Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Pediatr Radiol ; 48(1): 56-65, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28951948

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) has emerged as an improved metric for use by medical physicists and radiologists for estimating individual patient dose. Several methods of calculating SSDE have been described, ranging from patient thickness or attenuation-based (automated and manual) measurements to weight-based techniques. OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of thickness vs. weight measurement of body size to allow for the calculation of the size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) in pediatric body CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 109 pediatric body CT examinations for SSDE calculation. We examined two automated methods measuring a series of level-specific diameters of the patient's body: method A used the effective diameter and method B used the water-equivalent diameter. Two manual methods measured patient diameter at two predetermined levels: the superior endplate of L2, where body width is typically most thin, and the superior femoral head or iliac crest (for scans that did not include the pelvis), where body width is typically most thick; method C averaged lateral measurements at these two levels from the CT projection scan, and method D averaged lateral and anteroposterior measurements at the same two levels from the axial CT images. Finally, we used body weight to characterize patient size, method E, and compared this with the various other measurement methods. Methods were compared across the entire population as well as by subgroup based on body width. RESULTS: Concordance correlation (ρc) between each of the SSDE calculation methods (methods A-E) was greater than 0.92 across the entire population, although the range was wider when analyzed by subgroup (0.42-0.99). When we compared each SSDE measurement method with CTDIvol, there was poor correlation, ρc<0.77, with percentage differences between 20.8% and 51.0%. CONCLUSION: Automated computer algorithms are accurate and efficient in the calculation of SSDE. Manual methods based on patient thickness provide acceptable dose estimates for pediatric patients <30 cm in body width. Body weight provides a quick and practical method to identify conversion factors that can be used to estimate SSDE with reasonable accuracy in pediatric patients with body width ≥20 cm.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Tamaño Corporal , Peso Corporal , Dosis de Radiación , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Adulto Joven
2.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 205(2): 392-9, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26204293

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to assess radiation dose reduction, image quality, and diagnostic confidence using low tube voltage in combination with hybrid iterative reconstruction in contrast-enhanced pediatric abdominal CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT examinations of 133 patients (median age, 10 years) were performed at sequentially reduced doses. The first group (group 1) was scanned using dimension-based protocols at 120 kV for all patient sizes. The optimized group (group 5) was scanned at 80 kV for less than 18 cm in the lateral dimension and 100 kV in the 19-30 cm lateral dimension. CT examinations reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and four levels of hybrid iterative reconstruction were reviewed by four blinded readers for subjective image quality and diagnostic confidence. Objective noise, volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) were recorded. Data were analyzed using t tests, one and two-way ANOVA, and the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Compared with group 1, the radiation dose was reduced for group 5 by 63% measured by SSDE (4.69 vs 10.00 mGy; p < 0.001). Subjective image noise was increased for FBP images (p < 0.001) but not was statistically significantly different for all levels of hybrid iterative reconstruction; artifacts were reduced and visibility of small structures was improved (both p < 0.001). Diagnostic confidence was improved for solid organ injury and metastatic disease (both p < 0.001) and was not statistically significantly different for appendicitis (p = 0.306). CONCLUSION: Use of hybrid iterative reconstruction with low-tube-voltage protocols enables substantial radiation dose reduction for pediatric abdominal CT with equivalent to improved subjective image quality and diagnostic confidence.


Asunto(s)
Dosis de Radiación , Protección Radiológica/métodos , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador/métodos , Radiografía Abdominal/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Medios de Contraste , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/instrumentación , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA