[Choice of influenza vaccine in people over 65 years old. Analysis of reports from international vaccination advisory committees]. / Elección de vacuna antigripal en personas mayores de 65 años. Análisis de informes de comités asesores de vacunación internacionales.

OBJECTIVE: Annual recommendations on influenza vaccine use in different countries are developed by influenza-specific working groups within their Immunization Advisory Committees. Adults aged 65 years and over are included in the groups for which vaccination against influenza is particularly recommended due to the morbidity associated. A variety of influenza vaccines are available, some of which boosted immunity, are licensed for use only in this specific age group, where the immune response to traditional influenza vaccines may be suboptimal. We analyze the main annual recommendations on the use of the influenza vaccine issued by advisory committees on immunization for the population over 65 years of age. METHODS: The latest influenza vaccination guidelines have been selected and the recommendations for people over 65 years of age published by the main vaccination advisory committees have been reviewed. RESULTS: The UK Advisory Committee (JCVI) recommends the use of Quadruvalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine with Adjuvant (aQIV) or High Dose Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (QIV-HD). The US committee (ACIP) does not express a preference for any type of vaccine. The Australian committee (ATAGI) preferably recommends adjuvanted influenza vaccine. The advisory committees of Canada and Germany (NACI, STIKO) and the European Center for Disease Control (Ecdc) recommend using any of the age-appropriate flu vaccines available, although they bet on the The UK Advisory Committee (JCVI) recommends the use of Quadruvalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine with Adjuvant (aQIV) or High Dose Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (QIV-HD). The US committee (ACIP) does not express a preference for any type of vaccine. The Australian committee (ATAGI) preferably recommends adjuvanted influenza vaccine. The advisory committees of Canada and Germany (NACI, STIKO) and the European Center for Disease Control (Ecdc) recommend using any of the age-appropriate flu vaccines available, although they bet on the use of inactivated quadrivalent flu vaccine high dose at the individual level for those over 65 years.use of inactivated quadrivalent flu vaccine high dose at the individual level for those over 65 years. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary further studies and improvement in their quality that analyze the different vaccines available and their comparability, although the use of reinforced immunity vaccines is generally recommended in the population over 65 years of age.

Clinical significance of cross-reactivity between tobacco and latex.

BACKGROUND: Allergen cross-reactivity between tobacco and other species of Solanaceae family (tomato, potato, aubergine and egg plant) have been reported. We have recently studied IgE response to tobacco in asthmatic patients sensitised to Lolium perenne (Perennial rye grass pollen) and have found that 30% of the tobacco responsive patients also have latex sensitisation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to investigate the possibility of cross-reactivity between tobacco and latex in asthmatic patients with IgE response to latex. METHODS: A study was performed on tobacco and latex exposure in 15 patients who suffered from asthma and latex sensitisation and who were randomly chosen from our database of latex-sensitive patients. To identify tobacco and latex as possible allergens that might cause clinical specific responses, all these patients were tested with prick-tests, specific IgE to tobacco, latex and related allergens, bronchial challenge, and patch tests with tobacco, latex and nicotine. Immunological response was evaluated with immunoblotting, immunoblotting-inhibition and EAST-inhibition tests. RESULTS: Positive prick and bronchial challenge with specific IgE>0.35 kU/L to tobacco was demonstrated in 11 asthmatics who were also sensitised to rye grass. Tobacco IgE level was related with sensitisation to latex (p<0.002), but not to other vegetables belonging to the Solanaceae family. EAST-inhibition and immunoblotting-inhibition showed the existence of cross-reactivity between tobacco and latex. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-reactivity exists between latex and tobacco allergens. Smoker patients with IgE response to tobacco may be a risk population for latex sensitisation.

[Evaluation of the appropriateness of stays in a third level hospital]. / Evaluación de la adecuación de las estancias en un hospital de tercer nivel.

BACKGROUND: Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) has proved to be a useful tool for reviewing the utilisation of hospital resources. The aim of this article is to determine the proportion of inappropriate admissions and stays, as well as their causes, in patients hospitalised in the Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid (HCUV). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, analytical, observational, cohort study. The period of study was one year (2004). A sample of 1,630 admissions was gathered. Case definition, variables of interest and the model of data gathering were carried out in accordance with the AEP. The principal variables were analysed by means of a basal analysis and the possible relations between them. RESULTS: Fifty-four percent of the admissions showed at least one day of inappropriate stay, with the global rate of inappropriateness being 34.17%. Amongst the causes responsible for inappropriateness, 68.9% of admissions showed at least one criterion falling under the responsibility of the doctor or the hospital, and 51.3% were due to delays in the development of study or treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The utilisation of methods of identification of inappropriate use such as AEP show applications both in planning and in hospital management, by making it possible to identify hospital problems causing delays, principally problems of an organisational type, making it possible to develop interventions aimed at reducing inappropriate use.

Evaluación de la adecuación de las estancias en un hospital de tercer nivel / Evaluation of the appropriateness of stays in a third level hospital

FUNDAMENTO The Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) se ha mostrado como una herramienta útil para la revisión de la utilización de los recursos hospitalarios. El objetivo de este trabajo es conocer la proporción de ingresos y estancias inadecuadas, así como sus causas, en pacientes hospitalizados en el Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid (HCUV). MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS Estudio observacional analítico de cohortes retrospectivo. El período de estudio ha sido de un año (2004). Se seleccionó una muestra de 1.630 ingresos. La definición de caso, las variables de interés y el modelo de recogida de datos se han llevado a cabo conforme al AEP. Se han analizado las principales variables mediante un análisis basal y las posibles relaciones entre ellas. RESULTADOS El 54% de los ingresos presentaron al menos un día de estancia inadecuada, siendo la tasa de inadecuación global del 34,17%. Entre las causas responsables de la inadecuación, el 68,9% de los ingresos presentaron al menos un criterio englobado dentro de la responsabilidad del médico o del hospital, y el 51,3% debido a retrasos en el desarrollo del estudio o tratamiento. CONCLUSIONES La utilización de métodos de identificación del uso inapropiado como el AEP presenta aplicaciones tanto en planificación como en gestión hospitalaria, al permitir identificar problemas hospitalarios causantes de demoras, principalmente problemas de tipo organizativo, permitiendo el desarrollo de intervenciones encaminadas a la reducción del uso inapropiado

BACKGROUND The Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) has proved to be a useful tool for reviewing the utilisation of hospital resources. The aim of this article is to determine the proportion of inappropriate admissions and stays, as well as their causes, in patients hospitalised in the Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid (HCUV). MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective, analytical, observational, cohort study. The period of study was one year (2004). A sample of 1,630 admissions was gathered. Case definition, variables of interest and the model of data gathering were carried out in accordance with the AEP. The principal variables were analysed by means of a basal analysis and the possible relations between them. RESULTS Fifty-four percent of the admissions showed at least one day of inappropriate stay, with the global rate of inappropriateness being 34.17%. Amongst the causes responsible for inappropriateness, 68.9% of admissions showed at least one criterion falling under the responsibility of the doctor or the hospital, and 51.3% were due to delays in the development of study or treatment. CONCLUSIONS The utilisation of methods of identification of inappropriate use such as AEP show applications both in planning and in hospital management, by making it possible to identify hospital problems causing delays, principally problems of an organisational type, making it possible to develop interventions aimed at reducing inappropriate use