World Allergy Organization Anaphylaxis Guidelines: 2013 update of the evidence base.

The World Allergy Organization (WAO) Guidelines for the assessment and management of anaphylaxis are a widely disseminated and used resource for information about anaphylaxis. They focus on patients at risk, triggers, clinical diagnosis, treatment in health care settings, self-treatment in the community, and prevention of recurrences. Their unique strengths include a global perspective informed by prior research on the global availability of essentials for anaphylaxis assessment and management and a global agenda for anaphylaxis research. Additionally, detailed colored illustrations are linked to key concepts in the text [Simons et al.: J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;127:593.e1-e22]. The recommendations in the original WAO Anaphylaxis Guidelines for management of anaphylaxis in health care settings and community settings were based on evidence published in peer-reviewed, indexed medical journals to the end of 2010. These recommendations remain unchanged and clinically relevant. An update of the evidence base was published in 2012 [Simons et al.: Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2012;12:389-399]. In 2012 and early 2013, major advances were reported in the following areas: further characterization of patient phenotypes; development of in vitro tests (for some allergens) that help distinguish clinical risk of anaphylaxis from asymptomatic sensitization; epinephrine (adrenaline) research, including studies of a new epinephrine auto-injector for use in community settings, and randomized controlled trials of immunotherapy to prevent food-induced anaphylaxis. Despite these advances, the need for additional prospective studies, including randomized controlled trials of interventions in anaphylaxis is increasingly apparent. This 2013 Update highlights publications from 2012 and 2013 that further contribute to the evidence base for the recommendations made in the original WAO Anaphylaxis Guidelines. Ideally, it should be used in conjunction with these Guidelines and with the 2012 Guidelines Update.

Chronic Urticaria Suspected to be Caused by a 13.5 mg Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device (Skyla®).

Chronic urticaria (CU) is a hive-like rash lasting over six weeks. Common associations include low vitamin D, thyroid autoantibodies, and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, among others. Progesterone has been documented to trigger CU, by endogenous or exogenous progesterone. The use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) has been a popular source of birth control, with many containing progesterone. Although rarely reported, some patients have been seen to have an urticarial reaction after implantation of an IUD. Here, we present a case of a patient with progesterone-induced chronic urticaria, likely triggered by implantation of a 13.5 mg intrauterine device implant (Skyla®, Bayer, Whippany, NJ, USA). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case to report the association between Skyla® and chronic urticaria.

Uterine Anaphylaxis Due to Subcutaneous Immunotherapy (SCIT) for Inhalant Allergens: A Case Series.

Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT), commonly known as "allergy shots," aims to achieve a clinical tolerance for allergens that cause symptoms of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, allergic asthma, or insect sting allergies. Systemic reactions to SCIT are classified in severity from one organ system (grade 1) to anaphylaxis that potentially may have a fatal outcome (grade 5). Uterine cramps fall under grade 2, and they are rarely reported during SCIT. In this study, we report four cases of uterine anaphylaxis following SCIT for environmental allergens with symptoms such as severe lower abdominal cramping resembling menstrual cramps. Patients also experienced urticaria, angioedema, diffuse erythema, and flushing. None of the patients experienced uterine bleeding. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest case series reporting this reaction to SCIT. We accompany this finding with a review of the literature on this rare but interesting topic.

Innovations in technology: social media and mobile technology in the care of adolescents with asthma.

This literature review analyzed technological interventions in the adolescent asthmatic population. A PubMed search was performed with terms of asthma, adolescents, social media, Internet, website, mobile phone, text messaging, SMS, Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, and Technology during a 2.5-year period and identified 64 abstracts. Three studies fulfilled the criteria for adolescent intervention using Internet-based sites but did not provide evidence for effectiveness. Two studies focused on mobile technology. One study included text message reminders for controller medication use in asthma patients. Perceived usefulness, satisfaction, and ease of use of text messages were high, but there was no improvement in asthma control. The literature search did not find any studies exploring the use of smartphone applications or social media services. Current studies of technology use in adolescents with asthma do not provide consistent evidence of effectiveness. The positive attitude toward use of social media or mobile technology opens the possibility for future studies to further explore the potential benefits of such interventions.

Immunomodulators in asthma therapy.

New developments in the field of allergy and immunology have yielded a variety of novel therapeutic approaches in recent years, and more agents are at the clinical trial stage. Among the therapeutic approaches discussed in this review are Toll-like receptor agonists, immunostimulatory oligodeoxynucleotides, orally and parenterally administered cytokine blockers, and specific cytokine receptor antagonists. Transcription factor modulators targeting syk kinase, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma, and nuclear factor-kappaB are also being evaluated in the treatment of asthma. The anti-IgE monoclonal antibody omalizumab has established effectiveness in patients with allergic asthma, but the criteria for selecting patients who are most likely to benefit from it are less clear. This review summarizes data from human clinical trials with immunomodulators to discuss the rationale for their use, their efficacy, and adverse events associated with them.

Why treat anemia in the preoperative period of joint replacement surgery with erythropoietin? IMPACT consults. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Cleveland Clinic Perioperative Medicine Summit.

Treatment of anemia in the perioperative period of major orthopedic surgery decreases the need for blood transfusion and improves perioperative outcomes. Use of epoetin alfa in this setting is FDA-approved and provides significant benefit to qualified and carefully chosen patients.

International survey on skin patch test procedures, attitudes and interpretation.

BACKGROUND: Skin patch test is the gold standard method in diagnosing contact allergy. Although used for more than 100 years, the patch test procedure is performed with variability around the world. A number of factors can influence the test results, namely the quality of reagents used, the timing of the application, the patch test series (allergens/haptens) that have been used for testing, the appropriate interpretation of the skin reactions or the evaluation of the patient's benefit. METHODS: We performed an Internet -based survey with 38 questions covering the educational background of respondents, patch test methods and interpretation. The questionnaire was distributed among all representatives of national member societies of the World Allergy Organization (WAO), and the WAO Junior Members Group. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-nine completed surveys were received from 47 countries. The majority of participants had more than 5 years of clinical practice (61 %) and routinely carried out patch tests (70 %). Both allergists and dermatologists were responsible for carrying out the patch tests. We could observe the use of many different guidelines regardless the geographical distribution. The use of home-made preparations was indicated by 47 % of participants and 73 % of the respondents performed 2 or 3 readings. Most of the responders indicated having patients with adverse reactions, including erythroderma (12 %); however, only 30 % of members completed a consent form before conducting the patch test. DISCUSSION: The heterogeneity of patch test practices may be influenced by the level of awareness of clinical guidelines, different training backgrounds, accessibility to various types of devices, the patch test series (allergens/haptens) used for testing, type of clinical practice (public or private practice, clinical or research-based institution), infrastructure availability, financial/commercial implications and regulations among others. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of a worldwide homogeneity of patch test procedures, and this raises concerns about the need for standardization and harmonization of this important diagnostic procedure.

Investigational drugs for the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

INTRODUCTION: Allergic rhinitis is characterized by paroxysms of sneezing, rhinorrhea and nasal obstruction. Its prevalence is increasing in industrialized countries worldwide and imposes a significant economic burden as a result of reduced school performance, work productivity and medical expenses. Allergic rhinitis impairs the quality of life of those affected, and current treatment regimens are inadequate for those whose symptoms are severe or refractory to standard drug therapies. They mainly include symptom control with intranasal glucocorticoids, oral and intranasal antihistamines. AREAS COVERED: This article provides a review of the most current literature on research that has focused on improving the efficacy of current treatment regimens and developing new drugs. It also provides the reader with an improved understanding of the pathogenesis of allergic rhinitis, including the inflammatory mediators and cell types involved, which has led to novel treatment options that are under investigation. These new drugs aim to alter the immunologic response to allergens in order to achieve greater clinical efficacy. EXPERT OPINION: It is our opinion that despite developments in new therapies, a multidrug approach is vital for successful treatment of allergic rhinitis. Furthermore, immunotherapy in the form of sublingual immunotherapy is a promising additional therapeutic approach that will potentially make immunotherapy available to a wider selection of eligible patients with allergic rhinitis.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of topical calcineurin inhibitors for treatment of allergic conjunctivitis.

INTRODUCTION: Topical calcineurin (Cn) inhibitors delivered via ophthalmic drop is emerging as a potential treatment for severe, immune-mediated forms of allergic conjunctivitis, such as vernal keratoconjunctivitis, atopic keratoconjunctivitis and giant papillary conjunctivitis. AREAS COVERED: This article is based on a comprehensive literature search, with information taken from meta-analyses, systematic reviews, treatment guidelines and clinical studies in children and adults. The articles that have been selected evaluate the use of topical Cn inhibitors and their role in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. EXPERT OPINION: Ophthalmic topical Cn inhibitors have been shown to be safe for short-term use, with minimal systemic absorption and toxicity. For patients with severe, refractory forms of allergic conjunctivitis, topical Cn inhibitors offer a promising treatment option and an alternative to steroidal therapies. The safety profile and efficacy data for topical cyclosporine are more robust compared to that of tacrolimus and pimecrolimus, although larger trials will be needed for all three agents. With more randomized controlled trials involving larger sample sizes and long-term follow-up to establish both efficacy and safety, ophthalmic Cn inhibitors offer exciting treatment possibilities for the prevention of morbidity associated with refractory allergic conjunctivitis.

2012 Update: World Allergy Organization Guidelines for the assessment and management of anaphylaxis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The World Allergy Organization (WAO) Guidelines for the assessment and management of anaphylaxis published in early 2011 provide a global perspective on patient risk factors, triggers, clinical diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of anaphylaxis. In this 2012 Update, subsequently published, clinically relevant research in these areas is reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: Patient risk factors and co-factors that amplify anaphylaxis have been documented in prospective studies. The global perspective on the triggers of anaphylaxis has expanded. The clinical criteria for the diagnosis of anaphylaxis that are promulgated in the Guidelines have been validated. Some aspects of anaphylaxis treatment have been prospectively studied. Novel investigations of self-injectable epinephrine for treatment of anaphylaxis recurrences in the community have been performed. Progress has been made with regard to measurement of specific IgE to allergen components (component-resolved testing) that might help to distinguish clinical risk of future anaphylactic episodes to an allergen from asymptomatic sensitization to the allergen. New strategies for immune modulation to prevent food-induced anaphylaxis and new insights into subcutaneous immunotherapy to prevent venom-induced anaphylaxis have been described. SUMMARY: Research highlighted in this Update strengthens the evidence-based recommendations for assessment, management, and prevention of anaphylaxis made in the WAO Anaphylaxis Guidelines.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of olopatadine for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis.

INTRODUCTION: Olopatadine hydrochloride is an antihistamine and mast cell stabilizer available in three forms, including oral, intranasal and ocular preparations. Most of the practical applications focus on the use of olopatadine for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis via intranasal and ocular routes. AREAS COVERED: This article was formed from a comprehensive literature search with information taken from meta-analyses, systematic reviews, treatment guidelines and clinical studies on children and adults. Articles that have been selected evaluate the use of intranasal and ocular antihistamines and their role in allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis. EXPERT OPINION: Olopatadine is significantly more effective than placebos in alleviating the symptoms of allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis. Olopatadine is a viable alternative and addition to the mainstay therapy of these conditions with intranasal steroids and oral antihistamines. The compliance of the patients would be improved if a once-per-day formulation of olopatadine was developed for intranasal application. The future treatments of allergic rhinitis will probably involve a combination of intranasal antihistamine and steroid because clinical trials have demonstrated an improved efficacy without a significant increase in adverse effects.

Immunomodulators for asthma.

New information regarding the molecular mechanisms of allergic disorders has led to a variety of novel therapeutic approaches. This article briefly reviews the pathogenesis of asthma and allergic diseases, discusses the rationale behind using immunomodulators in these diseases; and examines the therapeutic effects of immunomodulators on allergic diseases. There are a number of immunomodulators that have been developed for the treatment of allergic disorders. Some have looked very promising in pre-clinical trials, but have not shown significant benefits in human clinical trials thus indicating the disparity between mouse models and human asthma. This review focuses on immunomodulators that are in human clinical trials and not molecules in pre-clinical development.

IL-13 and the IL-13 receptor as therapeutic targets for asthma and allergic disease.

It is widely accepted that T-helper 2 cell (Th2) cytokines play an important role in the maintenance of asthma and allergy. Emerging evidence has highlighted the role of IL-13 in the pathogenesis of these diseases. In particular, IL-13 is involved in the regulation of IgE synthesis, mucus hypersecretion, subepithelial fibrosis and eosinophil infiltration, and has been associated with the regulation of certain chemokine receptors, notably CCR5. Thus, targeting IL-13 and its associated receptors may be a therapeutic approach to the treatment of asthma and/or allergy. Pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies are researching various strategies, based on this approach, aimed at binding IL-13, increasing the level of the IL-13 decoy receptor, IL-13Ralpha2, or blocking the effect of the chemokine receptor CCR5. This review focuses on the therapeutic potential of anti-IL-13 agents and their role in the treatment of asthma and allergy.

Chronic diarrhea and abdominal pain: pin the pinworm.

Enterobius vermicularis is the most common helminthic infection in the US. It is usually considered an innocuous parasite that at the most causes perianal itching. We report a case of an 84-year-old female patient from an assisted living facility who presented with symptoms of colitis for 2 months. On detailed history and exam, she was found to have E. vermicularis infection. All her symptoms resolved dramatically within 2 days after a single dose of albendazole. We want to emphasize the importance of including parasitic infections such as E. vermicularis in the differential diagnoses of patients presenting with symptoms of colitis.