Autologous bilayered self-assembled skin substitutes (SASSs) as permanent grafts: a case series of 14 severely burned patients indicating clinical effectiveness.

Split-thickness skin autografts (AGs) are the standard surgical treatment for severe burn injuries. However, the treatment of patients with substantial skin loss is limited by the availability of donor sites for skin harvesting. As an alternative to skin autografts, our research group developed autologous self-assembled skin substitutes (SASSs), allowing the replacement of both dermis and epidermis in a single surgical procedure. The aim of the study was to assess the clinical outcome of the SASSs as a permanent coverage for full-thickness burn wounds. Patients were recruited through the Health Canada's Special Access Program. SASSs were grafted on debrided full-thickness wounds according to similar protocols used for AGs. The graft-take and the persistence of the SASS epithelium over time were evaluated. 14 patients received surgical care with SASSs. The mean percentage of the SASS graft-take was 98 % (standard deviation = 5) at 5 to 7 d after surgery. SASS integrity persisted over time (average follow-up time: 3.2 years), without noticeable deficiency in epidermal regeneration. Assessment of scar quality (skin elasticity, erythema, thickness) was performed on a subset of patients. Non-homogeneous pigmentation was noticed in several patients. These results indicated that the SASS allowed the successful coverage of full-thickness burns given its high graft-take, aesthetic outcome equivalent to autografting and the promotion of long-term tissue regeneration. When skin donor sites are in short supply, SASSs could be a valuable alternative to treat patients with full-thickness burns covering more than 50 % of their total body surface area.

A retrospective comparison study of the infra-mammary approach to the standard mastectomy scar in the 2nd stage of tissue expander to implant breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Staged expander-to-implant breast reconstruction is plagued by a high prevalence of complications. We have employed an alternative approach of using the infra-mammary crease (IMF) for expander-to-implant exchange. The IMF approach was thought to utilize healthier tissues, which are believed to be less affected by the process of tissue expansion, and reside distant from the field of the radiotherapy boost. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients undergoing a staged implant-based breast reconstruction from 2009 to 2014. Patients were divided into those that received an IMF vs. a mastectomy scar (MS) approach in the second stage of expander-to-implant exchange. Patient characteristics and postoperative complications were extracted. RESULTS: A total of 75 patients undergoing 96-staged reconstructions were included (70 cases MS vs. 26 cases IMF). Patient demographics and implant characteristics were similar between groups. There were no significant differences in overall complications between the groups (11.4% MS vs. 7.7% IMF, P=0.72). All cases of implant exposure occurred in the MS group and had a history of radiation. However, there was no statistical difference in implant exposure between groups (4.3% MS vs. 0% IMF, P=0.56) or in the irradiated patients subgroup (20% MS vs. 0% IMF, P=0.25). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the IMF approach for the second stage of expander-to-implant exchange is an alternative technique with a similar prevalence of complications as the traditional mastectomy scar approach. This technique may prove useful in reducing postoperative incisional dehiscence and implant exposure, especially in the context of radiotherapy.

[A surgical follow-up platform to reduce complications in free flap surgery]. / Une plateforme de suivi chirurgical pour réduire les complications en reconstruction par lambeau libre.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: In 2007, the WHO adopted surgical safety as the theme for the 2nd global patient safety challenge. Measurement of surgical services was identified as a surgical care area in need of major improvements. Aware of this recommendation, a preliminary study was conducted in our hospital and showed that the incidence of complete necrosis in free flap surgery was 10.0 %, a rate among the highest found in medical literature. In that context, an interactive surgical follow-up platform (PICS) was implemented to monitor outcomes in free flap surgery. The hypothesis was to reduce the short-term failure of microsurgical reconstructions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In Summer 2010, the tool for capturing and analyzing data (PICS) was implemented. All patients who underwent free flap reconstruction were prospectively registered in the platform. The primary endpoints to evaluate the effectiveness of the tool are the rates of surgical re-exploration and complete necrosis of the flap. RESULTS: From May 2010 to December 2011, 129 cases of free flap reconstruction were recorded. The rate of total flap necrosis was 10.0 % before database introduction and declined to 3.1 % afterwards (P<0.05). Take-backs occurred in 27.0 % of free flap reconstructions at baseline and in 10.1 % after implementation (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The implementation of PICS is associated with a significant improvement of postoperative short-term outcomes in free flap surgery. This tool is effective to evaluate care services and provides an increased surgical safety for patients. Surgical teams are encouraged to implement a data collection tool in order evaluate operative care on a routine basis.