Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 63(17): 384-5, 2014 May 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24785985

RESUMEN

CDC is investigating reports of potential occupational exposure to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and Mycobacterium tuberculosis among workers performing preparation and dissection procedures on human nontransplant anatomical materials at a nontransplant anatomical donation center in Arizona. CDC is working with Arizona public health officials to inform persons exposed to these potentially infected materials. Nontransplant anatomical centers around the United States process thousands of donated cadavers annually. These materials (which might be fresh, frozen, or chemically preserved) are used by universities and surgical instrument and pharmaceutical companies for medical education and research. The American Association of Tissue Banks has developed accreditation policies for nontransplant anatomical donation organizations. It also has written standards that specify exclusion criteria for donor material, as well as use of proper environmental controls and safe work practices to prevent transmission of infectious agents during receipt and handling of nontransplant anatomical materials. At the center under investigation, which is now closed, these standards might not have been consistently implemented.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Transmisibles/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Bancos de Tejidos , Arizona/epidemiología , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Hepatitis B/epidemiología , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo , Tuberculosis/epidemiología , Estados Unidos
2.
Chest ; 125(4): 1256-64, 2004 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15078732

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: New York City firefighters responding to the World Trade Center (WTC) disaster on September 11, 2001, were exposed to numerous hazards. A medical screening program was conducted 3 weeks after the disaster on a sample of firefighters. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether arrival time at the WTC and other exposure variables (including respirator use) were associated with symptoms and changes in pulmonary function (after exposure - before exposure). DESIGN: A cross-sectional comparison of firefighters representing the following groups: (1) firefighters who arrived before/during the WTC collapse, (2) firefighters who arrived 1 to 2 days after the collapse, (3) firefighters who arrived 3 to 7 days after the collapse, and (4) unexposed firefighters. SETTING: Fire Department of New York City (FDNY) Bureau of Health Services on October 1 to 5, 2001. POPULATION: A stratified random sample of 362 of 398 recruited working firefighters (91%). Of these, 149 firefighters (41%) were present at the WTC collapse, 142 firefighters (39%) arrived after the collapse but within 48 h, 28 firefighters (8%) arrived 3 to 7 days after the collapse, and 43 firefighters (12%) were unexposed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: New/worsening symptoms involving the eyes, skin, respiratory system, and nose and throat (NT), and changes in spirometry from before to after exposure. RESULTS: During the first 2 weeks at the WTC site, 19% of study firefighters reported not using a respirator; 50% reported using a respirator but only rarely. Prevalence ratios (PRs) for skin, eye, respiratory, and NT symptoms showed a dose-response pattern between exposure groups based on time of arrival at the WTC site, with PRs between 2.6 and 11.4 with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) excluding 1.0 for all but skin symptoms. For those spending > 7 days at the site, the PR for respiratory symptoms was 1.32 (95% CI, 1.13 to 1.55), compared with those who were exposed for < 7 days. Mean spirometry results before and after exposure were within normal limits. The change in spirometry findings (after exposure - before exposure) showed near-equal reductions for FVC and FEV(1). These reductions were greater than the annual reductions measured in a referent population of incumbent FDNY firefighters prior to September 11 (p or= 450 mL in FEV(1) in those arriving during the first 48 h compared to the referent (p

Asunto(s)
Desastres , Explosiones , Incendios , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Oculares , Trabajo de Rescate , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Respiratorios , Fenómenos Fisiológicos de la Piel , Espirometría , Terrorismo , Ventiladores Mecánicos , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ciudad de Nueva York , Exposición Profesional , Factores de Tiempo
4.
Am J Ind Med ; 50(5): 377-82, 2007 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17407147

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Concerns over increased reports of physical health symptoms thought to be related to floodwater exposure among New Orleans firefighters prompted a health hazard evaluation of firefighters following Hurricane Katrina. METHODS: A questionnaire assessing health symptoms possibly related to the response to Hurricane Katrina was administered to all New Orleans Fire Department (NOFD) personnel within 3 months of the disaster. Descriptive statistics were compiled and prevalence ratios (PR) were estimated for covariates using generalized linear models with Log link and Poisson distribution. RESULTS: Of the 525 firefighters who completed the questionnaire (77% participation), 201 (38%) reported one or more new-onset respiratory symptoms, such as sinus congestion (145 [28%]), throat irritation (92 [17%]), and cough (124 [24%]). Skin rash was reported by 258 (49%) of respondents, 414 (79%) reported skin contact with floodwater, and 165 (32%) reported contact with floodwater on multiple days. In multivariate analyses adjusting for age, gender, and smoking, firefighters who had floodwater contact with skin and either nose/mouth or eyes (224, 44%) had an increased rate of new-onset upper respiratory symptoms (PR = 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1, 3.1), and skin rash (PR = 2.1; 95% CI, 1.4, 3.2) compared to those not exposed to the floodwater. CONCLUSIONS: Response workers involved with floodwater should minimize direct skin and mucosal contact with floodwater if possible through the use of appropriate personal protective equipment, such as goggles, safety glasses with side shields, or full-face shields.


Asunto(s)
Desastres , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Incendios/prevención & control , Trastornos Respiratorios/epidemiología , Enfermedades de la Piel/epidemiología , Microbiología del Agua , Adulto , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Louisiana/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Distribución de Poisson , Equipos de Seguridad , Trastornos Respiratorios/etiología , Enfermedades de la Piel/etiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA