RESUMEN
Objectives: To assess the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and self-reported adherence to preventive measures in Switzerland during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: 4,299 participants from a digital cohort were followed between September 2020 and November 2021. Baseline equivalised disposable income and education were used as SES proxies. Adherence was assessed over time. We investigated the association between SES and adherence using multivariable mixed logistic regression, stratifying by age (below/above 65 years) and two periods (before/after June 2021, to account for changes in vaccine coverage and epidemiological situation). Results: Adherence was high across all SES strata before June 2021. After, participants with higher equivalised disposable income were less likely to adhere to preventive measures compared to participants in the first (low) quartile [second (Adj.OR, 95% CI) (0.56, 0.37-0.85), third (0.38, 0.23-0.64), fourth (0.60, 0.36-0.98)]. We observed similar results for education. Conclusion: No differences by SES were found during the period with high SARS-CoV-2 incidence rates and stringent measures. Following the broad availability of vaccines, lower incidence, and eased measures, differences by SES started to emerge. Our study highlights the need for contextual interpretation when assessing SES impact on adherence to preventive measures.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Clase Social , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Suiza/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , PandemiasRESUMEN
This analysis of the Swiss health system reviews recent developments in organization and governance, health financing, health care provision, health reforms and health system performance. The Swiss health system is highly complex, combining aspects of managed competition and “corporatism” (the integration of interest groups in the policy process) in a decentralized regulatory framework shaped by the influences of direct democracy. The health system performs very well with regard to a broad range of indicators. Coverage is ensured through mandatory health insurance (MHI), with subsidies for people on low incomes. The system offers a high degree of choice and direct access to all levels of care with virtually no waiting times, though managed care type insurance plans that include gatekeeping restrictions are becoming increasingly important. Public satisfaction is high and quality is viewed to be good or very good. Reforms since 2000 have improved the MHI system, changed the financing of hospitals, strengthened regulations in the area of pharmaceuticals and the control of epidemics, and harmonized regulation of human resources across the country. In addition, there has been a slow process towards more centralization of national health policy-making. Nevertheless, a number of challenges remain: the costs of the health care system are well above the EU average; MHI premiums have increased more quickly than incomes since 2003; by European standards, the share of out-of-pocket payments is exceptionally high; low- and middle-income households contribute a greater share of their income to the financing of the health system than higher-income households; and the system remains highly fragmented as regards both organization and planning as well as health care provision.