Impact of Empirical Antibiotic Regimens on Mortality in Neutropenic Patients with Bloodstream Infection Presenting with Septic Shock.

We analyzed risk factors for mortality in febrile neutropenic patients with bloodstream infections (BSI) presenting with septic shock and assessed the impact of empirical antibiotic regimens. A multicenter retrospective study (2010 to 2019) of two prospective cohorts compared BSI episodes in patients with or without septic shock. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for mortality in episodes with septic shock. Of 1,563 patients with BSI, 257 (16%) presented with septic shock. Those patients with septic shock had higher mortality than those without septic shock (55% versus 15%, P < 0.001). Gram-negative bacilli caused 81% of episodes with septic shock, Gram-positive cocci caused 22%, and Candida species caused 5%. Inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment (IEAT) was administered in 17.5% of septic shock episodes. Empirical ß-lactam combined with other active antibiotics was associated with the lowest mortality observed. When amikacin was the only active antibiotic, mortality was 90%. Addition of empirical specific Gram-positive coverage had no impact on mortality. Mortality was higher when IEAT was administered (76% versus 51%, P = 0.002). Age of >70 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 4.7), IEAT for Candida spp. or Gram-negative bacilli (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.3 to 11.1), acute kidney injury (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.9), and amikacin as the only active antibiotic (OR, 15.2; 95% CI, 1.7 to 134.5) were independent risk factors for mortality, while the combination of ß-lactam and amikacin was protective (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.57). Septic shock in febrile neutropenic patients with BSI is associated with extremely high mortality, especially when IEAT is administered. Combination therapy including an active ß-lactam and amikacin results in the best outcomes.

First external validation of the FLIPI-L score in a single-center series of patients with follicular lymphoma.

The FLIPI-L has recently been proposed as a novel prognostic index in follicular lymphoma (FL), combining FLIPI and the presence of lymphopenia. In our single-center validation in 381 FL patients, lymphopenia was less frequent than in the original publication and thus the distribution of risk categories was different. Although it was not able to properly predict time to first treatment, FLIPI-L performed slightly better than FLIPI alone in the prediction of response, early relapse, progression-free and overall survival, and histological transformation. This new tool or others encompassing parameters from the microenvironment might improve upon the prognostic ability of classical scores.

Clonal relationship in multisited mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas: a single-centre experience.

Clonal heterogeneity in multisited or recurrent lymphoid neoplasms is a phenomenon that has been increasingly studied in recent years. However, in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphomas it remains largely unexplored. Patients diagnosed at our institution with multisited MALT lymphoma, from January 2009 to October 2018, were studied. Molecular studies were performed for the detection of clonally rearranged immunoglobulin by polymerase chain reaction.In all, 91 patients were included. Of those, 28 had a multisited disease and in 16 clonality studies were done. In eight cases, multifocal involvement was synchronous and in eight metachronous. Patients with non-gastric gastrointestinal tract involvement tended to disseminate within the same tract, without observing other specific dissemination patterns. Four cases (25%) had clonal heterogeneity at the different organs involved. All patients with late relapses (two patients) had different clones. The majority of patients with multisited MALT lymphomas presented with the same clone in the different involved organs, identifying a different clone in those with late relapses. These patients could represent de novo neoplasms, rather than a relapse. This could mean that some individuals might have a genetic predisposition to develop this type of lymphoma and it could also have clinical implications regarding therapeutic decisions.

Prognostic ability of five clinical risk scores in follicular lymphoma: A single-center evaluation.

With the intention of identifying follicular lymphoma (FL) patients at higher risk of progression, early relapse (POD24), histological transformation (HT) or death, multiple risk scores (RS) have been proposed. However, it has not yet been established whether any of them globally outperforms the others. We evaluated the clinical utility and statistical performance of the five most widely used clinical scores (IPI, ILI, FLIPI, FLIPI2, PRIMA-PI) in a single-center series of 414 grade 1-3A FL patients diagnosed in the rituximab era. Overall concordance (proportion of patients allocated to the same risk category by all five RS) was 24%. FLIPI and FLIPI2 were predictive of time to first treatment. All five scores were predictive of response, POD24, progression-free, and OS, while only FLIPI predicted HT. IPI identified a small subset (7%) of truly high-risk patients (10-year OS of 16%). In subgroup analyses, we showed that ILI is useful in the prognostication of limited-disease patients, and PRIMA-PI is an age-independent score that can identify a high-risk subset of older patients. Performance metrics were slightly better for IPI in terms of calibration (Harrell's c-index 0.73), without major differences among RS regarding other parameters. Although the incorporation of molecular and imaging data will continue to refine the stratification of FL patients, FLIPI remains the most powerful clinical prognostic index in the rituximab era, predicting the greatest number of endpoints.

Use of Telehealth for Domiciliary Follow-up After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Prospective Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients who have recently received a hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) are at higher risk of acute complications in the first weeks after discharge, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the use of a telehealth platform for the follow-up of HCT patients during the first two weeks after discharge. METHODS: In total, 21 patients who received autologous or allogeneic HCT for hematological malignancies were screened from April 30, 2020, to July 15, 2020. The telehealth platform assisted in the daily collection of vital signs as well as physical and psychological symptoms for two weeks after hospital discharge. The required medical devices (oximeter and blood pressure monitor) were given to patients and a dedicated smartphone app was developed to collect this data. The data were reviewed daily through web-based software by a hematologist specializing in HCT. RESULTS: Only 12 of 21 patients were able to join and complete the study. Technological barriers were the most frequent limiting factor in this study. Among the 12 patients who completed the study, adherence to data reporting was high. The patients' experience of using such a system was considered good. In two cases, the system enabled the early recognition of acute complications. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study showed that telehealth systems can be applied in the early posttransplant setting, with evident advantages for physicians and patients for both medical and psychological aspects. Technological issues still represent a challenge for the applicability of such a system, especially for older adult patients. Easier-to-use technologies could help to expand the use of telehealth systems in this setting in the future.

The direct and indirect effects of COVID-19 pandemic in a real-life hematological setting.

BACKGROUND: Clinical outcomes of novel coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) in onco-hematological patients are unknown. When compared to non-immunocompromised patients, onco-hematological patients seem to have higher mortality rates. AIMS: We describe the characteristics and outcomes of a consecutive cohort of 24 onco-hematological patients with COVID-19 during the first month of the pandemic. We also describe variations in healthcare resource utilization within our hematology department. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from patients between the first month of the pandemic were retrospectively collected. Clinical and logistic data were also collected and compared with the average values from the prior 3 months of activity. Prevalence of COVID-19 in our hematological population was 0.4%. Baseline characteristics were as follows: male sex: 83%, lymphoid diseases: 46%, median age: 69 (22-82) years. Median follow-up in survivors was 14 (9-28) days and inpatient mortality rate was 46%. Average time to moderate/severe respiratory insufficiency and death were 3 (1-10) and 10 (3-18) days, respectively. Only 1 out of every 12 patients who developed moderate to severe respiratory insufficiency recovered. Upon univariate analysis, the following factors were associated with higher mortality: age ≥ 70 years (P = .01) and D-dimer ≥900 mcg/L (P = .04). With respect to indirect effects during the COVID-19 pandemic, and when compared with the prior 3 months of activity, inpatient mortality (excluding patients with COVID-19 included in the study) increased by 56%. This was associated with a more frequent use of vasoactive drugs (+300%) and advanced respiratory support (+133%) in the hematology ward. In the outpatient setting, there was a reduction in initial visits (-55%) and chemotherapy sessions (-19%). A significant increase in phone visits was reported (+581%). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 pandemic is associated with elevated mortality in hematological patients. Negative indirect effects are also evident within this setting.

Refractoriness to rituximab-based therapy and elevated serum B2-microglobulin predict for inferior survival in marginal zone lymphoma.

Short responses to immunochemotherapy predict for an inferior OS in follicular lymphoma. We set out to determine whether this is also the case in marginal zone lymphoma. A group of 139 marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) patients treated with front-line immuno- or immunochemotherapy (I/ICT) were categorized into I/ICT-refractory (non-response or relapse/progression within six months of treatment response assessment) or I/ICT-sensitive. Twenty-three patients (17%) were refractory. Refractory patients had inferior OS (4-yr probabilities of 57% vs. 83%, p = .0003) as did those with beta2-microglobulin (B2M)>3 mg/L (4-yr probabilities of 80% vs. 100%, p = .0029). On multivariable analysis they both showed a borderline significant correlation with OS (p = .06 and .07, respectively). B2M > 3 mg/L was also an adverse prognostic factor for progression-free survival in both univariable (4-yr probability of 61% vs. 83%, p = .02) and multivariable analysis (HR 2.9, p = .02). In conclusion, B2M and refractoriness to I/ICT may identify patients with MZL at higher risk of inferior survival.