Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Lab Anal ; 31(5)2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27775178

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vitamin C may interfere with the results of urine dipstick tests. We investigated the incidence of urinary vitamin C and its interference with urine dipstick reagents using a vitamin C dipstick. METHODS: The incidence of urinary vitamin C was determined in patients and healthy individuals undergoing routine medical check-ups. Interference tests were performed using samples with various amounts of added vitamin C. For clinical samples, we identified false-negative dipstick glucose, hemoglobin, and leukocyte esterase results based on the urine sediment and serum glucose results. RESULTS: Vitamin C was found in the urine of 18.1% of the subjects overall, and 23.1% of those undergoing medical check-ups. Dipstick results for glucose, leukocyte esterase, and hemoglobin differed between samples without vitamin C and with added vitamin C. When vitamin C was detected in clinical urine samples, 42.3%, 10.6%, and 8.2% of the glucose, hemoglobin, and leukocyte esterase dipstick tests were rated as false negative, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin C was frequently found in clinical urine samples, and its concentration was higher in individuals undergoing medical check-ups. Urinary vitamin C can interfere with the urine dipstick results. This study gives useful information for predicting false-negative rates of urine dipstick tests caused by vitamin C.


Asunto(s)
Ácido Ascórbico/química , Ácido Ascórbico/orina , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Urinálisis/normas , Hidrolasas de Éster Carboxílico/orina , Glucosuria , Hemoglobinuria , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Urinálisis/métodos
2.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(2)2022 Jan 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35214652

RESUMEN

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination began for healthcare workers in South Korea at the end of February 2021. This study investigated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody responses after various COVID-19 vaccinations in healthcare workers. Blood specimens of 497 vaccinated healthcare workers were collected. Inoculated vaccines were ChAdOx1 (AstraZeneca/Oxford), BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech), JNJ-78436735 (Janssen), and mRNA-1273 (Moderna). Each specimen was tested for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 using Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S assay (Roche Diagnostics), SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant assay (Abbott), and R-FIND SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody kit (SG medical Inc.). A questionnaire was used to investigate adverse events related to vaccination. We found that 99.5% of the subjects showed a 96-100% positive rate in all three antibody assays, regardless of the vaccine type. The antibody-positive rate of completed vaccination groups reached 96-100%, and antibody quantities significantly increased 2 weeks after vaccination. The antibody values measured approximately 3 months after BNT162b2 inoculation significantly correlated with adverse events.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA