[Diagnosis of a rare and severe inflammatory bowel disease in an infant with peri-orificial ulcerations]. / Diagnostic d'une maladie inflammatoire rare et sévère de l'intestin chez un nourrisson présentant des ulcérations péri-orificielles.

We report the case of an infant aged 8 and a half months, who had an apparent life-threatening event and died despite optimal resuscitation management. The medical history was marked by mild symptoms, mainly feeding difficulties and progressively settling skin lesions. Parents were related (first cousins) and the patient had two healthy older sisters. Autopsy showed growth delay, symmetrical erythematous and ulcerated periorificial lesions associated with punctiform erythematous lesions of the face and alopecia. Microscopic examination revealed deep bronchial inhalation with the onset of infectious pneumopathy, major inflammatory ulceration of the gastrointestinal tract, hepatic steatosis, brain stem and pancreas abnormalities. We conclude that the cause of death was a multi-visceral failure with inhalation pneumopathy, in a context of very early onset inflammatory bowel disease (VEO-IBD). Genetic consultation, into a rare disease reference center, allowed to orient the analysis, to identify a homozygous pathogenic variant in the IL10RA gene, confirming the diagnostic of an autosomal recessive very early onset inflammatory bowel disease (inflammatory bowel disease 28, early-onset, autosomal recessive, #613148).

Tangential cranial ballistic impact: An illustration of the limitations of post-mortem CT scan?

Post-mortem imaging has become more frequently used in forensic procedures, notably in a ballistic context. Despite many advances in this field, the interpretation of computed tomography (CT) can be a very complex matter. Our case illustrates the difficulties of interpretation after quasi-tangential cranial ballistic impact and keyhole wounds. These wounds are difficult to visualize on CT and are among the factors complicating the precise determination of ballistics. These sources of error remind us that CT findings must be interpreted in close comparison with autopsy findings.