Excess use of surgical supplies in minimally invasive benign gynecology surgery: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Single-use materials and equipment are regularly opened by the surgical team during procedures but left unused, potentially resulting in superfluous costs and excess environmental waste. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the excess use of surgical supplies in minimally invasive benign gynecologic surgeries. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective observational study conducted at a university-affiliated single tertiary medical center. Designated study personnel were assigned to observe surgical procedures performed during July to September 2022. Surgical teams were observed while performing surgeries for benign indications. The teams were not informed of the purpose of the observation to avoid potential bias. Disposable materials and equipment opened during the procedure were documented. Excess supplies were defined as those opened but left unused before being discarded. Costs per item of the excess supplies were estimated on the basis of material and equipment costs provided by the hospital. RESULTS: A total of 99 surgeries were observed, including laparoscopic (32%), robotic (39%), hysteroscopic (14%), vaginal (11%), and laparotomy procedures (3%). Excess use of surgical supplies was documented in all but one procedure. The total cost across all surgeries reached $6357. The contained tissue extraction bag was the most expensive item not used (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA; $390 per unit) in 4 procedures, contributing 25.54% to the total cost. Raytec was the most common surgical waste, with a total of n=583 opened but unused (average n=5.95 per surgery). A significant difference was found in the rate of excess supplies across the surgical approaches, with robotic surgery contributing 52.19% of the total cost (P=.01). CONCLUSION: Excess use of disposable materials and equipment is common in minimally invasive benign gynecologic surgeries and contributes to superfluous costs and excess environmental waste. It is predominantly attributed to the opening of inexpensive materials that are left unused during the procedure. Increased awareness of costs and generated waste may reduce excess use of surgical supplies and should be further explored in future research.

Effect of Preoperative Bilateral Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum Nerve Block on Quality of Recovery after Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy in an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Setting.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of preoperative bilateral ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum nerve block (QLB) on quality of recovery after minimally invasive hysterectomy, in an enhanced recovery after surgery setting. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial (Canadian Task Force level I). SETTING: University-affiliated tertiary medical center. PATIENTS: All women undergoing an elective robotic or laparoscopic hysterectomy. Women with chronic pain, chronic anticoagulation, and body mass index >50 kg/m2 were excluded. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized with a 1:1 allocation, to one of the following 2 arms, and stratified based on robotic versus laparoscopic approach. 1. QLB: QLB (bupivacaine) + sham local trocar sites infiltration (normal saline) 2. Local infiltration: sham QLB (normal saline) + local infiltration (bupivacaine) MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was defined as the quality of recovery score based on the validated questionnaire Quality of Recovery, completed 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included dynamic pain scores, accumulated opioid consumption up to 24 hours, postoperative nausea and vomiting, surgical complications, length of hospital stay, time to first pain medication administration in the postanesthesia care unit, and adverse events. A total of 76 women were included in the study. Demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. Median age was 44 years (interquartile range 39-50), 47% of the participants were African American, and mean body mass index was 32.8 kg/m2 (standard deviation [SD] 8.1). The mean Quality of Recovery score was 179.1 (SD ± 10.3) in the QLB and 175.6 (SD ± 9.7) for the local anesthesia group (p = .072). All secondary outcomes were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: QLBs do not significantly improve quality of recovery after elective robotic or laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with local anesthetic port site infiltration.

The association between BMI and continuity of etonogestrel (ENG)-releasing implant.

OBJECTIVE: The etonogestrel-releasing implant is a long-acting reversible contraception that is recommended by the Food and Drug Administration for 3 years and has been proven to be highly effective and convenient. Adverse effects including irregular bleeding patterns, weight gain, and acne are reported to be the main reasons for treatment discontinuation. The aim of this study is to learn the association between body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) and the incidence of side effects and adherence to treatment. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study, conducted at a single university-affiliated medical clinic, including all women who underwent etonogestrel-releasing implant (Nexplanon®; New Jersey, USA, Organon USA Inc., Merck and Co) insertion between January 2019 and December 2021. Cases where abnormalities were reported during the insertion procedure or missing data were excluded from the study. Information on patients' demographic, medical history, obstetric and gynecological history, and follow-up was collected from electronic medical files. The primary outcome was defined as the rate of implant removal in the different obesity classes. Data are presented as median and interquartile range. The study was approved by institutional review board. RESULTS: The study population included 1318 women, of whom 466 (35%) requested early removal of the implant. Women's demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between women who requested early removal and those with full-length treatment. The median time for early removal was 12 (6-20) months from insertion. Irregular bleeding was the most frequent reason for early removal in both groups and was more than twice as prevalent in the early removal group (239 [51.29%] vs 193 [22%], P = 0.001). The early removal group had fewer obese women (BMI ≥30) compared with women who had full-length treatment (163 [31.8%] vs 350 [68.2%], P = 0.03), with comparable rates of class 3 obesity women (BMI ≥40) (P = 0.68). Multi-regression logistic analysis including age, BMI, parity and side effects found that the presence of side effects is the only independent predictor significantly associated with early implant removal (B = 1.74, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Continuation of etonogestrel-releasing implant contraception treatment was associated with the presence of side effects that were more often reported in non-obese women. BMI was not found to be a significant factor influencing adherence to treatment.