RESUMEN
Background: There is still no consensus on perioperative pain control techniques in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery; protocols of conventional therapy can be improved by the use of perioperative anaesthesiologic techniques, such as epidural or loco-regional analgesic administration as transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. The aim of this evaluation was to investigate the role of laparoscopic-assisted TAP block during repair of diastasis recti associated with primary midline hernias in term of post-operative pain relief. Methods: This was a retrospective evaluation of a prospectively maintained database including patients undergoing laparoscopic repair of diastasis recti associated with primary ventral hernia. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A patients (n = 34) received laparoscopic-assisted bilateral TAP-block of 7.5 mg/ml ropivacaine for each side and Group B patients (n = 29) received conventional post-operative therapy. All patients received 24 h infusion of 20 mg morphine; pain was checked at 6, 24 and 48 h after surgery by numeric rating scale (NRS) score. A rescue analgesia by was given if NRS score was >4 or on patient request. Results: No differences in operative time, complications and post-operative stay, no complications related to TAP-block technique were found. Post-operative pain scores (determined by NRS) were found to be significantly different between groups. Group A patients showed a significant reduction in NRS score at 6, 24 and 48 h (P < 0.005) and in the number of patients requiring further analgesic drugs administration (P < 0.005) compared to Group B patients. Conclusions: Laparoscopic-guided TAP-block can be considered safe and effective in the management of post-operative pain and in the reduction of analgesic need in patients undergoing laparoscopic repair of diastasis recti and ventral hernias. The non-randomised nature of the study and the lack of a consistent series of patients require further evaluations.
RESUMEN
AIM: We present the outcomes and the recurrences of 848 patients with pilonidal disease (PD) treated by biopsy punch excision (BPE) and we weigh our results against progressively obtained operative experience. BPE is a modified 'merged' version of both the Bascom 'pit picking' procedure and the Gips procedure. It employs biopsy punches of different calibre, depending on whether treatment is in the natal cleft (calibre as small as possible) or lateral (larger calibre punches or even small incision). Sometimes this procedure is referred to as the Bascom-Gips procedure. METHODS: In all, 848 consecutive patients with PD were treated from January 2011 until December 2016 (sex 622 [73.4%] men and 226 [26.6%] women; median age 26.2 years, mean age 24.6 ± 28.99 [range 14-55] years, men 25.1 years, women 24.8 years). Of these 848 patients, 287 were operated in 2011-2012, 301 in 2013-2014 and 260 in 2015-2016. The recurrence rates were recorded 12, 24 and 60 months after surgery both cumulatively and by examining the outcomes of the three biennia individually (years of treatment 2011-2012 or group A, 2013-2014 or group B, 2015-2016 or group C). RESULTS: The mean operating time was 34 ± 24.45 min. Postoperative complications included early (<24 h; n = 22 or 2.6%) and delayed (>24 h; n = 26 or 3.1%) postoperative bleeding. Postoperative fluid collections (<2 weeks) occurred in 83/848 patients (9.8%) and included haematoma (n = 25) and seroma (n = 58). Full recovery was obtained after a mean of 21 ± 12.72 days and work/school/university activities were resumed after a mean of 4 ± 12.02 days. Twelve-, 24- and 60-month follow-ups were possible in 725 (85.5%), 682 (80.4%) and 595 (70.2%) patients out of 848. An overall significant (ê2 = 16.87, P = 0.0002) difference was found in the recurrence rates: 59 recurrences/725 patients (or 8.1%) after 1 year, 89 recurrences/682 patients (or 13.0%) after 2 years and 98 recurrences/595 (or 16.4%) after 5 years. However, when subgrouping patients in three 24-month subsets, the recurrence rates showed a steady and progressive decrease in the three biennia 2011-2012 (group A), 2013-2014 (group B) and 2015-2016 (group C) at 12-, 48- and 60-month follow-ups. Recurrences after 12 months were 29/225 (12.9%), 19/285 (6.7%) and 11/215 (5.1%) (ê2 = 8.53, P = 0.014) in groups A, B and C respectively; after 24 months, 36/226 (15.9%), 31/242 (12.8%) and 22/214 (10.2%) (ê2 = 2.38, P = 0.30 N.S.) in groups A, B and C respectively; after 60 months, 38/194 (19.5%), 36/215 (16.7%) and 24/186 (12.9%) (ê2 = 2.23, P = 0.32) in groups A, B and C respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BPE is an effective, disease-targeted, minimally invasive and inexpensive way to treat PD. Its results are influenced by the experience of the team involved, especially regarding early recurrences/failure of surgery. At least 5-year follow-ups are needed to ascertain the outcome of surgery for PD.
Asunto(s)
Seno Pilonidal , Enfermedades de la Piel , Adolescente , Adulto , Biopsia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Seno Pilonidal/cirugía , Recurrencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on pain control in patients undergoing laparoscopy; nowadays, conventional therapy may be improved by transversus abdominis plane block. The aim of this evaluation is to investigate the role of laparoscopic-assisted trocar-site ropivacaine infiltration during adrenalectomy in pain control. METHODS: This is a retrospective evaluation of a prospectively maintained database including patients undergoing adrenalectomy. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Group A patients received laparoscopic-assisted trocar-site infiltration of 7.5 mg/mL ropivacaine and Group B patients did not receive any infiltration. All patients received a 24-hour infusion of 20 mg morphine; pain was checked at 6, 24, and 48 hours after surgery by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score. A rescue analgesia by was given if VAS score was > 4 or on patient request. RESULTS: No differences in operative time, complications, and post-operative stay and no complications related to trocar-site infiltration were found. 6-hour and 48-hour VAS scores were not found to be significantly different between groups, even if a slight decrease in VAS score in Group A was reported. Group A showed significant reduction in VAS score at 24 hours (2.44 +/- .41 vs 3.01 +/- .78, P < .005) and in the number of patients requiring further analgesic drugs administration (40.6% vs 57.8%, P < .005). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic-guided trocar-site ropivacaine infiltration can be considered safe and effective in the management of post-operative pain and in the reduction of analgesic need in patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy. The retrospective nature of the study and the lack of a consistent series of patients require further evaluations.
Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Locales , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Ropivacaína , Anestésicos Locales/uso terapéutico , Anestésicos Locales/efectos adversos , Músculos Abdominales , Adrenalectomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , AnalgésicosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We compared 2 imaging modalities in patients suspected of having coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. Blinded to the results of real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) testing, lung ultrasound (LUS) examinations and chest computed tomography (CT) were performed, and the specific characteristics of these imaging studies were assessed. METHODS: From March 15, 2020, to April 15, 2020, 63 consecutive patients were enrolled in this prospective pilot study. All patients underwent hematochemical tests, LUS examinations, chest CT, and confirmatory rRT-PCR. The diagnostic performance of LUS and chest CT was calculated with rRT-PCR as a reference. The interobserver agreement of radiologists and ultrasound examiners was calculated. Ultrasound and CT features were compared to assess the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Positive and negative likelihood ratios measured the diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: Nineteen (30%) patients were COVID-19 negative, and 44 (70%) were positive. No differences in demographics and clinical data at presentation were observed among positive and negative patients. Interobserver agreement for CT had a κ value of 0.877, whereas for LUS, it was 0.714. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of chest CT for COVID-19 pneumonia were 93%, 90%, 85%, and 95%, respectively; whereas for LUS, they were 68%, 79%, 88%, and 52%. On receiver operating characteristic curves, area under the curve values were 0.834 (95% confidence interval, 0.711-0.958) and 0.745 (95% confidence interval, 0.606-0.884) for chest CT and LUS. CONCLUSIONS: Lung ultrasound had good reliability compared to chest CT. Therefore, our results indicate that LUS may be used to assess patients suspected of having COVID-19 pneumonia.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
Background: The current use of endoscopic stenting as a bridge to surgery is not always accepted in standard clinical practice to treat neoplastic colonic obstructions. Objectives: The role of colonic self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) positioning as a bridge to resective surgery versus emergency surgery (ES) for malignant obstruction, using all new data and available variables, was studied and we focused on short- and long-term results. Materials and Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed. PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases were included. The search comprised only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the interventions that included SEMS positioning versus ES. The primary outcomes were the rates of overall postoperative mortality, clinical and technical success. The secondary outcomes were the short- and long-term results. Results: A total of 12 studies were eligible for further analyses. A laparoscopic colectomy was the most common operation performed in the SEMS group, whereas the traditional open approach was commonly used in the ES group. Intraoperative colonic lavage was seldomly performed during ES. There were no differences in mortality rates between the two groups (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.55 to 2.04; I2 = 0%). In the SEMS group, the rate of successful primary anastomosis was significantly higher in of SEMS (69.75%) than in the ES (55.07%) (RR 1.26, 95% 245 CI 1.01 to 1.57; I2 = 86%). Conversely, the upfront Hartmann procedure was performed more frequently in the ES (39.1%) as compared to the SEMS group (23.4%) (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.85; I2 = 23%). The overall postoperative complications rate was significantly lower in the SEMS group (32.74%) than in the ES group (48.25%) (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.91; I2 = 65%). Conclusions: In the presence of malignant colorectal obstruction, SEMS is safe and associated with the same mortality and significantly lower morbidity than the ES group. The rate of successful primary anastomosis was significantly higher than the ES group. Nevertheless, recurrence and survival outcomes are not significantly different between the two groups. The analysis of short- and long-term results can suggest the use of SEMS as a bridge to resective surgery when it is performed by an endoscopist with adequate expertise in both colonoscopy and fluoroscopic techniques and who performed commonly colonic stenting.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles , Neoplasias Colorrectales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Twenty percent of the patients affected with stage IV antropyloric stomach cancer are hospitalized with a gastric outlet obstruction syndrome (GOOS) requiring its resolution to improve the quality of life (QoL). We present our preliminary short- and mid-term results regarding the influence of endoscopic placement of self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) or open stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy in QoL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective randomized longitudinal cohort trial, we randomly assigned 27 patients affected with stage IV antropyloric stomach cancer into two groups: Group 1 (13 patients) who underwent SEMS positioning and Group 2 (14 patients) in whom open stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy was performed. The Karnofsky performance scale and QoL assessment using the EQ-5D-5L™ questionnaire was administered before treatment and thereafter at 1, 3, and 6 months. Results: At 1-month, index values showed a statistically significant deterioration of the QoL in patients of Group 2 when compared to those of Group 1 (p = 0.004; CI: 0.04 to 0.21). No differences among the groups were recorded at 3-month; whereas, at 6-month, the index values showed a statistically significant deterioration of the QoL in patients of Group 1 (p = 0.009; CI: -0.25 to -0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Early QoL of patients affected with stage IV antropyloric cancer and symptoms of GOOS is significantly better in patients treated with SEMS positioning but at 6-month the QoL significantly decrease in this group of patients. We explained the reasons of this fluctuation with the higher risk of re-hospital admission in the SEMS group.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents , Neoplasias Gástricas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Independently of age, evidence-based guidelines recommend a multidisciplinary treatment approach in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). But actually, elderly patients are grossly underrepresented in clinical trials, accounting < 10% of enrolled cases. Therefore, LARC management in elderly patients remains a crucial issue in daily practice, especially due to their frailty. Multiple clinical factors, including general health status, cognitive status, co-morbidity, disability, and life expectancy should be considered to understand the complexities of geriatric assessment and then define therapy. We use a patient-centered approach in order to tailor the optimal treatment strategy. We treat fit elderly patients as younger patients, including neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy. Whereas, in vulnerable and frail patients, we propose standard CRT (vulnerable patients) or radiotherapy alone (frail patients).
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Recto/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Algoritmos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Terapia Combinada , Comorbilidad , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Neoplasias del Recto/etiología , Neoplasias del Recto/mortalidad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: An endovascular-first approach to limb salvage and relief from lifestyle-limiting claudication is widely accepted. Stenosis or short occlusion of common, superficial femoral, and popliteal arteries can be corrected with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with stent positioning. Patency rates of these procedures are limited. We report our experience with external iliac artery to the infrapopliteal vessels vein grafts when the endovascular treatment fails. METHODS: Between January 2013 and January 2019, 16 patients (16 limbs) were operated on for limb-threatening ischemia after the occlusion of PTA with stent positioning of the common, superficial femoral, and popliteal arteries. Three patients were treated at our hospital by interventional radiologists; the remaining were operated on elsewhere. An external iliac artery to the infrapopliteal vessels vein bypass graft was anatomically interposed to restore blood flow. End points of the study were death-related events, vein graft failure, and major (above- or below-knee amputation) or minor (foot or toe amputation) limb loss. RESULTS: There were 12 men and 4 women. Mean age of patients was 68 years. Indication for the initial PTA with stent positioning of the common and superficial femoral artery was according to the Rutherford classification Grade I: Category 1, 11 patients (69%) and Category 2, 5 (31%) patients (Stage IIa and IIb according to Fontaine classification, respectively). Great saphenous vein was used in 14 (87%) cases and in 2 (13%) cases a composite graft with a segment of cephalic vein was required. The distal anastomoses were performed on the posterior tibial artery in 6 (37%) cases, anterior tibial artery in 4 (26%), and peroneal artery in 6 (37%). Four-year survival and primary patency rates were 71% (standard error [SE] = 0.15) and 73% (SE = 0.14), respectively. One graft occlusion required an above-knee amputation. Four-year limb salvage rate was 86% (SE = 0.13). DISCUSSION: We recommend the external iliac artery as source of inflow in patients in whom the vein bypass cannot originate from the common femoral or from a more distal inflow source because of previous PTA with stent positioning or it is deemed hazardous.
Asunto(s)
Arteria Femoral , Arteria Ilíaca/cirugía , Isquemia/cirugía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Arterias Tibiales/cirugía , Injerto Vascular/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amputación Quirúrgica , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/fisiopatología , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/cirugía , Humanos , Arteria Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Ilíaca/fisiopatología , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia/etiología , Isquemia/fisiopatología , Recuperación del Miembro , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Stents , Arterias Tibiales/diagnóstico por imagen , Arterias Tibiales/fisiopatología , Factores de Tiempo , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Injerto Vascular/efectos adversos , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularRESUMEN
In this editorial we comment on the article published in the recent issue of the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2023; 15 (11): 634-680. Gastric cancer (GC) remains the fifth most common malignancy and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The overall prevalence of GC has declined, although that of proximal GC has increased over time. Thus, a significant proportion of GC cases and deaths can be avoided if preventive interventions are taken. Early GC (EGC) is defined as GC confined to the mucosa or submucosa. Endoscopic resection is considered the most appropriate treatment for precancerous gastrointestinal lesions improving patient quality of life, with reduced rates of complications, shorter hospitalization period, and lower costs when compared to surgical resection. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic sub-mucosal dissection (ESD) are representative endoscopic treatments for EGC and precancerous gastric lesions. Standard EMR implies injection of a saline solution into the sub-mucosal space, followed by excision of the lesion using a snare. Complete resection rates vary depending on the size and severity of the lesion. When using conventional EMR methods for lesions less than 1 cm in size, the complete resection rate is approximately 60%, whereas for lesions larger than 2 cm, the complete resection rate is low (20%-30%). ESD can be used to remove tumors exceeding 2 cm in diameter and lesions associated with ulcers or submucosal fibrosis. Compared with EMR, ESD has higher en bloc resection rates (90.2% vs 51.7%), higher complete resection rates (82.1 vs 42.2%), and lower recurrence rates (0.65% vs 6.05%). Thus, innovative techniques have been introduced.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: Despite the application of colorectal cancer (CRC) surveillance guidelines, the detection of early neoplastic lesions might be difficult in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). To explore the risk of post-colonoscopy CRC (PCCRC) in patients with IBD we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed (PROSPERO; no. CRD42023453049). We included studies reporting the 3-year PCCRC (PCCRC-3y) prevalence, according to World Endoscopy Organization (WEO)-endorsed definition, in IBD and non-IBD patients. As primary outcome we evaluated the PCCRC-3y prevalence, according to WEO definitions, in IBD- and non-IBD patients and calculated the odds ratio (OR). The secondary outcome was to assess risk factors for PCCRC development in IBD patients. RESULTS: Three retrospective observational cohort studies were included. The pooled PCCRC-3y rate in patients with IBD was 30.8% [95% confidence interval (CI)=24.4-37.5%] and in non-IBD patients was 6.8% (95%CI=6.2-7.4%). The PCCRC-3y occurrence in IBD patients was significantly higher than that in non-IBD patients (OR=6.04; 95%CI=4.04-9.4; I2=95%), but a high heterogeneity among studies was noted. Furthermore, patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) had a significantly higher prevalence of PCCRC than patients with Crohn's Disease (CD): 30.9% (95%CI=27.8-34.2%) vs. 22.3% (95%CI=18-27%), respectively (OR=1.6, 95%CI=1.2-2.2; I2=0%). CONCLUSION: One-third of CRC in IBD patients were PCCRC, and these numbers were significantly higher when compared with those in non-IBD patients. Furthermore, the prevalence of PCCRC in patients with UC was higher compared to those with CD. However, prospective studies are required to better characterize risk factors for PCCRC development in patients with IBD.
Asunto(s)
Colonoscopía , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/complicaciones , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Prevalencia , Oportunidad Relativa , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To develop a predictive index model, integrating both clinical and high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) features to further personalize the decision making process in anal canal carcinoma in COVID19 era. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We assess HRA parameters after definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with anal canal malignant lesions. RESULTS: HRA features could be important to assess the effect of CRT and a risk stratification system should be introduced in clinical practice to better allocate therapeutic interventions. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge this is the first proposal for HRA findings in anal canal cancer after definitive CRT. We believe that a risk score can be useful to estimate the risk of treatment failure (in term of persistence disease and/or recurrence) and its clinical relevance should not to be underestimated.
RESUMEN
Introduction and importance: This case report presents the clinical details of a 46-year-old postmenopausal woman who was diagnosed with a locally advanced, ulcerated, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative stage 2B lobular carcinoma of the breast. The complexity of the case necessitated a multidisciplinary, personalized approach. Case presentation: The patient, a postmenopausal woman, presented with locally advanced lobular carcinoma of the breast. The tumor was of significant size and exhibited ulceration. Given the hormone receptor-positive status of the tumor, a comprehensive treatment plan was formulated, taking into account the patient's overall health and potential tolerance to treatment. Surgical removal of the tumor was performed, followed by adjuvant therapy with aromatase inhibitors. Clinical discussion: The complexity of this case highlights the importance of a personalized and patient-centered strategy in managing breast cancer. The patient's menopausal status, tumor characteristics, and potential tolerance to treatment were crucial factors that influenced the treatment plan. The successful outcome of the treatment and the patient's ability to tolerate the therapy underscores the significance of individualized treatment planning. Conclusion: This case report emphasizes the necessity for a comprehensive and patient-centered approach to managing complex cases of breast cancer. The findings support the development of personalized therapeutic strategies aimed at improving patient outcomes and quality of life. The successful treatment of the locally advanced, ulcerated lobular carcinoma of the breast in this postmenopausal patient further highlights the importance of considering individual factors and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
RESUMEN
Background: Thyroidectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures carried out worldwide and it has evolved in recent years with alternative approaches. With the advent of minimally invasive techniques, the learning curve (LC) concept has become a fundamental "dogma". Methods: A literature search, according to the PRISMA guidelines, was performed via PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Only studies assessing the learning process to thyroidectomy (including hemi- and total thyroidectomy), reporting a minimum of 30 procedures and describing clearly the minimum number of performances required to achieve proficiency and the main evaluation items used to establish it, were included. Conventional, endoscopic and robotic approaches were separately analyzed. Only English-language studies were considered. Results: Forty-five relevant studies were selected for the analysis [respectively 16 concerning robotic thyroidectomy (RT), 22 endoscopic thyroidectomy (ET), 6 mini-invasive video assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT), 1 conventional thyroidectomy (CT)]. The number of procedures required for a single surgeon to achieve competence and the parameters used to define surgical proficiency were fully investigated for each individual technique. Conclusions: Our research shows how the current literature lacks an objective definition of the LC concept. The heterogeneity of analysis methodologies and parameters evaluated, the various surgical techniques and training background of single surgeons, make it impossible to draw univocal results. Future studies should consider confounding factors and establish criteria that should be consensually recognized in the assessment of surgical performances and skills.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pain management in patients undergoing laparoscopy is still a matter of debate as several techniques have been proposed to reduce postoperative analgesic consumption and improve recovery. Among these, transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is considered as safe, effective, and easy to perform under ultrasound guidance; even so, recently laparoscopically guided trocar site anesthetic infiltration has been proposed as a "surgeon-dependent alternative to TAP block." The aim of this evaluation is to compare these analgesic techniques in the setting of laparoscopic adrenalectomy. METHODS: This is a retrospective evaluation of a prospectively maintained database. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A patients received laparoscopic-assisted trocar site infiltration of ropivacaine; Group B patients received bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP block with ropivacaine. All patients received 24 h infusion of 20 mg morphine postoperatively; pain was checked at 6, 24 and 48 h after surgery. A rescue analgesia was given if numerical rating scale (NRS) score was > 4 or on patient request. RESULTS: One hundred and three patients were enrolled in the evaluation (57 in group A and 46 in group B). There were no differences in operative time, complications and postoperative stay, and no complications related to trocar site infiltration. There were no differences in NRS at 6, 24, and 48 hours as well as in patients requiring further analgesic administration. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic-guided trocar site ropivacaine infiltration has similar pain outcomes compared to ultrasound-guided TAP block in the management of postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Since there is no difference among these techniques, the decision can be based on surgeon or anesthesiologist preference.
Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Locales , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Ropivacaína , Estudios Retrospectivos , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Analgésicos , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Músculos Abdominales , Analgésicos OpioidesRESUMEN
The suture thread used in digestive surgery must have several characteristics, including resistance to tension until the anastomosis coalescence, rapid absorption to avoid complications, biocompatibility and ease of handling. The preference is for monofilament polymers as they offer greater guarantees in biliary-digestive anastomoses. Suturing with synthetic polymers and mechanical devices such as staplers are the most suitable techniques. It is believed that staplers may become the gold standard technique in robotic surgery based on their experience and experimental data. In general, the goal is to use materials that minimize the risk of post-operative complications and offer maximum reliability in the anastomosis. KEY WORD: Suture material, Stapler.
Asunto(s)
Polímeros , Engrapadoras Quirúrgicas , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Suturas , Técnicas de SuturaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: Chemotherapy offers a clear benefit in terms of survival rates of stage IV metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, but this advantage might be mitigated by the theoretical risks of short- and mid-term complications in the cases of contextual self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) positioning, which might also affect survival rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed all available literature from Medline and Scopus databases to study the role of chemotherapy with or without the simultaneous administration of targeted therapy in increasing the risk of the complications after SEMS positioning and, eventually, in affecting the survival rates. RESULTS: Thirteen retrospective studies and 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) were eligible for the present analysis. The study group consisted of a total of 682 patients. A total of 305 patients were treated with conventional chemotherapy, 212 with conventional chemotherapy also containing targeted therapy, and 165 with no chemotherapy administration. Chemotherapy administration did not increase the rate of SEMS-related complications and these complications did not affect the overall survival rates. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy administration is not associated with a higher risk of SEMS-related complications and a reduction in the survival rates.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Obstrucción Intestinal , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Cuidados Paliativos , Stents/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Introduction: Multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare tumors. Differential diagnosis between metastatic and multiple GISTs represents a challenge for a proper workup, prediction prognosis, and therapeutic strategy. Case presentation: We present the case of 67-year-old man with computed tomography (CT) evidence of multiple exophytic lesions in the abdomen, reaching diameters ranging from 1 to 9â cm, without any signs of organs infiltration, and resulting positive at 18F-FDG-PET/CT. Laparoscopic biopsy revealed multiple GISTs, and surgical resection by using an open approach was performed to achieve radicality. Moreover, an extensive review of the current literature was performed. Results: Small GISTs (<5â cm) can be treated by the laparoscopic approach, while in the case of large GISTs (>5â cm), tumor location and size should be taken into account to reach the stage of radical surgery avoiding tumor rupture. For metastatic GISTs, Imatinib represents the first choice of treatment, and surgery should be considered only in a few selected cases when all lesions are resectable. Conclusion: Sporadic multiple GISTs are a rare event, imaging findings are not specific for GISTs, and biopsy requires a secure diagnosis and proper management. In the case of large lesions, with a high risk of vessels injury, laparotomy excision should be considered to achieve radicality and to avoid tumor rupture.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Ischemic colitis (IC) accounts for more of the half of total diagnosis of gastrointestinal ischemia. It is a challenging condition due to non-specificity of the symptoms at onset, inconstant behaviour and a wide range of clinical gravity with a different therapeutic approach. A classification of IC into gangrenous, stricturing and transient forms can be considered. CASE REPORT: In the presented case, due to hypovolemic hemorrhagic shock, the patient developed a progressive IC without gangrene but slowly evolving in multiple colonic strictures with general serious clinical condition. Endoscopy was used to confirm diagnosis and to tempt a pneumatic stricture dilation which resulted ineffective. A diverting stoma was required and an elective subtotal colectomy was carried out after resolution of the acute phase. CONCLUSIONS: IC may present with a large spectrum of clinical conditions. In acute shocked patients it must be always considered when a complicated abdominal picture is present. Immediate surgery is not always required considering the spontaneous resolutions of the milder forms. Strictures are the most frequent evolution following the intermediate nongangrenous presentation and initially they can be treated conservatively with postponed tailored resection after the healing of the diffuse mucosal injuries. KEY WORDS: Ischemic, colitis, Shock, Stricture.