after interventional procedures have usually been thought to be without long-term clinical consequences. However, recent preliminary reports have suggested that there are important long-term clinical sequelae in patients with even mild enzyme elevations after coronary procedures. METHODS: Patients with new native lesions undergoing coronary intervention at 35 clinical sites were randomized to undergo percutaneous coronary angioplasty (n = 500) or directional coronary atherectomy (n = 512). Cardiac enzyme levels were measured 12 and 24 h after the interventional procedure and when clinically indicated for recurrent myocardial ischemia. Enzyme profiles were analyzed using a ratio that compared the peak enzyme level and the local laboratory upper limit of normal. Standard 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) recorded before and after the procedure were interpreted by two independent readers who had no knowledge of the randomization data. Postprocedural myocardial infarction was defined as the appearance of new Q waves on the ECG, CK-MB levels three or more times the upper limit of normal or a total CK concentration two or more times the upper limit of normal when CK-MB levels were unavailable. Regression models were used to evaluate the predictive significance of a postintervention myocardial infarction with respect to clinical outcomes at 30 days and 1 year. RESULTS: There were 78 myocardial infarctions in the atherectomy group and 34 in the angioplasty group (15.2% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.001). Patients with a myocardial infarction more often had a repeat intervention or emergency coronary artery bypass surgery. Hospital length of stay was increased among patients with an infarction, as were mean hospital costs ($17,340.65 vs. $11,308.47, p = 0.0003). Postprocedural myocardial infarction was highly predictive of mortality, bypass surgery or repeat intervention within 30 days (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial infarction occurred commonly after coronary intervention in CAVEAT and was associated with a worse clinical outcome. Although the incidence of myocardial infarction was higher with atherectomy than with angioplasty, the baseline characteristics and consequences of the infarctions were similar between the treatments with regard to 30-day outcome. Myocardial enzyme elevations after an otherwise successful interventional procedure may identify a population at risk for a future cardiac event.

Relation between estrogen replacement therapy and restenosis after percutaneous coronary interventions.

OBJECTIVES: We attempted to determine the relation between estrogen replacement therapy and the rate of restenosis after coronary angioplasty and atherectomy. BACKGROUND: Although estrogen replacement therapy in women has been associated with a reduction in cardiovascular events and improvement in endothelial function, no study has examined whether estrogen reduces restenosis rates after percutaneous coronary interventions. METHODS: A total of 204 women enrolled in the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial with angiographic follow-up were contacted, and their menopausal and estrogen replacement status was determined. Late loss in minimal lumen diameter, late loss index, minimal lumen diameter, rate of restenosis > 50% and actual percent of stenosis were compared in estrogen users and nonusers by quantitative coronary angiography at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Late loss in minimal lumen diameter was significantly less in women using estrogen than in nonusers (-0.13 vs. -0.46 mm, p = 0.01). A regression analysis of the determinants of late loss in minimal lumen diameter revealed that estrogen use was the single most important predictor of subsequent late loss (F = 13.38, p = 0.0006). Formal testing revealed a highly significant interaction between the use of estrogen and intervention (angioplasty or atherectomy). Women undergoing atherectomy who received estrogen had a significantly lower late loss index (0.06 vs. -0.63, p = 0.002), less late loss (0.06 vs. -0.61 mm, p = 0.0006), larger minimal lumen diameter (p = 0.044) and lower restenosis rates (p = 0.038 for > 50% stenosis) than those not using estrogen. In contrast, estrogen had minimal effects on restenosis end points after angioplasty. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the potential for estrogen replacement therapy to reduce angiographic measures of restenosis in postmenopausal women after coronary intervention, particularly in those undergoing atherectomy.

Therapeutic value of eptifibatide at community hospitals transferring patients to tertiary referral centers early after admission for acute coronary syndromes. PURSUIT Investigators.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the benefits of the glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonist, eptifibatide, after patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) were admitted to hospitals that approach revascularization for ACS through early transfer to tertiary referral centers. BACKGROUND: Across a variety of hospital settings, GP IIb/IIIa inhibition, after patients were admitted to the hospital for non-ST segment elevation ACS, is associated with a reduction in death or myocardial infarction (MI) before and during a percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: The outcomes of 429 patients from 153 sites in the Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in unstable angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy (PURSUIT) trial, who were transferred during study drug infusion ("transfer patients"), were compared with those of 1,987 patients who either remained in the hospital at those sites or were transferred after study drug termination ("nontransfer patients"). RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of transfer and nontransfer patients were similar. Patients receiving eptifibatide were transferred less frequently than those receiving placebo (16% vs. 20%, p = 0.014). Transfer patients underwent more procedures and experienced a greater 30-day incidence of death or MI, as compared with nontransfer patients (21% vs. 12%, p = 0.001). Eptifibatide was associated with a reduction in death or MI through 30 days, independent of transfer status (2.5% absolute reduction), as well as for those transferred (5.5% absolute reduction). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with ACS admitted to community hospitals, eptifibatide is associated with a reduced need for transfer and improved clinical outcomes.

Impact of diabetes mellitus on percutaneous revascularization (CAVEAT-I). CAVEAT-I Investigators. Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial.

We examined the relation between diabetes mellitus and outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization in the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I), a randomized trial comparing treatment with either percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or directional atherectomy for de novo lesions in native coronary arteries. Acute success and complication rates, 6-month angiographic restenosis rates, and 1-year clinical outcomes were compared between diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing each procedure. Acute success rates between diabetic (n = 191) and nondiabetic (n = 821) patients were similar for both revascularization techniques. Except for the need for dialysis, complication rates were also similar. Six months after atherectomy, diabetic patients had significantly more angiographic restenosis than nondiabetics (59.7% vs 47.4%) and significantly smaller minimum luminal diameters (1.20 vs 1.40 mm). Diabetics undergoing atherectomy required more frequent bypass surgery (12.8% vs 8.5%) and more repeat percutaneous revascularizations (36.5% vs 28.1%) than nondiabetics undergoing atherectomy. Restenosis rates, minimum luminal diameters and repeat revascularizations between diabetics and nondiabetics undergoing angioplasty were similar. The higher restenosis and repeat revascularization rates and the smaller minimum luminal diameter at follow-up in diabetic patients suggest that atherectomy may provide only modest benefit for these patients. The increased restenosis rate in diabetics undergoing atherectomy (but not angioplasty) requires further evaluation.

Economic implications of the prophylactic use of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in the setting of acute myocardial infarction. The Randomized IABP Study Group. Intraaortic Balloon Pump.

Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) has been shown to improve coronary artery patency and reduce the rates of recurrent myocardial ischemia and its sequelae in selected patients when used within 24 hours of acute myocardial infarction. The economic implications of prophylactic IABP use are unknown. We obtained hospital bills for 102 patients enrolled in the Randomized IABP Trial (56%) and converted charges to costs using each hospital's Medicare cost report. In-hospital costs for patients who had 48 hours of IABP were compared with those of patients who did not. The costs of angiographic and clinical complications were determined. Small differences in clinical and angiographic characteristics existed between patients in the economic substudy and the overall population, but overall angiographic and clinical outcomes were comparable. Costs for patients who had IABP versus control patients were similar: mean $22,357 +/- $14,369 versus $19,211 +/- $8,414, median (25th and 75th percentiles) $17,903 ($15,787, $22,147) versus $17,913 ($15,144, $21,433), p = 0.45. Hospital costs were higher with the development of recurrent ischemia: mean $23,125 +/- $7,690 versus $20,416 +/- $12,449, median $21,069 ($17,896, $26,885) versus $17,492 ($14,892, $20,998) p = 0.02. Patients who had an adverse clinical event (death, stroke, reinfarction, and emergency revascularization) also had higher hospital costs: mean $25,598 +/- $10,024 versus $19,790 +/- $12,045, median $21,877 ($18,380, $28,049) versus $17,364 ($14,773, $20,779), p = 0.002. The prophylactic use of IABP in patients at high risk of infarct artery reocclusion within 24 hours of acute myocardial infarction provides sustained clinical benefit without substantially increasing hospital costs.

Primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (the Primary Angioplasty Registry).

During a 14-month period, 6 experienced centers prospectively enrolled 271 patients into a registry in which percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was the primary treatment for acute myocardial infarction. Patients age > 18 years who presented with ST-segment elevation on the 12-lead electrocardiogram were enrolled if symptom duration was < 12 hours and there was no proclivity for bleeding. An independent core angiographic laboratory processed the angiographic data. Of 271 patients giving informed consent, 245 (90%) were deemed anatomically suitable and underwent angioplasty therapy. Upon leaving the catheterization laboratory 98% of patients had achieved reperfusion; 92% had a residual visual stenosis < or = 50%. Emergency bypass surgery was required in 14 patients (5%) for either failed angioplasty (n = 3) or presumed life-threatening anatomy (n = 11). The in-hospital mortality rate was 4%, whereas the reinfarction rate was 3% and the stroke rate was 1%, with 1 intracranial hemorrhage and 2 embolic events. Bleeding requiring > or = 2 units of blood occurred in 46 patients (18%); 14 of these transfusions were related to coronary artery bypass surgery. Primary angioplasty is associated with a high reperfusion rate, low in-hospital mortality and few recurrent myocardial ischemic events. These results point to the need for a large-scale trial comparing angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy in the setting of acute myocardial infarction.

Standard versus low-dose weight-adjusted heparin in patients treated with the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antibody fragment abciximab (c7E3 Fab) during percutaneous coronary revascularization. PROLOG Investigators.

Blockade of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor by abciximab (c7E3 Fab) during coronary intervention reduces the incidence of ischemic complications, but has been associated with a doubling of the risk for bleeding complications. The present pilot study investigated whether modification of heparin dosing and/or early sheath removal would reduce the hemorrhagic complications associated with abciximab. One hundred three patients undergoing coronary intervention received abciximab (0.25 mg/kg bolus, 10 microg/min infusion for 12 hours) and aspirin and were randomized by a 2 x 2 factorial design to 1 of 2 weight-adjusted heparin doses and to 1 of 2 strategies for heparin discontinuation and vascular sheath removal. In the "standard-dose heparin" group, an initial bolus of 100 U/kg was administered to achieve a procedural activated clotting time (ACT) > or = 300 seconds; in the "low-dose heparin" group, an initial bolus of 70 U/kg was administered without adjustment for ACT. In the "late sheath removal" arm, heparin infusion was continued for the 12-hour duration of abciximab infusion, followed by sheath removal; in the "early sheath removal" group, heparin was stopped after the interventional procedure and sheaths were removed during the abciximab infusion. There were no apparent differences between patients randomized to the different treatment groups with regard to the occurrence of ischemic end points. Rates of bleeding and blood transfusion were reduced by low-dose heparin and early sheath removal and were lowest when both strategies were combined. Reduction and weight adjustment of heparin dose and early sheath removal in the setting of platelet inhibition with abciximab during coronary intervention may be useful in diminishing the incidence of hemorrhagic complications without loss of clinical efficacy.

Prior aspirin use predicts worse outcomes in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. PURSUIT Investigators. Platelet IIb/IIIa in Unstable angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy.

Aspirin is beneficial in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular events, but patients who have events while taking aspirin may have worse outcomes than those not on aspirin. We investigated the association between prior aspirin use and clinical outcomes in 9,461 patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes enrolled in the Platelet IIb/IIIa in Unstable angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy (PURSUIT) trial, before and after adjustment for baseline factors. We also examined whether eptifibatide has a differential treatment effect in prior aspirin users. Prior aspirin users were less likely to have an enrollment myocardial infarction (MI) (vs unstable angina) (43.9% vs 48.8%, p = 0.001) but more likely to have death or MI at 30 days (16.1% vs 13.0%, p = 0.001) and at 6 months (19.9% vs 15.9%, p = 0.001). After adjustment, prior aspirin users remained less likely to have an enrollment MI (odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 0.97) and more likely to have death or MI at 30 days (odds ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.33) but not at 6 months (odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 0.98 to 1.33). In a multivariable model, eptifibatide did not have a different treatment effect in prior aspirin users compared with nonusers (p = 0.534). Prior aspirin users had fewer enrollment MIs but worse long-term outcomes than nonusers. We found no evidence for a different treatment effect of eptifibatide in prior aspirin users.

Is all unstable angina the same? insights from the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I). The CAVEAT-Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Certain characteristics of unstable angina have been associated with worse clinical outcomes after percutaneous revascularization procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared outcomes of patients with (n = 690) and those without (n = 320) unstable angina in the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I) by unstable angina subgroup: rest chest pain, postinfarction chest pain, chest pain with ischemic electrocardiographic changes, chest pain with recent acceleration, and no chest pain. Regression models were constructed to predict in-hospital and 6-month composite end point death, infarction, bypass surgery, percutaneous revascularization, and abrupt closure (in-hospital) or restenosis (6 months) for each subgroup. Only chest pain with electrocardiographic changes predicted the composite in-hospital outcome (24% vs 17% with no chest pain, P =.0374.) This subgroup also had a greater acute gain, more late loss, and more restenosis than patients in the other subgroups. Rest chest pain carried a higher incidence of the composite 6-month outcome (39.9% vs 29% with no chest pain, P =.0472). For all unstable angina categories, atherectomy was associated with worse overall outcomes than angioplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with unstable angina have more complications of percutaneous revascularization than patients without unstable angina, but event rates vary by anginal subgroup. The clinical presentation may help to identify unstable angina patients at particularly high risk for adverse outcomes.

One-year follow-up in the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT I)

BACKGROUND: Directional atherectomy is a frequently used percutaneous revascularization strategy, but its long-term outcomes have not previously been compared with those of balloon angioplasty in a prospective trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: The 1012 patients enrolled in the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT I) were followed for at least 1 year after randomization. Analyses of predetermined end points were performed, including a detailed analysis of the 14 patients who died. At 1 year, 11 patients had died in the atherectomy group compared with 3 in the angioplasty group (2.2% versus 0.6%, P = .035), with an excess of out-of-hospital deaths (2.2% versus 0.2%, P = .01) and late cardiac deaths (1.6% versus 0%, P = .01). Univariate predictors of death included age, abrupt closure, periprocedural enzyme elevation, and peripheral vascular complications. There was no evidence that the excess of deaths after atherectomy was linked to perforation, ectasia, or deep resection. Cumulative rates of myocardial infarction were higher in those who had been randomized to atherectomy than in those randomized to angioplasty (8.9% versus 4.4%, P = .005) with a trend toward excess Q-wave and non-Q-wave infarctions. By multivariate analysis, atherectomy was the only variable predictive of the combined end point of death or myocardial infarction. No clinical or angiographic characteristics added to this index. Rates of repeat percutaneous intervention at the target site (24.4% after atherectomy versus 25.9% after angioplasty), coronary artery bypass surgery (9.3% versus 9.1%), hospitalization (50% versus 47.1%), and stroke (1% in both groups) were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up of the 1012 patients randomized to atherectomy or angioplasty has revealed a statistically significant excess of deaths after directional atherectomy that was not evident at 6 months. This difference could be due to the chance occurrence of a low mortality rate in those randomized to angioplasty. The excess of myocardial infarctions after atherectomy remains statistically significant at 1 year. Further investigation is warranted to improve the safety of atherectomy.

Six-month clinical and angiographic follow-up after direct angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Final results from the Primary Angioplasty Registry.

BACKGROUND: After direct angioplasty in the setting of acute myocardial infarction, patients were followed clinically and angiographically for 6 months at six experienced centers to evaluate outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 258 patients with 6-month follow-up after surviving initial hospitalization, 5 (2%) died, 8 (3%) had nonfatal infarctions, 56 (22%) had chest pain, of whom 25 (10%) required hospitalization, and 42 (16%) patients needed repeat angioplasty. Of 203 eligible patients, 154 (76%) had angiographic follow-up. The infarct-related artery remained patent (defined as TIMI 2 or 3 flow) in 87%, while 13% developed reocclusion (TIMI 0 or 1 flow) by 6 months after discharge. Patients with reocclusion were more likely to have adverse events, including 35% with clinically evident reinfarction and 59% requiring repeat angioplasty. The median ejection fraction improvement from acute to follow-up study was 6%, with no improvement in patients with a reoccluded infarct-related artery and an 8% improvement in patients with a patent infarct-related artery. CONCLUSIONS: The positive clinical outcomes recorded immediately after direct angioplasty persisted through 6 months of follow-up. Although the incidence of clinical end points was equivalent to or lower than thrombolytic therapy trials, restenosis is a substantial problem. These findings provide evidence beyond the initial hospitalization that direct angioplasty is a reasonable choice for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction.

A multicenter, randomized trial of coronary angioplasty versus directional atherectomy for patients with saphenous vein bypass graft lesions. CAVEAT-II Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Directional coronary atherectomy and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty have both been used in symptomatic patients with coronary saphenous vein bypass graft stenoses. The relative merits of plaque excision and removal versus balloon dilatation remain uncertain. We compared outcomes after directional coronary atherectomy or angioplasty in patients with de novo bypass graft stenoses. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-four North American and European sites randomized 305 patients with de novo vein graft lesions to atherectomy (n = 149) or angioplasty (n = 156). Quantitative coronary angiography at a core laboratory assessed initial and 6-month results. Initial angiographic success was greater with atherectomy (89.2% versus 79.0%), as was initial luminal gain (1.45 versus 1.12 mm, P < .001). Distal embolization was increased with atherectomy (P = .012), and a trend was shown toward more non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (P = .09). Although the 6-month net minimum luminal diameter gain was 0.68 mm for atherectomy and 0.50 mm for angioplasty, the restenosis rates were similar, 45.6% for atherectomy and 50.5% for angioplasty (P = .491). At 6 months, there was a trend toward decreased repeated target-vessel interventions for atherectomy (P = .092); in addition, 13.2% of patients treated with atherectomy versus 22.4% of the angioplasty patients (P = .041) required repeated percutaneous intervention of the initial target lesion. CONCLUSIONS: Atherectomy of de novo vein graft lesions was associated with improved initial angiographic success and luminal diameter but also with increased distal embolization. There was no difference in 6-month restenosis rates, although primary atherectomy patients tended to require fewer target-vessel revascularization procedures.