Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 163(2): 521-529, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33219865

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are a type of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) with recurrence and metastatic potential. We aimed to investigate the risk factors for developing distant metastases (DM) and to identify the prognostic factors in patients with DM. METHODS: Based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database, MPNST patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 were extracted in our study. The logistic regression model was performed for predicting DM development while the Cox proportional hazard regression model was conducted for revealing the prognostic factors. RESULTS: Eventually, 764 patients diagnosed with MPNSTs were included with 109 cases presenting with metastases at initial diagnosis. Larger tumor size and lymph node metastases were independent risk factors for developing DM. The median overall survival (OS) for patients with metastases was 8.0 (95% CI: 6.1-9.9) months. Multiple metastatic sites and no surgical treatment were prognostic factors for worse survival. Tumors located in non-head and neck region were related with better survival. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of DM was 14.3% with a dismal median OS of 8.0 months for metastatic MPNSTs. More evaluation should be applied for patients with large tumor size and lymph metastases. Tumors located in head and neck region and the presence of multiple metastases predicted worse survival outcome. Surgical treatment can significantly improve the survival of MPNST patients with distant metastasis.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/epidemiología , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Neurofibrosarcoma/epidemiología , Neurofibrosarcoma/secundario , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/epidemiología , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/patología , Adulto , Femenino , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/mortalidad , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/enzimología , Neurofibrosarcoma/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Programa de VERF , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/mortalidad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
2.
Med Sci Monit ; 26: e923867, 2020 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32409630

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND Distant metastasis (DM) is a crucial problem in management of patients with gastric cancer. Identification of the risk factors for development of DM and the prognostic factors for patients with DM is essential in development of individualized treatment of patients at the advanced stage with specific metastasis. MATERIAL AND METHODS Records of patients with gastric cancer were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Survival duration of patients with specific DM was estimated, and the prognostic factors were investigated using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. The logistic regression model was used to reveal the inherent risk factors for development of DM. RESULTS Eventually, 32.6% (11,918 out of 36,588) of gastric cancer patients were diagnosed with DM between 2010 and 2015, among whom 5,361, 1,778, 1,495, and 231 patients were diagnosed with liver, lung, bone, and brain metastasis, respectively. The median overall survival for patients with DM was 5.0 (95% CI: 4.8-5.2) months, with a 5-year survival rate of 3.9%. Primary tumor site, histology types, tumor grade, T stage, N stage, surgery, chemotherapy, and the number of metastases were associated with worse survival. Younger age and higher tumor grade were positively associated with the development of DM. CONCLUSIONS Initial DM was found in 32.6% of patients with gastric cancer. Homogenous and heterogenous predictive factors were identified for patients with a specific metastatic site, which can be used in targeted screening and individualized treatment.


Asunto(s)
Metástasis de la Neoplasia/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Factores de Riesgo , Programa de VERF , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiología , Tasa de Supervivencia
3.
Med Sci Monit ; 25: 1105-1112, 2019 Feb 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30739123

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND The objective of the present research was to explore the prevalence, risk, and prognostic factors associated with bone metastases (BM) in newly diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS From 36 507 HCC patients who were registered in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we enrolled 1263 with BM at the initial diagnosis of HCC from 2010 to 2014. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to estimate overall survival for different subgroups. Univariate and multivariate logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors and independent prognostic factors for BM. RESULTS A total of 1567 (4.29%) HCC patients were detected with BM at initial diagnosis. Male sex, unmarried status, higher T stage, lymph node involvement, intrahepatic metastases, and extrahepatic metastases (lung or brain) were positively associated with BM. The median survival of the patients was 3.00 months (95% CI: 2.77-3.24 months). Marital status and primary tumor surgery were independently associated with the better survival. CONCLUSIONS A list of factors associated with BM occurrence and the prognosis of the advanced HCC patients with BM were found. These associated factors may provide a reference for BM screening in HCC and guide prophylactic treatment in clinical settings.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/fisiopatología , Adulto , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Neoplasias Óseas/fisiopatología , Huesos/fisiopatología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Programa de VERF
4.
Am J Transl Res ; 12(5): 2071-2082, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32509201

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The distant metastasis in liposarcoma is not thoroughly investigated. Based on a large cohort, we attempted to evaluate the survival in liposarcoma patients with distant metastasis and to reveal the risk factors. METHODS: The records of liposarcoma patients with or without distant metastasis were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database from 2010 to 2016. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox hazard regression was scheduled to investigate prognostic factors for liposarcoma patients with distant metastasis. Risk factors for metastasis were identified by the logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 227 liposarcomas with distant metastasis were identified in 4,181 patients. The 5-year survival rate for patients with and without metastasis was 12.1% (95% CI: 5.0%-19.0%) and 75.4% (95% CI: 73.6%-77.2%), respectively. Age ≥60 years (HR=1.73; 95% CI: 1.11-2.69) and surgery (HR=0.26; 95% CI: 0.17-0.41) were independent prognostic factors for patients with metastasis. The annual incidence of distant metastasis was from 3.76% to 7.3%. Liposarcoma in trunk (OR=1.69; 95% CI: 1.02-2.79), myxoid type (OR=2.65; 95% CI: 1.16-6.05), grade III (OR=2.62; 95% CI: 1.17-5.88), grade IV (OR=4.07; 95% CI: 1.84-9.00), T2 stage (OR=2.71; 95% CI: 1.15-6.40), and N1 stage (OR=9.44; 95% CI: 4.63-19.26) were associated with the development of metastasis. Homogeneous and heterogeneous factors were found for patients with different metastatic organs. CONCLUSIONS: The survival was significantly dismal in liposarcoma patients with distant metastasis. The risk and prognostic factors provide a reference to clinical screening and prevention for distant metastasis in liposarcoma.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA