RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The value of a combined index of neutrophil and white cell counts, named derived neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), has recently been proposed as a prognosticator of survival in various cancer types. We investigated the prognostic role of the dNLR in a large European cohort of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS: Data from 171 non-metastatic UTUC patients, operated between 1990 and 2012 at a single tertiary academic centre, were evaluated retrospectively. Cancer-specific- (CSS) as well as overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. To evaluate the independent prognostic significance of the dNLR, multivariate proportional Cox-regression models were applied. Additionally, the influence of the dNLR on the predictive accuracy of the multivariate model was further determined by Harrell's concordance index (c-index). RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 31 months. An increased dNLR was statistically significantly associated with shorter CSS (log-rank P=0.004), as well as with shorter OS (log-rank P=0.002). Multivariate analysis identified dNLR as an independent predictor for CSS (hazard ratio, HR=1.16, 95% confidence interval, CI=1.01-1.35, P=0.045), as well as for OS (HR=1.21, 95% CI=1.09-1.34, P<0.001). The estimated c-index of the multivariate model for OS was 0.68 without dNLR and 0.73 when dNLR was added. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a high pretreatment dNLR could be predicted to show subsequently higher cancer-specific- as well as overall mortality after surgery for UTUC compared with those with a low pretreatment dNLR. Thus, this combined index should be considered as a potential prognostic biomarker in future.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/sangre , Neoplasias Renales/sangre , Recuento de Leucocitos , Neutrófilos , Neoplasias Ureterales/sangre , Anciano , Austria/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/mortalidad , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Recuento de Linfocitos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Necrosis , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Curva ROC , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Ureterales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Ureterales/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Animal studies have shown the potential benefits of mannitol as renoprotective during warm ischemia; it may have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties and is sometimes used during partial nephrectomy (PN) and live donor nephrectomy (LDN). Despite this, a prospective study on mannitol has never been performed. The aim of this study is to document patterns of mannitol use during PN and LDN. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey on the use of mannitol during PN and LDN was sent to 92 high surgical volume urological centers. Questions included use of mannitol, indications for use, physician responsible for administration, dosage, timing and other renoprotective measures. RESULTS: Mannitol was used in 78 and 64 % of centers performing PN and LDN, respectively. The indication for use was as antioxidant (21 %), as diuretic (5 %) and as a combination of the two (74 %). For PN, the most common dosages were 12.5 g (30 %) and 25 g (49 %). For LDN, the most common doses were 12.5 g (36.3 %) and 25 g (63.7 %). Overall, 83 % of centers utilized mannitol, and two (percent or centers??) utilized furosemide for renoprotection. CONCLUSIONS: A large majority of high-volume centers performing PN and LDN use mannitol for renoprotection. Since there are no data proving its value nor standardized indication and usage, this survey may provide information for a randomized prospective study.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Riñón/cirugía , Donadores Vivos , Manitol/uso terapéutico , Nefrectomía/métodos , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios/farmacología , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Antioxidantes/administración & dosificación , Antioxidantes/farmacología , Antioxidantes/uso terapéutico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Riñón/efectos de los fármacos , Manitol/administración & dosificación , Manitol/farmacología , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The 7th edition of TNM for renal cell carcinoma introduced a subdivision of pT2 tumors at a 10 cm cutoff. In the present multicenter study the influence of tumor size as well as further clinical and histopathological parameters on cancer specific survival in patients with pT2 tumors was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 670 consecutive patients with pT2 tumors (10.4%) of 6,442 surgically treated patients with all tumor stages were pooled (mean followup 71.4 months). Tumors were reclassified according to the current TNM classification, and subdivided in stages pT2a and pT2b. Cancer specific survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariable and multivariable analyses were used to assess the influence of several parameters on survival. RESULTS: Tumor size continuously applied and subdivided at 10 cm or alternative cutoffs did not significantly influence cancer specific survival. In addition to N/M stage, Fuhrman grade and collecting system invasion also had an independent influence on survival. Integration of a dichotomous variable subsuming Fuhrman grade and collecting system invasion (grade 3/4 and/or collecting system invasion present vs grade 1/2 and collecting system invasion absent) into multivariate models including established prognostic parameters resulted in improvement of predictive abilities by 11% (HR 2.3, p <0.001) for all pT2 cases and 151% (HR 3.1, p <0.001) for stage pT2N0M0 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor size did not have a significant influence on cancer specific survival in pT2 tumors, neither continuously applied nor based on various cutoff values. To enhance prognostic discrimination, multifactorial staging systems including pathological features should be implemented. The prognostic relevance of the variable subsuming Fuhrman grade and collecting system invasion should be considered for future evaluation.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Túbulos Renales Colectores , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Carga Tumoral , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The aim of this study is to evaluate if surgical experience could influence the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in terms of stone clearance and complication rate. Patients from five institutions were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1: patients treated by three surgeons in the early phase of learning curve (surgical experience <100 procedures); Group 2: cases operated by two surgeons with great endourological experience (>400 procedures). Patients and stone characteristics, outcome and complications were analyzed. Multivariable regression model was used. Differences between groups were estimated using propensity scores to adjust for the bias inherent to the different characteristics. 381 RIRS were analyzed (Group 1: 150 RIRS; Group 2: 231 RIRS). Clinical data and stone parameters were comparable. The SFR was 70 % in Group 1 and 77.9 % in Group 2 (p = 0.082). Operative time was significantly shorter in the Group 2 (76.3 vs. 53.1 min, p = 0.001). The overall complication rate was significantly lower in Group 2 (20.7 vs. 8.7, p = 0.001). At unadjusted analysis, a non-significant difference was found between centers on SFR (OR 1.51 95 % CI 0.95-2.41). Conversely, a significant difference was found on overall complications (OR 0.36 95 %CI 0.20-0.67) with lower overall complication in Group 2. This study shows that surgeon experience influences the outcomes of RIRS mainly in terms of safety. Further studies will be needed to assess the exact number of procedures necessary to obtain a plateau in the rate of complications and success.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Cálculos Renales/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Ureteroscopía/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Riñón/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Prospectivos , Cirujanos/educación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ureteroscopía/métodos , Urología/educaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of RIRS in men ≥65 years to those <65 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent RIRS were prospectively collected from March 2013 to March 2014 in 5 European centers. Perioperative outcomes and complications in elderly men were compared with men <65 years. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed for factors predicting overall complications. The groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared using chi-squared test and the Yates correction or the Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: A total of 399 patients with renal stones were included, 308 (77.19%) were aged <65 years, 91 (22.8%) were aged ≥65 years. Elderly patients were more likely to have higher ASA scores (35.7% vs 92.3%; p < 001), Charlson Comorbidity Index (1.8 vs. 5.2, p < 0.001), hyperlipidemia (10.06% vs. 30.76%; p = 0,0005) and coronary heart disease (5.51% vs. 17.58; p = 0.005) compared to younger cohort. Perioperative outcomes (stone free rate, operative time and re-intervention rate) did not show differences between the two groups (p > 0.05). Surgical and medical complication rates were similar between the cohorts (14.28% vs 9.89%; p = 0.38). Multivariate analysis did not identify any predictive factors of complications among the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, elderly RIRS patients had comparable short term efficacy and perioperative complications to younger patients, despite a higher prevalence of comorbidity. Age itself should not be considered as a risk factor for the development of complications in patients undergoing RIRS for renal stone.
Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales/cirugía , Riñón/cirugía , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Since there is still an unmet need for potent adjuvant strategies for renal cancer patients with high progression risk after surgery, several targeted therapies are currently evaluated in this setting. We analyzed whether inclusion criteria of contemporary trials (ARISER, ASSURE, SORCE, EVEREST, PROTECT, S-TRAC, ATLAS) correctly identify high-risk patients. METHODS: The study group comprised 8873 patients of the international CORONA-database after surgery for non-metastatic renal cancer without any adjuvant treatment. Patients were divided into potentially eligible high-risk and assumable low-risk patients who didn't meet inclusion criteria of contemporary adjuvant clinical trials. The ability of various inclusion criteria for disease-free survival (DFS) prediction was evaluated by Harrell's c-index. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 53 months 15.2% of patients experienced recurrence (5-year-DFS 84%). By application of trial inclusion criteria, 24% (S-TRAC) to 47% (SORCE) of patients would have been eligible for enrollment. Actual recurrence rates of eligible patients ranged between 29% (SORCE) and 37% (S-TRAC) opposed to <10% in excluded patients. Highest Hazard Ratio for selection criteria was proven for the SORCE-trial (HR 6.42; p < 0.001), while ASSURE and EVEREST reached the highest c-index for DFS prediction (both 0.73). In a separate multivariate Cox-model, two risk-groups were identified with a maximum difference in 5-year-DFS (94% vs. 61%). CONCLUSION: Results of contemporary adjuvant clinical trials will not be comparable as inclusion criteria differ significantly. Risk assessment according to our model might improve patient selection in clinical trials by defining a high-risk group (28% of all patients) with a 5-year-recurrence rate of almost 40%.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Anciano , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Nefrectomía , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Medición de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIM: Although extensively addressed in US registries, the utilization rate of Partial Nephrectomy has been poorly addressed in European settings. Our aim is to evaluate the impact of hospital volume on the use of PN for cT1 renal tumors. METHODS: 2526 patients with cT1N0M0 renal tumors treated with either PN or radical nephrectomy at 10 European centres in the last decade were included in the analysis. Joinpoint regression analysis was used to identify significant changes over time in linear slope of the trend for each center. The correlation between yearly caseload and the slopes was assessed with the non-parametric Spearman test. Coincident pairwise tests and regression analyses were used to generate and compare the trends of high-volume (HV), mid-volume (MV) and low-volume (LV) groups. RESULTS: Yearly caseload was significantly associated with increased use of PN (R = 0.69, p = 0.028). The utilization rate of PN was stable at LV centres (p = 0.67, p = 0.7, p = 0.76, for cT1, cT1a, and cT1b tumors, respectively), while increased significantly at MV (p = 0.002, 0.0005 and 0.007, respectively) and HV centers (all p < 0.0001). Regression analysis confirmed the trends for HV and MV as significantly different from those observed in LV centres (all p ≤ 0.002) and highlighted significant differences also between MV and HV centres (all p ≤ 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed the association between caseload and the use of PN for cT1 tumors. Our findings suggest that a minimum caseload might turn the tide also in LV centres while a selective referral to HV centers for cT1b tumors should be considered.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Nefrectomía/métodos , Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto , Humanos , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The chromophobe subtype represents the third most common histological subtype of renal cell carcinoma (chRCC). Due to the rarity of this subtype only one publication regarding the specific analysis of clinical and histopathological criteria as well as survival analysis of more than 200 patients with chRCC is known to date. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 6,234 RCC patients from 11 centres who were treated by (partial) nephrectomy are contained in the database of this multinational study. Of the patients 259 were diagnosed with chRCC (4.2 %) and thus formed the study group for this retrospective investigation. These subjects were compared to 4,994 patients with a clear cell subtype (80.1 %) with respect to clinical and histopathological criteria. The independent influence of the chromophobe subtype regarding tumor-specific survival and overall survival was determined using analysis by Cox proportional hazards regression models. The median follow-up was 59 months (interquartile range 29-106 months). RESULTS: The chRCC patients were significantly younger (60 vs. 63.2 years, p < 0.001), more often female (50 vs. 41 %, p = 0.005) and showed simultaneous distant metastases to a lesser extent (3.5 vs. 7.1 %, p = 0.023) compared to patients with a clear cell subtype. Despite a comparable median tumor size a ≥ pT3 tumor stage was diagnosed in only 24.7 % of the patients compared to of 30.5 % in patients with a clear cell subtype (p = 0.047). In addition to the clinical criteria of age, sex and distant metastases, the histological variables pTN stage, grade and tumor size showed a significant influence on tumor-specific and overall survival. However, in the multivariable Cox regression analysis no independent effect on tumor-specific mortality (HR 0.88, p = 0.515) and overall mortality (HR 1.00, p = 0.998) due to the histological subtype was found (c-index 0.86 and 0.77, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with chRCC and clear cell RCC differ significantly concerning the distribution of clinical and histopathological criteria. Patients with chRCC present with less advanced tumors which leads to better tumor-specific survival rates in general; however, this advantage could not be verified after adjustment for the established risk factors.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Bases de Datos Factuales , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Nefrectomía/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Renales/diagnóstico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Medición de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
To achieve an optimal outcome after urethral reconstructive surgery knowledge of urethral and urogenital anatomy is mandatory. It is necessary to know the anatomical characteristics of grafts and flaps to achieve successful surgical results. An ideal graft is not yet available and an optimal surgical outcome depends on the technique of harvesting, graft handling and histological transplant characteristics. Surgical technique and experience are building a successful urethral surgery out of the challenge.