Evaluation of Induction Immunosuppression and Risk of Incisional Hernia After Liver Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Liver transplantation (LT) is a technically complex operation and usually performed on ill patients. A major postoperative morbidity is incisional hernia, occurring in 9.5%-32.4% of cases. There are mixed results in transplant studies regarding potential risk factors. Additionally, the literature is lacking in the relationship between specific immunosuppressive induction agents administered during LT and postoperative incisional hernia. METHODS: A single center, retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent primary LT between 4/2011-1/2018 was conducted. Clinical variables including demographics and comorbidities were reviewed. The primary end point was the development of an incisional hernia following LT. Sub analysis was performed for secondary end points to determine potential risk factors, including immunosuppressive induction agent. RESULTS: Overall, 418 patients met inclusion criteria. At 5 y post-LT, there were 66/271 (24.4%) and 53/147 (36.1%) patients diagnosed with an incisional hernia in the methylprednisolone and basiliximab groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, there was no difference in incisional hernia development between induction agents, P = 0.19. For patients with body mass index ≥30 and postoperative seroma of the abdominal wall, the hazard ratios were 2.67 (95% CI = 1.7, 4.3) and 2.03 (95% CI = 1.1, 3.9), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Incisional hernia rate after LT was 28.5% at 5 y. Our analysis found that immunosuppressive induction agent at LT was not associated with the development of postoperative incisional hernia. However, preoperative obesity (body mass index ≥30) and postoperative seroma of the abdominal wall were potential risk factors. Further studies are needed to delineate if these risk factors remain across institutions and in alternative settings.

Comparison of Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Limb Salvage Reconstructive Surgery Based on Estimated Prevalence of Preexisting Peripheral Arterial Disease.

BACKGROUND: Limb salvage after lower extremity (LE) trauma requires optimal blood flow for successful microsurgical reconstruction. Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) decreases LE perfusion, affecting wound healing. Patients who present with LE trauma may have undiagnosed PAD, particularly those with atherosclerotic risk factors. This study assesses outcomes after LE salvage in patients at risk for PAD. METHODS: This retrospective review evaluated patients who underwent LE reconstruction at a level 1 trauma center between 2007 and 2022. Patients with a nontraumatic mechanism of injury, missing postoperative records, and unspecified race were excluded. Demographics, flap characteristics, and postoperative complications were abstracted. The prevalence of LE PAD was calculated using a validated risk assessment tool. RESULTS: At our institution, 285 LE flaps performed on 254 patients were included in the study. Patients were categorized by prevalence of PAD, including 12 (4.7%) with high risk, 45 (17.7%) with intermediate risk, and 197 (77.6%) patients with low risk. The high-risk cohort had higher rates of partial flap necrosis ( P = 0.037), flap loss ( P = 0.006), and amputation ( P < 0.001) compared with the low-risk group. Fewer high-risk patients achieved full ambulation compared with the low-risk ( P = 0.005) cohort. Overall flap survival and limb salvage rates were 94.5% and 96.5%, respectively. Among the intermediate- and high-risk cohorts, only 50.9% of patients received a preoperative vascular assessment, and 3.8% received a vascular surgery consultation. CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral arterial disease represents a reconstructive challenge to microvascular surgeons. Patients with high-risk for PAD had higher rates of partial flap necrosis, flap loss, and amputation. In the setting of trauma, emphasis should be placed on preoperative vascular assessment for patients at risk of having undiagnosed PAD. Prospective studies collecting ankle-brachial index assessments and/or angiography will help validate this study's findings.

Flap-Based Lower Extremity Reconstruction in the Elderly-Is It Safe and Does Age Impact Ambulation?

INTRODUCTION: Lower extremity (LE) reconstruction in the elderly population presents a multifaceted challenge, primarily due to age-related degenerative changes, comorbidities, and functional decline. Elderly individuals often encounter conditions such as osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, and cardiovascular and peripheral artery disease (PAD), which can severely compromise the structural integrity and function of the lower limbs. As such, we aim to assess postoperative complications and functional recovery following LE reconstruction in elderly patients. METHODS: Patients ≥ 18 years who underwent post-traumatic LE reconstruction with flap reconstruction at a Level 1 trauma center between 2007 and 2022 were included. Patient demographics, flap/wound characteristics, complications, and ambulation for the elderly (≥ 60 years old) and the control (< 60 years old) cohorts were recorded. The primary outcome was final ambulation status, modeled with logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications. RESULTS: The mean ages of the control (n = 374) and elderly (n = 49) groups were 37.4 ± 12.6 and 65.8 ± 5.1 years, respectively. Elderly patients more frequently required amputation after flap surgery (p = 0.002). There was no significant difference between the two cohorts in preoperative ambulation status (p = 0.053). Postoperatively, 22.4% of elderly patients were independently ambulatory at final follow-up, compared to 49.5% of patients < 60. Of the elderly, 14.3% could ambulate with an assistance device (cane, walker, etc.), compared to 26.5% in the control group. A wheelchair was required for 46.9% of elderly patients, significantly higher than the 22.7% of those < 60 years of age (p < 0.001). Multivariate regression confirmed an association between older age and nonambulatory final status (p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: LE reconstruction can likely be performed safely in patients 60 years of age or older. However, older age is independently associated with significantly worse postoperative ambulation. Preoperative assessment, including gait and muscle strength, and early initiation of postoperative rehabilitation can potentially improve ambulation in elderly individuals undergoing LE reconstruction.

The cross-leg free flap: A systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Free tissue transfer is a mainstay treatment for lower extremity soft tissue injuries. When the traditional cross-leg flap cannot provide enough coverage, a cross-leg free flap (CLFF) is a limb-saving alternative. The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review of the literature published on the CLFF. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of articles describing the CLFF, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Inclusion criteria included articles with primary data on the CLFF. Exclusion criteria included those describing pedicled cross-leg flaps or lacking complete data. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 29.0. RESULTS: Our review included 28 articles encompassing 130 patients who underwent free tissue transfer. Most were male (63.8%) with a mean age of 32.4 years. Latissimus dorsi was the most common flap type (30.0%), followed by vertical rectus myocutaneous (20.0%). Average flap size was 301.8 cm2 , with trauma in the lower third of the leg being the most common indication (73.1%). The contralateral posterior tibialis was the most common recipient artery (84.1%) followed by the anterior tibialis (9.5%). Complications included amputation (1.4%), partial graft loss, thrombosis, hematoma, prolonged pain, nonunion, and seroma; a forest plot was used to illustrate the low overall adverse events rate. Although bivariate analysis identified age, flap size, type, location, and donor site as variables significantly impacting the incidence of complications (p < .05), this was not sustained in a multivariate logistic regression model. CONCLUSION: The CLFF remains an excellent option for limb salvage when a suitable recipient vessel is unavailable. Our review demonstrates 1.4% flap failure and an acceptable complication rate. While most cases in our review describe muscle flaps, we report a complex case of limb salvage using an unusually large anterolateral thigh flap.

The Impact of Increased Body Mass Index on Patient Outcomes and Complications in Microsurgical Lower Extremity Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Elevated body mass index (BMI) is a known perioperative risk factor for complications such as delayed wound healing and infection. However, there is a gap in understanding how elevated BMI impacts outcomes after posttraumatic lower extremity (LE) microvascular reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed at a level 1 trauma center between 2007 and 2022 of patients who underwent posttraumatic microvascular LE reconstruction. Demographics, flap/wound details, complications, and outcomes were recorded. Patients were stratified into BMI Center for Disease Control categories. RESULTS: A total of 398 patients were included with an average BMI of 28.2 ± 5.8. Nearly half (45%) of LE defects were located in the distal third of the leg, 27.5% in the middle third, and 34.4% in the proximal third. Most reconstructions utilized muscle-containing flaps (74.4%) compared with fasciocutaneous flaps (16.8%). Surgical approaches included free flaps (47.6%) and local flaps (52.5%). Class III obese patients were significantly more likely to be nonambulatory than nonobese patients (OR: 4.10, 95% CI 1.10-15.2, p = 0.035). At final follow-up, 30.1% of patients with Class III obesity were ambulatory, requiring either wheelchairs (42.3%) or assistance devices (26.9%). There were no significant differences in complication rates based on obesity status (0.704). The average follow-up time for the entire cohort was 5.8 years. CONCLUSIONS: BMI is critical for patient care and surgical decision-making in LE reconstruction. Further research is warranted to optimize outcomes for higher BMI patients, thereby potentially reducing the burden of postoperative complications and enhancing overall patient recovery.

A comparison of postoperative outcomes based on recipient vessels in scalp free flap reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The superficial temporal artery (STA) and facial artery (FA) are two commonly used recipient vessels when performing free tissue transfer to the head and neck. This meta-analysis compares the impact of recipient vessel location on free flap outcomes in scalp reconstruction. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA-P guidelines using six databases. Studies reporting free tissue transfer using the STA or FA as a recipient vessel for reconstructing scalp defects were included. Outcomes of interest included flap loss, partial flap necrosis, wound dehiscence, venous thrombosis, and infection rates. Quality evaluation was performed using ASPS criteria and the ROBINS-I tool. RESULTS: Of 3270 identified articles, 12 were included for final analysis. In total, 125 free flaps were identified (75 STA, 50 FA). Pooled analysis demonstrated an overall flap survival rate of 98.4% (STA 98.7% vs. FA 98.0%; p = .782). The mean defect size was significantly greater for flaps using the STA compared with the FA (223.7 ± 119.4 cm2 vs. 157.1 ± 96.5 cm2, p = .001). The FA group had a higher incidence of wound dehiscence than the STA group (14.0% vs. 1.3%, p = .005). However, meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in rates of wound dehiscence, flap loss, partial flap necrosis, venous congestion, or postoperative infection between groups. CONCLUSION: This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to assess recipient vessel selection in scalp reconstruction. Our results do not support a single vessel as the superior choice in scalp reconstruction. Rather, these findings suggest that the decision between using the STA or FA is multifaceted, requiring a flexible approach that considers the individual characteristics of each case. Further research is needed to explore additional factors influencing recipient vessel selection, including defect location, radiation therapy, and prior head and neck surgery.

A Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Based on Muscle versus Fasciocutaneous Flaps in Scalp Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Scalp reconstruction in plastic and reconstructive surgery often necessitates the transfer of soft tissue flaps to restore form and function. The critical decision lies in choosing between muscle-containing (MC) and fasciocutaneous (FC) flaps for scalp reconstruction, and while both variants have their merits, flap composition remains a subject of ongoing debate. This scientific discussion aims to explore this contentious issue through a comprehensive meta-analysis, shedding light on the rationale behind the choice of these flaps and the potential impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic review was conducted following PRISMA-P guidelines, encompassing six prominent databases up to the year 2023. Data were collected from studies assessing outcomes of MC and FC flaps for scalp reconstruction. Quality evaluation was performed using ASPS criteria and the ROBINS-I tool. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and assessment of bias using STATA software. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 28 non-randomized studies, totaling 594 flaps (380 MC, 214 FC). MC flaps were significantly larger than FC flaps. There were no significant differences in flap loss, flap necrosis, or wound dehiscence between the two flap types. However, the incidence of venous congestion was significantly higher in FC flaps. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of results, and publication bias assessment showed no significant evidence of bias. CONCLUSIONS: While both MC and FC flaps offer viable options for scalp reconstruction, the choice should be tailored to individual patient characteristics and defect size. FC flaps may provide advantages such as shorter operative times and reduced morbidity, whereas MC flaps could be preferred for addressing larger defects. Future research should focus on prospective studies and strategies to mitigate venous congestion in FC flaps, enhancing their safety and efficacy in scalp reconstruction.

Flap-Based Reconstruction in Patients with Autoimmune Disease: An Institutional Experience with the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune diseases are associated with characteristic chronic inflammation, aberrations in tissue perfusion, and hypercoagulability, and thus have considerable implications for local and free-flap reconstruction. We seek to summarize the current evidence on outcomes of flap-based reconstruction in patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease and present our experience with autologous breast reconstruction in this population. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles, and pertinent data were presented qualitatively. Institutional data were queried for patients who underwent autologous breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps between 2015 and 2024. A retrospective review was conducted to identify DIEP patients with a history of autoimmune disease. Data on patient demographics, medication history, flap outcomes, and perioperative complications were collected. RESULTS: The majority of existing studies found no increased independent risk of flap complications. However, other complications, predominantly wound dehiscence, were independently associated with autoimmune disease. Regarding immunosuppressant therapy, the literature demonstrated that perioperative glucocorticoid use was consistently associated with all complications, including seroma, infection, wound disruption, and partial flap loss.Our 13-patient institutional experience identified no cases of total flap loss or microvascular thrombotic complications. There was one case of partial flap necrosis further complicated by abdominal site cellulitis, and one case of recipient-site dehiscence managed with local wound care. No patients required re-operation for flap or donor-site complications. CONCLUSION: The literature suggests that flap reconstruction can be performed safely in patients with autoimmune conditions, which was also supported by our institutional experience. While there is likely minimal risk of microsurgical complications in the context of free tissue transfer, donor-site morbidity and wound dehiscence remain major concerns for patients with a history of autoimmune disease. Limiting the use of immunosuppressive agents, especially corticosteroids, may potentially improve outcomes of flap reconstruction.

The Impact of Intraoperative Vasopressor Use and Fluid Status on Flap Survival in Traumatic Lower Extremity Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Historically, the use of intraoperative vasopressors during free flap lower extremity (LE) reconstruction has been proposed to adversely affect flap survival due to concerns about compromising flap perfusion. This study aims to analyze the impact of intraoperative vasopressor use and fluid administration on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing traumatic LE reconstruction. METHODS: Patients who underwent LE free flap reconstruction between 2015 and 2023 at a Level I Trauma Center were retrospectively reviewed. Statistical analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between vasopressor use and intraoperative fluids with partial/complete flap necrosis, as well as the differential effect of vasopressor use on flap outcomes based on varying fluid levels. RESULTS: A total of 105 LE flaps were performed over 8 years. Vasopressors were administered intraoperatively to 19 (18.0%) cases. Overall flap survival and limb salvage rates were 97.1 and 93.3%, respectively. Intraoperative vasopressor use decreased the overall risk of postoperative flap necrosis (OR 0.00005, 95% CI [9.11 × 10-9-0.285], p = 0.025), while a lower net fluid balance increased the risk of this outcome (OR 0.9985, 95% CI [0.9975-0.9996], p = 0.007). Further interaction analysis revealed that vasopressor use increased the risk of flap necrosis in settings with a higher net fluid balance (OR 1.0032, 95% CI [1.0008-1.0056], p-interaction =0.010). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that intraoperative vasopressor use and adequate fluid status may be beneficial in improving flap outcomes in LE reconstruction. Vasopressor use with adequate fluid management can optimize hemodynamic stability when necessary during traumatic LE microvascular reconstruction without concern for increased risk of flap ischemia.

Does Side Matter? The Impact of Free Flap Harvest Laterality on Ambulatory Function in Lower Extremity Traumatic Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Free flaps are essential for limb salvage in patients with lower extremity (LE) trauma; however, significant donor-site morbidity could impact functional outcomes. This study compares postoperative ambulatory function between contralateral and ipsilateral free flap harvest in LE traumatic reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent LE reconstruction at a level 1 trauma center from 2009 to 2022. Flap characteristics, injury history, and ambulatory function were collected. Flap harvest laterality was determined in relation to the injured leg. The flaps were categorized as either fasciocutaneous or those that included a muscle component (muscle/myocutaneous). Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Upon review, 173 LE free flaps were performed, of which 70 (65.4%) were harvested from the ipsilateral leg and 37 (34.6%) were from the contralateral leg. Among all LE free flaps, the limb salvage rate was 97.2%, and the flap survival rate was 94.4%. Full ambulation was achieved in 37 (52.9%) patients in the ipsilateral cohort and 18 (48.6%) in the contralateral cohort (p = 0.679). The average time to full ambulation did not vary between these cohorts (p = 0.071). However, upon subanalysis of the 61 muscle/myocutaneous flaps, the ipsilateral cohort had prolonged time to full ambulation (6.4 months, interquartile range [IQR]: 4.8-13.5) compared with the contralateral one (2.3 months, IQR: 2.3 [1.0-3.9]) p = 0.007. There was no significant difference in time to full ambulation between flap harvest laterality cohorts among the fasciocutaneous flaps (p = 0.733). CONCLUSION: Among free flaps harvested from the ipsilateral leg, fasciocutaneous flaps were associated with faster recovery to full ambulation relative to muscle/myocutaneous flaps. Since harvesting muscle or myocutaneous flaps from the ipsilateral leg may be associated with a slower recovery of ambulation, surgeons may consider harvesting from a donor site on the contralateral leg if reconstruction requires a muscle component.

Integration of Universal Germline Genetic Testing for All New Breast Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: The American Society of Breast Surgeons recommends genetic testing (GT) for all women with breast cancer (BC), but implementation and uptake of GT has not been well-described. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for newly diagnosed BC patients or patients with a newly identified recurrence of BC seen in a multidisciplinary clinic (MDBC) who were offered genetic counseling (GC) and GT. RESULTS: The 138 women attending the MDBC had a median age of 54 years and comprised non-Hispanic whites (46%), Asians (28%), Hispanics (17%), blacks (4%), and other (5%). Of the 105 (76%) patients without prior GT, 100 (95%) accepted GC, with 93 (93%) of these 100 patients undergoing GT. The patients meeting the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for GT were more likely to undergo GT. Testing was performed with a 67- to 84-gene panel, together with an 8- to 9-gene STAT panel if needed. Among 120 patients with reports available, including 33 patients previously tested, 15 (12%) were positive (1 BLM, 1 BRCA1, 3 BRCA2, 1 BRIP1, 1 CFTR, 1 CHEK2, 1 MUTYH, 1 PALB2, 1 PRSS1, 1 RAD50, 1 RET, and 2 TP53), 44 (37%) were negative, and 61 (51%) had an uncertain variant. The median time to STAT results (n = 50) was 8 days. The STAT results were available before surgery for 47 (98%) of the 48 STAT patients undergoing surgery. CONCLUSIONS: New BC patients attending the MDBC demonstrated high rates of acceptance of GC and GT. The combination of GC and GT can offer timely information critical to patient risk assessment and treatment planning.

Outcomes of Local Versus Free Flaps for Reconstruction of the Proximal One-Third of the Leg.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of the proximal one-third of the leg often requires soft tissue transfer to facilitate limb salvage. Tissue transfers are usually local or free flaps depending on wound dimensions, location, and surgeon preference. Historically, the proximal third of the leg was covered with pedicle flaps, but recently, we have used more free flaps in this position. Using data from a level 1 trauma center, we sought to evaluate outcomes of surgical management of proximal-third leg reconstruction across local and free flaps. METHODS: This is an institutional review board-approved, retrospective chart review undertaken at LAC + USC Medical Center from 2007 to 2021. Patient history, demographics, flap characteristics, Gustilo-Anderson fracture classification, and outcomes were collected and analyzed in an internal database. Outcomes of interest included flap failure rates, postoperative complications, and long-term ambulatory status. RESULTS: Among 394 lower extremity flaps placed, 122 flaps involved the proximal-third leg across 102 patients. Average age of patients was 42.8 ± 15.2 years; of note, the free flap cohort was significantly younger than the local flap cohort (P = 0.019). Ten local flaps suffered from infectious complications: osteomyelitis (n = 6) and hardware infection (n = 4), versus only 1 free flap that suffered from hardware infection; notably, these differences were not significant across cohorts. Free flaps had significantly more flap revisions (13.3%; P = 0.039) and overall flap complications (20.0%; P = 0.031) compared with local flaps; however, partial flap necrosis (4.9%) and flap loss (3.3%) were not significantly different across cohorts. Overall flap survival was 96.7%, and full ambulation was achieved in 42.2% of patients without significant differences across cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Our evaluation of proximal-third leg wounds demonstrates fewer infectious outcomes with free flaps compared with local flaps. There are multiple confounding variables; however, this finding may speak to the reliability of a robust free flap. Overall, there was no significant difference in patient comorbidities across flap cohorts with great overall flap survival. Ultimately, flap selection did not affect rates of flap necrosis, flap loss, or final ambulatory status.

Comparative Evaluation of the Electronic Residency Application Service Versus the Plastic Surgery Common Application to a Single Institution in the 2022 Integrated Plastic Surgery Match.

BACKGROUND: The Plastic Surgery Common Application (PSCA) has emerged as a low-cost alternative application portal to the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) for integrated plastic surgery applicants. During the 2021 to 2022 application cycle, our plastic surgery residency program accepted both the PSCA and ERAS applications to help recruit candidates otherwise deterred by prohibitively high application costs. We sought to determine how the PSCA compared with the ERAS application in a standardized review of applications scores. METHODS: The PSCA and ERAS applications from 28 candidates who received interviews from the Keck School of Medicine were analyzed. These 56 applications were randomly assigned across 22 independent reviewers. Each reviewer scored applications on a scale of 1 to 5 with regard to communication skills, leadership, intellectual curiosity, compatibility with the program, service, and perseverance. Mean scores between the applications were compared using 2-tailed z tests, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The 56 residency applications had a combined mean score of 4.21 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.13-4.29). The mean score of PSCA applications (4.19; 95% CI, 4.08-4.31) did not significantly differ from the mean score of ERAS applications (4.24; 95% CI, 4.12-4.35; P = 0.57). The PSCA and ERAS applications did not have a significant difference in the mean scores for any review category. CONCLUSION: There was no difference between the overall scores and the scores of each review category between the PSCA and ERAS applications, suggesting that the PSCA may be a reasonable alternative to ERAS for medical students applying to plastic surgery residency.

Arterial Anastomosis Using Microsurgical Techniques in Adult Live Donor Liver Transplant: A Focus on Technique and Outcomes at a Single Institution.

BACKGROUND: Microvascular hepatic artery reconstruction (MHAR) is associated with decreased rates of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). There is a paucity of literature describing the learning points and initiation of this technique at the institutional level. The objective of this study is to report our institutional experience using MHAR in adult LDLT with a focus on technique and outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of adult patients who underwent LDLT from January 2012 to December 2020 was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups, those who underwent LDLT without MHAR and with MHAR. We analyzed cases for technical data including donor and recipient artery characteristics, anastomotic techniques, intraop events, and postop complications. A Mann-Whitney test was performed to compare outcomes between non-MHAR and MHAR patients. RESULTS: Fifty non-MHAR and 50 MHAR patients met inclusion criteria. Median age at transplantation was 58 (interquartile range [IQR] 11.8) and 57.5 years (IQR 14.5), respectively. Median follow-up for MHAR patients was 12.8 months (IQR 11.6). The most common recipient arteries were the right hepatic artery (HA) (58%) and left HA (20%). Median size of recipient and donor arteries were 3.3 mm (IQR 0.7) and 3.1 mm (IQR 0.7), resulting in a median mismatch size of 0.3 mm (IQR 0.4). Median microanastomosis time was 44 minutes (IQR 0). HAT, graft failure, and mortality rates were higher in the non-MHAR cohort (6% vs. 0%, 8% vs. 0%, and 16% vs. 6%, respectively); however, these did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: This study found lower rates of HAT and graft failure after implementing MHAR, though statistical significance was not achieved. Larger cohort studies are needed to further assess the potential benefit of MHAR in adult LDLT. From our experience, MHAR requires cooperation between the transplant and microsurgical teams, with technical challenges overcome with appropriate instrumentation and planning.

A Quantitative Evaluation of Functional Recovery after Traumatic Lower Extremity Salvage.

INTRODUCTION: Soft tissue reconstruction is a routine component of lower extremity trauma care and focus is increasingly being directed towards understanding functional outcomes. This study aims to quantify functional recovery and identify variables associated with functional outcomes of patients who undergo traumatic limb salvage. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients with lower extremity traumatic injuries requiring vascularized soft tissue reconstruction at a Level 1 trauma center between July 2007-December 2015. Postoperatively, patients were administered the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) questionnaires by telephone. Demographics, perioperative variables, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed by univariate and bivariate analysis. RESULTS: Forty-two patients with 42 flaps and a mean of 12.7 months follow up were included in the study. Limb salvage was successful in 38 patients (90.5%). Patients ≥ 40 years old had significantly worse SF-36v2 scores in physical functioning (P ≤0.01) and mental health (P ≤0.05) than their younger counterparts. Patients who had pre-existing hypertension demonstrated significantly lower physical functioning (P ≤0.01). Role limitation due to emotional health was significantly lower in patients who were female (P ≤0.01) or required revision surgery (P ≤0.01). The mean LEFS score was 37.7 ± 18.5. CONCLUSIONS: Patients exhibited poor functional outcomes following major limb trauma with attempted limb salvage based on two validated patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs). Patient characteristics should be considered in evaluating candidates for reconstruction to optimize outcomes and to effectively counsel patients on their functional prognosis.

Microscope-Assisted Arterial Anastomosis in Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has expanded the availability of liver transplant but has been associated with early technical complications including the devastating complication of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT), which has been reported to occur in 14% to 25% of LDLT using standard anastomotic techniques. Microvascular hepatic artery reconstruction (MHAR) has been implemented in an attempt to decrease rates of HAT. The purpose of this study was to review the available literature in LDLT, specifically related to MHAR to determine its impact on rates of posttransplant complications including HAT. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed/Medline and Web of Science. Case series and reviews describing reports of microscope-assisted hepatic artery anastomosis in adult patients were considered for meta-analysis of factors contributing to HAT. RESULTS: In all, 462 abstracts were screened, resulting in 20 studies that were included in the meta-analysis. This analysis included 2,457 patients from eight countries. The pooled rate of HAT was 2.20% with an overall effect size of 0.00906. CONCLUSION: Systematic literature review suggests that MHAR during LDLT reduces vascular complications and improves outcomes posttransplant. Microvascular surgeons and transplant surgeons should collaborate when technical challenges such as small vessel size, short donor pedicle, or dissection of the recipient vessel wall are present.

A Novel Abdominal Decompression Technique to Treat Compartment Syndrome After Burn Injury.

BACKGROUND: Prevalence of abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is estimated to be 4%-17% in severely burned patients. Although decompressive laparotomy can be lifesaving for ACS patients, severe complications are associated with this technique, especially in burn populations. This study outlines a new technique of releasing intraabdominal pressure without resorting to decompressive laparotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten fresh tissue cadavers were studied; none of whom had had prior abdominal surgery. Using Veress needles, abdomens were insufflated to 30 mm Hg and subsequently connected to arterial pressure transducers. Two techniques were then used to incise fascia. First, large skin flaps were raised from a midline incision (n = 5). Second, small 2 cm cutdowns at the proximal and distal extent of midaxillary, subcostal, and inguinal incisional sites were made, followed by tunneling a subfascial plane using an aortic clamp with fascial incisions made through the grooves of a tunneled vein stripper (n = 5). Pressures were recorded in the sequence of incisions mentioned previously. RESULTS: The open midline flap technique decreased abdominal pressure from a mean pressure of 30 ± 1.8 mm Hg to 6.9 ± 5.0 mm Hg (P < 0.01). The minimally invasive technique decreased intraabdominal pressure from 30 ± 0.9 to 5.8 ± 5.2 mm Hg (P < 0.01). This technique significantly reduced intraabdominal pressure via extraperitoneal component separation and fascial release at the midaxillary, subxiphoid, and inguinal regions. CONCLUSIONS: This technique offers the benefit of reducing the morbidity, mortality, and complications associated with an open abdomen, which may be beneficial in the burn injury population.

Early onset of deep sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery is associated with decreased survival: A propensity weighted analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes after the development of early (≤30 days) versus delayed (>30 days) deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) after cardiac surgery. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2016, 64 patients were treated surgically for DSWI following cardiac surgery. Thirty-three developed early DSWI, while 31 developed late DSWI. The mean follow-up was 34.1 ± 32.3 months. RESULTS: Survival for the entire cohort at 1, 3, and 5 years was 93.9%, 85.1%, and 80.8%, respectively. DSWI diagnosed early and attempted medical management was strongly associated with overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 25.0 and 9.9; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 1.18-52.8 and 1.28-76.5; p-value .04 and .04, respectively). Survival was 88.1%, 77.0%, 70.6% and 100%, 94.0% and 94.0% at 1, 3, and 5 years in the early and late DSWI groups, respectively (log-rank = 0.074). Those diagnosed early were more likely to have a positive wound culture (odds ratio [OR], 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01-0.69; p = .024) and diagnosed late were more likely to be female (OR, 8.75; 95% CI, 2.0-38.4; p = .004) and require an urgent DSWI procedure (OR, 9.25; 95% CI, 1.86-45.9; p = .007). Both early diagnosis of DSWI and initial attempted medial management were strongly associated with mortality (HR, 7.48; 95% CI, 1.38-40.4; p = .019 and HR, 7.76; 95% CI, 1.67-35.9; p = .009, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Early aggressive surgical therapy for DSWI after cardiac surgery results in excellent outcomes. Those diagnosed with DSWI early and who have failed initial medical management have increased mortality.

Risk Factors for Wound Complications After Soft Tissue Sarcoma Resection.

ABSTRACT: Soft tissue sarcomas are a heterogenous group of malignant tumors that represent approximately 1% of adult malignancies. Although these tumors occur throughout the body, the majority involved the lower extremity. Management may involve amputation but more commonly often includes wide local resection by an oncologic surgeon and involvement of a plastic surgeon for reconstruction of larger and more complex defects. Postoperative wound complications are challenging for the surgeon and patient but also impact management of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy. To explore risk factors for wound complications, we reviewed our single-institution experience of lower-extremity soft tissue sarcomas from April 2009 to September 2016. We identified 127 patients for retrospective review and analysis. The proportion of patients with wound complications in the cohort was 43.3%. Most notably, compared with patients without wound complications, patients with wound complications had a higher proportion of immediate reconstruction (34.5% vs 15.3%; P = 0.05) and a marginally higher proportion who received neoadjuvant radiation (30.9% vs 16.7%; P = 0.06).

The Efficacy of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Antibiotic Beads in Lower Extremity Salvage.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic beads and negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) represent two methods of wound management used during staged debridement in the post-trauma limb salvage pathway. The efficacy of NPWT and antibiotic beads in preventing infection remains unclear. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of patients with traumatic lower extremity open fractures who received NPWT and/or antibiotic beads before soft tissue reconstruction at an urban level 1 trauma center between August 2007 and December 2015. Patients with wound infections before application of NPWT and/or antibiotic beads were excluded. RESULTS: In 73 lower extremities requiring soft tissue coverage, 46 received antibiotic beads and 48 received NPWT. Overall infection rate was 15.1%. Use of antibiotic beads was associated with a decreased risk of infection (6.4% versus 30.7%; P = 0.01). Use of NPWT was associated with an increased risk of one or more complications (45.7% versus 4.2%; P = 0.001). The development of infection was associated with a greater period of time between application of antibiotic beads (22 ± 13 versus 12 ± 6 d, P = 0.01) or NPWT (23 ± 15 versus 10 ± 11 d, P = 0.004) and soft tissue coverage. Overall limb salvage rate was 95.9%; secondary amputation was associated with development of infection (P = 0.001) but not with use of NPWT or antibiotic beads. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic beads may prevent infections in patients awaiting soft tissue coverage of wounds. NPWT may contribute to a greater rate of complication. Limb salvage was successful in most cases regardless of method of wound management.