Costs and Readmissions Associated with Type A Aortic Dissections at High- and Low-Volume Centers.

BACKGROUND: Costs and readmissions associated with type A aortic dissection repairs are not well understood. We investigated statewide readmissions, costs, and outcomes associated with the surgical management of type A aortic dissection repairs at low- and high-volume centers. METHODS: We identified all adult type A aortic dissection patients who underwent operative repair in the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission's database (2012-2020). Hospitals were stratified into high- (top quartile of total repairs) or low-volume centers. RESULTS: Of the 249 patients included, 193 (77.5%) were treated at a high-volume center. Patients treated at high- and low-volume centers had no differences in age, sex, race, primary payer, or severity (all p > 0.5). High- compared to low-volume centers had a greater proportion of patients transferred in (71.5% vs. 17.9%, p < 0.001). High-volume centers also had longer lengths of stay (12 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001), similar inpatient mortality (13.0% vs. 16.1%, p = 0.6), and similar proportion of patients readmitted (54.9% vs. 51.8%, p = 0.7). High-volume centers had greater index admission costs ($114,859 vs. $72,090, p < 0.001) and similar readmission costs ($48,367 vs. $42,204, p = 0.5). At high-volume centers, transferred patients compared to direct admissions had greater severity of illness (p = 0.05), similar mortality (p = 0.53), and greater lengths of stay (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: High-volume centers had a greater number of patients transferred from other institutions compared to low-volume centers. High-volume centers were associated with increased index admission resource utilization, with transfer patients having higher illness severity and greater resource utilization, yet similar mortality, compared to direct admission patients.

Risk factors for in-hospital acquisition of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in patients with severe burns.

BACKGROUND: Although patients with severe burns are prone to severe infections with antibiotic-resistant bacteria and inevitably have some risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) acquisition, risk factors for CRE infection or colonization in these patients have not been investigated. AIM: To identify the independent risk factors for CRE acquisition in patients with severe burns. METHODS: Patients admitted to the burn intensive care unit (BICU) for acute burn care were categorized based on culture results during BICU care into the CRE group and non-CRE group, which included the carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacterales (CSE) and control groups. Clinical and microbiological factors were compared between the CRE and non-CRE groups, and between the CRE and CSE groups to identify independent risk factors for in-hospital CRE acquisition. FINDINGS: Among the included 489 patients, 101 (20.7%) and 388 (79.3%) patients were classified in the CRE and non-CRE groups, respectively. The non-CRE group included 91 (18.6%) and 297 (60.7%) patients in the CSE and control groups, respectively. In multivariate analysis between the CRE and non-CRE groups, exposure to other CRE-acquired patients (P = 0.018), abbreviated burn severity index score ≥9 (P = 0.012), and mechanical ventilation (P < 0.001) were associated with CRE acquisition. In multivariate analysis between the CRE and CSE groups, exposure to other CRE-acquired patients was associated with CRE acquisition (P = 0.048). CONCLUSION: Considering the limitation of controlling the burn severity in hospitalized patients, enhanced infection control measures for preventing in-hospital CRE transmission among patients with severe burns should be emphasized.

An Unusual Phenomenon of Spontaneously Reversing Nystagmus in Peripheral Vertigo-A Case Report and Literature Review.

Direction-changing nystagmus on positional testing is classically ascribed to a central pathology. We herein report a case of a patient with Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV) who demonstrated the unusual phenomenon of spontaneously reversing nystagmus, and discuss the theorised mechanisms with a novel illustration. In left lateral position, our patient's Videonystagmography (VNG) demonstrated an initially fast-phase geotropic nystagmus (leftward-beating, SPV 29°/s) which then paused for 8 s, then spontaneously reversed direction into a slow-phase ageotropic nystagmus (rightward-beating, SPV 7°/s). The rest of the neurootological examination and audiometry were normal. An MRI Brain scan also revealed no intracranial pathology. In subsequent reviews the vertigo resolved after repositioning manoeuvres for Left Horizontal Canal BPPV. With review of existing literature, this case may have exhibited coexistent left canalolithiasis and cupulolithiasis, resulting in simultaneous ampullopetal then ampullofugal forces in a single head position. Other posited theories include that of Endolymphatic Reflux and short-term central adaptation of the Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex. This case highlights a diagnostic challenge the otolaryngologists and neurologists may face with an atypical spontaneously reversing nystagmus in BPPV. However it remains a priority to rule out central pathologies first, and calls for specialists to take care in diagnosing horizontal canal BPPV by observing for a period of latency and spontaneous reversal of nystagmus first, so as to perform the appropriate repositioning manoeuvres. Laryngoscope, 2024.