Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Cancer ; 146(10): 2829-2835, 2020 05 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32037527

RESUMEN

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are available to treat chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). In 2007-2008, regulatory notifications advised of venous thromboembolism and mortality risks while the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services' restricted ESA initiation to patients with hemoglobin <10 g/dl. In 2010, a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies required consent prior to administration. We evaluated ESA utilization from 2003 to 2012 and obtained private health insurer claims data for persons with lung, colorectal, or breast cancer from 2001 to 2012. ESA use for CIA was determined by an ESA claim after chemotherapy, up to 6 months after treatment. We identified 839,948 commercially insured patients, including 24,785 patients with ESA-treated CIA (3.2%). Darbepoetin use increased 3.9-fold from 2003 to 2007 (12.3% to 48.7%) and then decreased 95% to 2.6% by 2012. Epoetin use decreased 90% from 2003 to 2012 (30.3% to 3.1%). Between 2003 and 2012, mean epoetin dosing decreased 0.8-fold (244,979 in 2003 vs. 196,216 units in 2012), but increased 1.8-fold for darbepoetin-treated CIA (262 in 2003 to 467 µg in 2012). Among CIA patients, transfusions were low (4.5%) in 2002-2007, then increased 2.2-fold between 2008 and 2012. Safety initiatives between 2007 and 2010 facilitated reductions in ESA use combined with changes in coverage. These data show the efficacy of regulatory efforts, publication of adverse events and changes in reimbursement in reducing use of ESAs. Future studies are warranted to optimize deimplementation strategies to improve patient safety.


Asunto(s)
Anemia/inducido químicamente , Anemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Hematínicos/uso terapéutico , Oncología Médica/tendencias , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Estados Unidos
2.
PeerJ ; 8: e8231, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32002320

RESUMEN

The most intense commercial harvest of marine aquarium species in North America occurs in the coastal waters surrounding Florida, yet very often little information exists on the life histories, population dynamics, or reproductive characteristics of these organisms. The peppermint shrimp Lysmata boggessi is one such species and is heavily targeted along the west coast of Florida. It is known primarily among aquarists for its ability to control pest anemones and in the scientific community for its unique sexual system, protandric simultaneous hermaphroditism. However, no study has addressed fishery interactions or long-term population dynamics for L. boggessi. We used monthly fisheries-dependent sampling, with a trained observer present, for a full year to assess seasonality in sex phase ratio (males to males + hermaphrodites), size at sex change, fecundity, embryo volume and reproductive output of an exploited L. boggessi population. L. boggessi exhibited distinct seasonality in size distribution, sex phase ratio, size at sex phase change and reproductive activity. The peak reproductive season was in spring, when the population was dominated by small but fecund hermaphrodites. Reproduction decreased during fall and winter and sex phase ratios favored male phase shrimp that exhibited delayed sex change. This population and individual level information is the first of its kind for L. boggessi and fills a much needed data gap for the informed management of this fishery.

3.
PLoS One ; 15(6): e0234541, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32584835

RESUMEN

Erythropoisis stimulating agent (ESA) use was addressed in Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Oncology Drug Advisory Committee (ODAC) meetings between 2004 and 2008. FDA safety-focused regulatory actions occurred in 2007 and 2008. In 2007, black box warnings advised of early death and venous thromboembolism (VTE) risks with ESAs in oncology. In 2010, a Risk Evaluation Strategies (REMS) was initiated, with cancer patient consent that mortality and VTE risks were noted with ESAs. We report warnings and REMS impacts on ESA utilization among Veterans Administration (VA) cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). Data were from Veterans Affairs database (2003-2012). Epoetin and darbepoetin use were primary outcomes. Segmented linear regression was used to estimate changes in ESA use levels and trends, clinical appropriateness, and adverse events (VTEs) among chemotherapy-treated cancer patients. To estimate changes in level of drug prescription rate after policy actions, model-specific indicator variables as covariates based on specific actions were included. ESA use fell by 95% and 90% from 2005, for epoetin and darbepoetin, from 22% and 11%, respectively, to 1% and 1%, respectively, among cancer patients with CIA, respectively (p<0.01). Following REMS in 2010, mean hematocrit levels at ESA initiation decreased from 30% to 21% (p<0.01). Black box warnings preceded decreased ESA use among VA cancer patients with CIA. REMS was followed by reduced hematocrit levels at ESA initiation. Our findings contrast with privately- insured and Medicaid insured cancer patient data on chemotherapy-induced anemia where ESA use decreased to 3% to 7% by 2010-2012. By 2012, the era of ESA administration to VA to cancer patients had ended but the warnings remain relevant and significant. In 2019, oncology/hematology national guidelines (ASCO/ASH) recommend that cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia should receive ESAs or red blood cell transfusions after risk-benefit evaluation.


Asunto(s)
Anemia/epidemiología , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Hematínicos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anemia/inducido químicamente , Anemia/patología , Anemia/prevención & control , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Etiquetado de Medicamentos , Femenino , Hematínicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/patología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Tromboembolia Venosa , Adulto Joven
4.
Sports Biomech ; 8(4): 302-17, 2009 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20169760

RESUMEN

The effect of anthropometric differences in shank to thigh length ratio upon timing and magnitude of joint power production during the drive phase of the rowing stroke was investigated in 14 elite male rowers. Rowers were tested on the RowPerfect ergometer which was instrumented at the handle and foot stretcher to measure force generation, and a nine segment inverse dynamics model used to calculate the rower's joint and overall power production. Rowers were divided into two groups according to relative shank thigh ratio. Time to half lumbar power generation was significantly earlier in shorter shank rowers (p = 0.028) compared to longer shank rowers, who showed no lumbar power generation during the same period of the drive phase. Rowers with a relatively shorter shank demonstrated earlier lumbar power generation during the drive phase resulting from restricted rotation of the pelvic segment requiring increased lumbar extension in these rowers. Earlier lumbar power generation and extension did not appear to directly affect performance measures of the short shank group, and so can be attributed to a technical adaptation developed to maximise rowing performance.


Asunto(s)
Transferencia de Energía/fisiología , Pierna/anatomía & histología , Pierna/fisiología , Deportes/fisiología , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas , Muslo/anatomía & histología , Muslo/fisiología , Simulación por Computador , Ergometría , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos Anatómicos , Modelos Biológicos , Esfuerzo Físico/fisiología , Navíos , Estadística como Asunto , Adulto Joven
5.
Schizophr Bull ; 2024 Jan 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38206996
6.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs ; 8(1): 45-50, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18303937

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Treatment regimens that require fewer dosage units and less frequent dosing to decrease the complexity and cost of care are among the strategies recommended to improve compliance with antihypertensive therapy. Simplifying therapy may be particularly important for elderly patients, who are more likely to have co-morbid conditions and to be taking multiple medications. OBJECTIVE: To determine rates of compliance with antihypertensive therapy and total costs of care among elderly Medicaid recipients treated with fixed-dose combination amlodipine besylate/benazepril versus a dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist and ACE inhibitor prescribed as separate agents (free combination). STUDY DESIGN: A longitudinal, retrospective, cohort analysis of South Carolina Medicaid claims for ambulatory services, hospital services, Medicare crossover, and prescription drug for the years 1997-2002. Follow-up was 12 months from the index date, defined as the first prescription dispensing date for a study drug. PATIENTS: South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries aged >or=65 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Outcomes variables included compliance defined as the medication possession ratio (MPR), which was the total days' supply of drug (excluding last prescription fill) divided by the length of follow-up (with number of hospital days subtracted from the numerator and denominator). We hypothesized that elderly individuals receiving fixed-dose combination amlodipine besylate/benazepril HCl would be more compliant with therapy than those receiving a dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist and ACE inhibitor as free combination. RESULTS: There were 2336 individuals in the fixed-combination group and 3368 in the free-combination group. The mean age was 76.0 +/- 7.2 years, and 82.6% were female. Compliance rates were significantly higher with fixed-dose versus free-combination therapy (63.4% vs 49.0%; p < 0.0001). The average total cost of care for patients receiving the fixed-dose combination was $US3179 compared with $US5236 (2002 values) for the free-combination regimen. In multivariate regression analyses on the log of total cost of care, average total costs increased by 0.5% for each 1-unit increase in MPR, and for each additional co-morbidity (measured by the chronic disease score) there was an increase of 10.4%. However, average total costs were reduced by 12.5% for patients using fixed-dose versus free-combination therapy (p < 0.003). CONCLUSION: Use of fixed-dose amlodipine besylate/benazepril HCl by elderly Medicaid recipients was associated with improved compliance and lower healthcare costs compared with a dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist and ACE inhibitor prescribed as separate agents.


Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Cooperación del Paciente , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amlodipino/economía , Amlodipino/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/economía , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/economía , Benzazepinas/economía , Benzazepinas/uso terapéutico , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/economía , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Dihidropiridinas/economía , Dihidropiridinas/uso terapéutico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/economía , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , South Carolina , Estados Unidos
7.
Ethn Dis ; 18(2): 204-9, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18507275

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess compliance with antihypertensive therapy and healthcare utilization among African American and White Medicaid recipients who are receiving fixed-dose combination amlodipine besylate/benazepril HCl or a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker plus an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor prescribed as separate agents (free-combination). DESIGN: Longitudinal, retrospective, cohort analysis of South Carolina Medicaid claims for the years 1997 through 2002. Followup was 12 months from the index date, defined as the first prescription dispensing date for a study drug. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries receiving fixed-dose (n=3363) and free-combination (n=713) therapy, including 3016 African Americans and 1060 White patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Compliance was defined as the total days' supply of drug (excluding last prescription fill) divided by the length of followup; healthcare utilization included cost and number of claims associated with ambulatory services, hospital care, and prescription drugs. RESULTS: The cohort (N=4076) was 74.0% African American; mean age was 62.2 years. Compliance was significantly greater in patients who received fixed-dose therapy than in those who received free-combination therapy (58.6% vs 48.1%; P<.05). The average total cost of care was lower for the fixed-dose group ($4605) than for the free-combination group ($8531). African Americans and Whites were equally likely to receive the fixed-dose combination. However, compliance was lower among African American patients than among White patients (55% vs 61% respectively; P<.05). Costs and claims for ambulatory and hospital services were higher for African American patients, whereas drug costs and claims were higher for White patients. CONCLUSION: Fixed-dose amlodipine besylate/benazepril HCl was associated with higher compliance rates than was free-combination therapy, independent of race. Lower compliance rates among African American patients may have contributed to the higher healthcare resource use and costs observed. Efforts to enhance medication compliance tailored to African Americans may improve outcomes and reduce costs in this high-risk population.


Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Negro o Afroamericano/psicología , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/etnología , Cooperación del Paciente/etnología , Población Blanca/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Benzazepinas/uso terapéutico , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Hipertensión/psicología , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicaid/economía , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , South Carolina , Estados Unidos
8.
Clin Ther ; 29(3): 504-18, 2007 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17577471

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Routine clinical practice data are useful for payers and formulary decision makers to make sound decisions regarding coverage policy. Based on a literature search, there has been scant research into topiramate prescribing patterns among Medicaid patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe diagnoses, demographic characteristics, additional co-existing diagnoses, and dosing among Medicaid patients prescribed topiramate. METHODS: This descriptive, retrospective database analysis used data from South Carolina (SC) and Texas (TX) ambulatory Medicaid claims dated October 1, 2003, to December 31, 2004. Patients whose data were eligible for inclusion in the study were enrolled in Medicaid during the study period, had >or=2 topiramate prescriptions, were aged <65 years, and had evidence of a topiramate treatment-related diagnosis (possible diagnoses were identified through literature search and drug compendiums). Four cohorts were defined: (1) epilepsy only; (2) migraine only; (3) epilepsy and migraine; and (4) nonepilepsy/nonmigraine. Demographic characteristics, diagnoses, comorbidities, and daily dose of topiramate were summarized using descriptive statistics. The initial study analysis (period 1) was a 180-day window comprising the 90 days before and after the first available topiramate prescription claim was filed. A second, 360-day analysis (period 2) was completed comprising the 180 days before and after the index topiramate prescription date. RESULTS: In the 180-day analysis, 2216 SC and 4766 TX Medicaid patients met the selection criteria. Cohort classification percentages were 32.3% and 39.6% (epilepsy only), 29.7% and 16.4% (migraine only), 10.7% and 9.2% (epilepsy and migraine), and 27.3% and 34.9% (nonepilepsy/nonmigraine) for SC and TX, respectively. Mean (SD) ages were 29.9 (15.9) (SC) and 27.1 (16.1) (TX) years. In the nonepilepsy/nonmigraine cohort, the most common diagnoses were bipolar disorder and depression. The median daily doses in the epilepsy-only cohort were 175 mg/d in the SC group and 200 mg/d in the TX group. In the migraine-only cohort, the median daily dose was 100 mg/d in SC and TX. Results for the 360-day analysis were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In this descriptive study using data from 2 Medicaid populations, the majority of patients using topiramate had a diagnosis of epilepsy and/or migraine. Median dosages ranged from 175 to 200 mg/d in patients with epilepsy and 100 mg/d in those with migraine. Depression was a common comorbidity in the migraine cohort and the nonepilepsy/nonmigraine cohort.


Asunto(s)
Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Fructosa/análogos & derivados , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos como Asunto , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Fructosa/administración & dosificación , Fructosa/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , South Carolina , Texas , Topiramato
9.
J Oncol Pract ; 13(6): e562-e573, 2017 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28504901

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved epoetin and darbepoetin for chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). Approved epoetin and darbepoetin dosing schedules were three times per week and weekly, respectively, although off-label, less frequent scheduling was common. In 2004, 2007, and 2008, a US Food and Drug Administration Advisory Committees warned of risks associated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. During this period, lawsuits alleging illegal darbepoetin marketing practices have concluded, resulting in $1.1 billion in fines and settlements and one criminal conviction. No prior study, to our knowledge, has reported on the use of darbepoetin versus epoetin for CIA. METHODS: We evaluated the dosing, utilization, and costs of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents among 3,761 South Carolina Medicaid patients with CIA. RESULTS: Epoetin and darbepoetin utilization rates were 22% and 28% in 2003, 10% and 33% in 2007, and 3% and 7% in 2010, respectively. Mean per-patient per-administration epoetin and darbepoetin doses were 40,983 IU and 191 µg, respectively, in 2003 and 47,753 IU and 369 µg, respectively, in 2010. Mean monthly patient costs for epoetin and darbepoetin were $1,030 and $981, respectively, in 2003 and $932 and $1,352, respectively, in 2010. Epoetin use decreased steadily between 2002 and 2010; darbepoetin use increased steadily between 2003 and 2007 and then decreased steadily thereafter. Per-patient dosing of darbepoetin, but not epoetin, increased steadily between 2003 and 2010, and monthly per-patient epoetin costs decreased 3% while the per-patients costs of darbepoetin increased 30% between 2003 and 2010. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, our findings are the first data reporting on epoetin versus darbepoetin use for CIA and support recently concluded lawsuits involving allegations of illegal marketing practices of the manufacturer of darbepoetin.


Asunto(s)
Anemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Utilización de Medicamentos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Hematínicos/uso terapéutico , Medicaid/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anemia/inducido químicamente , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Darbepoetina alfa/economía , Darbepoetina alfa/uso terapéutico , Utilización de Medicamentos/economía , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Epoetina alfa/economía , Epoetina alfa/uso terapéutico , Eritropoyetina/economía , Eritropoyetina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Hematínicos/economía , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Medicaid/economía , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas Recombinantes/economía , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéutico , South Carolina , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
10.
J Manag Care Pharm ; 12(4): 331-40, 2006 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16792439

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Therapeutic interchange (TI) interventions are commonly used to manage pharmacy benefit costs. While several studies have considered the effect that TI interventions have on drug costs, most have not considered the effect they have on medical management costs. The purpose of the present study was to assess drug cost and drug therapy management costs of a TI intervention following a change in the drug formulary for 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor (statin) drugs, including the conversion of atorvastatin from formulary to nonformulary status. METHODS: A retrospective, quasi-experimental within-subjects design was used in this study. Administrative claims data were obtained from a select northeastern segment of a multistate Medicaid managed care organization (MCO). To be included in the study, patients had to meet the following criteria: (1) they must have had a minimum of 3 atorvastatin prescriptions during a 6-month enrollment phase, (2) they must have been continuously enrolled throughout the 900-day study period, and (3) they must have switched from atorvastatin to another statin between April 1, 2003, and July 31, 2003. The day of the switch from atorvastatin marked for each patient the end of the 12-month pre-TI period and the beginning of the 12-month post-TI period. Two separate dependent variables were developed: (1) statin drug costs (statin cost + dispensing fee) and (2) the costs paid by the MCO for the medical management of statin therapy, including office visit costs and the medical laboratory costs of measuring lipids and creatine kinase, and of checking liver functions. To estimate expenditures over 24 months, a panel analytic technique was used that allows each patient to serve as his or her own control. Multivariate models were used to assess the effects of the TI policy while controlling for age, gender, adjunctive dyslipidemia therapy, comorbidity, presence of a prior coronary artery event, statin compliance, cardiologist management, and disease severity. RESULTS: Of the 3,636 patients who met the study inclusion criteria and were converted from atorvastatin to an alternate statin drug, 129 patients (3.5%) switched back to atorvastatin following the TI. The average statin cost per claim in the 12-month post-TI period was Dollars 70.93, 9.5% less than the average cost in the 12-month pre-TI period (Dollars 78.40). The average cost per patient per year (PPPY) for statin laboratory tests (lipid panels, creatine kinase tests, and liver function tests) increased by 31.5% to Dollars 16.15 in the post-TI period compared with Dollars 12.28 PPPY in the pre-TI period, and medical office visit costs increased by 44.9% to Dollars 20.70 PPPY in the post-TI period compared with Dollars 14.29 PPPY in the preperiod. These increased costs related to the medical management of statin therapy were overwhelmed by an 11.7% reduction in statin drug costs, from Dollars 793.69 PPPY in the pre-TI period to Dollars 701.01 PPPY in the post-TI period, resulting in a net 10.0% reduction for combined statin costs and related medical costs, from Dollars 820.27 PPPY in the pre-TI period to Dollars 737.87 in the post-TI period. After limiting the analysis to patients who did not convert from atorvastatin to pravastatin (which cost more than atorvastatin before the rebate) and controlling for the influence of potential confounders, statin expenditure decreased by 33% (P < 0.001). Multivariate models indicated no statistically significant differences in the costs related to the medical management of statin therapy after the TI compared with before the TI.


Asunto(s)
Acilcoenzima A/economía , Acilcoenzima A/uso terapéutico , Dislipidemias/tratamiento farmacológico , Dislipidemias/economía , Formularios Farmacéuticos como Asunto , Gastos en Salud , Acilcoenzima A/administración & dosificación , Atorvastatina , Costos de los Medicamentos , Femenino , Ácidos Heptanoicos/economía , Ácidos Heptanoicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Masculino , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud , Medicaid , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pirroles/economía , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Equivalencia Terapéutica
11.
J Health Econ Outcomes Res ; 3(1): 97-107, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37662660

RESUMEN

Background: Many persons with severe mental illness qualify for Medicaid coverage. However, under federal law, states must either suspend or terminate eligibility once they are incarcerated. We hypothesize that prompt re-acquisition of Medicaid eligibility following release from incarceration lowers the risk of re-incarceration. Objective: To assess the relationship between Medicaid eligibility and risk of re-incarceration among previously incarcerated schizophrenia diagnosed subjects. Methods: Study subjects were selected between January 1, 2006 and September 30, 2011 from a single state Medicaid database that was combined with department of corrections data. Subjects were included if they had a schizophrenia diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD- 9-CM] code 295.xx), were between the ages of 18 and 62, and had been released from incarceration. Covariates included age, race, gender, marital status, and reason for incarceration. Time to Medicaid eligibility after release from incarceration, cumulative days of eligibility, and whether they were eligible on the re-incarceration date were evaluated in independent models. One and three-year Cox Regression models analyses (p<0.05) were used to evaluate the hazard for re-incarceration. Results: The 932 subjects were 26.5% white, 73.7% male and were, on average, 37.6 years old on their index date (i.e., incarceration release date). They were 73.5% single or divorced and 12.7% were incarcerated for a substance abuse violation. In the 1-year follow-up period, 110 subjects (11.8%) were re-incarcerated. In the 3-year follow-up period 209 (22.4%) were re-incarcerated. Age (in years) was the only significant predictor of re-incarceration for the 1-year models (hazard ratio [HR]=0.976; confidence interval [CI]=0.957, 0.994). Eligibility was a significant predictor in the 3-year follow-up models. A longer 'time to first eligibility' (HR=1.046; CI=1.017, 1.075 was associated with a greater hazard for re-incarceration. Being eligible at the time of re-incarceration (HR=0.659; CI=0.498, 0.870) was associated with a lower hazard, and the cumulative number of months of eligibility (HR=0.978; CI=0.958, 0.997) and age were associated with a lower hazard for re-incarceration (HR=0.986; CI=0.973, 0.999). Conclusions: Access to Medicaid health services post-release may reduce the risk of re-incarceration.

12.
Arch Oral Biol ; 48(11): 787-95, 2003 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14550381

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: When a dental elastomer is placed in the oral vestibule and the facial muscles contracted while it sets, the functional cast produced frequently shows a deep anteroposterior groove, and marked posterosuperior and smaller anteroinferior bulges. This study investigates whether these features have a structural or a physiological basis. DESIGN: Casts of the right side of the oral vestibule of dissecting room cadavers and living volunteers were made using a polyvinylsiloxane dental elastomer. The volunteers each produced two functional casts in each of the following situations: while the teeth were clenched but the facial muscles inactive, while grimacing, and while swallowing. RESULTS: Grooves and bulges were largely absent in casts from the dissecting room cadavers and of living volunteers with the teeth clenched but the facial muscles inactive. They were present when the elastomer set while the subjects grimaced but most marked when they had been swallowing their saliva. The depth of the grooves varied between individuals and generally was greatest alongside the second molar teeth. We found that the posterosuperior bulge did not coincide with the position of the parotid duct. CONCLUSIONS: The anteroposterior groove represents a well developed horizontal part of buccinator. The regions of the casts bulging superior and inferior to the groove probably represent weaker regions of buccinator towards its maxillary and mandibular attachments. The bulge superior to the groove was not explained by a weakness in buccinator where it is pierced by the parotid duct.


Asunto(s)
Músculos Masticadores/anatomía & histología , Boca/anatomía & histología , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Cadáver , Deglución/fisiología , Técnica de Colado Dental , Materiales de Impresión Dental , Expresión Facial , Músculos Faciales/fisiología , Femenino , Encía/anatomía & histología , Encía/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Masticación/fisiología , Músculos Masticadores/fisiología , Boca/fisiología , Elastómeros de Silicona
13.
Manag Care ; 13(3 Suppl): 3-6, 2004 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15074161

RESUMEN

The following questions facilitate further thought on the issue of reimportation: POLICY ISSUES: Who should pay for drug development? Do NCEs provide value for money invested? What is the most efficient means of developing new drugs? What is the proper balance between societal benefit and intellectual property protection? REGULATORY QUESTIONS: If reimportation or importation is permitted, how can the provenance of a product be protected? How is reimportation defined? Can a product be transported from the United States to Europe to Canada and then be sent back to the United States? Or, is reimportation a single-step process (e.g., United States to Canada and vice versa)? If reimportation is limited to Canada, can we expect that other countries would want to be included (or excluded) from our reimportation policy? Will state pharmacy practice acts be applicable to reimportation? Does reimportation alter the balance between state and federal regulations? If legal action occurs because of alleged harm from a reimported product, who is liable? MARKET ISSUES: Will U.S. prices rise in protected markets to compensate for losses due to reimports? Will Canadians be allowed to import prescription drugs from the United States?


Asunto(s)
Costos de los Medicamentos , Gastos en Salud/tendencias , Comercio , Países Desarrollados , Costos de los Medicamentos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Competencia Económica , Europa (Continente) , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Formulación de Políticas , Control de Calidad , Reino Unido , Estados Unidos
14.
Patient Prefer Adherence ; 7: 509-16, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23807840

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare two methods of adherence calculation using administrative data for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who are prescribed disease-modifying drugs. METHODS: Pharmacy-billed disease-modifying drug prescription claims were selected from the 2007-2008 LifeLink™ Health Plan Claims Database. The index date was the first disease-modifying drug prescription claim. Two cohorts were created: all patients with a disease-modifying drug claim in 2007 and a subset with continuous eligibility for 12 months post-index. Adherence was calculated across all disease-modifying drugs for 12 months post-index. Medication possession ratios (MPRs) with variable (start to end of therapy) and fixed (365 days) duration denominators were calculated. Variable MPR was calculated by summing days supply from the first to the last prescription (inclusive) divided by time between the last prescription date plus days supply and the first prescription date. Variable MPR was evaluated for all patients and the continuously eligible cohort. Fixed MPR used the same numerator but divided by 365 days of follow-up and evaluated only for the continuously eligible cohort. RESULTS: There were 3405 patients with MS and a disease-modifying drug claim in 2007 and 2145 in the continuously eligible cohort. Means for variable MPR ranged from 87.5% ± 16.6% for the continuously eligible cohort to 90.5% ± 16.0% for the 2007 cohort. The comparable value for fixed MPR was 78.0% ± 28.2% for the continuously eligible cohort. Fixed MPR gave a consistently lower rate of adherence than variable MPR at an 80% adherence threshold. CONCLUSION: Different adherence measures can yield different outcomes, especially when using different eligibility criteria. These results demonstrate the importance of full disclosure of methods used for calculations and specification of the study population.

16.
J Oncol Pract ; 8(3): 149-55, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22942808

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Neutropenic complications (NCs) after myelosuppressive chemotherapy are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We described NC rates by using US hospital discharge data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis used data from the US National Inpatient Sample database. Hospital discharges with cancer diagnoses (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] code) from 1989 to 2007 were analyzed for the ICD-9-CM neutropenia code. NC rates per 10,000 discharges were calculated for all adult discharges without radiation therapy (study population, all cancers); lung cancer, breast cancer, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL); and all three combined. The use of growth factors and myelosuppressive chemotherapy from 1994 to 2008 was estimated by using the IMS Health Drug Distribution Database. RESULTS: Estimated lung cancer and breast cancer discharges remained relatively steady, whereas NHL discharges increased. NC rates for each study cancer increased two-fold until the late 1990s before stabilizing and/or declining. The average hospital stay for all three cancers decreased from 10.4 days to 7.1 days. The mortality rates for NCs for the three cancers combined decreased at a fairly constant rate from 10% in 1989 to 5.4% in 2007. Estimated discharges for NCs from 1989 to 2007 ranged from 111,000 to 169,000 for the study population, from 57,000 to 103,000 for all cancers, and from 21,000 to 40,000 for the three study cancers. The use of growth factors and myelosuppressive chemotherapy increased from 1994 to 2008. CONCLUSION: Whereas the number of hospitalizations with cancer diagnoses has remained steady since 1989, hospitalizations for NCs increased approximately two-fold from 1989 to 1997 and then stabilized.

18.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 65(18): 1720-6, 2008 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18768998

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The frequency of potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and other (non-AED) medications in Medicaid patients taking newer AED monotherapy, older AED monotherapy, and combinations of AED treatment was studied. METHODS: A retrospective, observational study was conducted using administrative claims obtained from South Carolina Medicaid. Patients were included in the analysis if they (1) had at least one prescription for an AED between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2004, (2) were taking a specific AED for at least 60 days, (3) had at least one epilepsy diagnosis during the 6 months before or during the enrollment period, and (4) were enrolled in Medicaid for at least 11 of the 12 months of the follow-up period. Possible DDI exposure was defined as 10 days of overlap between an AED and a non-AED known to have the potential to cause a clinically relevant interaction. RESULTS: A total of 4955 patients met the inclusion criteria. Approximately 45% of patients receiving monotherapy with an older AED had a potential DDI, compared with 3.9% receiving a newer AED. An average of 0.08 potential DDI per year of exposure occurred in the newer AED monotherapy cohort compared with 1.18 in the older AED monotherapy cohort. The most common potential interaction category was a decreased concentration of the non-AED. CONCLUSION: Older AEDs were associated with a greater likelihood of a potential DDI than were newer AEDs. Further research is needed to elucidate the relationship between the occurrence of potential DDIs and actual clinically relevant consequences.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/sangre , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid , Estudios Retrospectivos , South Carolina , Estados Unidos
20.
Discov Med ; 4(22): 172-9, 2004 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20704981

RESUMEN

Extract: The development of a new drug requires a major investment of capital, human resources, and technological expertise. It also requires strict adherence to regulations on testing and manufacturing standards before a new drug can be used in the general population. All these requirements contribute to the cost increases for a new chemical entities (NCE, i.e., new drug candidate) research and development (R&D). The central question raised by this trend is who will pay for new pharmaceutical R&D? With this question in mind, this article has three objectives: 1) to describe how the environment for pharmaceutical R&D has changed over time and the effect of these changes on the R&D process, 2) to summarize available information on the cost of drug discovery and development for NCEs, and 3) to consider the societal value of new drugs. The focus is on the United States, as the largest pharmaceutical market, and for which the relevant literature is most comprehensive, but many of the issues discussed are similarly important in the other major markets.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA