Stratifying Minimal Versus Severe Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis Using a Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this cross-sectional correlational study was to determine the association of pain with morphologic and inflammatory sonographic findings in patients with knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: A total of 113 participants with knee osteoarthritis were assessed using visual analog scale pain score and sonography. Ultrasound evaluation included morphologic changes (ie, articular cartilage degeneration, medial and lateral meniscal protrusion, and presence of osteophytes on the joint margins) and inflammatory changes (ie suprapatellar effusion and/or synovitis, Baker cyst, superficial and deep infrapatellar effusion, pes anserine tendinopathy, and Hoffa panniculitis). RESULTS: Cluster analysis via Ward's method grouped patients with minimal pain (visual analog scale score, 0-4) and with substantial pain (visual analog scale score, 5-10). Stepwise logistic regression yielded 5 variables that significantly explained the variation in the probability of perceived substantial pain at 10% level of significance: lateral cartilage clarity (LCC; P = .025), medial cartilage clarity (MCC; P = .20), medial cartilage thickness (MCT; P = .041), medial meniscus protrusion (MMP) (P = .029), and osteophytes at medial femoral margin (P = .082), with 63% overall prediction accuracy. When age and sex were added, 4 variables remained significant at a 10% level of significance: LCC, MCC, MCT, and MMP, with 65% overall prediction accuracy. The receiver operating characteristic curve of this model was 0.667. CONCLUSION: The study was able to demonstrate that morphologic abnormalities in the ultrasound parameters for LCC, MCC, MCT, and MMP were able to predict significant joint pain in knee osteoarthritis. There were no inflammatory changes that contributed to significant joint pain in this study.

Biotherapeutic Applications of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Regenerative Medicine.

BACKGROUND: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), a blood-based product containing platelets and growth factors, is being utilized to treat numerous non-hemostatic disorders. Studies have explored the use of PRP to provide rapid repair, healing, and recovery from various injuries; some studies mentioned the effectiveness of PRP as compared with other forms of treatment like the use of hyaluronic acid. Commercially available PRP systems are available now, and each varies from one another depending on how it is prepared, thus causing variations in platelet concentration and growth factor content. These variations also implicated different therapeutic applications. METHODS: The paper reviews the various applications of PRP, including factors to consider before using PRP therapy, and provides an extensive list of PRP applications. RESULTS: The administration of PRP as a standalone treatment or as a co-therapy results in observed positive outcomes. However, there is a lack of standardization for PRP preparation, increasing the risks for heterogeneity and bias amongst results. CONCLUSION: The use of PRP is indeed an option for regenerative therapy, but more research is needed before it can fully be recommended as a primary treatment modality.