Longitudinal ultrasound-based AI model predicts axillary lymph node response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: Developing a deep learning radiomics model from longitudinal breast ultrasound and sonographer's axillary ultrasound diagnosis for predicting axillary lymph node (ALN) response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer. METHODS: Breast cancer patients undergoing NAC followed by surgery were recruited from three centers between November 2016 and December 2022. We collected ultrasound images for extracting tumor-derived radiomics and deep learning features, selecting quantitative features through various methods. Two machine learning models based on random forest were developed using pre-NAC and post-NAC features. A support vector machine integrated these data into a fusion model, evaluated via the area under the curve (AUC), decision curve analysis, and calibration curves. We compared the fusion model's performance against sonographer's diagnosis from pre-NAC and post-NAC axillary ultrasonography, referencing histological outcomes from sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection. RESULTS: In the validation cohort, the fusion model outperformed both pre-NAC (AUC: 0.899 vs. 0.786, p < 0.001) and post-NAC models (AUC: 0.899 vs. 0.853, p = 0.014), as well as the sonographer's diagnosis of ALN status on pre-NAC and post-NAC axillary ultrasonography (AUC: 0.899 vs. 0.719, p < 0.001). Decision curve analysis revealed patient benefits from the fusion model across threshold probabilities from 0.02 to 0.98. The model also enhanced sonographer's diagnostic ability, increasing accuracy from 71.9% to 79.2%. CONCLUSION: The deep learning radiomics model accurately predicted the ALN response to NAC in breast cancer. Furthermore, the model will assist sonographers to improve their diagnostic ability on ALN status before surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our AI model based on pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy ultrasound can accurately predict axillary lymph node metastasis and assist sonographer's axillary diagnosis. KEY POINTS: Axillary lymph node metastasis status affects the choice of surgical treatment, and currently relies on subjective ultrasound. Our AI model outperformed sonographer's visual diagnosis on axillary ultrasound. Our deep learning radiomics model can improve sonographers' diagnosis and might assist in surgical decision-making.

Development of a Novel Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound-Based Nomogram for Superficial Lymphadenopathy Differentiation: Postvascular Phase Value.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop and prospectively validate a prediction model for superficial lymphadenopathy differentiation using Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) combined with ultrasound (US) and clinical data. METHODS: The training cohort comprised 260 retrospectively enrolled patients with 260 pathological lymph nodes imaged between January and December 2020. Two clinical US-CEUS models were created using multivariable logistic regression analysis and compared using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis: Model 1 included clinical and US characteristics; Model 2 included all confirmed predictors, including CEUS characteristics. Feature contributions were evaluated using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) algorithm. Data from 172 patients were prospectively collected between January and May 2021 for model validation. RESULTS: Age, tumor history, long-axis diameter of lymph node, blood flow distribution, echogenic hilus, and the mean postvascular phase intensity (MPI) were identified as independent predictors for malignant lymphadenopathy. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MPI alone was 0.858 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.817-0.891), 86.47%, 74.55%, and 81.2%, respectively. Model 2 had an AUC of 0.919 (95% CI, 0.879-0.949) and good calibration in training and validation cohorts. The incorporation of MPI significantly enhanced diagnostic capability (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.002 for training and validation cohorts, respectively). Decision curve analysis indicated Model 2 as the superior diagnostic tool. SHAP analysis highlighted MPI as the most pivotal feature in the diagnostic process. CONCLUSION: The employment of our straightforward prediction model has the potential to enhance clinical decision-making and mitigate the need for unwarranted biopsies.

Sono-anatomy of the middle cervical sympathetic ganglion verified with pathology.

Objectives: Cervical discomfort and other symptoms may be attributable to the middle cervical sympathetic ganglion. The aim of this study was to explore the sonographic features of this ganglion in anatomical specimens and cadavers and evaluate the feasibility of its visualization using high-resolution ultrasonography. Methods: We examined three cervical sympathetic-ganglion specimens and two fresh cadavers using high-resolution ultrasound to explore the sonographic features of this ganglion. Basic imaging characteristics examined included the shape, echo intensity, and location of the ganglion. Core-needle biopsy was performed to examine the suspected middle cervical sympathetic ganglion in the two fresh cadavers and verify the accuracy of the sonographic identification via pathological examination. Results: The middle cervical sympathetic ganglion appeared on high-resolution ultrasonography as an oval-shaped hypoechoic structure, with at least one continuous hypoechoic line connected to each ending in the anatomical specimens and fresh cadavers, and it was distinctly different from the adjacent lymph nodes. Discussion: Based on an adequate understanding of both its location and sonographic features, the direct visualization of the middle cervical sympathetic ganglion using high-resolution ultrasonography is feasible.

Application of computer-aided diagnosis to predict malignancy in BI-RADS 3 breast lesions.

Purpose: To evaluate the ability of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system (S-Detect) to identify malignancy in ultrasound (US) -detected BI-RADS 3 breast lesions. Materials and methods: 148 patients with 148 breast lesions categorized as BI-RADS 3 were included in the study between January 2021 and September 2022. The malignancy rate, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. Results: In this study, 143 breast lesions were found to be benign, and 5 breast lesions were malignant (malignancy rate, 3.4 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.5-6.3). The malignancy rate rose significantly to 18.2 % (4/22, 95 % CI: 2.1-34.3) in the high-risk group with a "possibly malignant" CAD result (p = 0.017). With a "possibly benign" CAD result, the malignancy rate decreased to 0.8 % (1/126, 95 % CI: 0-2.2) in the low-risk group (p = 0.297). The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of the CAD system in BI-RADS 3 breast lesions were 0.837 (95 % CI: 77.7-89.6), 80.0 % (95 % CI: 73.6-86.4), 87.4 % (95 % CI: 82.0-92.7), 87.2 % (95 % CI: 81.8-92.6), 18.2 % (95 % CI: 2.1-34.3) and 99.2 % (95 % CI: 97.8-100.0), respectively. Conclusions: CAD system (S-Detect) enables radiologists to distinguish a high-risk group and a low-risk group among US-detected BI-RADS 3 breast lesions, so that patients in the low-risk group can receive follow-up without anxiety, while those in the high-risk group with a significantly increased malignancy rate should actively receive biopsy to avoid delayed diagnosis of breast cancer.