Pharmacokinetics of isavuconazonium sulfate and its active metabolite isavuconazole in healthy dogs.

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are growing in importance in veterinary and human medicine. IFIs such as aspergillosis, blastomycosis, coccidioidomycosis and histoplasmosis remain challenging to treat in dogs. Isavuconazole is a novel antifungal medication that, when compared to currently used azoles, has an expanded spectrum of antifungal activity Rudramurthy (2011), Pfaller (2013), Spec (2018), has more predictable pharmacokinetics in humans Desai (2016), Cojutti (2021) and may cause fewer side effects such as liver and renal toxicity Maertens (2016), DiPippo (2018). The pharmacokinetic profile and safety of isavuconazole in dogs has not yet been characterized. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of isavuconazole in healthy dogs that received a single dose of the prodrug isavuconazonium sulfate. Using full crossover design, six healthy beagle dogs received isavuconazonium sulfate at a mean (+/- SD) dose of 20.6 (+/- 2.8) mg/kg orally and 21.8 (+/- 4.2) mg/kg intravenously. Plasma was collected for batched pharmacokinetic analysis of prodrug and metabolite, isavuconazole, by ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). The median (Q1-Q3) maximum isavuconazole peak plasma concentration was estimated at 3,876.5 (2,811.0-4,800.0) ng/mL following oral administration, with a median (Q1-Q3) peak level at 1.3 (1.0-2.0) hours. Following intravenous administration, the median (Q1-Q3) isavuconazole peak plasma concentration was estimated at 3,221.5 (2,241.5-3,609.0) ng/mL, with a median (Q1-Q3) peak level at 0.4 (0.3-0.6) hours. The median (Q1-Q3) half-life of isavuconazole was 9.4 (7.0-12.2) hours and 14.0 (8.1-21.7) hours for oral and intravenous routes, respectively. One dog received inadvertent subcutaneous drug administration without any apparent adverse effects. Another dog experienced an anaphylactic reaction following accidental rapid drug infusion. No other drug-related adverse events were observed. At dosages used in this study, healthy dogs achieved isavuconazole plasma levels comparable to human therapeutic targets, and when properly administered the drug was well-tolerated.

Systemic absorption and gastrointestinal adverse effects from topical ketorolac and diclofenac ophthalmic solutions in healthy dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate systemic absorption and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects of topical ketorolac 0.5% and diclofenac 0.1% ophthalmic solutions. ANIMALS: 11 healthy purpose-bred Beagles. METHODS: Dogs were randomly assigned to receive either ketorolac (n = 6) or diclofenac (5), 1 drop in both eyes 4 times daily for 28 days. Upper GI endoscopy was performed on days 0 and 29 with mucosal lesion scores (0 to 7) assigned to each region evaluated. Plasma samples were collected on days 14, 21, and 28 for measurement of diclofenac and ketorolac using high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: GI erosions and/or ulcers developed in all ketorolac-treated dogs and 1 of 5 diclofenac-treated dogs. Post-treatment mucosal lesion score for the antrum was higher in the ketorolac group than in the diclofenac group (P = .006) but not significantly different for any other region. Post-treatment antral mucosal lesion scores were significantly related to plasma ketorolac concentrations (P < .001). Ketorolac and diclofenac were detected in the plasma at all time points (median ketorolac day 14, 191 ng/mL; day 21, 173.5 ng/mL; and day 28, 179.5 ng/mL; and median diclofenac day 14, 21.1 ng/mL; day 21, 20.6 ng/mL; day 28, 27.5 ng/mL). Vomiting and decreased appetite events were observed uncommonly and were not significantly different between treatment groups. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: GI ulceration and erosion developed after ophthalmic administration of ketorolac and diclofenac, with higher plasma concentrations and more severe GI lesions associated with ketorolac. Clients should be alerted to this potential risk with ophthalmic use and informed to watch for systemic clinical signs that would warrant veterinary reevaluation.