Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Ann Pharmacother ; 57(11): 1273-1281, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36975181

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A consensus guideline on salicylate poisoning recommends referring patients to the emergency department if they ingested 150 mg/kg of aspirin. The dose of aspirin associated with severe poisoning in pediatric patients has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to associate medical outcomes with aspirin overdoses in patients 5 years old and younger. METHODS: A retrospective review of data on pediatric patients with single substance aspirin exposures reported from poison centers across the country was conducted. The primary endpoint was to associate aspirin doses with medical outcomes. Secondary endpoints included evaluation of the signs, symptoms, and treatments of ingestion and their association with medical outcomes. RESULTS: There were 26 488 included exposures with aspirin exposures resulting in no effect (92.5%), minor effect (6.0%), moderate effect (1.4%), major effect (0.2%), and death (0.02%). There were 8921 cases with available weight-based dosing information. Median doses associated with no effect, minor effects, moderate effects, major effects, and death ranged between 28.4 and 40.9 mg/kg, 52.5 and 82.3 mg/kg, 132.1 and 182.3 mg/kg, 132.3 and 172.8 mg/kg, and 142.2 and 284.4 mg/kg, respectively. Minor effect and moderate effect exposures were more likely to have alkalinization documented compared to no effect exposures (odds ratio [OR] = 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.41-2.17; OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.12-2.86). There was no difference in rates of alkalinization between minor and moderate exposures (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.61-1.7). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Reevaluation of the current recommendation of 150 mg/kg for referral to a healthcare facility is necessary for pediatric acute salicylate overdoses.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones , Niño , Humanos , Preescolar , Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Salicilatos , Aspirina
2.
Cardiol Young ; 29(12): 1440-1444, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31767042

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pain control is an important element of care for patients after surgery, leading to better outcomes, quicker transitions to recovery, and improvement in quality of life. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in children after cardiac surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients between the ages of 1 month and 18 years of age, who received intravenous or oral non-steroidal anti-inflammataory drugs after cardiac surgery, from November 2015 until September 2017 were included in this study. The primary endpoints were non-steroidal anti-inflammataory drug-associated renal dysfunction and post-operative bleeding. Secondary endpoints examined the effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammataory drug use on total daily dose of narcotics, number of intravenous PRN narcotic doses received, and pain assessment score. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics for frequencies and ranges. Multivariate analysis was performed to measure the association of all predictors and outcomes. Wilcoxon singed-rank test was performed for secondary outcomes. RESULTS: There was no association between the incidence of renal dysfunction and the use of or duration of non-steroidal anti-inflammataory drugs; in addition no association was found with increased chest tube output. There was a statistically significant reduction of patients' median Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scores (2-0; p = 0.003), seen within first 24 hours after initiation of ketorolac, and a significant reduction of morphine requirements seen from day 1 to day 2 (0.3 mg/kg versus 0.1 mg/kg; p < 0.001) and number of as-needed doses. CONCLUSION: Non-steroidal anti-inflammataory drugs in paediatric cardiac surgery patients are safe and effective for post-operative pain management.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Ketorolaco/uso terapéutico , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Maryland , Dimensión del Dolor , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 109(1): 243-252, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33119888

RESUMEN

At least 60% of the neonates with opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) require morphine to control withdrawal symptoms. Currently, the morphine dosing strategies are empiric, not optimal and associated with longer hospital stay. The aim of the study was to develop a quantitative, model-based, real-world data-driven approach to morphine dosing to improve clinical outcomes, such as reducing time on treatment. Longitudinal morphine dose, clinical response (Modified Finnegan Score (MFS)), and baseline risk factors were collected using a retrospective cohort design from the electronic medical records of neonates with NOWS (N = 177) admitted to the University of Maryland Medical Center. A dynamic linear mixed effects model was developed to describe the relationship between MFS and morphine dose adjusting for baseline risk factors using a split-sample data approach (70% training: 30% test). The training model was evaluated in the test dataset using a simulation based approach. Maternal methadone and benzodiazepine use, and race were significant predictors of the MFS response. Positive autocorrelations of 0.56 and 0.12 were estimated between consecutive MFS responses. On an average, for a 1,000 µg increase in the morphine dose, the MFS decreased by 0.3 units. The model evaluation showed that observed and predicted median time on treatment were similar (13.0 vs. 13.8 days). A model-based framework was developed to describe the MFS-morphine dose relationship using real-world data that could potentially be used to develop an adaptive, individualized morphine dosing strategy to improve clinical outcomes in infants with NOWS.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/tratamiento farmacológico , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Metadona/administración & dosificación , Metadona/efectos adversos , Morfina/administración & dosificación , Morfina/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther ; 26(5): 472-477, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34239399

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Verigene blood culture panels comprise rapid diagnostic testing, which aids in early bacteremia species identification. This study determined the concordance of Verigene rapid diagnostic results compared with the Vitek reference standard in patients admitted to a children's hospital. METHODS: This was a 3-year retrospective observational study of neonatal and pediatric patients ≤18 years admitted to a children's hospital with confirmed bacteremia for whom Verigene testing was performed. Verigene testing was conducted on cultures with reported growth on Gram stain and final organism speciation confirmed via Vitek. Percent concordance and positive percent agreement with 95% CIs were calculated for Verigene panel-identifiable organisms. Negative percent agreement with 95% CIs was calculated for non-panel organisms. Time-to-result was calculated from Gram stain reporting to both Verigene and Vitek final organism susceptibility. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five Gram-positive (GP) and 51 Gram-negative (GN) isolates were identified through Vitek. Verigene GP panel-detectable organisms were correctly identified 96.9% (125/129) at the genus level and 95.3% (123/129) at the species level. Overall positive percent agreement was 95.3 (CI: 90.2-98.3). Negative percent agreement was 83.3 (CI: 35.9-99.6) for the 6 non-panel GP organisms. All GN isolates were correctly identified on Verigene. Median time-to-result was 2.9 hours (IQR 2.6, 3.2) and 44.4 hours (IQR: 35.4, 52.5) for Verigene and final susceptibilities, respectively. There was a statistically significant time savings of 41.5 hours (CI: 29.8-53.2) for identification and detection of resistance markers (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Verigene concordance at our institution aligns with results from previously published studies and can be considered a reliable clinical decision-support tool.

5.
Int J Pharm Pract ; 29(5): 486-492, 2021 Oct 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34173658

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Blood culture rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) aids in early organism identification and resistance gene detection. This information allows quicker transition to tailored antimicrobial therapy, improved patient outcomes and prevention of antimicrobial resistance. An antimicrobial treatment algorithm based on RDT results and local antibiograms can serve as a valuable clinical decision-support tool. This study assessed the proportion of appropriate antibiotic therapy recommendations using a novel paediatric RDT-guided treatment algorithm compared with standard care (SC) in paediatric bacteraemia. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational study of admitted paediatric patients who received antibiotics for RDT-confirmed bacteraemia. Appropriateness of SC was compared with algorithm-recommended treatment. Antimicrobial appropriateness was defined as in vitro susceptibility to the organism identified through traditional microbiology. Clinical appropriateness took into consideration the ability to tailor therapy within 12 h of RDT results. Appropriateness was evaluated by two blinded, independent reviewers. KEY FINDINGS: Eighty-six blood cultures were included with 15 unique Gram-positive and Gram-negative species or genus identified. Comparative antimicrobial appropriateness of SC and algorithm-recommended treatment was 94.2% (81/86) and 100% (86/86), respectively (P = 0.06). Clinical assessment determined 39.5% (34/86) of SC patients were on appropriate therapy within 12 h of RDT result. Algorithm-recommended therapy was clinically appropriate in 97.7% (84/86) of patients (P < 0.001). There was a median time savings of 42.7 h (IQR 40.6, 49.4) for the patients able to be de-escalated as compared with waiting on final sensitivities. CONCLUSIONS: Algorithm-guided treatment may allow most patients to be de-escalated to organism-tailored therapy earlier in their therapeutic course.


Asunto(s)
Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Bacteriemia , Algoritmos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Cultivo de Sangre , Niño , Humanos , Recién Nacido
6.
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther ; 23(5): 362-366, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30429689

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine if education material targeting children would improve understanding of medication indication, administration, and common side effects in pediatric subjects. METHODS: This cross-sectional pilot study included students 7 to 11 years old from a suburban elementary school. Study participants were read either the US Food and Drug Administration-approved adult medication leaflet or a pediatric medication leaflet created at a first-grade reading level for levetiracetam (Keppra, UCB, Inc, Atlanta, GA). Students were asked a set of standardized survey questions to evaluate comprehension of side effects, medication indication, dosing frequency, administration, and overall impression of the leaflet. RESULTS: Fifty-eight children were included. Fifty percent of the children were male, 79% were Caucasian, and the average age was 9 years. There was no statistical difference for demographics in the adult leaflet versus the pediatric leaflet group. Children correctly stated the indication for the medication in 30% of participants (9/30) in the adult leaflet group and 79% of participants (22/28) in the pediatric leaflet group, p = 0.002. The administration frequency question was answered correctly in 93% of the pediatric leaflet group (26/28) as compared to 73% in the adult leaflet group (22/30), p = 0.05. For questions about side effects and how to administer the medication, there was no difference between the groups. The responses regarding readability and understanding of the leaflets were significantly different in the pediatric leaflet group compared to the adult leaflet group, p = 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Leaflets designed for pediatric patients resulted in an improvement in the understanding of the indication for levetiracetam.

7.
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther ; 22(6): 385-393, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29290737

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The use of dietary supplements has increased and is associated with adverse effects. Indications for use include recreation, body image concerns, mood enhancement, or control of medical conditions. The risk of adverse effects may be enhanced if agents are used improperly. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of abuse and misuse of 4 dietary substances among adolescents reported nationally to poison centers. Secondary outcomes included an assessment of medical outcomes, clinical effects, location of treatments provided, and treatments administered. METHODS: This descriptive retrospective review assessed data concerning the use of garcinia (Garcinia cambogia), guarana (Paullinia cupana), salvia (Salvia divinorum), and St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) among adolescents reported nationally to poison centers from 2003 to 2014. Adolescents with a singlesubstance exposure to one of the substances of interest coded as intentional abuse or misuse were included. Poison center calls for drug information or those with unrelated clinical effects were excluded. Data were collected from the National Poison Data System. RESULTS: There were 84 cases: 7 cases of Garcinia cambogia, 28 Paullinia cupana, 23 Salvia divinorum, and 26 Hypericum perforatum. Garcinia cambogia was used more frequently by females (100% versus 0%), and Paullinia cupana and Salvia divinorum were used more frequently by males (61% versus 36% and 91% versus 9%, respectively). Abuse, driven by Salvia divinorum, was more common overall than misuse. Abuse was also more common among males than females (p <0.001). Use of these agents fluctuated over time. Overall, use trended down since 2010, except for Garcinia cambogia use. In 62 cases (73.8%), the medical outcome was minor or had no effect or was judged as nontoxic or minimally toxic. Clinical effects were most common with Paullinia cupana and Salvia divinorum. Treatment sites included emergency department (n = 33; 39.3%), non-healthcare facility (n = 24; 28.6%), admission to a health care facility (n = 8; 9.5%), and other/unknown (n = 19; 22.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Abuse and misuse of these dietary supplements was uncommon, and outcomes were mild. Further research should be performed to determine use and outcomes of abuse/misuse of other dietary supplements in this population.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA