Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: In the treatment of very low rectal cancer, a distal resection margin of more than 1 cm can be obtained by partial internal sphincteric resection, allowing a sphincter preserving surgery. Thus, intersphincteric resection (ISR) has been proposed as an alternative to abdominoperineal resection for selected low rectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to assess the morbidity, mortality, and the long-term oncologic and functional results of ISR. METHODS: Charts of patients who had ISR between 1992 and 2004 were reviewed. Cancer-related survival and locoregional recurrence rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Functional outcome was assessed by using a standardized gastrointestinal functional questionnaire. Incontinence was assessed by the continence score of Wexner. RESULTS: Ninety patients (59 males, 31 females) with a tumor at a median distance of 35 mm (range, 22-52) from the anal verge had an ISR. Thirty-seven patients (41%) had preoperative radiotherapy. Histologically complete remission after neoadjuvant radiotherapy (ypT0) was observed in 7 patients (8%), 12 patients (13%) were pT1, 35 patients (39%) pT2, 32 patients (36%) pT3, and 4 patients (4%) pT4. Five patients (5.5%) had synchronous liver metastases. R0 resection was obtained in 85 patients (94.4%). The median distal resection margin on the fixed specimen was 12 mm (range, 5-35) and was positive in 1 case. The circumferential margin was positive (< or =1 mm) in 4 patients (4.4%). There was no mortality. Complication rate was 18.8%: anastomotic leakage occurred in 8 patients (8.8%) and 1 patient had an anovaginal fistula. Five patients (5.6%) underwent secondary abdominoperineal resection: 1 for positive distal margin, 1 for colonic J-pouch necrosis, and 3 for local recurrence. ONCOLOGIC RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 56.2 months (range, 13.3-168.4), local, distant, and combined recurrence occurred in 6 (6.6%), 8 (8.8%), and 2 patients, respectively. Thirteen patients (14.4%) died of cancer recurrence. Five-year overall and disease-free survival was 82% (80-97) and 75% (64-86), respectively. In univariate analysis, overall survival was significantly influenced by pTNM stage and T stage (pT 1-2 vs. 3-4: P = 0.008 and stage I-II vs. III-IV: P = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, we did not find any impact on local recurrence-free survival for the investigated prognostic variables. FUNCTIONAL RESULTS: For a total of 83 patients the mean stool frequency was 2.3 +/- 1.3 per 24 hours. Forty-one percent of patients had stool fragmentation, one-third nocturnal defecation, 19% fecal urgency, and 36% followed low fiber diet. Thirty-four patients (41%) were fully continent, 29 patients (35%) had minor continence problems, and 20 patients (24%) were incontinent. After adjustment for age, gender, tumor level, and pTNM stage, preoperative radiotherapy was the only factor associated with a risk of fecal incontinence [OR (IC 95%) = 3.1 (1.0-9.0), P = 0.04]. CONCLUSION: In selected patients, ISR is a safe operation with good oncologic results. It achieves good functional results in 76% of patients. Functional results are significantly altered by preoperative radiotherapy.

Prediction of postoperative complications after urgent laparotomy by intraperitoneal microdialysis: A pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of intraperitoneal microdialysis (IPM) techniques in monitoring the evolution of postoperative critically ill patients requiring urgent laparotomy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Postoperative intraabdominal sepsis is associated with an important degree of morbidity and mortality in acutely ill patients. Early diagnosis is critical to improve outcomes. METHODS: : The study included 25 consecutive patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after urgent laparotomy. Measurements of microdialysate fluid were performed through a microdialysis catheter, positioned intraperitoneally, during the first 5 postoperative days and lactate/pyruvate (L/P) ratios calculated. Patients were followed until hospital discharge. RESULTS: Ten patients had a complicated postoperative course, including 4 deaths (3 refractory shock, 1 mesenteric ischemia), 3 reinterventions (1 necrotic collection, 1 mesenteric ischemia, 1 biliary leak), 2 secondary peritonitis, and 1 intraabdominal collection. The IPM L/P ratio in these patients was already significantly higher during the first 24 postoperative hours compared with patients who had no complications (35 +/- 21 vs. 18 +/- 6, P < 0.01). An IPM L/P ratio above 22 on postoperative day 1 had a sensitivity of 0.64 and a specificity of 0.79 for complications. There were no significant differences between the two groups in pH, lactate, white blood cell count, or subcutaneous L/P ratio. No complication was associated with the technique. CONCLUSIONS: IPM is safe and reliable and provides valuable information after urgent laparotomy. Persistently high L/P values should raise the possibility of serious postoperative complications.

Endoscopic therapy for main pancreatic-duct rupture after Silastic-ring vertical gastroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis with pancreatic-duct rupture and fluid collections is a rare complication after Silastic ring vertical gastroplasty. It can be attributed to pancreatic trauma occurring during surgery. METHODS: Endoscopic therapy with transmural drainage of collections was performed in 4 patients who had undergone Silastic ring vertical gastroplasty and who had presented with acute pancreatitis with main pancreatic-duct rupture at the body of the pancreas. OBSERVATIONS: All patients had successful transmural drainage with cystogastrostomy, followed by stent insertion. Only one patient had a late recurrence because of stent migration. The major difficulty was related to positioning of the endoscope and the possible need of pneumatic dilation of the outlet channel to reach the puncture site. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic therapy is useful in acute pancreatitis with pancreatic-duct rupture after Silastic-ring vertical gastroplasty and, although technically difficult, could be considered as a first-line approach in the management of these patients.