Safety profile of immune checkpoint inhibitors: An analysis of the Italian spontaneous reporting system database.

AIMS: To provide an overview of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) safety profile using the Italian spontaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting system. METHODS: We selected all ADR reports attributed to ipilimumab (CTLA-4 inhibitor), nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors) from the Italian spontaneous reporting system (2011-2018). Descriptive analyses of reports for ICIs have been conducted. Time to onset of adverse effects was stratified by system organ class. Reporting odds ratio was used as measure of ADR reporting disproportionality. ICI-related ADR reports were compared with 2 reference groups, i.e. all other suspected drugs or all other antineoplastic agents. RESULTS: Overall, 2217 (0.7%) reports were related to ICIs (nivolumab: 72.2% of those reports; ipilimumab: 14.3%; pembrolizumab: 10.3%; and atezolizumab: 3.5%). ICI-related ADR reports mostly involved males (65%) and median age was 67 (interquartile range 59-73) years. Serious reports accounted for 48.8%. Frequencies of endocrine, general, hepatobiliary, metabolism, musculoskeletal, respiratory disorders, infections and neoplasms were significantly higher for ICIs than for all other drugs (P < .001). Except for infections, similar results emerged through comparison with other anticancer drugs. Colitis, hypophysitis and skin disorders were more frequently reported for anti-CTLA-4 drugs than PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs, and the opposite for musculoskeletal effects, pneumonia, and thyroid dysfunctions. ICIs were disproportionally associated also with less known risks, e.g. ischaemic heart disease, cardiac failure and optic nerve disorders. CONCLUSION: The most frequently reported safety issues were probably immune-related adverse events including general, gastrointestinal and respiratory disorders. Potentially emerging safety signals, such as ischaemic heart disease and cardiac failure, requiring further investigation were detected.

Pediatric adverse reactions to antiseizure medications - An analysis of data from the Italian spontaneous reporting system (2001-2019).

INTRODUCTION: Spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a valuable supplement to clinical studies in informing about the safety of medications. This is especially relevant for pediatric populations, which are not often included in large-scale clinical trials. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate patterns of pediatric ADRs to antiseizure medications (ASMs) reported to the Italian Spontaneous Reporting System (SRS) database during the period November 1, 2001─May 31, 2019. METHODS: Suspected ADRs ascribed to medications listed under ATC code N03, plus clobazam (code N05BA09), and affecting individuals below age 18 years were sourced from the Italian SRS database, categorized based on a modification of the MedDRA® high-level term, and analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 956 reports listing a total of 1806 ADRs ascribed to one or more ASMs were received for individuals in pediatric age. The most commonly reported ADRs were skin rashes (24.0% of all reports), epileptic seizures (12.6%), gastrointestinal disturbances (11.8%), and somnolence (10.6%). A more detailed analysis was conducted on 675 reports listing a single ASM as suspected drug and occurring in patients with a specified or presumed diagnosis of epilepsy. Adverse drug reaction patterns differed widely across ASMs. Skin rashes were the most commonly reported ADR for lamotrigine (62.3%), carbamazepine (50.3%), phenobarbital (42.3%), and oxcarbazepine (33.0%). Other most commonly reported ADRs were gastrointestinal symptoms for ethosuximide (44%), irritability/aggression for levetiracetam (25.0%), epileptic seizures for valproic acid (16.1%), fever (often associated with hypohidrosis) for topiramate (17.9%), and utilization error (mostly accidental drug administration) for clonazepam (34.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of spontaneous ADR reports are indicative of major differences in safety profile among individual ASMs. Most, but not all, frequently reported ADRs were in line with findings from clinical trials and observational studies.

Psoriasis and psoriasiform reactions secondary to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

The advent of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) as a standard of care for several cancers, including melanoma and head/neck squamous cell carcinoma has changed the therapeutic approach to these conditions, drawing at the same time the attention on some safety issues related to their use. To assess the incidence of psoriasis as a specific immune-related cutaneous adverse event attributing to ICIs using the Eudravigilance reporting system. All reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) concerning either exacerbation of psoriasis or de novo onset of psoriasis/psoriasiform reactions associated to the use of Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors ipilimumab and tremelimumab, and the Programmed cell Death protein 1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, avelumab, and cemiplimab were identified and extracted from the Eudravigilance reporting system, during the period between the date of market licensing (for each study drug) and 30 October 2020. 8213 reports of cutaneous ADRs associated with at least one of study drug have been recorded, of which 315 (3.8%) reporting psoriasis and/or psoriasiform reactions as ADR. In 70.8% of reports patients had pre-existing disease. ICIs-related skin toxicity is a well-established phenomenon, presenting with several conditions, sustained by an immune background based on the activity of some cells (CD4+/CD8+ T-cells, neutrophils, eosinophils, and plasmocytes), inflammatory mediators, chemokines, and tumor-specific antibodies. In this setting, psoriasis represents probably the most paradigmatic model of these reactions, thus requiring adequate recognition as no guidelines on management are now available.

Adverse drug reactions with oral anticoagulants: data from sicilian spontaneous reporting system database.

OBJECTIVE: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were developed to avoid the limitations of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). DOACs are associated with a greater incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding and a smaller number of intracranial haemorrhages than VKAs. Therefore, it is important to deepen our knowledge of their safety profiles. The aim of this study was thus to analyse adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports on DOACs and VKAs using the Sicilian Spontaneous Reporting System (SRS) database. METHODS: All ADR reports with DOACs and VKAs as suspected drugs that were entered into the Sicilian SRS database during the period 2001-2019 were selected. In detail, all reports with the following single active substances were included: dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban; acenocoumarol and warfarin were included as a comparator group. Descriptive statistical methodology was used to evaluate characteristics of the reported cases with a case-by-case assessment. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Out of 521 reports related to anticoagulants, 444 (85.2%) and 77 (14.8%) involved DOACs and VKAs, respectively. DOAC-related reports were mainly of gastrointestinal disorders. In contrast, VKAs were mostly associated with blood and lymphatic system disorders, injury, investigations and vascular disorders. Many more cases of ADRs in the form of gastrointestinal disorders concerned dabigatran etexilate (n = 179, 73.7%) than the other DOACs, while ADRs in the form of blood disorders were mainly associated with acenocoumarol (n = 27, 57.4%). The most commonly reported Preferred Terms for DOACs were dyspepsia (n = 89, 17.1%), upper abdominal pain (n = 41, 9.2%) and pruritus (n = 26, 5.8%), whereas for VKAs, they were anaemia (n = 21, 27.3%) and hypocoagulable state (n = 18, 3.5%). Potentially interacting concomitant medications particularly included antithrombotic agents (n = 19, 4.3%) for DOACs and proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) (n = 37, 48.1%) and antithrombotic agents (n = 13, 16.9%) for VKAs. CONCLUSION: The ADRs most commonly associated with DOACs, especially dabigatran, were gastrointestinal disorders, particularly gastrointestinal bleeding. Our study also highlights the potential role of drug-drug interactions in the ADRs. The cases of gastrointestinal bleeding highlight the need for careful prescribing of DOACs and use of potentially interacting concomitant drugs.

A case of lung injury resembling diffuse pulmonary hemorrhage after the first administration of alemtuzumab in a patient with multiple sclerosis. Role of the HRCT.

Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH) is an acute often life-threatening condition characterized by a variable combination of hemoptysis, dyspnoea, diffuse and bilateral ground glass pulmonary opacities, anemia and hypoxemia, that can be induced by different causes, including several drugs. We report here the case of a 25-year-old woman who has been admitted to our pulmonary clinic for the onset of chest pain, cough and haemoptysis, started one week after her first treatment with alemtuzumab for multiple sclerosis. Computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest at the admission showed diffuse and bilateral ground glass pulmonary opacities. Her symptoms resolved completely without any treatment, after the interruption of alemtuzumab, and CT scan of the chest performed one month later showed total disappearance of the pulmonary opacities.

Safety of Biological Therapies for Severe Asthma: An Analysis of Suspected Adverse Reactions Reported in the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database.

BACKGROUND: The management of uncontrolled severe asthma has greatly improved since the advent of novel biologic therapies. Up to August 2022, five biologics have been approved for the type 2 asthma phenotype: anti-IgE (omalizumab), anti-IL5 (mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab), and anti-IL4 (dupilumab) monoclonal antibodies. These drugs are usually well tolerated, although long-term safety information is limited, and some adverse events have not yet been fully characterized. Spontaneous reporting systems represent the cornerstone for the detection of potential signals and evaluation of the real-world safety of all marketed drugs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide an overview of safety data of biologics for severe asthma using VigiBase, the World Health Organization global pharmacovigilance database. METHODS: We selected all de-duplicated individual case safety reports (ICSRs) attributed to five approved biologics for severe asthma in VigiBase, up to 31st August 2022 (omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab and dupilumab). Descriptive frequency analyses of ICSRs were carried out both as a whole class and as individual products. Reporting odds ratios (ROR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as the measure of disproportionality for suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with the study drugs compared with either all other suspected drugs (Reference Group 1, RG1) or inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting ß-agonists (ICSs/LABAs) (Reference Group 2, RG2) or with oral corticosteroids (OCSs) (Reference Group 3, RG3). RESULTS: Overall, 31,724,381 ICSRs were identified in VigiBase and 167,282 (0.5%) were related to study drugs; the remaining reports were considered as RG1. Stratifying all biologic-related ICSRs by therapeutic indication, around 29.4% (n = 48,440) concerned asthma use; omalizumab was mainly indicated as the suspected drug (n = 20,501), followed by dupilumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab and reslizumab. Most asthma ICSRs concerned adults (57%) and women (64.1%). Asthma biologics showed a higher frequency of serious suspected ADR reporting than RG1 (41.3% vs 32.3%). The most reported suspected ADRs included asthma, dyspnea, product use issue, drug ineffective, cough, headache, fatigue and wheezing. Asthma biologics were disproportionally associated with several unknown or less documented adverse events, such as malignancies, pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis with omalizumab; alopecia and lichen planus with dupilumab; alopecia and herpes infections with mepolizumab; alopecia, herpes zoster and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis related to benralizumab; and alopecia with reslizumab. CONCLUSIONS: The most frequently reported suspected ADRs of asthma biologics in VigiBase confirmed the presence of well-known adverse effects such as general disorders, injection-site reactions, nasopharyngitis, headache and hypersensitivity, while some others (e.g. asthma reactivation or therapeutic failure) could be ascribed to the indication of use. Moreover, the analysis of signals of disproportionate reporting suggests the presence of malignancies, effects on the cardiovascular system, alopecia and autoimmune conditions, requiring further assessment and investigation.

The Reporting of a Disproportionality Analysis for Drug Safety Signal Detection Using Individual Case Safety Reports in PharmacoVigilance (READUS-PV): Development and Statement.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Disproportionality analyses using reports of suspected adverse drug reactions are the most commonly used quantitative methods for detecting safety signals in pharmacovigilance. However, their methods and results are generally poorly reported in published articles and existing guidelines do not capture the specific features of disproportionality analyses. We here describe the development of a guideline (REporting of A Disproportionality analysis for drUg Safety signal detection using individual case safety reports in PharmacoVigilance [READUS-PV]) for reporting the results of disproportionality analyses in articles and abstracts. METHODS: We established a group of 34 international experts from universities, the pharmaceutical industry, and regulatory agencies, with expertise in pharmacovigilance, disproportionality analyses, and assessment of safety signals. We followed a three-step process to develop the checklist: (1) an open-text survey to generate a first list of items; (2) an online Delphi method to select and rephrase the most important items; (3) a final online consensus meeting. RESULTS: Among the panel members, 33 experts responded to round 1 and 30 to round 2 of the Delphi and 25 participated to the consensus meeting. Overall, 60 recommendations for the main body of the manuscript and 13 recommendations for the abstracts were retained by participants after the Delphi method. After merging of some items together and the online consensus meeting, the READUS-PV guidelines comprise a checklist of 32 recommendations, in 14 items, for the reporting of disproportionality analyses in the main body text and four items, comprising 12 recommendations, for abstracts. CONCLUSIONS: The READUS-PV guidelines will support authors, editors, peer-reviewers, and users of disproportionality analyses using individual case safety report databases. Adopting these guidelines will lead to more transparent, comprehensive, and accurate reporting and interpretation of disproportionality analyses, facilitating the integration with other sources of evidence.

The REporting of A Disproportionality Analysis for DrUg Safety Signal Detection Using Individual Case Safety Reports in PharmacoVigilance (READUS-PV): Explanation and Elaboration.

In pharmacovigilance, disproportionality analyses based on individual case safety reports are widely used to detect safety signals. Unfortunately, publishing disproportionality analyses lacks specific guidelines, often leading to incomplete and ambiguous reporting, and carries the risk of incorrect conclusions when data are not placed in the correct context. The REporting of A Disproportionality analysis for drUg Safety signal detection using individual case safety reports in PharmacoVigilance (READUS-PV) statement was developed to address this issue by promoting transparent and comprehensive reporting of disproportionality studies. While the statement paper explains in greater detail the procedure followed to develop these guidelines, with this explanation paper we present the 14 items retained for READUS-PV guidelines, together with an in-depth explanation of their rationale and bullet points to illustrate their practical implementation. Our primary objective is to foster the adoption of the READUS-PV guidelines among authors, editors, peer reviewers, and readers of disproportionality analyses. Enhancing transparency, completeness, and accuracy of reporting, as well as proper interpretation of their results, READUS-PV guidelines will ultimately facilitate evidence-based decision making in pharmacovigilance.

Spontaneous reporting of adverse reactions related to proton pump inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed in all age groups, and their use is increasing. However, their safety profile has been frequently questioned. AIMS: The aim of this study was to analyze the characteristics of PPI-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported to the Italian spontaneous reporting system (SRS) database and relative to an Italian region (Sicily). METHODS: A 20-year observational, retrospective study was conducted, evaluating PPI-related ADR reports from Sicily between January 1st, 2001, and June 30th, 2021. The factors associated with ADR seriousness were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 148 spontaneous reports of ADRs related to PPIs were analyzed. Lansoprazole was the drug with the highest number of associated reports (30.87%). The most frequently reported ADRs were cutaneous (24.56%) and/or gastrointestinal manifestations (18.10%), the latter especially in the case of lansoprazole-related ADRs (p<0.006). The great majority of ADR reports were relative to on-label prescriptions. Serious ADRs were 39 (26.35%). Serious ADRs were more common in reports including omeprazole than in reports containing other PPIs (p<0.008) and in reports presenting PPIs combined with other drugs than in reports with PPI single therapies (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Most PPI-related ADRs are non-serious. Omeprazole and combination therapy seem to be associated with ADR seriousness.

Tolerability profile of paliperidone palmitate formulations: A pharmacovigilance analysis of the EUDRAVigilance database.

Introduction: Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) have proven to be effective in the maintenance treatment of patients suffering from schizophrenia, and their safety and tolerability profiles represent a key factor in their long-term use and choice in clinical practice. Paliperidone palmitate (PP) is the only second-generation LAI (SGA-LAI), available in both one- (PP1M) and 3-month (PP3M) formulations. However, real-world prospective studies on PP1M and PP3M are still few and mostly conducted on small samples. In this context, we aimed to better define the safety and tolerability profile of PP using real world pharmacovigilance data. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the publicly available data regarding Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs), presenting PP1M and/or PP3M as suspected drugs, reported on EUDRAVigilance between 2011 and June 30th, 2022. ICSRs relative to at least one SGA-LAI other than PP, reported between 2003 and June 30th, 2022, were also examined as reference group. Data were evaluated with a descriptive analysis, and then, as disproportionality measures, crude reporting odds ratio (ROR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Results: A total of 8,152 ICSRs met the inclusion criteria, of those 77.7% (n = 6,332) presented as suspected drug PP1M, 21.2% (n = 1,731) PP3M, while 89 cases indicated both PP1M and PP3M. Significantly higher probabilities of reporting in PP-related reports were observed for the primary Standardized MedDRA Queries "Sexual Dysfunctions" (ROR = 1.45; 95% CI 1.23-1.70), "Haemodynamic oedema, effusions and fluid overload" (ROR = 1.42; 1.18-1.70), as well as "Fertility disorders" (ROR = 2.69; 1.51-4.80). Discussion: Our analysis indicates that the tolerability and safety profiles of PP are in line with what is known for the other SGA-LAIs. However, differences regarding endocrine system ADRs have been noticed. The results presented in this work do not discourage the prescription of SGA-LAI formulations but aim to enhance their safety.

Is PEGylation of Drugs Associated with Hypersensitivity Reactions? An Analysis of the Italian National Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting System.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Evidence highlights the allergenic potential of PEGylated drugs because of the production of anti-polyethylene glycol immunoglobulins. We investigated the risk of hypersensitivity reactions of PEGylated drugs using the Italian spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting system database. METHODS: We selected adverse drug reaction reports attributed to medicinal products containing PEGylated active substances and/or PEGylated liposomes from the Italian Spontaneous Reporting System in the period between its inception and March 2021. As comparators, we extracted adverse drug reaction reports of medicinal products containing the same non-PEGylated active substances and/or non-PEGylated liposomes (or compounds belonging to the same mechanistic class). A descriptive analysis of reports of hypersensitivity reactions was performed. Reporting rates and time to onset of hypersensitivity reactions were also calculated in the period between January 2009 and March 2021. As a measure of disproportionality, we calculated the reporting odds ratio. RESULTS: Overall, 3865 adverse drug reaction reports were related to PEGylated medicinal products and 11,961 to their non-PEGylated comparators. Around two-thirds of patients were female and reports mostly concerned patients aged between 46 and 64 years. The frequency of hypersensitivity reactions reporting was higher among PEGylated versus non-PEGylated medicinal products (11.7% vs 9.4%, p < 0.0001). The hypersensitivity reaction reporting rates were higher for PEGylated medicinal products versus non-PEGylated medicinal products, with reporting rate ratios that ranged from 1.4 (95% confidence interval 0.8-2.5) for pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim to 20.0 (95% confidence interval 2.8-143.5) for peginterferon alpha-2a versus interferon alpha-2a. The median time to onset of hypersensitivity reactions was 10 days (interquartile range: 0-61) for PEGylated medicinal products, and 36 days (interquartile range: 3-216) for non-PEGylated comparators. Statistically significant reporting odds ratios were observed when comparing the reporting of hypersensitivity reactions for PEGylated versus non-PEGylated medicinal products (reporting odds ratio: 1.3; 95% confidence interval 1.1-1.4). However, when using all other drugs as comparators, the disproportionality analysis showed no association with hypersensitivity reactions for PEGylated nor non-PEGylated medicinal products, thus suggesting that many other triggers of drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions play a major role. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this analysis of the Italian spontaneous adverse drug reaction database suggest a potential involvement for PEGylation in triggering drug-related hypersensitivity reactions, especially clinically relevant reactions. However, when comparing both PEGylated and non-PEGylated drugs under study to all other drugs no disproportionate reporting of hypersensitivity reactions was observed, probably due to a masking effect owing to the presence in the same database of other medicinal products increasing the threshold required to highlight a safety signal when the entire database is used as a reference.

Adverse Drug Reactions with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treatment: An Analysis from the Italian Pharmacovigilance Database.

BACKGROUND: Anti-HER2 therapy has evolved in the last years and an important role in this transformation was that of monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Considering their extended use in clinical practice, some toxicity problems have been highlighted around these drugs. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the onset of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) related to the use of HER2-positive breast cancer treatments through a spontaneous reporting system (SRS) database. METHODS: All ADR reports having as suspected drug trastuzumab, pertuzumab, lapatinib, or trastuzumab emtansine (TDM-1), recorded into the Report Reazioni Avverse dei Medicinali (RAM) system database for national data and into the Italian SRS database for Sicilian data and collected from 2006 to 2020 have been evaluated. A descriptive analysis of basal demographic and drug-related characteristics was performed. A case-by-case methodology was conducted paying particular attention to the serious ADR reports collected in Sicily, focusing on type of seriousness, age, sex, concomitant drugs, comorbidities, time to onset (TTO), and time to resolution (TTR). RESULTS: Of the 3609 Italian reports, 65.6% were related to trastuzumab (n = 2367), followed by pertuzumab, TDM-1, and lapatinib. Almost all reports occurred in female patients (94.3%) and were most frequent in the age group 18-65 years (69.6%). A higher number of cases were related to general disorders and administration site conditions (n = 1079; 29.9%), gastrointestinal disorders (n = 1037; 28.7%), skin disorders (n = 821; 22.7%), and blood disorders (n = 599; 16.6%). Cases involving trastuzumab and pertuzumab mainly reported general disorders (n = 788; 33.3% and n = 194; 32.1%, respectively) while more than half of the reports associated with lapatinib were related to gastrointestinal (n = 184; 59.7%) and skin diseases (n = 146; 47.4%). Regarding TDM-1, 40% of reports had at least one ADR belonging to blood and lymphatic system disorders. The case-by-case assessment of Sicilian ADR reports showed that 40 cases were serious (33.3%), with a median TTO of 37 (6-97) days. Serious ADR reports mainly involved the onset of thrombocytopenia (n = 8; 20.0%), diarrhea (n = 6; 15.0%), asthenia and cardiac failure (both with n = 5; 12.5%), vomiting, hypersensitivity, and ejection fraction decreased (all with n = 4; 10.0%) and stomatitis (n = 3: 7.5%). CONCLUSION: This study is fundamentally consistent with results from the literature. Given the serious clinical condition of breast cancer and taking into account the importance of preventing some clinically relevant ADRs related to the use of anti-HER2 therapy, further analyses are essential to better describe the safety profile of these target therapies.

Safety profile of tyrosine kinase inhibitors used in non-small-cell lung cancer: An analysis from the Italian pharmacovigilance database.

Introduction: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is often caused by molecular alterations that can be detected by predictive biomarkers including mutations or amplifications of several genes. Several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been approved in Europe by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for NSCLC. The aim of this study was to analyze the onset of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) related to TKIs in NSCLC through a spontaneous reporting system (SRS) database. Methods: All ADR reports having as suspected drug afatinib (AFT), alectinib (ALEC), brigatinib (BRG), ceritinib (CER), crizotinib (CRIZ), erlotinib (ERL), gefitinib (GEF), lorlatinib (LORL), nintedanib (NTB), and osimertinib (OSI) recorded into the Report Reazioni Avverse dei Medicinali (RAM) system database for national data and into the Italian SRS database for Sicilian data and collected from 2006 to 2021 have been evaluated. A descriptive analysis of basal demographic and drug-related characteristics was performed. A case-by-case methodology was conducted paying particular attention to all serious ADR reports collected in Sicily, focusing on type of seriousness, age, sex, concomitant drugs, and comorbidities. Results: Of the 3,048 Italian reports, most of ADRs were related to ERL (n = 1,448), followed by AFT (n = 435) and GEF (n = 366). ADR reports were slightly more frequent in females (52.2%) and in the age group >65 years (53.0%). A higher number of cases were related to skin disorders (n = 1,766; 57.9%), followed by gastrointestinal disorders (n = 1,024; 33.6%), general disorders and administration site conditions (n = 536; 17.6%), and infections (n = 483; 15.8%). The case-by-case assessment of Sicilian ADRs showed that 33 cases were serious (12.5%) and mainly involved ERL (n = 17; 51.5%), occurring in males with a higher onset of respiratory diseases (30.3%) such as respiratory failure, interstitial lung disease and dyspnea. Discussion: The analysis of spontaneous ADR reports of TKIs confirmed, in general, well-known risks, which often include skin, gastrointestinal, general, liver, and respiratory diseases as well as infections. However, more attention should be paid to the occurrence of serious life-threatening ADRs including respiratory failure, interstitial lung disease, and cardiogenic shock, especially in young patients.

Post-Marketing Surveillance of CAR-T-Cell Therapies: Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database.

INTRODUCTION: As chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies are becoming increasingly available in the armamentarium of the hematologist, there is an emerging need to monitor post-marketing safety. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to better characterize their safety profile by focusing on cytokine release syndrome and identifying emerging signals. METHODS: We queried the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (October 2017-September 2020) to analyze suspected adverse drug reactions to tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) and axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel). Disproportionality analyses (reporting odds ratio) were performed by comparing chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies with (a) all other drugs (reference group 1) and (b) other onco-hematological drugs with a similar indication, irrespective of age (reference group 2), or (c) restricted to adults (reference group 3). Notoriety was assessed through package inserts and risk management plans. Adverse drug reaction time to onset and cytokine release syndrome features were investigated. RESULTS: Overall, 3225 reports (1793 axi-cel; 1433 tisa-cel) were identified. The reported toxicities were mainly: cytokine release syndrome (52.2%), febrile disorders (27.7%), and neurotoxicity (27.2%). Cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity were often co-reported and 75% of the events occurred in the first 10 days. Disproportionalities confirmed known adverse drug reactions and showed unexpected associations: for example, axi-cel with cardiomyopathies (reporting odds ratio = 2.3; 95% confidence interval 1.2-4.4) and gastrointestinal perforations (2.9; 1.2-7.3), tisa-cel with hepatotoxicity (2.5; 1.1-5.7) and pupil disorders (15.3; 6-39.1). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the well-known adverse drug reactions and detects potentially emerging safety issues specific for each chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, also providing insights into a stronger role for tisa-cel in inducing some immunodeficiency-related events (e.g., hypogammaglobulinemia, infections) and coagulopathies, and for axi-cel in neurotoxicity.

Adverse reactions related to proton pump inhibitors in pediatric population: an analysis of spontaneous reporting data.

BACKGROUND: The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has increased in the last 10 years in children. Data regarding their safety profile are limited. The aim of this study was to analyze data from the Italian spontaneous reporting system (SRS) database to evaluate the incidence and characteristics of PPI-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in children. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective study analyzing PPI-related ADR reports in children in the Italian SRS database between January 1st, 2001, and December 31st, 2020. ADRs were coded according to the system organ class term level. Factors associated with ADR seriousness were investigated. RESULTS: Seventy spontaneous reports of ADRs related to PPIs were analyzed. Esomeprazole and lansoprazole caused the highest number of ADRs equally (27% respectively), and the most frequently reported ADRs presented with gastrointestinal (24%) and/or skin manifestations (21.3%). More than a half of PPI prescriptions were off label for pediatric population. Serious ADRs were 19 (27.1%). Serious ADRs were more frequent in reports presenting PPIs combined with other drugs in comparison to reports with PPI single therapies (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: PPI-related ADRs in children are mostly not serious, and combination therapy seems to be associated with ADR seriousness.

Drug-induced Urinary Retention: An Analysis of a National Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Database.

BACKGROUND: Numerous drugs have been associated with urinary retention (UR), but updated information on drugs that may induce UR is limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate drug-induced UR using the Italian spontaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reporting database. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We selected all suspected spontaneous reports of drug-induced UR collected into the Italian spontaneous reporting system (SRS) database from its inception to June 30, 2019. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The Mantel-Haenszel χ2 test and the Mann-Whitney U test were performed for statistical comparisons of categorical and continuous variables, respectively. As a measure of disproportionality, we calculated the reporting odds ratios (RORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals using a statistical case/noncase methodology. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 506 383 ADR reports were received in the Italian SRS database during the study period. Of these, 421 reports (0.1%) included UR-related ADRs, for a total of 497 suspected drugs. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of patients experiencing UR was 67 (47-77) yr. Overall, 174 (41.3%) ADR reports were considered serious. One-third of male patients experiencing UR suffered from benign prostatic hyperplasia, followed by diabetes mellitus (N = 58, 13.8%), and bladder-related disorders (N = 21, 5.0%). The median lag time between the start of drug treatment and UR onset was 7 (IQR 1-47.5) d. Overall, a statistically significant ROR was reported for 39 individual drugs, and for five (12.8%) of them (dapagliflozin, gabapentin, lithium, celecoxib, and piroxicam) UR was not described in their summary of product characteristics. Limitations include under-reporting and selective over-reporting of suspected ADRs and lacking information on the number of drug users. CONCLUSIONS: A disproportionality analysis identified five potentially new UR signals for dapagliflozin, gabapentin, lithium, celecoxib, and piroxicam, requiring further evaluation. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this analysis of the Italian spontaneous reporting system database, we found new urinary retention signals, requiring further evaluation, for dapagliflozin, gabapentin, lithium, celecoxib, and piroxicam.

Adverse Drug Reactions with Drugs Used in Multiple Sclerosis: An Analysis from the Italian Pharmacovigilance Database.

Given the importance of inflammation at the onset of multiple sclerosis (MS), therapy is mainly based on the use of anti-inflammatory drugs including disease modifying therapies (DMTs). Considering the recent approval of some DMTs, pharmacovigilance becomes a fundamental tool for the acquisition of new safety data. The aim of the study was to analyze adverse drug reactions (ADRs) related to the use of drugs approved for MS. All national publicly-available aggregated ADR reports recorded from 2002 to 2020 into the Reports of Adverse Reactions of Medicines (RAM) system and all complete Sicilian data reported into the Italian spontaneous reporting system (SRS) database having as suspected drugs interferon ß-1a (IFN ß-1a), interferon ß-1b (IFN ß-1b), peginterferon ß-1a (PEG-IFN ß-1a), glatiramer acetate (GA), natalizumab (NTZ), fingolimod (FNG), teriflunomide (TRF), dimethyl fumarate (DMF), alemtuzumab (Alem), ocrelizumab (OCZ), or cladribine (Cladr), were collected. Descriptive analyses of national, publicly-available aggregated data and full-access regional data were performed to assess demographic characteristics and drug-related variables followed by a more in-depth analysis of all Sicilian ADRs with a case-by-case assessment and a disproportionality analysis of unexpected ADRs. A total of 13,880 national reports have been collected from 2002 to 2020: they were mainly not serious ADRs (67.9% vs. 26.1%) and related to females (71.7% vs. 26.3%) in the age group 18-65 years (76.5%). The most reported ADRs were general and administration site conditions (n = 6,565; 47.3%), followed by nervous (n = 3,090; 22.3%), skin (n = 2,763; 19.9%) and blood disorders (n = 2,180; 15.7%). Some unexpected Sicilian ADRs were shown, including dyslipidemia for FNG (n = 10; ROR 28.5, CI 14.3-59.6), NTZ (n = 5; 10.3, 4.1-25.8), and IFN ß-1a (n = 4; 8.7, 3.1-24.1), abortion and alopecia for NTZ (n = 9; 208.1, 73.4-590.1; n = 3; 4.9, 1.5-15.7), and vitamin D deficiency for GA (n = 3; 121.2, 30.9-475.3). Moreover, breast cancer with DMF (n = 4, 62.8, 20.5-191.9) and hypothyroidism with Cladr (n = 3; 89.2, 25.9-307.5) were also unexpected. The reporting of drugs-related ADRs in MS were mostly reported in the literature, but some unknown ADRs were also found. However, further studies are necessary to increase the awareness about the safety profiles of new drugs on the market.

Allergic Reactions to COVID-19 Vaccines: Risk Factors, Frequency, Mechanisms and Management.

Conventional vaccines have been widely studied, along with their risk of causing allergic reactions. These generally consist of mild local reactions and only rarely severe anaphylaxis. Although all the current COVID-19 vaccines marketed in Europe have been shown to be safe overall in the general population, early post-marketing evidence has shown that mRNA-based vaccines using novel platforms (i.e., lipid nanoparticles) were associated with an increased risk of severe allergic reactions as compared to conventional vaccines. In this paper we performed an updated literature review on frequency, risk factors, and underlying mechanisms of COVID-19 vaccine-related allergies by searching MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases. We also conducted a qualitative search on VigiBase and EudraVigilance databases to identify reports of "Hypersensitivity" and "Anaphylactic reaction" potentially related to COVID-19 vaccines (Comirnaty, Spikevax, Vaxzevria and COVID-19 Janssen Vaccine), and in EudraVigilance to estimate the reporting rates of "Anaphylactic reaction" and "Anaphylactic shock" after COVID-19 vaccination in the European population. We also summarized the scientific societies' and regulatory agencies' recommendations for prevention and management of COVID-19 vaccine-related allergic reactions, especially in those with a history of allergy.

COVID-19 Vaccination in Pregnancy, Paediatrics, Immunocompromised Patients, and Persons with History of Allergy or Prior SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Overview of Current Recommendations and Pre- and Post-Marketing Evidence for Vaccine Efficacy and Safety.

To date, four vaccines have been authorised for emergency use and under conditional approval by the European Medicines Agency to prevent COVID-19: Comirnaty, COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen, Spikevax (previously COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna) and Vaxzevria (previously COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca). Although the benefit-risk profile of these vaccines was proven to be largely favourable in the general population, evidence in special cohorts initially excluded from the pivotal trials, such as pregnant and breastfeeding women, children/adolescents, immunocompromised people and persons with a history of allergy or previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, is still limited. In this narrative review, we critically overview pre- and post-marketing evidence on the potential benefits and risks of marketed COVID-19 vaccines in the above-mentioned special cohorts. In addition, we summarise the recommendations of the scientific societies and regulatory agencies about COVID-19 primary prevention in the same vaccinee categories.

Azithromycin in COVID-19 Patients: Pharmacological Mechanism, Clinical Evidence and Prescribing Guidelines.

The global COVID-19 pandemic has led to a race to find medications that can improve the prognosis of the disease. Azithromycin, in association with hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine, has been proposed as one such medication. The aim of this review is to describe the pharmacological mechanism, clinical evidence and prescribing guidelines concerning azithromycin in COVID-19 patients. There is weak evidence on the antiviral and immunomodulating effects of azithromycin, which in addition is not based on results from COVID-19 patients specifically. Therefore, this antibacterial should be considered only as empirical treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), although not all current treatment guidelines are in agreement. After the initial expectations raised by a small trial, more recent evidence has raised serious safety concerns on the use of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with azithromycin to treat COVID-19 patients, as all these drugs have arrhythmogenic potential. The World Health Organization has not made recommendations suggesting the use of azithromycin with hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine as treatment for COVID-19, but some national organisations have taken a different position, recommending this as first-line treatment. Several scientific societies, including the American College of Cardiology, have cautioned about the risks of this treatment in view of the lack of evidence concerning its benefits.