Prostatic arterial embolization versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: 1-year outcomes.

PURPOSE: Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) and Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE) are novel techniques for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia lower urinary tract symptoms (BPH-LUTS). The objective of this study was to describe and compare the functional results and complications of these two techniques at one year follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective, monocentric study of all patients consecutively treated in our center with HoLEP or PAE for symptomatic or complicated BPH between January 2016 and December 2019. Data regarding patient and perioperative characteristics, follow-up biological results, functional questionnaires and uroflowmetry were collected from medical records. RESULTS: A total of 490 and 57 patients were treated with HoLEP and PAE, respectively. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the two groups were similar. The operative time was significantly higher for PAE (p < 0.001) and hospitalization time longer after HoLEP (p = 0.0006). The urinary catheterization time was longer after PAE (p < 0.001). The prostatic volume treated was higher with HoLEP than with PAE (56% versus 26%, p < 0.001). The mean difference in IPSS from baseline to 12 months was significantly higher after HoLEP than after PAE: - 17.58 versus - 8 (p < 0.001). The mean difference in QoL-IPSS from baseline to 12 months was significantly higher after HoLEP: - 4.09 versus - 2.27 (p < 0.001). The rate of postoperative adverse events in the first three months was similar between the two groups:35% after HoLEP and 33% after PAE (p = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: HoLEP and PAE both significantly improved BPH-LUTS, with HoLEP having an advantage over PAE.

The Mayo Adhesive Probability score can help predict intra- and postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: Living donor nephrectomy is a high-stake procedure involving healthy individuals, therefore every effort should be made to define each patient's individualized risk and improve potential donors' information. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interest of the Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) score, an imaging-based score initially designed to estimate the risk of adherent perinephric fat in partial nephrectomy, to predict intra- and postoperative complications of living donor nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the imaging, clinical, and follow-up data of 452 kidney donors who underwent laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in two academic centers. RESULTS: Imaging and follow-up data were available for 307 kidney donors, among which 44 (14%) had a high MAP score (≥ 3). Intraoperative difficulties were encountered in 50 patients (16%), including difficult dissection (n = 35) and bleeding (n = 17). Conversion to open surgery was required for 13 patients (4.2%). On multivariate analysis, a MAP score ≥ 3 was significantly associated with the risk of intraoperative difficulty [OR 14.12 (5.58-35.7), p < 0.001] or conversion to open surgery [OR 18.96 (3.42-105.14), p = 0.0042]. Postoperative complications were noted in 99 patients (32%), including 12 patients (3.9%) with Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV complications. On multivariate analysis, a high MAP score was also associated with the risk of postoperative complications [OR 2.55 (1.20-5.40), p = 0.01]. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective bicentric study, a high MAP score was associated with the risk of intra- and postoperative complications of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. The MAP score appears of interest in the living donor evaluation process to help improve donors' information and outcomes.

Long-term kidney transplant survival in patients with continent urinary diversion.

OBJECTIVES: To report the long-term survival of transplanted kidneys in patients with a continent urinary diversion. METHODS: Between January 1987 and July 2015, 16 patients with a median age of 37 years (range 21-63 years) underwent kidney transplantation on a continent urinary diversion. A total of 14 patients presented irreversible dysfunction of the lower urinary tract, and two patients had required radical cystectomy because of bladder cancer. All continent urinary diversions were carried out before the transplantation. There were nine Kock pouches, five Mainz pouches, one Mainz neobladder and one Hautmann neobladder. A total of 11 patients had a previous non-continent urinary diversion. Of the transplants, 14 came from brain-dead donors and two from related living donors. RESULTS: The median post-transplantation follow up was 171 months (range 30-298 months). Two patients died, while six patients lost their transplant and resumed hemodialysis. Nine patients (56.2%) were alive with a functional transplant at the end of follow up. The most common allograft complication was acute pyelonephritis, but no graft was lost as a result of urinary diversion complications. The kidney transplant survival rate was 73.3% after 10 years, and 66.6% after 15 years. Among patients who still had a functional transplant at the time of the study, creatinine clearance was >30 mL/min for seven patients and <30 mL/min for two patients. CONCLUSIONS: The present study is the longest series to date of renal transplantation on continent urinary diversions. The long-term outcome shows that the presence of a continent urinary diversion does not reduce transplant survival.

En Bloc Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Study of an 18-year Experience in a Single Institution.

Background: Renal transplantation is facing a shortage of grafts. En bloc kidney transplantation (EBKT) from pediatric donors could increase the number of available grafts. Objective: To describe the surgical technique as well as the long-term functional and morphological results of EBKT. Design setting and participants: We performed a retrospective study of all the EBKT procedures performed in Lyon between 2002 and 2020. Electronic medical records were checked with an analysis of demographics, and peri- and postoperative results. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: A descriptive analysis of donor and recipient characteristics, perioperative data, complications, and renal function was performed. Results and limitations: Between 2002 and 2020, 21 EBKT procedures were performed. Donors had a mean weight of 8.6 kg and a mean age of 12 mo, with a mean cold ischemia time of 11 h and 30 min. Receivers had a mean age of 30 yr and a body mass index of 20. The mean follow-up time was 62 mo, with patient survival of 100% and graft survival of 95%. There were 13 reinterventions comprising one early unilateral transplantectomy for thrombosis. Renal function was excellent, and the morphological findings described an important growth in size in the first 2 yr before attaining the adult size. This study's limitations include its retrospective nature and a small number of participants. Conclusions: The present study reports excellent results with EBKT and supports the pursuit and spread of this technique. Patient summary: In this report, we describe the technique and results of en bloc kidney transplantation. We found that results are excellent for renal function and patient survival. We conclude that en bloc kidney transplantation should be considered to increase the number of grafts.

Holmium laser versus thulium laser enucleation of the prostate: a matched-pair analysis from two centers.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to compare perioperative and functional outcomes of two different prostatic laser enucleation techniques performed in two high-volume centers: 100 W holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) (Lyon, France) and 110 W thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) (Varese, Italy). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A nonrandomized, observational, retrospective and matched-pair analysis was performed on two homogeneous groups of 117 patients that underwent prostate laser enucleation in the HoLEP or ThuLEP centers between January 2015 and April 2017, following the classical 'three lobes' enucleation technique. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and prostate volume were the main parameters considered for matching the patients between the two groups. Patients on anticoagulant therapy, with documented detrusor hypoactivity or hyperactivity or with the finding of concurrent prostate cancer were excluded from the study. Follow up was assessed at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Median enucleation and morcellation time was 75.5 and 11.5 min, respectively, in the HoLEP group versus 70.5 and 12 min, respectively, in the ThuLEP group (p = 0.001 and 0.49, respectively). Enucleated adenoma weight was comparable (44 g versus 45.6 g, p = 0.60). Energy index (3884.63 versus 4137.35 J/g, p = 0.30) and enucleation index (0.57 versus 0.6 g/min, p = 0.81) were similar in the two groups. Catheterization time was comparable (1 versus 1 day; p = 0.14). The International Prostate Symptom Score and Quality of Life score significantly decreased, as well as maximal urinary flow rate. Median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) drop 1 year after surgery was 2.1 ng/ml in the HoLEP group (-52.83%) versus 1.75 ng/ml in the ThuLEP group (-47.85%) (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Both HoLEP (100 W) and ThuLEP (110 W) relieve lower urinary tract symptoms in a comparable way with high efficacy and safety, with negligible clinical differences.