Gynecologists' attitudes toward and use of complementary and integrative medicine approaches: results of a national survey in Germany.

PURPOSE: Despite patients' widespread use and acceptance of complementary and integrative medicine (IM), few data are available regarding health-care professionals' current implementation of it in clinical routine. A national survey was conducted to assess gynecologists' attitudes to and implementation of complementary and integrative treatment approaches. METHODS: The Working Group on Integrative Medicine of the German Society of Gynecological Oncology conducted an online survey in collaboration with the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) in July 2019. A 29-item survey was sent to all DGGG members by email. RESULTS: Questionnaires from 180 gynecologists were analyzed, of whom 61 were working office-based in private practice and 95 were employed in hospitals. Seventy percent stated that IM concepts are implemented in their routine clinical work. Most physicians reported using IM methods in gynecological oncology. The main indications for IM therapies were fatigue (n = 98), nausea and vomiting (n = 89), climacteric symptoms (n = 87), and sleep disturbances (n = 86). The most commonly recommended methods were exercise therapy (n = 86), mistletoe therapy (n = 78), and phytotherapy (n = 74). Gynecologists offering IM were more often female (P = 0.001), more often had qualifications in anthroposophic medicine (P = 0.005) or naturopathy (P = 0.019), and were more often based in large cities (P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: There is strong interest in IM among gynecologists. The availability of evidence-based training in IM is increasing. Integrative therapy approaches are being implemented in clinical routine more and more, and integrative counseling services are present all over Germany. Efforts should focus on extending evidence-based knowledge of IM in both gynecology and gynecological oncology.

Personality and its association with self-management in multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: In a healthcare system which aims to empower the patient, self-management becomes increasingly important. In Multiple Sclerosis, an effective self-management is associated with various favorable health-related outcomes like improvement in quality of life, the reduction of depression and anxiety symptoms, and reduced healthcare costs. This study investigates the association between the Big Five personality traits and self-management including activity in self-help groups. METHODS: People with MS were recruited via several paths within Germany (e.g. medical practices, social events and the German MS society). The final study sample consisted of 682 participants who answered a multidimensional questionnaire. This comprised the Big-Five-Inventory-10 for personality, the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ) for self-management competencies, questions for participation in self-help groups, and socio-demographic and clinical variables. RESULTS: Multivariate regression analyses showed that personality could explain a greater amount of variance of self-management than socio-demographic and clinical variables. Neuroticism was the strongest predictor and correlated negatively with all heiQ-dimensions of self-management. In contrast, in logistic regression analysis none of the Big Five traits became significant in predicting the activity in self-help groups. CONCLUSION: As expected, personality plays an important role regarding self-management. Ideally, a time-saving personality assessment should be considered in routine clinical practice to identify patients at risk; however, at a minimum, personality traits should be considered in consultations with their neurologists. They may need help to understand the benefits of effective self-management and should receive support to improve their self-management skills and to reduce their neuroticism to lower the risk of secondary complications.