Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Ultrasound Med ; 38(6): 1411-1423, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30239017

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this cross-sectional correlational study was to determine the association of pain with morphologic and inflammatory sonographic findings in patients with knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: A total of 113 participants with knee osteoarthritis were assessed using visual analog scale pain score and sonography. Ultrasound evaluation included morphologic changes (ie, articular cartilage degeneration, medial and lateral meniscal protrusion, and presence of osteophytes on the joint margins) and inflammatory changes (ie suprapatellar effusion and/or synovitis, Baker cyst, superficial and deep infrapatellar effusion, pes anserine tendinopathy, and Hoffa panniculitis). RESULTS: Cluster analysis via Ward's method grouped patients with minimal pain (visual analog scale score, 0-4) and with substantial pain (visual analog scale score, 5-10). Stepwise logistic regression yielded 5 variables that significantly explained the variation in the probability of perceived substantial pain at 10% level of significance: lateral cartilage clarity (LCC; P = .025), medial cartilage clarity (MCC; P = .20), medial cartilage thickness (MCT; P = .041), medial meniscus protrusion (MMP) (P = .029), and osteophytes at medial femoral margin (P = .082), with 63% overall prediction accuracy. When age and sex were added, 4 variables remained significant at a 10% level of significance: LCC, MCC, MCT, and MMP, with 65% overall prediction accuracy. The receiver operating characteristic curve of this model was 0.667. CONCLUSION: The study was able to demonstrate that morphologic abnormalities in the ultrasound parameters for LCC, MCC, MCT, and MMP were able to predict significant joint pain in knee osteoarthritis. There were no inflammatory changes that contributed to significant joint pain in this study.


Asunto(s)
Artralgia/complicaciones , Artralgia/fisiopatología , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/complicaciones , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Anciano , Artralgia/diagnóstico , Protocolos Clínicos , Análisis por Conglomerados , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Inflamación/complicaciones , Inflamación/diagnóstico por imagen , Inflamación/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Filipinas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Ultrasonografía/métodos
2.
J Med Ultrasound ; 26(1): 14-23, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30065508

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Electrophysiologic studies have been considered the "gold standard" in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS); however, reports of false-negative results, as well as discomfort for the patient during the procedure has paved the use of ultrasound, being a painless and cost-efficient tool, as an alternative means for its diagnosis. Various ultrasound parameters assessing the median nerve and wrist dimensions have been described, but description of landmarks to assess these in a reliable manner has been lacking. METHODOLOGY: A systematic search of different databases yielded data regarding ultrasound parameters for CTS diagnosis, the landmarks used, and presence of reliability testing. Based on this, three sonologists discussed the external and sonographic landmarks that will be used in measuring the median nerve measurements, bowing of the flexor retinaculum and the carpal tunnel dimensions. A pilot test with two consecutive healthy participants using the discussed ultrasound parameters was carried out, and results were subjected to inter- and intra-rater reliability testing. Modifications were accordingly made on the acquisition of ultrasound image using external landmarks. The reliability testing proper was done with ten consecutive healthy participants. RESULTS: Based on the systematic review and the pilot study, external landmarks were used to locate the median nerve in the forearm, carpal tunnel inlet and outlet. For the forearm measurement, it was taken 10 cm proximal from the distal palmar crease. The distal palmar crease was the external landmark used for the carpal tunnel inlet, while for the carpal tunnel outlet; it was measured 1 cm distal to the distal palmar crease. Instead of using the inner edge of the hook of hamate and trapezium, the apices of these bones were used as the landmarks in measuring the carpal tunnel outlet dimensions. There was excellent intra-rater reliability (mid-forearm, carpal tunnel inlet and outlet) except for the following: cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel inlet and outlet; and bowing of the flexor retinaculum. All the parameters had an excellent inter-rater reliability measured at the three levels (intraclass correlation [ICC]: Of 0.77-0.99) except for CSA of the median nerve at the levels of the forearm (fair-to-good with ICC of 0.71) and the carpal tunnel inlet (fair-to-good reliability of ICC: 0.43). CONCLUSION: There was an improved inter- and intra-rater reliability when external landmarks were used instead of sonographic landmarks.

3.
4.
J Med Ultrasound ; 26(4): 229-230, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30662160
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA