Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 25
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 150(3): 655-66, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25809092

RESUMEN

African American (AA) women are more likely than white women to be obese and to be diagnosed with ER- and triple-negative (TN) breast cancer, but few studies have evaluated the impact of obesity and body fat distribution on breast cancer subtypes in AA women. We evaluated these associations in the AMBER Consortium by pooling data from four large studies. Cases were categorized according to hormone receptor status as ER+, ER-, and TN (ER-, PR-, and HER2-) based on pathology data. A total of 2104 ER+ cases, 1070 ER- cases (including 491 TN cases), and 12,060 controls were included. Odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were computed using logistic regression, taking into account breast cancer risk factors. In postmenopausal women, higher recent (most proximal value to diagnosis/index date) BMI was associated with increased risk of ER+ cancer (OR 1.31; 95 % CI 1.02-1.67 for BMI ≥ 35 vs. <25 kg/m(2)) and with decreased risk of TN tumors (OR 0.60; 95 % CI 0.39-0.93 for BMI ≥ 35 vs. <25). High young adult BMI was associated with decreased premenopausal ER+ cancer and all subtypes of postmenopausal cancer, and high recent waist-to-hip ratio with increased risk of premenopausal ER+ tumors (OR 1.35; 95 % CI 1.01-1.80) and all tumor subtypes combined in postmenopausal women (OR 1.26; 95 % CI 1.02-1.56). The impact of general and central obesity varies by menopausal status and hormone receptor subtype in AA women. Our findings imply different mechanisms for associations of adiposity with TN and ER+ breast cancers.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución de la Grasa Corporal/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/etnología , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Obesidad/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Menopausia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/epidemiología , Obesidad/etnología , Oportunidad Relativa , Receptor ErbB-2/análisis , Receptores de Estrógenos/análisis , Receptores de Progesterona/análisis , Factores de Riesgo
2.
Int J Cancer ; 134(6): 1422-35, 2014 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23996837

RESUMEN

African American (AA) women are more likely than European American (EA) women to be diagnosed with breast cancer at younger ages and to develop poor prognosis tumors. However, these racial differences are largely unexplained. Folate and other methyl-group nutrients may be related to breast carcinogenesis, but few studies have examined these associations in AA populations. We examined the associations of dietary intake of these nutrients with breast cancer risk overall, by menopausal and estrogen receptor (ER) status among 1,582 AA (749 cases) and 1,434 EA (744 cases) women using data from a case-control study, the Women's Circle of Health Study. Unconditional multivariable logistic regression models were used to compute odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of each nutrient and breast cancer risk. In AA women, inverse associations were observed for natural food folate intake among premenopausal women (fourth vs. first quartile: OR = 0.57, 95% CI, 0.33-1.00; p for trend = 0.06) and for ER-positive tumors (fourth vs. first quartile: OR = 0.58, 95% CI, 0.36-0.93; p for trend = 0.03), whereas in EA women, a positive association was observed for intake of synthetic folate (fourth vs. first quartile: OR = 1.53, 95% CI, 1.06-2.21; p for trend = 0.03). Our findings suggest that natural food folate intake is inversely associated with breast cancer risk and that this association may vary by race, menopausal status or ER status. The finding of an increased risk observed among EA women with the highest intake of synthetic folate from fortified foods warrants further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Dieta , Ácido Fólico/administración & dosificación , Metionina/administración & dosificación , Vitamina B 12/administración & dosificación , Vitamina B 6/administración & dosificación , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Premenopausia , Pronóstico , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Factores de Riesgo , Vitaminas/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven
3.
Annu Rev Nutr ; 33: 319-48, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23701588

RESUMEN

Laboratory evidence suggests a plausible role for dietary fat in breast cancer pathophysiology. We conducted a systematic literature review to assess the epidemiological evidence on the impact of total dietary fat and fat subtypes, measured pre- and/or postcancer diagnosis, in relation to breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality among breast cancer survivors. Studies were included if they were in English, had a sample size ≥200, and presented the hazard ratio/rate ratio for recurrence, disease-specific mortality, or all-cause mortality (n = 18). Although the results are mixed, most studies suggested that higher saturated fat intake prediagnosis was associated with increased risk of breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality. Postdiagnostic trans fat intake was associated with a 45% and 78% increased risk of all-cause mortality. Higher monounsaturated fat intake before and after diagnosis was generally associated with increased risk of all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality, albeit the majority of the studies were statistically nonsignificant. Two studies evaluating omega-3 fat intake suggested an inverse association with all-cause mortality. Although there were too few studies on fat subtypes to draw definitive conclusions, high consumption of saturated fat may exert a detrimental effect on breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality, whereas omega-3 fat may be beneficial. The inconsistent and limited evidence warrants research to assess the impact of consumption of fat subtypes on breast cancer recurrence and mortality.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Dieta Alta en Grasa/efectos adversos , Animales , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Daño del ADN , Femenino , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Obesidad/etiología , Obesidad/fisiopatología , Estrés Oxidativo , Pronóstico
4.
Nutr Cancer ; 66(7): 1187-99, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25265504

RESUMEN

Limiting energy-dense foods, fast foods, and sugary drinks that promote weight gain is a cancer prevention recommendation, but no studies have evaluated intake in relation to breast cancer risk in African American (AA) women. In a case-control study with 1692 AA women (803 cases and 889 controls) and 1456 European American (EA) women (755 cases and 701 controls), odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for risk were computed, stratifying for menopausal and estrogen receptor (ER) status. Among postmenopausal EA women, breast cancer risk was associated with frequent consumption of energy-dense foods (OR = 2.95; 95% CI: 1.66-5.22), fast foods (OR = 2.35; 95% CI: 1.38-4.00), and sugary drinks (OR = 2.05; 95% CI: 1.13-3.70). Elevated risk of ER+ tumors in EA women was associated with energy-dense (OR = 1.75; 95% CI: 1.14-2.69) and fast foods (OR = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.22-2.77). Among AA women, frequent fast food consumption was related to premenopausal breast cancer risk (OR = 1.97; 95% CI: 1.13-3.43), and with ER+ tumors. Energy adjustment attenuated risk estimates in AA women, while strengthening them among EA women. Frequent consumption of energy-dense and fast foods that have poor nutritive value appeared to increase breast cancer risk in AA and EA women, with differences by menopausal status and ER status.


Asunto(s)
Bebidas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Carbohidratos de la Dieta/efectos adversos , Ingestión de Energía , Comida Rápida/efectos adversos , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Dieta , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Edulcorantes Nutritivos/efectos adversos , Posmenopausia , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Aumento de Peso , Población Blanca , Adulto Joven
5.
Cancer Causes Control ; 24(7): 1427-36, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23657460

RESUMEN

Consumption of foods high in sugar promotes insulin production, which has been linked to endometrial carcinogenesis. We evaluated the impact of dietary intake of sugary foods and beverages, as well as added sugar and total sugar on endometrial cancer risk in a population-based case-control study, including 424 cases and 398 controls. Participants completed an interview and food frequency questionnaire, and provided self-recorded waist and hip measurements. Women in the highest quartile of added sugar intake had significantly increased endometrial cancer risk (OR = 1.84, 95% CI 1.16-2.92). Among women with waist-to-hip ratio ≥0.85, risk was significantly higher for the highest versus lowest tertile of added sugar intakes (OR = 2.50, 95% CI 1.38-4.52). The association with added sugar also became stronger when analyses were restricted to never users of hormone replacement therapy (OR = 2.03; 95% CI 1.27-3.26, for highest versus lowest tertile). There was little evidence of effect modification by body mass index or physical activity. Given the high prevalence of intake of sugary foods and drinks in Western populations, additional research is warranted to confirm our findings on endometrial cancer.


Asunto(s)
Carbohidratos de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Endometriales/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Carbohidratos de la Dieta/efectos adversos , Sacarosa en la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Sacarosa en la Dieta/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Relación Cintura-Cadera
6.
Cancer Causes Control ; 24(12): 2231-43, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24113797

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: There is growing evidence that body size in early life influences lifetime breast cancer risk, but little is known for African American (AA) women. METHODS: We evaluated body size during childhood and young adulthood and breast cancer risk among 1,751 cases [979 AA and 772 European American (EA)] and 1,673 controls (958 AA and 715 EA) in the Women's Circle of Health Study. Odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were computed using logistic regression models while adjusting for potential covariates. RESULTS: Among AA women, being shorter at 7-8 years compared to peers was associated with increased postmenopausal breast cancer risk (OR 1.68, 95 % CI 1.02-2.74), and being heavier at menarche with decreased postmenopausal breast cancer risk, although of borderline significance (OR 0.45, 95 % CI 0.20-1.02). For EA women, being shorter from childhood through adolescence, particularly at menarche, was associated with reduced premenopausal breast cancer risk (OR 0.55, 95 % CI 0.31-0.98). After excluding hormone replacement therapy users, an inverse association with postmenopausal breast cancer was found among EA women reporting to be heavier than their peers at menarche (OR 0.18, 95 % CI 0.04-0.79). The inverse relationship between BMI at age 20 and breast cancer risk was stronger and only statistically significant in EA women. No clear association with weight gain since age 20 was found. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that the impact of childhood height on breast cancer risk may differ for EA and AA women and confirm the inverse association previously reported in EA populations with adolescent body fatness, in AA women.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamaño Corporal , Neoplasias de la Mama/etnología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , New Jersey/epidemiología , Posmenopausia , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
7.
Cancer Causes Control ; 24(12): 2217-29, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24091794

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Research on the role of red meat and poultry consumption in breast carcinogenesis is inconclusive, but the evidence in African-American (AA) women is lacking. The association between consuming meat and breast cancer risk was examined in the Women's Circle of Health Study involving 803 AA cases, 889 AA controls, 755 Caucasian cases, and 701 Caucasian controls. METHODS: Dietary information was collected using a Food Frequency Questionnaire. Odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were obtained from logistic regression models adjusting for potential covariates. RESULTS: Comparing the fourth versus the first quartiles, among Caucasian women, processed meat (OR = 1.48; 95 % CI 1.07-2.04), unprocessed red meat (OR = 1.40; 95 % CI 1.01-1.94), and poultry intakes (OR = 1.42; 95 % CI 1.01-1.99) increased breast cancer risk. Risk associated with poultry intake was more dominant in premenopausal women (OR = 2.33; 95 % CI 1.44-3.77) and for women with ER- tumors (OR = 2.55; 95 % CI 1.29-5.03) in the Caucasian group. Associations in AA women were mostly null except for a significant increased risk trend with processed meat consumption for ER+ tumors (OR = 1.36; 95 % CI 0.94-1.97, p trend = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, associations between breast cancer risk and consumption of red meat and poultry were of different magnitude in AA and Caucasian women, with further differences noted by menopausal and hormone receptor status in Caucasian women. This is the first study to examine racial differences in meat and breast cancer risk and represents some of the first evidence in AA women.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Mama/etnología , Dieta , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Carne/efectos adversos , Aves de Corral , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Animales , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Menopausia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
8.
Cancer Causes Control ; 24(5): 989-1004, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23456270

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The majority of previous studies have observed an increased risk of mucinous ovarian tumors associated with cigarette smoking, but the association with other histological types is unclear. In a large pooled analysis, we examined the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer associated with multiple measures of cigarette smoking with a focus on characterizing risks according to tumor behavior and histology. METHODS: We used data from 21 case-control studies of ovarian cancer (19,066 controls, 11,972 invasive and 2,752 borderline cases). Study-specific odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were obtained from logistic regression models and combined into a pooled odds ratio using a random effects model. RESULTS: Current cigarette smoking increased the risk of invasive mucinous (OR = 1.31; 95 % CI: 1.03-1.65) and borderline mucinous ovarian tumors (OR = 1.83; 95 % CI: 1.39-2.41), while former smoking increased the risk of borderline serous ovarian tumors (OR = 1.30; 95 % CI: 1.12-1.50). For these histological types, consistent dose-response associations were observed. No convincing associations between smoking and risk of invasive serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer were observed, while our results provided some evidence of a decreased risk of invasive clear cell ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed marked differences in the risk profiles of histological types of ovarian cancer with regard to cigarette smoking, although the magnitude of the observed associations was modest. Our findings, which may reflect different etiologies of the histological types, add to the fact that ovarian cancer is a heterogeneous disease.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/epidemiología , Fumar/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/etiología , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/etiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
9.
Annu Rev Nutr ; 32: 311-42, 2012 Aug 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22540252

RESUMEN

Although obesity is a well-known risk factor for several cancers, its role on cancer survival is poorly understood. We conducted a systematic literature review to assess the current evidence evaluating the impact of body adiposity on the prognosis of the three most common obesity-related cancers: prostate, colorectal, and breast. We included 33 studies of breast cancer, six studies of prostate cancer, and eight studies of colo-rectal cancer. We note that the evidence overrepresents breast cancer survivorship research and is sparse for prostate and colorectal cancers. Overall, most studies support a relationship between body adiposity and site-specific mortality or cancer progression. However, most of the research was not specifically designed to study these outcomes and, therefore, several methodological issues should be considered before integrating their results to draw conclusions. Further research is urgently warranted to assess the long-term impact of obesity among the growing population of cancer survivors.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Obesidad/complicaciones , Adiposidad , Investigación Biomédica , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Proyectos de Investigación
10.
BMC Cancer ; 13: 94, 2013 Feb 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23442818

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecologic cancer in the US. The consumption of refined sugars has increased dramatically over the past few decades, accounting for almost 15% of total energy intake. Yet, there is limited evidence on how sugar consumption affects ovarian cancer risk. METHODS: We evaluated ovarian cancer risk in relation to sugary foods and beverages, and total and added sugar intakes in a population-based case-control study. Cases were women with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer, older than 21 years, able to speak English or Spanish, and residents of six counties in New Jersey. Controls met same criteria as cases, but were ineligible if they had both ovaries removed. A total of 205 cases and 390 controls completed a phone interview, food frequency questionnaire, and self-recorded waist and hip measurements. Based on dietary data, we computed the number of servings of dessert foods, non-dessert foods, sugary drinks and total sugary foods and drinks for each participant. Total and added sugar intakes (grams/day) were also calculated. Multiple logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for food and drink groups and total and added sugar intakes, while adjusting for major risk factors. RESULTS: We did not find evidence of an association between consumption of sugary foods and beverages and risk, although there was a suggestion of increased risk associated with sugary drink intake (servings per 1,000 kcal; OR=1.63, 95% CI: 0.94-2.83). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we found little indication that sugar intake played a major role on ovarian cancer development.


Asunto(s)
Sacarosa en la Dieta/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/etiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Bebidas/efectos adversos , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Registros de Dieta , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/epidemiología , New Jersey/epidemiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
11.
BMC Cancer ; 13: 475, 2013 Oct 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24118876

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Obesity has been shown to be inversely associated with breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, while increasing risk in postmenopausal women. However, the current evidence is largely based on studies in Caucasian populations. Associations in women of African ancestry (AA), who have a higher prevalence of obesity, have been evaluated in few studies and results suggest different effects. METHODS: We evaluated the impact of body size, body fat distribution, and body composition on breast cancer risk among AA women (978 cases and 958 controls) participating in the Women's Circle of Health Study, a multi-site case-control study in New York City (NYC) and New Jersey (NJ). Cases were newly diagnosed with histologically confirmed ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive breast cancer, age 20-75 yrs. In NYC, cases were recruited through hospitals with the largest referral patterns for AA women and controls through random digit dialing (RDD). In NJ, cases were identified in seven counties in NJ thorough the NJ State Cancer Registry, and controls through RDD and community-based recruitment. During in-person interviews, questionnaires were administered and detailed anthropometric measurements were obtained. Body composition was assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis. RESULTS: BMI did not have a major impact on pre- or post-menopausal breast cancer, but was significantly associated with reduced risk of ER-/PR- tumors among postmenopausal women (OR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.15-0.96 for BMI > 30 vs. BMI < 25). Furthermore, increased premenopausal breast cancer risk was found for higher waist and hip circumferences after adjusting for BMI, with ORs of 2.25 (95% CI: 1.07-4.74) and 2.91 (95% CI: 1.39-6.10), respectively, comparing the highest vs. lowest quartile. While ORs for higher fat mass and percent body fat among postmenopausal women were above one, confidence intervals included the null value. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that in AA women BMI is generally unrelated to breast cancer. However, higher waist and hip circumferences were associated with increased pre-menopausal breast cancer risk, while general obesity was associated with decreased risk of ER-/PR- tumors. Larger studies are needed to confirm findings and to evaluate the impact of obesity on breast cancer subtypes.


Asunto(s)
Población Negra , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Obesidad/complicaciones , Riesgo , Adiposidad , Adulto , Composición Corporal , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Menopausia , Persona de Mediana Edad , New Jersey/epidemiología , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo
12.
BMC Cancer ; 13: 28, 2013 Jan 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23339562

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating the association between alcohol intake and ovarian carcinoma (OC) are inconsistent. Because OC and ovarian borderline tumor histologic types differ genetically, molecularly and clinically, large numbers are needed to estimate risk associations. METHODS: We pooled data from 12 case-control studies in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium comprising 5,342 OC cases, 1,455 borderline tumors and 10,358 controls with quantitative information on recent alcohol intake to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) according to frequencies of average daily intakes of beer, wine, liquor and total alcohol. RESULTS: Total alcohol intake was not associated with all OC: consumption of >3 drinks per day compared to none, OR=0.92, 95% CI=0.76-1.10, P trend=0.27. Among beverage types, a statistically non-significant decreased risk was observed among women who consumed >8 oz/d of wine compared to none (OR=0.83, 95% CI=0.68-1.01, P trend=0.08). This association was more apparent among women with clear cell OC (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22-0.83; P trend=0.02), although based on only 10 cases and not statistically different from the other histologic types (P value for statistical heterogeneity between histologic types = 0.09). Statistical heterogeneity of the alcohol- and wine-OC associations was seen among three European studies, but not among eight North American studies. No statistically significant associations were observed in separate analyses evaluating risk with borderline tumors of serous or mucinous histology. Smoking status did not significantly modify any of the associations. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that recent moderate alcohol drinking is associated with increased risk for overall OC, or that variation in risk is associated strongly with specific histologic types. Understanding modifiable causes of these elusive and deadly cancers remains a priority for the research community.


Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Carcinoma/epidemiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/epidemiología , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Australia/epidemiología , Canadá/epidemiología , Carcinoma/patología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
13.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 13: 71, 2013 May 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23721229

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recruitment of controls remains a challenge in case-control studies and particularly in studies involving minority populations. METHODS: We compared characteristics of controls recruited through random digit dialing (RDD) to those of community controls enrolled through churches, health events and other outreach sources among women of African ancestry (AA) participating in the Women's Circle of Health Study, a case-control study of breast cancer. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were also computed using unconditional logistic regression to evaluate the impact of including the community controls for selected variables relevant to breast cancer and for which there were significant differences in distribution between the two control groups. RESULTS: Compared to community controls (n=347), RDD controls (n=207) had more years of education and higher income, lower body mass index, were more likely to have private insurance, and less likely to be single. While the percentage of nulliparous women in the two groups was similar, community controls tended to have more children, have their first child at a younger age, and were less likely to breastfeed their children. Dietary intake was similar in the two groups. Compared to census data, the combination of RDD and community controls seems to be more representative of the general population than RDD controls alone. Furthermore, the inclusion of the community group had little impact on the magnitude of risk estimates for most variables, while enhancing statistical power. CONCLUSIONS: Community-based recruitment was found to be an efficient and feasible method to recruit AA controls.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Grupos Control , Grupos Minoritarios , Adulto , Anciano , Población Negra , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Proyectos de Investigación , Factores de Riesgo , Población Blanca , Adulto Joven
14.
Matern Child Health J ; 17(1): 165-71, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22322430

RESUMEN

The aim of this paper was to investigate the association between birthweight and prevalence of food allergies using a national sample of US children. Adult report of birthweight and child food allergies were obtained for years 2005-2009 from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), a cross-sectional household survey of the US population. A total of 51,748 children aged 0-17 years were included in the analyses representing over 73 million children. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined associations between birthweight categories and food allergies stratified by age and gender; accounting for the complex design of NHIS. Children aged 6-12 years who were born very low birthweight (500-1,499 g) were more likely to have reported food allergy compared to referent (3,000-3,499 g), OR = 1.72; 95% CI: 1.02-2.91. However, there was no clear trend of an association between birthweight and food allergy with increasing or decreasing birthweight across all ages. Estimates were generally stronger in younger male children as compared to estimates in females of the same age group. Marginal associations for respiratory allergy (OR = 1.52; 95% CI: 1.02-2.29) and hay fever (OR = 1.54; 95% CI: 0.93-2.54) were observed among very low birthweight children aged 0-5 years. There was limited evidence for a clear association between birthweight and food allergy. Marginal associations observed in children weighing 500-1,499 g at birth support efforts to minimize preterm births and very low birthweight given the increase in pediatric food allergies and the large number of children born low birthweight each year in the US.


Asunto(s)
Peso al Nacer , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/epidemiología , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Adolescente , Distribución por Edad , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Encuestas Nutricionales , Oportunidad Relativa , Nacimiento Prematuro , Prevalencia , Análisis de Regresión , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
15.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 32(3): 337-343, 2023 03 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36576991

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study used machine learning to develop a 3-year lung cancer risk prediction model with large real-world data in a mostly younger population. METHODS: Over 4.7 million individuals, aged 45 to 65 years with no history of any cancer or lung cancer screening, diagnostic, or treatment procedures, with an outpatient visit in 2013 were identified in Optum's de-identified Electronic Health Record (EHR) dataset. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator model was fit using all available data in the 365 days prior. Temporal validation was assessed with recent data. External validation was assessed with data from Mercy Health Systems EHR and Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database. Racial inequities in model discrimination were assessed with xAUCs. RESULTS: The model AUC was 0.76. Top predictors included age, smoking, race, ethnicity, and diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The model identified a high-risk group with lung cancer incidence 9 times the average cohort incidence, representing 10% of patients with lung cancer. Model performed well temporally and externally, while performance was reduced for Asians and Hispanics. CONCLUSIONS: A high-dimensional model trained using big data identified a subset of patients with high lung cancer risk. The model demonstrated transportability to EHR and claims data, while underscoring the need to assess racial disparities when using machine learning methods. IMPACT: This internally and externally validated real-world data-based lung cancer prediction model is available on an open-source platform for broad sharing and application. Model integration into an EHR system could minimize physician burden by automating identification of high-risk patients.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Humanos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Incidencia , Aprendizaje Automático , Registros Electrónicos de Salud
16.
Chest ; 2023 Dec 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38065405

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Standard treatment for early-stage or locoregionally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) includes surgical resection. Recurrence after surgery is commonly reported, but a summary estimate for postsurgical recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with NSCLC is lacking. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the RFS after surgery in patients with stage I-III NSCLC at different time points, and what factors are associated with RFS? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases between January 2011 and June 2021. The primary outcome was RFS at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years postresection. Single-arm, random-effects meta-analyses were done to calculate effect estimates and 95% CIs. Analyses were stratified by stage/substage as per the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, and RFS was estimated (1) after pooling studies, using seventh or eighth edition staging criteria; and (2) among studies using only the eighth edition. Meta-regressions were performed to assess associations between RFS and patient demographic/clinical characteristics of interest. RESULTS: Data from 471 studies comprising 1,060 surgical study arms were extracted. RFS estimates from 60,695 patients staged with the seventh or eighth edition were analyzed. RFS ranged from 96% at 1 year postresection to 82% at 5 years for stage I, and from 68% at 1 year to 34% at 5 years for stage III. Estimates for patients staged using only eighth edition criteria were slightly higher. Older age, higher percentage of male patients, advancing stage, larger tumor size, and geographic region (North America/Europe vs Asia) were significantly associated with worse RFS. INTERPRETATION: This study presents a comprehensive assessment of reported RFS from published clinical literature, offering estimates at multiple postsurgical time points and by geographic region. Findings can inform treatment decisions, clinical trial design, and future research to improve outcomes among patients with NSCLC.

17.
JMIR AI ; 2: e44537, 2023 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38875565

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ground-glass opacities (GGOs) appearing in computed tomography (CT) scans may indicate potential lung malignancy. Proper management of GGOs based on their features can prevent the development of lung cancer. Electronic health records are rich sources of information on GGO nodules and their granular features, but most of the valuable information is embedded in unstructured clinical notes. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop, test, and validate a deep learning-based natural language processing (NLP) tool that automatically extracts GGO features to inform the longitudinal trajectory of GGO status from large-scale radiology notes. METHODS: We developed a bidirectional long short-term memory with a conditional random field-based deep-learning NLP pipeline to extract GGO and granular features of GGO retrospectively from radiology notes of 13,216 lung cancer patients. We evaluated the pipeline with quality assessments and analyzed cohort characterization of the distribution of nodule features longitudinally to assess changes in size and solidity over time. RESULTS: Our NLP pipeline built on the GGO ontology we developed achieved between 95% and 100% precision, 89% and 100% recall, and 92% and 100% F1-scores on different GGO features. We deployed this GGO NLP model to extract and structure comprehensive characteristics of GGOs from 29,496 radiology notes of 4521 lung cancer patients. Longitudinal analysis revealed that size increased in 16.8% (240/1424) of patients, decreased in 14.6% (208/1424), and remained unchanged in 68.5% (976/1424) in their last note compared to the first note. Among 1127 patients who had longitudinal radiology notes of GGO status, 815 (72.3%) were reported to have stable status, and 259 (23%) had increased/progressed status in the subsequent notes. CONCLUSIONS: Our deep learning-based NLP pipeline can automatically extract granular GGO features at scale from electronic health records when this information is documented in radiology notes and help inform the natural history of GGO. This will open the way for a new paradigm in lung cancer prevention and early detection.

18.
Public Health Nutr ; 15(4): 738-48, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22122844

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: While the role of nutrition, physical activity and body size on breast cancer risk has been extensively investigated, most of these studies were conducted in Caucasian populations. However, there are well-known differences in tumour biology and the prevalence of these factors between African-American and Caucasian women. The objective of the present paper was to conduct a review of the role of dietary factors, anthropometry and physical activity on breast cancer risk in African-American women. DESIGN: Twenty-six research articles that presented risk estimates on these factors in African-American women and five articles involving non-US black women were included in the current review. SETTING: Racial disparities in the impact of anthropometric and nutritional factors on breast cancer risk. SUBJECTS: African-American and non-US black women. RESULTS: Based on the few studies that presented findings in African-American women, an inverse association with physical activity was found for pre- and postmenopausal African-American women, while the association for anthropometric and other dietary factors, such as alcohol, was unclear. Studies assessing the effect by molecular subtypes in African-American women were too few and based on sample sizes too small to provide definitive conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of certain nutrition and lifestyle factors on breast cancer in African-American women is not starkly distinct from those observed in white women. However, there is an enormous need for further research on this minority group to obtain more confirmatory findings.


Asunto(s)
Antropometría , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Dieta , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Obesidad/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Menopausia , Obesidad/complicaciones
19.
Cancer Causes Control ; 22(4): 563-71, 2011 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21286802

RESUMEN

The evidence for a role of diet on ovarian cancer prevention remains inconclusive. While many studies have evaluated individual foods and food groups, the evaluation of a comprehensive dietary quality index for predicting cancer risk has received little attention. This study investigates the association between the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), which reflects adherence to the current USDA Dietary Guidelines for Americans and ovarian cancer risk in a population-based case-control study in New Jersey. A total of 205 cases and 390 controls completed the Block 98.2 food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) in addition to reporting on potential risk factors for ovarian cancer. FFQ data were then utilized to calculate the HEI score, and cup, ounce, gram, or caloric equivalents for the 12 different food groups comprising the index. In multivariate models, the OR for the highest tertile of the HEI score compared with the lowest (reflecting a better diet compared with a worse diet) was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.55-1.47). There was limited evidence for a statistically significant association between any of the 12 individual food components and ovarian cancer risk. Based on this study's results, neither individual food groups nor dietary quality showed potential for preventing ovarian cancer.


Asunto(s)
Dieta , Conducta Alimentaria/fisiología , Indicadores de Salud , Anciano , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/etiología , Encuestas Nutricionales/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Ováricas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos
20.
BMC Womens Health ; 11: 40, 2011 Sep 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21943063

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While there is extensive literature evaluating the impact of phytoestrogen consumption on breast cancer risk, its role on ovarian cancer has received little attention. METHODS: We conducted a population-based case-control study to evaluate phytoestrogen intake from foods and supplements and epithelial ovarian cancer risk. Cases were identified in six counties in New Jersey through the New Jersey State Cancer Registry. Controls were identified by random digit dialing, CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service) lists, and area sampling. A total of 205 cases and 390 controls were included in analyses. Unconditional logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine associations with total phytoestrogens, as well as isoflavones (daidzein, genistein, formononetin, and glycitein), lignans (matairesinol, lariciresinol, pinoresinol, secoisolariciresinol), and coumestrol. RESULTS: No statistically significant associations were found with any of the phytoestrogens under evaluation. However, there was a suggestion of an inverse association with total phytoestrogen consumption (from foods and supplements), with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.38-1.00; p for trend: 0.04) for the highest vs. lowest tertile of consumption, after adjusting for reproductive covariates, age, race, education, BMI, and total energy. Further adjustment for smoking and physical activity attenuated risk estimates (OR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.41-1.08). There was little evidence of an inverse association for isoflavones, lignans, or coumestrol. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided some suggestion that phytoestrogen consumption may decrease ovarian cancer risk, although results did not reach statistical significance.


Asunto(s)
Cumestrol/administración & dosificación , Isoflavonas/administración & dosificación , Lignanos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/prevención & control , Neoplasias Ováricas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/prevención & control , Fitoestrógenos/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Intervalos de Confianza , Suplementos Dietéticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , New Jersey/epidemiología , Oportunidad Relativa , Análisis de Regresión , Alimentos de Soja , Salud de la Mujer
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA