RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Switching biologics is now common practice in severe eosinophilic asthma. After insufficient response to anti-IL-5 or 5 receptor (anti-IL-5/5R), the optimal switch between an anti-IL-4R mAb (interclass) or another anti-IL-5/5R drug (intraclass) remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the effectiveness of these 2 strategies in asthma control in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma and insufficient response to an anti-IL-5/5R mAb. METHODS: We emulated a target randomized trial using observational data from the Recherche sur les AsthMes SEvèreS (RAMSES) cohort. Eligible patients were switched to an anti-IL-4R mAb or another anti-IL-5/5R drug after insufficient response to an anti-IL-5/5R mAb. The primary outcome was the change in Asthma Control Test score at 6 months. RESULTS: Among the 2046 patients in the cohort, 151 were included in the study: 103 switched to an anti-IL-4R mAb and 48 to another anti-IL-5/5R. At 6 months, the difference in Asthma Control Test score improvement was not statistically significant (mean difference groups, 0.82 [-0.47 to 2.10], P = .213). The interclass group exhibited greater cumulative reduction in oral corticosteroid dose (Pinter-intra, -1.05 g [-1.76 to -0.34], P = .041). The interclass group had a better effect, although not significantly, on reducing exacerbations (Δinter-intra, -0.37 [-0.77 to 0.02], P = .124) and increasing lung function (FEV1) (126.8 mL [-12.7 to 266.4], P = .124). CONCLUSIONS: After anti-IL-5/5R mAb insufficient response, switching to dupilumab demonstrated similar improvement in Asthma Control Test scores compared with intraclass switching. However, it appeared more effective in reducing oral corticosteroid use. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these results.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Sleep apnoea (SA) is associated with accelerated cognitive decline in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Treatment of SA by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) may slow this decline if patients comply with the treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the rate of CPAP compliance in this population. METHODS: In this single-centre retrospective study conducted in a tertiary care institution, patients with a diagnosis of MCI and SA initiating CPAP between January 2015 and August 2021 were included. Data from the initial sleep recording, the 3-month follow-up and compliance with at least 12 months of CPAP were analysed. Compliance was defined as an average CPAP use of at least 4 h per night. RESULTS: 55 patients were included (49% women, age 70.7 ± 8.9 years, body mass index 28.9 ± 6.5 kg/m2). Aetiology of MCI was vascular (45.5%), psychiatric (12.7%) and related to Alzheimer's disease (7.3%), with 47.3% of amnesic disorders and 45.5% of dysexecutive disorders. The MiniMentalState score was 26.7 ± 3.1. SA was mostly obstructive (81.8%) with a mean apnoea-hypopnoea index of 41.1 ± 16.4/h. At 3 months, 38 patients were compliant (69%) with a CPAP median use of 5.9 h per night and 83% of nights. Self-reported tolerance was better in compliant patients (75.7% vs 38.5% p = 0.017). Thirty-four patients remained compliant at 12 months (62%). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest a high rate of CPAP compliance in patients suffering from MCI. Compliance was related to the device tolerance, emphasizing the need to closely monitor and improve this factor.
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Cognitiva , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua , Cooperación del Paciente , Humanos , Disfunción Cognitiva/terapia , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Síndromes de la Apnea del Sueño/terapiaRESUMEN
Background: Our objective was to evaluate the short-, medium- and long-term benefits of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on the physical and affective components of dyspnoea in people with fibrotic idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (f-IIPs). Anxiety and depressive symptoms, fatigue, health-related quality of life and exercise tolerance were also assessed. Methods: Data on 166 individuals with f-IIPs who enrolled in an 8-week home-based PR programme (weekly supervised 90-min session) were retrospectively analysed. Assessments included the Dyspnoea-12 (D-12) questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Fatigue Assessment Scale, Visual Simplified Respiratory Questionnaire and 6-min stepper test, and were performed at home at short, medium (6â months) and long (12â months) term. Results: Among the 166 individuals with f-IIPs who enrolled in PR, 75 (45%) and 91 (55%) participants had a diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and fibrosing non-specific interstitial pneumonia, respectively, and 87 (52%) participants concluded a full year of follow-up. In the total group, both physical and affective components of dyspnoea were improved, at short, medium and long term, after PR. Overall, half of the participants reached the minimally important difference of 3â points of the D-12 questionnaire at the end of PR, and at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Anxiety and depressive symptoms, fatigue and health-related quality of life were also improved, while the short-term benefits in exercise tolerance were not maintained 1â year after PR. Conclusion: An individualised home-based PR programme resulted in short-, medium- and long-term improvements in both physical and affective components of dyspnoea assessed by the D-12 questionnaire.
RESUMEN
Patients with idiopathic fibrosing interstitial pneumonias (f-IIPs) mainly suffer from dyspnea. Refractory dyspnea, defined as persistent dyspnea despite optimal treatment, could be the signal to prescribe dyspnea relievers. We aimed to examine the prevalence and characteristics of refractory dyspnea in consecutive patients with f-IIPs. Refractory dyspnea was defined by an mMRC≥3 and also by a VAS dyspnea score≥2 at rest. The sensory and affective characteristics of refractory dyspnea (mMRC≥3) and associated quality of life (QoL) anxiety and depression were compared with non-refractory dyspnea (mMRC1-2) using the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP), King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease (KBILD) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADs). We included 40 patients (24 men), aged 72 [68-79], FVC of 71 % [59-86] and DLCO 47 % [40-49]. Refractory dyspnea, was found in 38 % (95%CI:23-54) when defined by mMRC≥3 and in 67 % (95%CI:50-81) using a resting VAS dyspnea score ≥2. The agreement between the two definitions was low. Patients with refractory dyspnea (mMRC≥3) were more often women (60 % vs.28 %, p = 0.046), had a lower DLCO (24 % [22-43] vs.47 % [43-51], p = 0.014) and more frequently used oxygen (60 % vs.12 %, p = 0.003); they experience more intense air hunger (5/10 [3-6] vs.2/10 [0-5], p = 0.018)). No significant differences were observed in VAS, MDP, KBILD, or HADs scores between refractory and non-refractory dyspnea patients. Our results indicate a significant frequency of refractory dyspnea in patients with f-IIPs and an association with air hunger but no impact on the affective dimension of dyspnea, anxiety, depression and QoL, suggesting that the mMRC score might not accurately identify patients distressed by their breathlessness.
Asunto(s)
Neumonías Intersticiales Idiopáticas , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Calidad de Vida , Neumonías Intersticiales Idiopáticas/complicaciones , Neumonías Intersticiales Idiopáticas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/complicaciones , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/epidemiología , Disnea/diagnóstico , Disnea/epidemiología , Disnea/etiologíaRESUMEN
Background: The French RAMSES study is an observational prospective multicentre real-life cohort including severe asthmatic subjects. The objective of the study was to compare the characteristics of patients, in terms of phenotype and asthma care trajectories, between those managed by tertiary referral centres (TRCs) or secondary care centres (SCCs). Methods: Patients were prospectively recruited and enrolled for a 5-year follow-up. Patients' characteristics were analysed at inclusion and compared between TRCs and SCCs. Results: 52 centres (24 TRCs and 28 SCCs) included 2046 patients: 1502 (73.4%) were included by a TRC and 544 (26.6%) by a SCC. Patients were mainly women (62%), 53±15â years old, 67% with Asthma Control Test <20; at inclusion, 14% received oral corticosteroids (OCS) and 66% biologics. Compared with the SCC group, the TRC group had more frequent comorbidities and lower blood eosinophil counts (262 versus 340â mm-3; p=0.0036). OCS and biologics use did not differ between groups, but patients in the TRC group benefited more frequently from an educational programme (26% versus 18%; p=0.0008) and received more frequently two or more sequential lines of biologics (33% versus 24%; p=0.0105). In-depth investigations were more frequently performed in the TRC group (allergy tests: 74% versus 62%; p<0.0001; exhaled nitric oxide fraction: 56% versus 21%; p<0.0001; induced sputum: 6% versus 3%; p=0.0390). Conclusions: Phenotypes and care trajectories differed in the RAMSES cohort between SCCs and TRCs, probably related to different levels of asthma severity and differences in medical resources and practices among centres. This highlights the need for standardisation of severe asthma care.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: One of the major challenges in managing allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis remains consistent and reproducible assessment of response to treatment. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the most relevant changes in CT scan parameters over time for assessing response to treatment? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this ancillary study of a randomized clinical trial (NebuLamB), patients with asthma with available CT scan and without exacerbation during a 4-month allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis exacerbation treatment period (corticosteroids and itraconazole) were included. Changed CT scan parameters were assessed by systematic analyses of CT scan findings at initiation and end of treatment. CT scans were assessed by two radiologists anonymized to the clinical data. Radiologic parameters were determined by selecting those showing significant changes over time. Improvement of at least one, without worsening of the others, defined the radiologic response. Agreement between radiologic changes and clinical and immunologic responses was likewise investigated. RESULTS: Among the 139 originally randomized patients, 132 were included. We identified five CT scan parameters showing significant changes at end of treatment: mucoid impaction extent, mucoid impaction density, centrilobular micronodules, consolidation/ground-glass opacities, and bronchial wall thickening (P < .05). These changes were only weakly associated with one another, except for mucoid impaction extent and density. No agreement was observed between clinical, immunologic, and radiologic responses, assessed as an overall response, or considering each of the parameters (Cohen κ, -0.01 to 0.24). INTERPRETATION: Changes in extent and density of mucoid impaction, centrilobular micronodules, consolidation/ground-glass opacities, and thickening of the bronchial walls were found to be the most relevant CT scan parameters to assess radiologic response to treatment. A clinical, immunologic, and radiologic multidimensional approach should be adopted to assess outcomes, probably with a composite definition of response to treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02273661; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov).