RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of major fetal structural anomalies can be detected in the first trimester by ultrasound examination. However, the test performance of the first-trimester anomaly scan performed in a low-risk population as part of a nationwide prenatal screening program is unknown. Potential benefits of the first-trimester anomaly scan include early detection of fetal anomalies, providing parents with more time for reproductive decision-making. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the uptake, test performance, and time to a final prenatal diagnosis after referral. STUDY DESIGN: A nationwide implementation study was conducted in the Netherlands (November 2021-November 2022). The FTAS was performed between 12+3 and 14+3 weeks of gestation by certified sonographers using a standard protocol. Women were referred to a tertiary care center if anomalies were suspected. Uptake, test performance, and time to a final prenatal diagnosis (days between referral and date of final diagnosis/prognosis for reproductive decision-making) were determined. Test performance was calculated for first-trimester major congenital anomalies, such as anencephaly and holoprosencephaly and all diagnosed anomalies <24 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: The first-trimester anomaly scan uptake was 74.9% (129,704/173,129). In 1.0% (1313/129,704), an anomaly was suspected, of which 54.9% (n=721) had abnormal findings on the detailed first-trimester diagnostic scan and 44.6% (n=586) showed normal results. In 0.5% (n=6), intrauterine fetal death occurred. In the total group of 721 cases with abnormal findings, 332 structural anomalies, 117 genetic anomalies, 82 other findings (abnormal fetal biometry, sonomarkers, placental/umbilical cord anomaly, an-/oligohydramnios), and 189 cases with transient findings (defined as ultrasound findings which resolved <24 weeks of gestation) were found, with 1 case having an unknown outcome. 0.9% (n=1164) of all cases with a normal first-trimester anomaly scan were diagnosed with a fetal anomaly in the second trimester. Test performance included a sensitivity of 84.6% (126/149) for first-trimester major congenital anomalies and 31.6% (537/1701) for all types of anomalies. Specificity for all anomalies was 99.2% (98,055/98,830); positive predictive value 40.9% (537/1312); negative predictive value 98.8% (98,055/99,219); positive likelihood ratio 40.3; negative likelihood ratio 0.7; false positive rate 0.8% (775/98,830), and false negative rate 68.4% (1164/1701). The median time to diagnosis for structural anomalies was 20 days (6-43 days; median gestational age 16+3), for genetic anomalies 17 days (8.5-27.5 days; median gestational age 15+6 weeks), and for first-trimester major congenital anomalies 9 days (5-22 days; median gestational age 14+6 weeks). CONCLUSION: The performance of a newly introduced nationwide first-trimester anomaly scan in a low-risk population showed a high sensitivity for first-trimester major congenital anomalies and a lower sensitivity for all anomalies combined. The program was accompanied by a referral rate of 1.0%, of which 59.1% involved cases where anomalies were either not confirmed or resolved before 24 weeks gestation. Timing of diagnosis was around 16 weeks of gestation for referred cases. To evaluate the balance between benefits and potential harm of the first-trimester anomaly scan within a nationwide prenatal screening program, it is essential to assess the effectiveness of the program over time and to consider the perspectives of both women and their partners, as well as healthcare professionals.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the coronary sinus (CS) presence, size, and CS to atrial ratio (CS/A) in the first trimester (FT) compared with the second trimester (ST). METHODS: In this IRB-approved retrospective study, fetuses with adequate FT cardiac sweeps and normal ST hearts were included. Maternal and fetal characteristics were obtained. CS and atrial diameters were measured by a single sonologist. The CS/A ratio was compared between FT and ST. Linear regression assessed the relationship between biparietal diameter (BPD) and CS and atrial diameters. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: Among 99 fetuses, the CS was seen in 42/53 (79.2%) in the FT and 14/32 (43.8%) in the ST. No significant associations were found between CS visualization and the factors analyzed. The CS/A ratio was significantly higher in the FT versus ST (0.43 vs 0.25; P < .0001). Combined FT and ST data revealed positive correlations between BPD and both CS (slope = 0.018, P < .0001) and atrial diameters (slope = 0.135, P < .0001), suggesting differential growth rates, with the atrium exhibiting a faster growth rate as BPD increased. CONCLUSIONS: The CS appears prominent in the FT compared with the ST, likely due to differential growth rates between the CS and atrium. Remnants of embryonic structures, differences in myocardial drainage, and hemodynamics may also be contributing factors. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and assess the value of the FT CS/A ratio.
Asunto(s)
Seno Coronario , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Humanos , Femenino , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Seno Coronario/diagnóstico por imagen , Seno Coronario/embriología , Embarazo , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/métodos , Adulto , Corazón Fetal/diagnóstico por imagen , Corazón Fetal/embriologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: First-trimester ultrasound screening is increasingly performed to detect fetal anomalies early in pregnancy, aiming to enhance reproductive autonomy for future parents. This study aims to display the current practice of first-trimester ultrasound screening in developed countries. METHOD: An online survey among 47 prenatal screening experts in developed countries. RESULTS: First-trimester structural anomaly screening is available in 30 of the 33 countries and is mostly offered to all women with generally high uptakes. National protocols are available in 23/30 (76.7%) countries, but the extent of anatomy assessment varies. Monitoring of scan quality occurs in 43.3% of the countries. 23/43 (53.5%) of the respondents considered the quality of first-trimester ultrasound screening unequal in different regions of their country. CONCLUSIONS: First-trimester screening for structural fetal anomalies is widely offered in developed countries, but large differences are reported in availability and use of screening protocols, the extent of anatomy assessment, training and experience of sonographers and quality monitoring systems. Consequently, this results in an unequal offer to parents in developed countries, sometimes even within the same country. Furthermore, as offer and execution differ widely, this has to be taken into account when results of screening policies are scientifically published or compared.
Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico Prenatal , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Países Desarrollados , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Since 2007 all pregnant women in the Netherlands are offered the second-trimester anomaly scan (SAS) in a nationwide prenatal screening program. This study aims to assess the level of informed choice of women opting for the SAS and to evaluate the presence of routinization 16 years after its implementation. It further explores decisional conflict and women's decision making. METHODS: This prospective national survey study consisted of an online questionnaire which was completed after prenatal counseling and before undergoing the SAS. Informed choice was measured by the adapted multidimensional measure of informed choice (MMIC) and was defined in case women were classified as value-consistent, if their decision for the SAS was deliberated and made with sufficient knowledge. RESULTS: A total of 894/1167 (76.6%) women completed the questionnaire. Overall, 54.8% made an informed choice, 89.6% had good knowledge, 59.8% had deliberated their choice and 92.7% held a positive attitude towards the SAS. Women with low educational attainment (p=0.004) or respondents of non-Western descent (p=0.038) were less likely to make an informed choice. Decisional conflict was low, with a significantly lower decisional conflict score in women that made an informed choice (p<0.001). Most respondents (97.9%) did not perceive pressure to undergo the SAS. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed a relatively low rate of informed choice for the SAS, due to absence of deliberation. Therefore, some routinization seem to be present in the Netherlands. However, most women had sufficient knowledge, did not perceive pressure and experienced low decisional conflict.
Asunto(s)
Estudios de Cohortes , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Países Bajos , Estudios Prospectivos , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , EscolaridadRESUMEN
The Netherlands launched a nationwide implementation study on non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a first-tier test offered to all pregnant women. This started on April 1, 2017 as the TRIDENT-2 study, licensed by the Dutch Ministry of Health. In the first year, NIPT was performed in 73,239 pregnancies (42% of all pregnancies), 7,239 (4%) chose first-trimester combined testing, and 54% did not participate. The number of trisomies 21 (239, 0.33%), 18 (49, 0.07%), and 13 (55, 0.08%) found in this study is comparable to earlier studies, but the Positive Predictive Values (PPV)-96% for trisomy 21, 98% for trisomy 18, and 53% for trisomy 13-were higher than expected. Findings other than trisomy 21, 18, or 13 were reported on request of the pregnant women; 78% of women chose to have these reported. The number of additional findings was 207 (0.36%); these included other trisomies (101, 0.18%, PPV 6%, many of the remaining 94% of cases are likely confined placental mosaics and possibly clinically significant), structural chromosomal aberrations (95, 0.16%, PPV 32%,) and complex abnormal profiles indicative of maternal malignancies (11, 0.02%, PPV 64%). The implementation of genome-wide NIPT is under debate because the benefits of detecting other fetal chromosomal aberrations must be balanced against the risks of discordant positives, parental anxiety, and a potential increase in (invasive) diagnostic procedures. Our first-year data, including clinical data and laboratory follow-up data, will fuel this debate. Furthermore, we describe how NIPT can successfully be embedded into a national screening program with a single chain for prenatal care including counseling, testing, and follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Down/diagnóstico , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Genoma Humano , Implementación de Plan de Salud , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Síndrome de la Trisomía 13/diagnóstico , Síndrome de la Trisomía 18/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Aberraciones Cromosómicas , Síndrome de Down/epidemiología , Síndrome de Down/genética , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Pronóstico , Síndrome de la Trisomía 13/epidemiología , Síndrome de la Trisomía 13/genética , Síndrome de la Trisomía 18/epidemiología , Síndrome de la Trisomía 18/genética , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Female heart disease has for a long time been an underrecognized problem in the field of cardiology. With an ever-growing number of these patients getting pregnant, cardiac dysfunction during pregnancy is an increasingly large medical problem. Previous work has shown that maternal heart disease may have an adverse effect on pregnancy outcome in both mother and child. The placenta forms the connection and it is postulated that cardiac dysfunction negatively affects the placenta, and consequently, neonatal outcome. Given the paucity of data in this field, more research on the influence of cardiac (mal)function on placental (mal)function is needed. The present review describes placental function in women with various types of cardiac dysfunction, thereby aiming to provide more insight into possible underlying mechanisms of placental malfunction. Organ dysfunction in patients with heart failure is for an important part based on reduced perfusion and venous congestion. This has been shown in other organs such as kidneys, liver and brain. In pregnant women with cardiac dysfunction, placental dysfunction may follow similar patterns. Moreover, other factors, such as pre-existing hypertension and chronic hypoxia may lead to further impairment of placental function, through abnormal vascular remodeling of the uterine spiral arteries. The pathophysiology of placental dysfunction in pregnant women with cardiac dysfunction may thus be multifactorial. It is therefore important to monitor closely cardiac and placental function in such high-risk pregnancies. Gaining a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms may have important clinical implications in terms of pregnancy counseling, monitoring and outcome.
Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías , Placenta , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Pulmón , Placenta/irrigación sanguínea , Placenta/fisiología , Embarazo , Arteria Uterina/fisiología , Remodelación VascularRESUMEN
This study reviewed the literature about the diagnosis, antepartum surveillance, and time of delivery of fetuses suspected to be small for gestational age or growth restricted. Several guidelines have been issued by major professional organizations, including the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. The differences in recommendations, in particular about Doppler velocimetry of the ductus venosus and middle cerebral artery, have created confusion among clinicians, and this review has intended to clarify and highlight the available evidence that is pertinent to clinical management. A fetus who is small for gestational age is frequently defined as one with an estimated fetal weight of <10th percentile. This condition has been considered syndromic and has been frequently attributed to fetal growth restriction, a constitutionally small fetus, congenital infections, chromosomal abnormalities, or genetic conditions. Small for gestational age is not synonymous with fetal growth restriction, which is defined by deceleration of fetal growth determined by a change in fetal growth velocity. An abnormal umbilical artery Doppler pulsatility index reflects an increased impedance to flow in the umbilical circulation and is considered to be an indicator of placental disease. The combined finding of an estimated fetal weight of <10th percentile and abnormal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry has been widely accepted as indicative of fetal growth restriction. Clinical studies have shown that the gestational age at diagnosis can be used to subclassify suspected fetal growth restriction into early and late, depending on whether the condition is diagnosed before or after 32 weeks of gestation. The early type is associated with umbilical artery Doppler abnormalities, whereas the late type is often associated with a low pulsatility index in the middle cerebral artery. A large randomized clinical trial indicated that in the context of early suspected fetal growth restriction, the combination of computerized cardiotocography and fetal ductus venosus Doppler improves outcomes, such that 95% of surviving infants have a normal neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years of age. A low middle cerebral artery pulsatility index is associated with an adverse perinatal outcome in late fetal growth restriction; however, there is no evidence supporting its use to determine the time of delivery. Nonetheless, an abnormality in middle cerebral artery Doppler could be valuable to increase the surveillance of the fetus at risk. We propose that fetal size, growth rate, uteroplacental Doppler indices, cardiotocography, and maternal conditions (ie, hypertension) according to gestational age are important factors in optimizing the outcome of suspected fetal growth restriction.
Asunto(s)
Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal , Peso Fetal , Femenino , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/diagnóstico por imagen , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/terapia , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Lactante , Placenta , Embarazo , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Ultrasonografía Doppler , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Arterias Umbilicales/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the additional value of advanced fetal anatomical assessment by ultrasound in pregnancies with twice inconclusive noninvasive testing (NIPT) due to low fetal fraction (FF). METHODS: We performed a multicenter-retrospective study between 2017 and 2020 including 311 pregnancies with twice inconclusive NIPT due to low FF ≤ 1%. Women were offered invasive testing and advanced fetal anatomical assessment at ≤18 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound findings, genetic testing, and pregnancy/postnatal outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Ninety-two/311 (29.6%) women underwent invasive testing. Structural anomalies were diagnosed in 13/311 (4.2%) pregnancies (nine at the first scan and four at follow-up). In 6/13 (46.2%) cases, genetic aberrations were confirmed (one case of Trisomy 13 (detectable by NIPT), two of Triploidy, one of 16q12-deletion, HCN4-mutation and UPD(16) (nondetectable by NIPT). Genetic aberrations were found in 4/298 (1.3%) structurallynormal pregnancies (one 47XYY, two microscopic aberrations, one monogenic disorder found postpartum). Structural anomalies in genetically normal fetuses (2.0%) were not more prevalent compared to the general pregnant population (OR 1.0 [0.4-2.2]). CONCLUSION: In pregnancies with twice inconclusive NIPT due to low FF, fetal structural anomalies are not more prevalent than in the general obstetric population. The detailed anatomical assessment has the added value to detect phenotypical features suggestive of chromosomal/genetic aberrations and identify pregnancies where advanced genetic testing may be indicated.
Asunto(s)
Ácidos Nucleicos Libres de Células , Aberraciones Cromosómicas , Femenino , Humanos , Canales Regulados por Nucleótidos Cíclicos Activados por Hiperpolarización/genética , Masculino , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trisomía/diagnóstico , Trisomía/genética , Ultrasonografía , Ultrasonografía PrenatalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a screening method for trisomy 21 and other chromosomal abnormalities has been adopted widely across the globe. However, while many clinical validation studies have been performed, less is known regarding the patient experience with NIPT. This study explored how individuals experience NIPT in a pre- and post-test setting, where NIPT is broadly available as a primary screening method with the option of reporting beyond common trisomies. METHODS: Participants were recruited using social media with a strategy designed to select individuals who had the option to have NIPT as part of the TRIDENT-2 study (In the Netherlands, NIPT is only available within the TRIDENT studies executed by the NIPT consortium. This research was done independently from the NIPT consortium.) in the Netherlands. The study used online questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Both were developed around a patient experience framework consisting of seven themes: information, patient as active participant, responsiveness of services, lived experience, continuity of care and relationships, communication, and support. RESULTS: Overall, 4539 questionnaire responses were analyzed and 60% of the respondents had experienced NIPT. Of those, 1.7% received a high-risk result for trisomy or another chromosomal copy number variant (referred to as an "additional finding"). Overall, participants felt they had received sufficient information and had control over their decision regarding whether or not to choose NIPT. The vast majority of respondents who had NIPT were positive about their experience and would use it again. Those with results showing an increased probability for trisomy or additional findings were more likely to report negative feelings such as tension and anxiety, and less likely to feel that they had been sufficiently prepared for the implications of their results. CONCLUSIONS: The patient experience with first-tier NIPT in the Netherlands was largely positive. Areas for improvement included counseling on the implications of screening and the different possible outcomes of NIPT, including additional findings that may be uncovered by expanding NIPT beyond the common trisomies. The experiences reported in this study may be useful for other countries intending to implement NIPT.
Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico Prenatal , Trisomía , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Trisomía/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Países Bajos , Aneuploidia , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al PacienteRESUMEN
In the Netherlands prenatal screening is offered as a mean to increase reproductive choices of couples. All women are counseled on the existing options by trained midwives. The government puts a great emphasis on informed choice and on womens' opinions and reactions to screenings options. Since 2017 non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT, cf-DNA) is offered as first tier screening for aneuploidies in the genome-wide (GW) variant at the cost of 175 Euro's. Uptake is around 50%. This screenings offer is perceived as unconventional for the traditionally cautious Dutch system.
Asunto(s)
Implementación de Plan de Salud/ética , Pruebas Prenatales no Invasivas/ética , Femenino , Humanos , Países Bajos , EmbarazoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of the first-trimester Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) screening algorithm, including maternal characteristics and medical history, blood pressure, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and placenta growth factor, crown rump length, and uterine artery pulsatility index, for the prediction of preeclampsia in a high-risk population in the Netherlands. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort including nulliparous women and women with preeclampsia or intrauterine growth restriction in previous pregnancy. We screened patients at 11-14 weeks of gestation to calculate the risk for preeclampsia. The primary outcome was preeclampsia and gestational age at delivery. Performance of the model was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs) and calibration graphs; based on the ROC curves, optimal predicted risk cutoff values for our study population were defined. RESULTS: We analyzed 362 women, of whom 22 (6%) developed preeclampsia. The algorithm showed fair discriminative performance for preeclampsia <34 weeks (AUC 0.81; 95% CI 0.65-0.96) and moderate discriminative performance for both preeclampsia <37 weeks (AUC 0.71; 95% CI 0.51-0.90) and <42 weeks (AUC 0.71; 95% CI 0.61-0.81). Optimal cutoffs based on our study population for preeclampsia <34, <37, and <42 weeks were 1:250, 1:64, and 1:22, respectively. Calibration was poor. CONCLUSIONS: Performance of the FMF preeclampsia algorithm was satisfactory to predict early and preterm preeclampsia and less satisfactory for term preeclampsia in a high-risk population. However, by addressing some of the limitations of the present study, the performance can potentially improve. This is essential before implementation is considered.
Asunto(s)
Preeclampsia , Algoritmos , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Preeclampsia/diagnóstico por imagen , Preeclampsia/epidemiología , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Maternal right ventricular (RV) dysfunction (measured by echocardiography) is associated with impaired uteroplacental circulation, however echocardiography has important limitations in the assessment of RV function. We therefore aimed to investigate the association of pre-pregnancy RV and left ventricular (LV) function measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance with uteroplacental Doppler flow parameters in pregnant women with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (ToF). METHODS: Women with repaired ToF were examined, who had been enrolled in a prospective multicenter study of pregnant women with congenital heart disease. Clinical data and CMR evaluation before pregnancy were compared with uteroplacental Doppler parameters at 20 and 32 weeks gestation. In particular, pulsatility index (PI) of uterine and umbilical artery were studied. RESULTS: We studied 31 women; mean age 30 years, operated at early age. Univariable analyses showed that reduced RV ejection fraction (RVEF; P = 0.037 and P = 0.001), higher RV end-systolic volume (P = 0.004) and higher LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volume (P = 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively) were associated with higher uterine or umbilical artery PI. With multivariable analyses (corrected for maternal age and body mass index), reduced RVEF before pregnancy remained associated with higher umbilical artery PI at 32 weeks (P = 0.002). RVEF was lower in women with high PI compared to women with normal PI during pregnancy (44% vs. 53%, p = 0.022). LV ejection fraction was not associated with uterine or umbilical artery PI. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced RV function before pregnancy is associated with abnormal uteroplacental Doppler flow parameters. It could be postulated that reduced RV function on pre-pregnancy CMR (≤2 years) is a predisposing factor for impaired placental function in women with repaired ToF.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Imagen por Resonancia Cinemagnética , Circulación Placentaria , Tetralogía de Fallot/cirugía , Arterias Umbilicales/fisiopatología , Arteria Uterina/fisiopatología , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/diagnóstico por imagen , Función Ventricular Derecha , Adulto , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tetralogía de Fallot/complicaciones , Tetralogía de Fallot/diagnóstico por imagen , Tetralogía de Fallot/fisiopatología , Ultrasonografía Doppler , Arterias Umbilicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Uterina/diagnóstico por imagen , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/etiología , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Currently fetal nuchal translucency (NT) ≥3.5 mm is an indication for invasive testing often followed by chromosomal microarray. The aim of this study was to assess the risks for chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with an NT 3.0-3.4 mm, to determine whether invasive prenatal testing would be relevant in these cases and to assess the residual risks in fetuses with normal non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study and meta-analysis of literature cases with NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm and 2 cohorts of pregnant women referred for invasive testing and chromosomal microarray was performed: Rotterdam region (with a risk >1:200 and NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm) tested in the period July 2012 to June 2019 and Central Denmark region (with a risk >1:300 and NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm) tested between September 2015 and December 2018. RESULTS: A total of 522 fetuses were referred for invasive testing and chromosomal microarray. Meta-analysis indicated that in 1:7.4 (13.5% [95% CI 8.2%-21.5%]) fetuses a chromosomal aberration was diagnosed. Of these aberrant cases, 47/68 (69%) involved trisomy 21, 18, and 13 and would potentially be detected by all NIPT approaches. The residual risk for missing a (sub)microscopic chromosome aberration depends on the NIPT approach and is highest if NIPT was performed only for common trisomies-1:21 (4.8% [95% CI 3.2%-7.3%]). However, it may be substantially lowered if a genome-wide 10-Mb resolution NIPT test was offered (~1:464). CONCLUSIONS: Based on these data, we suggest that the NT cut-off for invasive testing could be 3.0 mm (instead of 3.5 mm) because of the high risk of 1:7.4 for a chromosomal aberration. If women were offered NIPT first, there would be a significant diagnostic delay because all abnormal NIPT results need to be confirmed by diagnostic testing. If the woman had already received a normal NIPT result, the residual risk of 1:21 to 1:464 for chromosome aberrations other than common trisomies, dependent on the NIPT approach, should be raised. If a pregnant woman declines invasive testing, but still wants a test with a broader coverage of clinically significant conditions then the genome-wide >10-Mb resolution NIPT test, which detects most aberrations, could be proposed.
Asunto(s)
Aberraciones Cromosómicas , Análisis por Micromatrices , Pruebas Prenatales no Invasivas , Medida de Translucencia Nucal , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trisomía/diagnóstico , Trisomía/genéticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To develop a prediction model of postnatal renal function in fetuses with lower urinary tract obstruction (LUTO) based on fetal ultrasound parameters and amniotic fluid volume. METHODS: Retrospective nationwide cohort study of fetuses with postnatally confirmed LUTO and known eGFR. Fetuses treated with fetal interventions such as vesico-amniotic shunting or cystoscopy were excluded. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify prognostic ultrasound variables with respect to renal outcome following multiple imputation of missing data. On the basis of these fetal renal parameters and amniotic fluid volume, a model was developed to predict postnatal renal function in fetuses with LUTO. The main study outcome was an eGFR less than 60 mL/min * 1.73 m2 based on the creatinine nadir during the first year following diagnosis. Model performance was evaluated by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, calibration plots, and bootstrapping. RESULTS: Hundred one fetuses with a confirmed diagnosis of LUTO were included, eGFR less than 60 was observed in 40 (39.6%) of them. Variables predicting an eGFR less than 60 mL/min * 1.73m2 included the following sonographic parameters: hyperechogenicity of the renal cortex and abnormal amniotic fluid volume. The model showed fair discrimination, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.70 (95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.81, 0.66 after bootstrapping) and was overall well-calibrated. CONCLUSION: This study shows that a prediction model incorporating ultrasound parameters such as cortical appearance and abnormal amniotic fluid volume can fairly discriminate an eGFR above or below 60 mL/min * 1.73m2 . This clinical information can be used in identifying fetuses eligible for prenatal interventions and improve counseling of parents.
Asunto(s)
Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Riñón/fisiopatología , Modelos Estadísticos , Anomalías Urogenitales/fisiopatología , Líquido Amniótico , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Anomalías Urogenitales/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether complex gastroschisis (ie, intestinal atresia, perforation, necrosis, or volvulus) can prenatally be distinguished from simple gastroschisis by fetal stomach volume and stomach-bladder distance, using three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound. METHODS: This multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted in the Netherlands between 2010 and 2015. Of seven university medical centers, we included the four centers that performed longitudinal 3D ultrasound measurements at a regular basis. We calculated stomach volumes (n = 223) using Sonography-based Automated Volume Count. The shortest stomach-bladder distance (n = 241) was determined using multiplanar visualization of the volume datasets. We used linear mixed modelling to evaluate the effect of gestational age and type of gastroschisis (simple or complex) on fetal stomach volume and stomach-bladder distance. RESULTS: We included 79 affected fetuses. Sixty-six (84%) had been assessed with 3D ultrasound at least once; 64 of these 66 were liveborn, nine (14%) had complex gastroschisis. With advancing gestational age, stomach volume significantly increased, and stomach-bladder distance decreased (both P < .001). The developmental changes did not differ significantly between fetuses with simple and complex gastroschisis, neither for fetal stomach volume (P = .85), nor for stomach bladder distance (P = .78). CONCLUSION: Fetal stomach volume and stomach-bladder distance, measured during pregnancy using 3D ultrasonography, do not predict complex gastroschisis.
Asunto(s)
Gastrosquisis/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional , Estudios Longitudinales , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Estómago/diagnóstico por imagen , Estómago/embriología , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate effectiveness of a new ISUOG (International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology) Outreach Teaching and Training Program delivered in Muscat, Oman. METHODS: Quantitative assessments to evaluate knowledge and practical skills were administered before and after an ultrasound course for sonologists attending the ISUOG Outreach Course, which took place in November, 2017, in Oman. Trainees were selected from each region of the country following a national vetting process conducted by the Oman Ministry of Health. Twenty-eight of the participants were included in the analysis. Pre- and post-training practical and theoretical scores were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: Participants achieved statistically significant improvements, on average by 47% (p < 0.001), in both theoretical knowledge and practical skills. Specifically, the mean score in the theoretical knowledge test significantly increased from 55.6% (± 14.0%) to 81.6% (± 8.2%), while in the practical test, the mean score increased from 44.6% (± 19.5%) to 65.7% (± 23.0%) (p < 0.001). Performance was improved post-course among 27/28 participants (96.4%) in the theoretical test (range: 14 to 200%) and among 24/28 (85.7%) trainees in the practical skills test (range: 5 to 217%). CONCLUSION: Application of the ISUOG Basic Training Curriculum and Outreach Teaching and Training Course improved the theoretical knowledge and practical skills of local health personnel. Long-term re-evaluation is, however, considered imperative to ascertain and ensure knowledge retention.
Asunto(s)
Ginecología/educación , Obstetricia/educación , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Sociedades Médicas , Ultrasonografía , Adulto , Competencia Clínica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Omán , EmbarazoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Early-onset fetal growth restriction represents a particular dilemma in clinical management balancing the risk of iatrogenic prematurity with waiting for the fetus to gain more maturity, while being exposed to the risk of intrauterine death or the sequelae of acidosis. OBJECTIVE: The Trial of Umbilical and Fetal Flow in Europe was a European, multicenter, randomized trial aimed to determine according to which criteria delivery should be triggered in early fetal growth restriction. We present the key findings of the primary and secondary analyses. STUDY DESIGN: Women with fetal abdominal circumference <10th percentile and umbilical pulsatility index >95th percentile between 26-32 weeks were randomized to 1 of 3 monitoring and delivery protocols. These were: fetal heart rate variability based on computerized cardiotocography; and early or late ductus venosus Doppler changes. A safety net based on fetal heart rate abnormalities or umbilical Doppler changes mandated delivery irrespective of randomized group. The primary outcome was normal neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years. RESULTS: Among 511 women randomized, 362/503 (72%) had associated hypertensive conditions. In all, 463/503 (92%) of fetuses survived and cerebral palsy occurred in 6/443 (1%) with known outcome. Among all women there was no difference in outcome based on randomized group; however, of survivors, significantly more fetuses randomized to the late ductus venosus group had a normal outcome (133/144; 95%) than those randomized to computerized cardiotocography alone (111/131; 85%). In 118/310 (38%) of babies delivered <32 weeks, the indication was safety-net criteria: 55/106 (52%) in late ductus venosus, 37/99 (37%) in early ductus venosus, and 26/105 (25%) in computerized cardiotocography groups. Higher middle cerebral artery impedance adjusted for gestation was associated with neonatal survival without severe morbidity (odds ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.52) and infant survival without neurodevelopmental impairment at 2 years (odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.72) although birthweight and gestational age were more important determinants. CONCLUSION: Perinatal and 2-year outcome was better than expected in all randomized groups. Among survivors, 2-year neurodevelopmental outcome was best in those randomized to delivery based on late ductus venosus changes. Given a high rate of delivery based on the safety-net criteria, deciding delivery based on late ductus venosus changes and abnormal computerized fetal heart rate variability seems prudent. There is no rationale for delivery based on cerebral Doppler changes alone. Of note, most women with early-onset fetal growth restriction develop hypertension.
Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/terapia , Frecuencia Cardíaca Fetal , Arteria Cerebral Media/diagnóstico por imagen , Venas Umbilicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Acidosis , Peso al Nacer , Cardiotocografía , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Muerte Fetal , Humanos , Flujometría por Láser-Doppler , Embarazo , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , Tercer Trimestre del Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro , Flujo Pulsátil , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Ultrasonografía Doppler , Ultrasonografía PrenatalRESUMEN
BackgroundLittle is known on amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) during the first few days after birth in neonates with congenital heart disease (CHD). Our aim was, therefore, to assess electrocortical activity using aEEG within the first 72 h after birth in neonates diagnosed prenatally with CHD, and to define independent prenatal and postnatal predictors for abnormal aEEG.MethodsNeonates with CHD who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively included. We assessed aEEG background patterns, sleep-wake cycling, and epileptic activity during the first 72 h after birth and defined prenatal and postnatal clinical parameters associated with aEEG patterns.ResultsSeventy-two neonates were included. Twenty-six (36%) had mildly abnormal and six (8%) had severely abnormal aEEG background patterns at some point during the study period. Sleep-wake cycling was present in 97% of the neonates. Subclinical seizures were common (15%), whereas none of the neonates had clinical seizures. Only treatment with sedatives was a significant predictor for abnormal aEEG background patterns, explaining 56% of the variance.ConclusionAbnormal aEEG background patterns are common and are strongly associated with treatment with sedatives in neonates with prenatally diagnosed CHD. Future studies should assess the association between early postnatal aEEG abnormalities and neurodevelopmental outcome.
Asunto(s)
Electroencefalografía/métodos , Epilepsia/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiopatías Congénitas/diagnóstico , Epilepsia/patología , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Masculino , Arteria Cerebral Media/diagnóstico por imagen , Placenta/diagnóstico por imagen , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Convulsiones/patología , Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por Computador , Factores de Tiempo , Ultrasonografía Doppler , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Arterias Umbilicales/diagnóstico por imagenAsunto(s)
Diagnóstico Prenatal , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Edad MaternaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: There is evidence that in fetuses with congenital heart defects (CHDs), head growth is affected. However, scanty data are available on longitudinal growth patterns of other biometric parameters such as abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL). The aim was to evaluate growth patterns in fetuses with isolated CHD diagnosed prenatally in different categories of lesions. METHODS: Fetuses with isolated CHD seen between 2008 and 2013 at the Fetal Medicine Unit of 2 tertiary referral centers were retrospectively included in the study. CHD was classified into 7 categories. Fetal biometry parameters were assessed at 4 variable time points between 18 and 35 weeks' gestation and transformed into Z scores. Linear mixed modeling was performed to analyze repeated measurements and construction of growth models. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-six live births with CHD were analyzed. Linear growth modeling showed a slight decrease in head circumference (HC) in the second half of pregnancy, whereas AC and FL growth were not significantly affected. The model predicted a significantly smaller HC at 36 weeks' gestation in fetuses with conotruncal heart defects. CONCLUSIONS: Fetuses with CHD showed a modest but significant linear decrease in HC growth, whereas AC and FL growth trajectories remained stable.