Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 37
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Transl Med ; 17(1): 296, 2019 08 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31464635

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This multi-institutional retrospective real life study was conducted in 22 Italian Oncology Centers and evaluated the role of Axitinib in second line treatment in not selected mRCC patients. METHODS: 148 mRCC patients were evaluated. According to Heng score 15.5%, 60.1% and 24.4% of patients were at poor risk, intermediate and favorable risk, respectively. RESULTS: PFS, OS, DCR and ORR were 7.14 months, 15.5 months, 70.6% and 16.6%, respectively. The duration of prior sunitinib treatment correlated with a longer significant mPFS, 8.8 vs 6.3 months, respectively. Axitinib therapy was safe, without grade 4 adverse events. The most frequent toxicities of all grades were: fatigue (50%), hypertension (26%), and hypothyroidism (18%). G3 blood pressure elevation significantly correlated with longer mPFS and mOS compared to G1-G2 or no toxicity. Dose titration (DT) to 7 mg and 10 mg bid was feasible in 24% with no statistically significant differences in mPFS and mOS. The sunitinib-axitinib sequence was safe and effective, the mOS was 41.15 months. At multivariate analysis, gender, DCR to axitinib and to previous sunitinib correlated significantly with PFS; whereas DCR to axitinib, nephrectomy and Heng score independently affected overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Axitinib was effective and safe in a not selected real life mRCC population. Trial registration INT - Napoli - 11/16 oss. Registered 20 April 2016. http://www.istitutotumori.na.it.


Asunto(s)
Axitinib/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Sunitinib/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Axitinib/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Metástasis de la Neoplasia
2.
Anticancer Drugs ; 30(2): 179-185, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30320608

RESUMEN

In the pre-chemotherapy (CT) and post-CT settings of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) significantly extended median overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival (PFS) compared with prednisone alone. Yet, few data are available on therapy efficacy in the subgroup with visceral metastases, who represent a small population with poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical experience of AAP in patients with mCRPC with liver and/or lung metastases in real-world setting. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of patients with mCRPC with liver and/or lung metastases treated at the National Cancer Institute 'Fondazione G. Pascale' from September 2011 to May 2017. Co-primary end points were overall survival and radiographic PFS. Survival estimates were computed using Kaplan-Meier method. Secondary end points were response rate and safety. Of 143 patients with mCRPC treated, 18.9% (N=27) had visceral metastases: 85.2% (N=23) of the lung, 11.1% (N=3) of the liver and 3.7% (N=1) of both. Median PFS was 13.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.8-NA] in the pre-CT setting (N=11, median follow-up: 12.9 months), and 10.5 months (95% CI: 4.4-16.6) in the post-CT setting (N=16, median follow-up: 17.2 months). Pre-CT and post-CT patients with lung metastases had a median PFS of 16.5 months (95% CI: 4.3-NA) and 11.4 months (95% CI: 4.2-17.0), respectively. AAP tolerability was consistent with that previously reported in patients with mCRPC, without new safety concerns. Our finding provides preliminary evidence that AAP in real-world setting is a potential effective and safe therapeutic option for patients with mCRPC with a more advanced disease associated with the presence of visceral metastases, in both the pre-CT and post-CT settings.


Asunto(s)
Acetato de Abiraterona/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
3.
Anticancer Drugs ; 28(1): 104-109, 2017 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27579728

RESUMEN

The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) represents the future of the geriatric oncology to reduce toxicities and treatment-related hospitalization in the elderly. Most patients receiving docetaxel for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer are in their seventies or older. We explored the efficacy of the CGA in predicting chemotherapy feasibility and response to docetaxel in a cohort of 24 patients aged at least 70. This was an observational, prospective study involving 24 patients who were 70 years of age or older and about to start chemotherapy with docetaxel for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; we performed a CGA including five domains and divided our patients into 'healthy' and 'frail'; the relations between general condition and (i) early chemotherapy discontinuation and (ii) response to docetaxel were explored. We found a statistically significant relationship between frailty assessed by CGA and early docetaxel discontinuation; we also found an association between frailty and response to chemotherapy, but this did not reach statistical significance. A geriatric assessment before starting chemotherapy may help clinicians to recognize frail patients, and hence to reduce toxicities and early treatment discontinuation. Further analyses are required to simplify the CGA tools and to facilitate its incorporation into routine clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Taxoides/uso terapéutico , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Docetaxel , Humanos , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/fisiopatología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
4.
Int J Med Sci ; 14(6): 554-559, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28638271

RESUMEN

The gold standard for the detection of urothelial carcinoma is represented by urethro-cystoscopy and biopsy. Both procedures are invasive and expensive and therefore cytology is often used as first approach to investigate on a possible neoplasia, being a safe and cost-effective diagnostic modality of evaluation. Because cytology alone is not highly sensitive for detection of low grade urothelial carcinoma and recurrence of the disease, several adjunct markers and urine based tests for urothelial carcinoma have been developed, which can help in the final diagnosis. In particular, ProEx C is an immunohistochemical cocktail containing antibodies direct against topoisomerase IIα (TOP2A) and minichromosome maintenance 2 (MCM2) proteins. It proved to be a valid biomarker especially in detecting squamous intraepithelial lesions in cervical liquid-based samples and in discerning these lesions from their mimickers, as well as in ovarian, endometrial, vulvar, primary and metastatic melanomas, breast, pancreatic and renal cell carcinomas. This brief review covers the effective utility of ProEx C as adjunct tool in assessing the urothelial lesions in urine cytology, also providing prognostic and therapeutic information to help in clinical decisions.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , ADN-Topoisomerasas de Tipo II/genética , Componente 2 del Complejo de Mantenimiento de Minicromosoma/genética , Proteínas de Unión a Poli-ADP-Ribosa/genética , Neoplasias Urológicas/diagnóstico , Anticuerpos/inmunología , Biomarcadores de Tumor/inmunología , Citodiagnóstico , ADN-Topoisomerasas de Tipo II/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Componente 2 del Complejo de Mantenimiento de Minicromosoma/inmunología , Proteínas de Unión a Poli-ADP-Ribosa/inmunología , Pronóstico , Juego de Reactivos para Diagnóstico , Neoplasias Urológicas/genética , Neoplasias Urológicas/patología , Frotis Vaginal
5.
Am J Ther ; 23(1): e300-3, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24368609

RESUMEN

Anticancer agents may trigger reactivation of hepatitis B virus infection ensuing in asymptomatic to severe liver damage. Preemptive administration of antiviral agents such as lamivudine to patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy has been shown to inhibit viral replication and prevent such events. No data are available so far concerning the coadministration of antiviral agents and everolimus, an oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor recently approved for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. We present in this study the first case to our knowledge of a hepatitis B surface antigen-positive patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who has been successfully treated with prophylactic lamivudine and everolimus. Long-term depletion of viral replication was obtained along with stabilization of lung and bone metastases. Hepatitis B surface antigen positivity may be found in up to 10% of cancer patients but should not be considered a contraindication to treatment with everolimus.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Everolimus/uso terapéutico , Virus de la Hepatitis B/efectos de los fármacos , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Lamivudine/farmacología , Activación Viral/efectos de los fármacos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/virología , Hepatitis B/prevención & control , Virus de la Hepatitis B/fisiología , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/virología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
6.
Anticancer Drugs ; 26(10): 1017-25, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26241803

RESUMEN

Oncogenic viruses may have a significant impact on the therapeutic management of several malignancies besides their well-known role in tumor pathogenesis. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) induces neoplastic transformation of epithelial cells of the nasopharynx by various molecular mechanisms mostly involving activation of oncogenes and inactivation of tumor-suppressor genes. EBV infection can also induce the expression of several immunogenic peptides on the plasma membrane of the infected cells. Importantly, these virus-related antigens may be used as targets for antitumor immunotherapy-based treatment strategies. Two different immunotherapy strategies, namely adoptive and active immunotherapy, have been developed and strongly improved in the recent years. Furthermore, EBV infection may influence the use of targeted therapies for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) considering that the presence of EBV can induce important modifications in cell signaling. As an example, latent membrane protein type 1 is a viral transmembrane protein mainly involved in the cancerogenesis process, which can also mediate overexpression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in NPC cells, rendering them more sensitive to anti-EGFR therapy. Finally, EBV may induce epigenetic changes in the infected cells, such as DNA hypermethylation and histone deacetylation, that can sustain tumor growth and can thus be considered potential targets for novel therapies. In conclusion, EBV infection can modify important biological features of NPC cells, rendering them more vulnerable to both immunotherapy and targeted therapy.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr/complicaciones , Herpesvirus Humano 4 , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/virología , Antígenos Virales/metabolismo , Carcinoma , Factor de Crecimiento Epidérmico/antagonistas & inhibidores , Factor de Crecimiento Epidérmico/metabolismo , Epigénesis Genética , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr/terapia , Herpesvirus Humano 4/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/etiología , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/terapia , Proteínas de la Matriz Viral/metabolismo
7.
Anticancer Drugs ; 26(2): 123-38, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25406023

RESUMEN

Gastric cancer is one of the most dreadful neoplastic diseases and remains the second cause of cancer death worldwide. Patients who develop peritoneal metastasis have a poor prognosis, with a median survival of less than 6 months. Despite being the cause of 60% of deaths from gastric cancer, peritoneal metastasis can still be considered a local disease and a local multidisciplinary approach can improve the prognosis even in this end-stage disease. At present, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the most widely accepted treatment for peritoneal surface diseases and can be performed in patients with different stages of cancer and with various antitumoral drugs. We performed a systematic review of the current status of HIPEC in the treatment of gastric peritoneal metastasis in an attempt to obtain answers to the questions that still remain: do results differ with these different methods? Does HIPEC exert a significant effect on the intracavitary delivery of drugs? Which patients should be treated and which should not? What can we expect from this approach in terms of survival, morbidity, and mortality? On reviewing the literature, despite the lack of trials comparing the different methods, we found that HIPEC has been shown to be an effective tool whenever a complete or an almost complete resection of the peritoneal implants can be performed. Therefore, it is advisable to refer all at-risk patients to specialized centers to be enrolled in randomized trials to achieve truly reliable results.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida/efectos adversos , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias Peritoneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/patología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Life (Basel) ; 13(10)2023 Oct 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37895484

RESUMEN

Cancer therapies have revolutionized patient survival rates, yet they come with the risk of cardiotoxicity, necessitating effective monitoring and management. The existing guidelines offer a limited empirical basis for practical approaches in various clinical scenarios. This article explores the intricate relationship between cancer therapy and the cardiovascular system, highlighting the role of advanced multimodality imaging in monitoring patients before, during, and after cancer treatment. This review outlines the cardiovascular effects of different cancer therapy classes, offering a comprehensive understanding of their dose- and time-dependent impacts. This paper delves into diverse imaging modalities such as echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, cardiac computed tomography, and nuclear imaging, detailing their strengths and limitations in various conditions due to cancer treatment, such as cardiac dysfunction, myocarditis, coronary artery disease, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, pulmonary hypertension, arterial hypertension, valvular heart diseases, and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Moreover, it underscores the significance of long-term follow-up for cancer survivors and discusses future directions.

9.
Tumori ; 109(2): 224-232, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35400269

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: With the availability of multiple treatment options for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), new real-world data on disease management and drugs' performance are needed. METHODS: We described characteristics, management and clinical outcomes of patients receiving first-line mCRPC treatment within the Italian cohort of the real-world, prospective, international Prostate Cancer Registry. Patients were enrolled consecutively (2013-2016) in 32 Italian sites and followed for 3 years. RESULTS: 238 patients were included: 157 received first-line abiraterone acetate plus prednisone ("abiraterone" thereafter) and 70 first-line docetaxel; 11 patients receiving other treatments were not considered. Compared with docetaxel-treated patients, those receiving abiraterone were significantly older (age ⩾75: 63.7% vs 38.6%), less frequently had a Gleason score >8 (48.2% vs 67.6%, p<0.005) at initial diagnosis, and more frequently an ECOG score ⩾1 (52.7% vs 36.2%, p<0.05) and comorbidities (76.4% vs 57.1%, p<0.05) at baseline; they reported a lower analgesic use (15.3% vs 30%, p<0.005). In the abiraterone group (median follow-up 22.1 months), median time to progression (TTP) and progression-free survival (PFS) were, respectively, 14.4 months (95% confidence interval, CI, 10.6-18.0) and 13.0 months (95% CI, 9.1-16.8); median overall survival (OS) was not reached, and 3-year OS was 59.1%. In the docetaxel treatment group (median follow-up 25.3 months), median TTP, PFS and OS were, respectively, 8.2 months (95% CI, 6.1-10.3), 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.8-10.3) and 33.2 months (95% CI, 19.2-not estimable). CONCLUSION: This investigation provided valuable information on the overall mCRPC treatment pattern and the effectiveness of first-line abiraterone and docetaxel in a population representative of everyday practice.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Docetaxel , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad
10.
Anticancer Drugs ; 23(5): 573-7, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22481064

RESUMEN

Guidelines on the treatment of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the penis are limited to a few prospective trials. Cisplatin-based regimens represent the standard of treatment with promising activity of taxanes. Recently, epidermal growth factor receptor overexpression has been shown in these patients. We treated an elderly man with a docetaxel-cetuximab combination after failure of the cisplatin regimen. We observed a necrosis of the inguinal lymph nodes and a reduction of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake at PET/CT scan. Only mild mucositis and skin toxicity had been detected. Our case report, the first in the literature, shows that this combination is active and well tolerated in penile squamous cell carcinoma.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Pene/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Cetuximab , Docetaxel , Esquema de Medicación , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias del Pene/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Pene/patología , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Taxoides/administración & dosificación , Taxoides/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
BJU Int ; 110(11 Pt B): E661-6, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22958571

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Metastatic or locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (SCCP) is generally incurable, but it can be palliated with systemic chemotherapy. Two retrospective studies, involving <10 patients each, showed that cisplatin plus continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) may be effective and well tolerated. Cisplatin, methotrexate and bleomycin, cisplatin and irinotecan and taxanes can also play an important role for patients with locally advanced/metastatic SCCP. Finally, anti-EGFR therapy may also be effective in advanced SCCP. Although cisplatin plus continuous infusion of 5-FU is widely used in clinical practice for palliation of SCCP, toxicity and efficacy data regarding this schedule include a total of 14 patients with SCCP, treated more than two decades ago. In our retrospective study, cisplatin plus continuous infusion of 5-FU was used for palliative purposes in a homogenous sample of 25 patients with SCCP. Partial responses and stable disease were observed in 8 (32%) and 10 (40%) patients, respectively, with a median progression-free survival of 20 weeks. Neutropenia was the most important grade 3-4 side effect observed, occurring in 20% of patients. These data provide confirmation that such a combination regimen is moderately effective and well tolerated in patients with SCCP. OBJECTIVE: • To investigate the activity and toxicity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as a first-line treatment in metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (SCCP). METHODS: • The medical records of 78 patients with SCCP treated between January 2000 and June 2011 at the four participating centres were reviewed. • Data regarding patients treated with first-line 5-FU were extracted. • Patients were included in the study if radiological reports were available for determination of response and progression-free survival (PFS) according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) 1.1. RESULTS: • Between January 2000 and June 2011, 25 patients were treated with i.v. cisplatin on day 1 followed by 5-FU as a continuous 24-h infusion for 4 days every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Partial responses and stable disease were observed in eight (32%) and 10 (40%) patients, respectively, with a disease control rate of 72%. • Severe neutropenia was the most important grade 3-4 side effect observed, occurring in 20% of patients. • The median (interquartile range [IQR]) PFS was 20 (11-20) weeks and the median (IQR) overall survival (OS) was 8 (7-12) months. CONCLUSION: • 5-FU is associated with a moderate response rate and is well tolerated in patients with metastatic SCCP.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias del Pene/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias del Pene/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Pene/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Cancer Treat Rev ; 74: 35-42, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30738364

RESUMEN

In few years the scenario of metastatic prostate carcinoma treatment has radically changed due to improved knowledge of those mechanisms responsible of prostatic cancer cells survival and proliferation. Five new therapeutic agents (abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, cabazitaxel, radium-223, sipuleucel-T), all able to improve overall survival, have been introduced in the management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Moreover, recent evidences showed that adding docetaxel chemotherapy or abiraterone acetate to androgen deprivation therapy significantly increases overall survival of de novo castration-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer patients. Due to this rapid therapeutic evolution clinicians face one crucial challenge: the choice of the best treatment sequencing. In particular, there are no prospective data to guide clinical decision in patients with progressive disease after docetaxel or abiraterone acetate treatment for castration sensitive disease. In this review we provide an overview of the therapeutic agents available for both castration-sensitive and castration-resistant prostate cancer. We propose some biological and clinical insights helpful in selecting the most appropriate treatment for patients progressing after metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer treatment with docetaxel or abiraterone acetate.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/terapia , Acetato de Abiraterona/uso terapéutico , Benzamidas , Humanos , Masculino , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Nitrilos , Feniltiohidantoína/análogos & derivados , Feniltiohidantoína/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/radioterapia , Radio (Elemento)/uso terapéutico , Taxoides/uso terapéutico , Extractos de Tejidos/uso terapéutico
13.
Front Oncol ; 9: 1400, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31921657

RESUMEN

In the last decades, the prognosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has remarkably improved following the advent of the "targeted therapy" era. The expanding knowledge on the prominent role played by angiogenesis in RCC pathogenesis has led to approval of multiple anti-angiogenic agents such as sunitinib, pazopanib, axitinib, cabozantinib, sorafenib, and bevacizumab. These agents can induce radiological responses and delay cancer progression for months or years before onset of resistance, with a clinically meaningful activity. The need for markers of prognosis and efficacy of anti-angiogenic agents has become more compelling as novel systemic immunotherapy agents have also been approved in RCC and can be administered as an alternative to angiogenesis inhibitors. Anti PD-1 monoclonal antibody nivolumab has been approved in the second-line setting after tyrosine kinase inhibitors failure, while combination of nivolumab plus anti CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody ipilimumab has been approved as first-line therapy of RCC patients at intermediate or poor prognosis. In this review article, biomarkers of prognosis and efficacy of antiangiogenic therapies are summarized with a focus on those that have the potential to affect treatment decision-making in RCC. Biomarkers predictive of toxicity of anti-angiogenic agents have also been discussed.

14.
Curr Cancer Drug Targets ; 18(5): 468-479, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28183256

RESUMEN

In the last decades, the treatment of mRCC, metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma, has become more and more complex due to the approval of a great number of effective systemic treatments that have significantly improved the prognosis of patients suffering from such disease. An additional knowledge of the genetic aberrations and the molecular pathways alterations that underlie RCC, has promoted the development of several novel agents, known as target therapies (TTs). Even though TTs are not curative and all patients eventually progress, an adequate sequencing of these drugs can provide a significant benefit in terms of PFS, Progression Free Survival, and hopefully OS, Overall Survival. To date, there are few data about the optimal sequential use of the TTs hence, in clinical practice, the therapeutic strategy is chosen on the basis of the safety profile of the drug, patients medical history and the pivotal trial results, though such studies often exclude patients with poor performance status and/or severe comorbidities that we routinely see in our clinics. This review aims to provide an overview of the systemic therapies for mRCC both in the newly diagnosed patients and in the subsequent lines of treatment, with a special focus on the last advances about TTs and immunotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Proteínas de Neoplasias/antagonistas & inhibidores , Carcinoma de Células Renales/metabolismo , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/metabolismo , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Medicina de Precisión , Pronóstico
15.
Curr Cancer Drug Targets ; 18(5): 457-467, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28183253

RESUMEN

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in males and, despite a marked improvement in diagnostic techniques, a not small percentage of prostate tumours is still diagnosed in advanced stage. It is now clear that prostate cancer passes through distinct phases during its natural history, starting from an initial phase, in which the disease has a locoregional extent, until a very late phase when it becomes refractory to hormone therapy. It is important to distinguish between local disease, in which tumor may be considered localized in the gland and a systemic disease characterized by high tumor burden and/or dissemination of circulating tumour cells. All the prostate cancers, at first diagnosis, are characterized by high sensitivity to the androgen deprivation therapy (ADT); however, during the natural history, after a variable period, they become castration resistant. In the past, few therapy options were available for castration resistant prostate cancer, while at present much more approaches can be employed, both hormone-based therapies and chemotherapy regimens. Hypercastration agents are defined as drugs capable to target the androgenandrogen receptor axis even in castrate resistant conditions. Abiraterone and enzalutamide are the only two hypercastration agents available for clinical use. Osteoclast targeted agents, such as zoledronic acid and denosumab can always been employed, but their use should be limited to the castrate resistant setting. The optimal understanding of all phases characterizing the natural history of prostate cancer may certainly be useful for the selection of the best therapeutic options in prostate cancer.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptores Androgénicos/química , Humanos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología
16.
Curr Cancer Drug Targets ; 18(5): 442-456, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28183255

RESUMEN

Melanoma represents 2-3% of all cancers, 95% of them arise from skin, while only 5% are non-cutaneous melanoma. Despite an optimal surgery management, the risk of a local and systemic relapse remains high, particularly in high-risk patients (node-positive or node-negative T3b, T4 a/b). We conducted a systematic review of the main published and ongoing phase I/II/III trials between 2000 and June 2015 on the adjuvant treatment of cutaneous melanoma. The IFN remains the only option currently available for this aim. Ipilimumab represents a possible breakthrough in this setting, considering the positive results of the EORTC 18701 trials in terms of disease free survival (DFS), while data regarding OS are pending. Recent advances in the understanding of the biology of melanoma result in the identification of MAPK pathway role in the melanoma development. Based on these features, B-RAF inhibitors and their combination with immunotherapy could represent the upcoming therapeutic strategy.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Humanos , Melanoma/patología , Pronóstico
17.
Oncotarget ; 9(1): 1365-1379, 2018 Jan 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29416701

RESUMEN

Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) represent the most common solid tumors affecting young men. They constitute a distinct entity because of their embryonic origin and their unique biological behavior. Recent preclinical data regarding biological signaling machinery as well as genetic and epigenetic mechanisms associated with molecular patterns of tumors have contribute to explain the pathogenesis and the differentiation of TGCTs and to understand the mechanisms responsible for the development of resistance to treatment. In this review, we discuss the main genetic and epigenetic events associated with TGCTs development in order to better define their role in the pathogenesis of these tumors and in cisplatin-acquired resistance.

18.
Neuroradiol J ; 31(1): 18-26, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29206077

RESUMEN

Objective The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact of stereotactic radiosurgery/fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with the Cyberknife system on local disease control, clinical outcome and toxicity in patients with meningioma, according to the site and histological grade of lesion. From January 2013 to April 2017, 52 patients with intracranial meningiomas were treated with the Cyberknife system. Twenty-four patients had undergone previous surgery: 38% gross total resection, 10% subtotal resection; 27 patients underwent no surgery; 22 patients had a recurrence of meningioma. Methods Radiosurgery was used for lesions smaller than 2 cm, stereotactic radiotherapy for lesions larger than 2 cm, or smaller but close to a critical site such as the optical chiasm, optic pathway or brainstem. Results Local control and clinical outcomes were analysed. Median follow-up was 20 months: six patients died, one after re-surgery died from post-surgical sepsis, three from heart disease. Progression-free survival had a mean value of 38.3 months and overall survival of 41.6 months. We evaluated at 12 months 28 patients (100% local control); at 24 months 19 patients (89% local control); at 36 months nine patients (89% local control). At baseline, 44/52 patients (85%) were symptomatic: 19 visual disorders, 17 motor disorders, six hearing disorders, 10 headache and six epilepsy. Visual symptoms remained unchanged in 52%, improved in 32%, resolved in 16%. Headache was improved in 40%, resolved in 10%, unchanged in 50%. Epilepsy was resolved in 17%, unchanged in 33%, worsened in 33%. Conclusions Stereotactic radiosurgery/fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with Cyberknife provides a good local disease control, improving visual, hearing and motor symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Meníngeas/radioterapia , Meningioma/radioterapia , Radiocirugia/instrumentación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Meníngeas/patología , Meningioma/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Front Pharmacol ; 8: 484, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28775690

RESUMEN

In metastatic renal cell carcinoma, complete response to first-line antiangiogenic agents is rare and resistance to therapy often develops. Protocols for sequential treatment with angiogenesis and mTOR inhibitors are under evaluation to improve outcomes. In this observational, real-world study, patients received a first-line therapy with pazopanib until discontinuation for disease progression or toxicity, then a second-line with everolimus. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) for sequence, progression free survival (PFS) for each agent, and safety. Thirty-one patients were included in the analysis: 73.3% of patients underwent nephrectomy before treatment, 25.8% had at least three comorbidities. At the beginning of therapy, the median age was 68 years, with more than 60% of patients older than 65 years. The median OS for sequence was 26.5 months (95% CI 17.4-nc); median PFS was 10.6 months (95% CI 6.3-12.1) with pazopanib and 5.3 months (95% CI 3.8-6.7) with everolimus. The median persistence in pazopanib therapy was 8.1 months (Interquartile Range IQR 5.3-12.7), with 31% of patients who required dose reduction, while persistence in everolimus was 4.4 months (IQR 3.4-6.5). Sequence was well tolerated with a different profile of adverse events for each agent. These data confirmed that pazopanib was effective, even in reduced dosing, and well tolerated and suggested that everolimus may represent an opportunity to continue a therapy when patients cannot further tolerate angiogenesis inhibitors or develop a resistance.

20.
Oncotarget ; 8(10): 17383-17395, 2017 Mar 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28129649

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this review was to compare radiation toxicity in Localized Prostate Cancer (LPC) patients who underwent conventional fractionation (CV), hypofractionated (HYPO) or extreme hypofractionated (eHYPO) radiotherapy. We analyzed the impact of technological innovation on the management of prostate cancer, attempting to make a meta-analysis of randomized trials. METHODS: PubMed database has been explored for studies concerning acute and late urinary/gastrointestinal toxicity in low/intermediate risk LPC patients after receiving radiotherapy. Studies were then gathered into 5 groups: detected acute and chronic toxicity data from phase II non randomized trials were analyzed and Odds Ratio (OR) was calculated by comparing the number of patients with G0-1 toxicity and those with toxicity > G2 in the studied groups. A meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials was also carried out. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 575 results, but only 32 manuscripts met all eligibility requirements: in terms of radiation-induced side effects, such as gastrointestinal and genitourinary acute and late toxicity, hypofractionated 3DCRT seemed to be more advantageous than 3DCRT with conventional fractionation as well as IMRT with conventional fractionation compared to 3DCRT with conventional fractionation; furthermore, IMRT hypofractionated technique appeared more advantageous than IMRT with conventional fractionation in late toxicities. Randomized trials meta-analysis disclosed an advantage in terms of acute gastrointestinal and late genitourinary toxicity for Hypofractionated schemes. CONCLUSIONS: Although our analysis pointed out a more favorable toxicity profile in terms of gastrointestinal acute side effects of conventional radiotherapy schemes compared to hypofractionated ones, prospective randomized trials are needed to better understand the real incidence of rectal and urinary toxicity in patients receiving radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.


Asunto(s)
Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Enfermedades del Recto/etiología , Recto/patología , Recto/efectos de la radiación , Trastornos Urinarios/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA