Event-free survival after radical prostatectomy according to prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography and European Association of Urology biochemical recurrence risk groups.

OBJECTIVE: To assess European Association of Urology (EAU) risk groups for biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer relative to prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) status and oncological outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a study that incorporated PSMA-PET for men with BCR after radical prostatectomy (RP) was undertaken. EAU risk groups were considered relative to clinical variables, PSMA-PET findings, and deployment of salvage radiotherapy (SRT). The primary oncological outcome was event-free survival (EFS) and this was analysed relative to clinical and imaging variables. An 'event' occurred if prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level rose >0.2 ng/mL above nadir or additional therapies were introduced. RESULTS: A total of 137 patients were included, most of whom had EAU high-risk disease (76%) and/or low PSA levels (80% <0.5 ng/mL) at the time of PSMA-PET. EAU risk group was not associated with regional nodal/distant metastasis on PSMA-PET. Regional nodal/distant metastasis on PSMA PET (compared to negative/local recurrence: hazard ratio [HR] 2.2; P = 0.002) and SRT use (vs no SRT: HR 0.44; P = 0.004) were associated with EFS. EAU high-risk status was not significantly associated with worse EFS (HR 1.7, P = 0.12) compared to EAU low-risk status. Among patients who received SRT, both regional/distant metastasis on PSMA-PET (HR 3.1; P < 0.001) and EAU high-risk status (HR 2.9; P = 0.04) were independently associated with worse EFS, which was driven by patients in the EAU high-risk group with regional/distant metastases (38%; HR 3.1, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with post-RP BCR, PSMA-PET findings and receipt of SRT predicted EFS. In patients receiving SRT, PSMA status combined with EAU risk grouping was most predictive of EFS. These findings suggest that the EAU risk groups could be improved with the addition of PSMA-PET.

Multimodality Treatment Improves Locoregional Control, Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Patients with Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Oncological Outcomes and Morbidity between Multimodality Treatment and Limited Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) have poor overall survival, and the optimal management approach remains unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate our experience with multimodality (MMT) versus limited treatment (LT) for ATC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort study of patients with ATC managed in a tertiary referral center was undertaken. The outcomes of MMT were compared with those of LT. The primary outcome measures were locoregional control and progression-free and overall survival. Secondary outcome measures were treatment-related complications and factors associated with improved survival. RESULTS: In total, 59 patients (35 females) with a median age of 73 years (range 39-99 years) and ATC stage IVA (n = 2), IVB (n = 28), or IVC (n = 29) were included. LT was utilized in 25 patients (42%), and 34 cases had MMT. MMT patients had a longer time of locoregional control (18.5 versus 1.9 months; p < 0.001), progression-free survival (3.5 versus 1.2 months; p < 0.001), and overall survival (6.9 versus 2.0 months; p < 0.001) when compared with LT. For patients with stage IVC ATC, locoregional control (p = 0.03), progression-free survival (p < 0.001), and overall survival (p < 0.001) were superior in the MMT cohort compared with LT. MMT had more treatment-related complications than LT (p < 0.001). An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status < 2 (HR 0.30; p = 0.001) and MMT (HR 0.35; p = 0.008) were associated with improved overall survival. CONCLUSION: MMT is likely to improve locoregional control, progression-free survival, and overall survival in selected ATC patients including stage IVC tumors but comes with a greater complication risk.

Validation of the 8th edition UICC/AJCC TNM staging system for HPV associated oropharyngeal cancer patients managed with contemporary chemo-radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: To compare outcomes of high-risk human papilloma virus-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV OPSCC) treated with modern radiation treatment (RT) and daily image-guidance, staged with the 7th versus the 8th Edition (Ed) Union for International Cancer Control (UICC)/American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging systems. METHODS: All eligible patients with HPV OPSCC treated definitively over a 10-year period (2007-2016) at a single institution were included. Protocols consisting of either RT or chemo-radiation (CRT) (weekly cisplatin or cetuximab) +/- neoadjuvant chemotherapy for those with bulky disease were used. All patients were Fluorine-18-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) staged at baseline and at intervals for up to 2 years post-treatment. Patients received parotid-sparing intensity modulated or volumetric modulated arc therapy with simultaneous integrated boost to either 70Gy in 35 fractions or 66Gy in 30 fractions. The overall survival (OS) was determined for each stage using the 7th Ed and subsequently with the updated 8th Ed staging system. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three patients were analysed. Patient stage groupings varied between the 7th and 8th Eds respectively; Stage I (0.7% vs 64.7%), Stage II (8.5% vs 22.2%), stage III (21.6% vs 12.4%) and stage IV (69.3% vs 0.7%). In the 7th Ed, the 5 year probability of OS for stages I to III was 90%, versus stage IV 85.5%. There was no statistically significant difference between the staging groups (p = 0.85). In the 8th Ed there was a statistically significant difference in 5 year OS for stage I and stage II disease (96.9% vs 77.1% respectively; p < 0.0001), but not between stage II and III disease (p = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: The new 8th Ed UICC/AJCC TNM staging system better discriminates between stage I and Stage II HPV OPSCC with respect to OS compared with the 7th Ed staging system. Further investigation is required for stage III or IV patients.

A randomised phase II trial of Stereotactic Ablative Fractionated radiotherapy versus Radiosurgery for Oligometastatic Neoplasia to the lung (TROG 13.01 SAFRON II).

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is emerging as a non-invasive method for precision irradiation of lung tumours. However, the ideal dose/fractionation schedule is not yet known. The primary purpose of this study is to assess safety and efficacy profile of single and multi-fraction SABR in the context of pulmonary oligometastases. METHODS/DESIGN: The TROG 13.01/ALTG 13.001 clinical trial is a multicentre unblinded randomised phase II study. Eligible patients have up to three metastases to the lung from any non-haematological malignancy, each < 5 cm in size, non-central targets, and have all primary and extrathoracic disease controlled with local therapies. Patients are randomised 1:1 to a single fraction of 28Gy versus 48Gy in four fractions of SABR. The primary objective is to assess the safety of each treatment arm, with secondary objectives including assessment of quality of life, local efficacy, resource use and costs, overall and disease free survival and time to distant failure. Outcomes will be stratified by number of metastases and origin of the primary disease (colorectal versus non-colorectal primary). Planned substudies include an assessment of the impact of online e-Learning platforms for lung SABR and assessment of the effect of SABR fractionation on the immune responses. A total of 84 patients are required to complete the study. DISCUSSION: Fractionation schedules have not yet been investigated in a randomised fashion in the setting of oligometastatic disease. Assuming the likelihood of similar clinical efficacy in both arms, the present study design allows for exploration of the hypothesis that cost implications of managing potentially increased toxicities from single fraction SABR will be outweighed by costs associated with delivering multiple-fraction SABR. TRIALS REGISTRATION: ACTRN12613001157763 , registered 17th October 2013.

Systemic inflammation is an independent predictive marker of clinical outcomes in mucosal squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in oropharyngeal and non-oropharyngeal patients.

BACKGROUND: Currently there are very few biomarkers to identify head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cancer patients at a greater risk of recurrence and shortened survival. This study aimed to investigate whether a marker of systemic inflammation, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), was predictive of clinical outcomes in a heterogeneous cohort of HNSCC cancer patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis to identify associations between NLR and clinicopathological features to recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Univariate analysis was used to identify associations and selected variables were included in multivariable Cox regression analysis to determine predictive value. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients with stage I-IV HNSCC that had undergone radiotherapy were analysed. Seventy-six of these patients had oropharyngeal cancer and 69 had non-oropharyngeal HNSCC and these populations were analysed separately. NLR was not associated to any clinicopathological variable. On univariate analysis, NLR showed associations with RFS and OS in both sub-populations. Multivariable analysis showed patients with NLR > 5 had shortened OS in both sub-populations but NLR > 5 only predicted RFS in oropharyngeal patients. Poor performance status predicted OS in both sub-populations and current smokers had shortened OS and RFS in non-oropharyngeal patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results show patients with NLR > 5 predict for shorter overall survival. Further prospective validation studies in larger cohorts are required to determine the clinical applicability of NLR for prognostication in HNSCC patients.

Audiovisual biofeedback breathing guidance for lung cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a multi-institutional phase II randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: There is a clear link between irregular breathing and errors in medical imaging and radiation treatment. The audiovisual biofeedback system is an advanced form of respiratory guidance that has previously demonstrated to facilitate regular patient breathing. The clinical benefits of audiovisual biofeedback will be investigated in an upcoming multi-institutional, randomised, and stratified clinical trial recruiting a total of 75 lung cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy. METHODS/DESIGN: To comprehensively perform a clinical evaluation of the audiovisual biofeedback system, a multi-institutional study will be performed. Our methodological framework will be based on the widely used Technology Acceptance Model, which gives qualitative scales for two specific variables, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, which are fundamental determinants for user acceptance. A total of 75 lung cancer patients will be recruited across seven radiation oncology departments across Australia. Patients will be randomised in a 2:1 ratio, with 2/3 of the patients being recruited into the intervention arm and 1/3 in the control arm. 2:1 randomisation is appropriate as within the interventional arm there is a screening procedure where only patients whose breathing is more regular with audiovisual biofeedback will continue to use this system for their imaging and treatment procedures. Patients within the intervention arm whose free breathing is more regular than audiovisual biofeedback in the screen procedure will remain in the intervention arm of the study but their imaging and treatment procedures will be performed without audiovisual biofeedback. Patients will also be stratified by treating institution and for treatment intent (palliative vs. radical) to ensure similar balance in the arms across the sites. Patients and hospital staff operating the audiovisual biofeedback system will complete questionnaires to assess their experience with audiovisual biofeedback. The objectives of this clinical trial is to assess the impact of audiovisual biofeedback on breathing motion, the patient experience and clinical confidence in the system, clinical workflow, treatment margins, and toxicity outcomes. DISCUSSION: This clinical trial marks an important milestone in breathing guidance studies as it will be the first randomised, controlled trial providing the most comprehensive evaluation of the clinical impact of breathing guidance on cancer radiation therapy to date. This study is powered to determine the impact of AV biofeedback on breathing regularity and medical image quality. Objectives such as determining the indications and contra-indications for the use of AV biofeedback, evaluation of patient experience, radiation toxicity occurrence and severity, and clinician confidence will shed light on the design of future phase III clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial has been registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), its trial ID is ACTRN12613001177741 .

Functional swallowing outcomes in nasopharyngeal cancer treated with IMRT at 6 to 42 months post-radiotherapy.

We sought to evaluate the swallowing function of 18 patients surviving nasopharyngeal cancer, who had been treated using an intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) protocol designed to minimise functional impairment. We compared the outcomes of a patient-reported oral function score with fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallow (FEES), Australian Therapy Outcome Measures (AusTOMs) and a measure of trismus. While all patients returned to a fully oral diet, there was ongoing swallow dysfunction characterised by bolus residue and delay, but no aspiration. Dysphagia was of mild or moderate severity on all measures, generally because of the need for texture modification, impaired bolus transit or dysgeusia. There was xerostomia on self-reported measurement combined with reports of behaviours adaptive to xerostomia on AusTOMs; however, salivary functioning was less impaired on FEES. There was no trismus in this cohort. Our cohort lacked the morbidity experienced by cohorts reported in earlier studies, potentially due to the use of IMRT.

Prognostic impact of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) staging for clinically node-positive prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: In the current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system, patients with pelvic nodal metastases are considered stage IV prostate cancer. This study aims to investigate whether men with prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET)-detected pelvic node-positive prostate cancer at diagnosis have a better outcome compared to men with node-positive disease identified on conventional imaging. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study comparing the outcomes of men with node-positive prostate cancer and disease confined to the pelvis, staged with conventional versus PSMA PET imaging. Men had to be treated definitively with a combination of androgen deprivation therapy and radiation treatment to the prostate and pelvic lymph nodes. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis was used to compare biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Seventy-six men with nodal metastases confined to the pelvis were identified. Fifty-one were detected with PSMA PET while 25 were staged with conventional imaging. PSMA PET staged patients had a lower proportion of Gleason 8-10 disease (78% vs. 96%) as well as a lower median prostate-specific antigen (11 ng/mL vs. 26 ng/mL). BFFS at 4 years was 72% with PSMA PET-detected node-positive disease vs. 38% with conventionally detected node-positive disease. Four-year OS was 93% with PSMA PET staged patients vs. 76% with conventionally staged patients. On multivariate analysis, the PSMA PET staged group was associated with improved BFFS (Adjusted HR = 3.00, 95% CI 1.43, 6.29, P = 0.004) and OS (Adjusted HR = 5.81, 95% CI 1.43, 23.7, P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Men with PSMA PET-detected node-positive prostate cancer confined to the pelvis have significantly better biochemical control and survival compared to those with node-positive pelvic disease identified through conventional staging.

An elusive prostate tumour: Metastatic microcystic cribriform carcinoma presenting with imaging-histologic discordance.

Microcystic adenocarcinoma is an uncommon histologic variant of prostate carcinoma. Despite its rarity, it has gained increasing recognition over the past decade for its diagnostic challenges and unclear prognostic significance. Herein, we describe a rare case of metastatic microcystic prostate adenocarcinoma, presenting with discordance between imaging and histologic findings. This report highlights the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of this pathological entity and the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration in the management of intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Decision Regret and Bother With the Addition of Androgen Deprivation Therapy to Definitive Radiation Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with radiation treatment (RT) is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for unfavorable intermediate and high-risk localized prostate cancer. Although there is a variable survival benefit conferred by ADT, there are potential side effects to consider for patient decision-making. We aimed to assess the side effects and bother of adding ADT to RT, the degree of regret, and what overall survival (OS) benefit men would want to justify adding or extending the duration of ADT, after their experience with this treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Men receiving ADT with definitive RT completed a questionnaire asking about the side effects and degree of bother from ADT using a 4-point scale. They were also asked about regret, and what survival benefit would warrant ADT. RESULTS: In the study, 846 patients received definitive RT, of whom 356 received ADT and were asked about their experience with ADT. Of these, 234 responded (66%). In 54%, ADT caused some bother, most commonly hot flushes (32%), fatigue (29%), and sexual problems (29%). Five percent regretted receiving ADT "quite a lot" or "very much." Approximately one-third of men deemed a 1% OS benefit from ADT worthwhile, whereas one-third (34%) would want a >10% OS benefit enough to justify choosing ADT again. In addition, 49% of patients who received short-term ADT would accept longer duration ADT for a 6% OS benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Significant regret for ADT was low (5%). There was a clear dichotomy between those who deemed any OS benefit from ADT worthwhile versus those who needed a significant survival benefit to justify the side effects. Given that some men may change their opinion on the relative value of ADT after experiencing its effects, this study emphasizes the importance of revisiting patients after 6 months to given patients an opportunity to renegotiate their treatment.

Radiological evaluation of an iodised hydrogel for prostate radiotherapy applications.

PURPOSE: Physical separation of healthy tissue and target volumes in prostate radiotherapy through the insertion of hydrogel can improve patient toxicity rates. An iodised hydrogel may provide anatomical separation of prostate and rectum while being easily visualised through radio-opacity. The aim of this study was to characterise SpaceOAR Vue™ in kilovoltage (kV) images and megavoltage (MV) radiotherapy treatment planning. METHODS: Two cassettes were 3D-printed, one filled with water and the other with SpaceOAR Vue™. Transmission dose through each cassette was measured in slab phantom geometry and compared for 6MV and 10MV photon energies. The SpaceOAR Vue™ slab phantom setup was simulated using computed tomography (CT) and a treatment plan created. The plan was calculated with the hydrogel segmented and material assignment set to water, and the resultant dose compared to corresponding measurement doses. The first 5 patients treated with SpaceOAR Vue™ were assessed with the volume and Hounsfield units (HU) of the hydrogel evaluated in CT and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. RESULTS: Transmission through Water and SpaceOAR Vue™ agreed to within 0.5% for both photon energies. Furthermore, the segmentation of SpaceOAR Vue™ and material assignment to water, resulted in a plan dose that agreed to measurement to within 0.5%. Clinically, the SpaceOAR Vue™ volume and HU did not vary over patient treatment course, however was found to display differently on different kV imaging modalities. CONCLUSIONS: SpaceOAR Vue™ was found to be radio-opaque on kV images, but dosimetrically behaved similarly to water in MV treatment beams, making it suitable for clinical use.

Mapping of Local Recurrences After Radical Prostatectomy Using 68-Gallium-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: Implications for Postprostatectomy Radiation Therapy Clinical Target Volumes.

PURPOSE: Our objective is to describe the distribution of local recurrences after radical prostatectomy (RP) as delineated using 68-Gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) to identify areas where current consensus guideline clinical target volumes (CTVs) are insufficient or excessive and to identify predictors of recurrence location within the fossa. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Retrospective review of databases from 2 tertiary referral centers was performed to identify patients who underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for biochemical recurrence after RP. Those with a component of local recurrence were included for further analysis. The epicenter of each recurrence was defined relative to reference points in 3 axes, categorized into 1 of 7 levels in the superior/inferior axis relative to the vesicourethral anastomosis, and recorded as within or outside the Faculty of Radiation Oncology Genito-urinary Group (FROGG) and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus CTVs. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of recurrence location based on clinical and histopathologic variables. RESULTS: One thousand forty-nine 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans were reviewed. One hundred forty sites of local recurrence were identified on 132 scans. Relative to the vesicourethral anastomosis, 13 (9%), 31 (22%), 17 (12%), 24 (17%), 27 (19%), 20 (14%), and 8 (6%) recurrences occurred >5 mm inferior; within 5 mm above or below; and 6 to 15 mm, 16 to 25 mm, 26 to 35 mm, 36 to 45 mm, and >45 mm superiorly, respectively. Thirteen (9%) and 2 (1.4%) recurrences occurred beyond the FROGG and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus CTVs, respectively, with all below the inferior CTV margin. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest study to date mapping local recurrences after RP in 3-dimensions, we provide several insights to inform future contouring guidelines; in particular, 9% of recurrences occurred inferior to the FROGG CTV.

Evaluation of the clinical feasibility of cone-beam computed tomography guided online adaption for simulation-free palliative radiotherapy.

Background and purpose: Simulation-free radiotherapy, where diagnostic imaging is used for treatment planning, improves accessibility of radiotherapy for eligible palliative patients. Combining this pathway with online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) may improve accuracy of treatment, expanding the number of eligible patients. This study evaluated the adaptive process duration, plan dose volume histogram (DVH) metrics and geometric accuracy of a commercial cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided oART system for simulation-free, palliative radiotherapy. Materials and methods: Ten previously treated palliative cases were used to compare system-generated contours against clinician contours in a test environment with Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC). Twenty simulation-free palliative patients were treated clinically using CBCT-guided oART. Analysis of oART clinical treatment data included; evaluation of the geometric accuracy of system-generated synthetic CT relative to session CBCT anatomy using a Likert scale, comparison of adaptive plan dose distributions to unadapted, using DVH metrics and recording the duration of key steps in the oART workflow. Results: Auto-generated contours achieved a DSC of higher than 0.85, excluding the stomach which was attributed to CBCT image quality issues. Synthetic CT was locally aligned to CBCT anatomy for approximately 80% of fractions, with the remaining suboptimal yet clinically acceptable. Adaptive plans achieved a median CTV V95% of 99.5%, compared to 95.6% for unadapted. The median overall oART process duration was found to be 13.2 mins, with contour editing being the most time-intensive adaptive step. Conclusions: The CBCT-guided oART system utilising a simulation-free planning approach was found to be sufficiently accurate for clinical implementation, this may further streamline and improve care for palliative patients.

Long-Term Outcomes of TROG 13.01 SAFRON II Randomized Trial of Single- Versus Multifraction Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Pulmonary Oligometastases.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.In a randomized phase II clinical trial, the Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group compared single- versus multifraction stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in 90 patients with 133 oligometastases to the lung. The study found no differences in safety, efficacy, systemic immunogenicity, or survival between arms, with single-fraction SABR picked as the winner on the basis of cost-effectiveness. In this article, we report the final updated survival outcome analysis. The protocol mandated no concurrent or post-therapy systemic therapy until progression. Modified disease-free survival (mDFS) was defined as any progression not addressable by local therapy, or death. At a median follow-up of 5.4 years, the 3- and 5-year estimates for overall survival (OS) were 70% (95% CI, 59 to 78) and 51% (95% CI, 39 to 61). There were no significant differences between the multi- and single-fraction arms for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.1 [95% CI, 0.6 to 2.0]; P = .81). The 3- and 5-year estimates for disease-free survival were 24% (95% CI, 16 to 33) and 20% (95% CI, 13 to 29), with no differences between arms (HR, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.6 to 1.6]; P = .92). The 3- and 5-year estimates for mDFS were 39% (95% CI, 29 to 49) and 34% (95% CI, 24 to 44), with no differences between arms (HR, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.6 to 1.8]; P = .90). In this patient population, where patients receive SABR in lieu of systemic therapy, one-in-three patients are alive without disease in the long term. There were no differences in outcomes by fractionation schedule.

Genomic Classifiers in Personalized Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy Approaches: A Systematic Review and Future Perspectives Based on International Consensus.

Current risk-stratification systems for prostate cancer (PCa) do not sufficiently reflect the disease heterogeneity. Genomic classifiers (GC) enable improved risk stratification after surgery, but less data exist for patients treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT) or RT in oligo-/metastatic disease stages. To guide future perspectives of GCs for RT, we conducted (1) a systematic review on the evidence of GCs for patients treated with RT and (2) a survey of experts using the Delphi method, addressing the role of GCs in personalized treatments to identify relevant fields of future clinical and translational research. We performed a systematic review and screened ongoing clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov. Based on these results, a multidisciplinary international team of experts received an adapted Delphi method survey. Thirty-one and 30 experts answered round 1 and round 2, respectively. Questions with ≥75% agreement were considered relevant and included in the qualitative synthesis. Evidence for GCs as predictive biomarkers is mainly available to the postoperative RT setting. Validation of GCs as prognostic markers in the definitive RT setting is emerging. Experts used GCs in patients with PCa with extensive metastases (30%), in postoperative settings (27%), and in newly diagnosed PCa (23%). Forty-seven percent of experts do not currently use GCs in clinical practice. Expert consensus demonstrates that GCs are promising tools to improve risk-stratification in primary and oligo-/metastatic patients in addition to existing classifications. Experts were convinced that GCs might guide treatment decisions in terms of RT-field definition and intensification/deintensification in various disease stages. This work confirms the value of GCs and the promising evidence of GC utility in the setting of RT. Additional studies of GCs as prognostic biomarkers are anticipated and form the basis for future studies addressing predictive capabilities of GCs to optimize RT and systemic therapy. The expert consensus points out future directions for GC research in the management of PCa.

Image-guided dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: treating to doses beyond 78 Gy.

UNLABELLED: Study Type - Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? High doses of radiotherapy correspond to higher cure rates. Most radiation centers in the UK and Australia limit prescription doses to 74-78 Gy and do not use IGRT and IMRT for all patients. The combination of IGRT and IMRT can limit the rectum and bladder to low doses allowing doses above 78 Gy to be delivered, including pelvic lymph node treatment, with low side effects. This paper provides a detailed guide of planning technique and expected toxicity to enable implementation of similar dose escalated prostate programmes in other radiotherapy centres. OBJECTIVE: To determine the short-term side-effects of dose-escalated image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT) for the definitive treatment of prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were treated at doses >78 Gy and with definitive intent. Patients from a prospective database with International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0 (CTCAE) toxicity were recorded weekly during treatment and at follow-up. RESULTS: In all, 101 patients were included, with doses ranging from 78.3 to 84 Gy (median = 79.3). The median (range) age was 71 (46-83) years; 60% received concurrent androgen deprivation and 35% had pelvic lymph node treatment. The median (range) IPSS at baseline, on treatment and at first follow-up were 7 (0-35), 15 (1-34) and 6 (0-30), respectively. The percentages of patients with grade 2 or higher toxicity during treatment, at 3 months and at 2 years were, respectively, 6.9%, 1% and 2% for gastrointestinal symptoms and 39%, 6.9% and 3% for genitourinary symptoms. There was no significant difference in gastrointestinal toxicity during treatment (P= 0.860) or at 3 months (P= 0.334) between patients with and without lymph node treatment. CONCLUSION: Doses >78 Gy delivered using daily image guidance and IMRT are well tolerated, and by 3 months short-term side-effects have normalized for the majority of patients.

Early Outcomes and Decision Regret Using PSMA/MRI-Guided Focal Boost for Prostate Cancer SBRT.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a recognized treatment for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, with 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions the most commonly used regimen. We explored the preliminary efficacy, patient recorded toxicity, and decision regret in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer receiving SBRT with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guided focal gross tumor volume boost to 45 Gy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between July 2015 and June 2019, 120 patients received SBRT across 2 institutions with a uniform protocol. All patients had fiducial markers and hydrogel, MRI and PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) scan. All patients received a questionnaire asking the degree of urinary, bowel, and sexual bother experienced at set time points, including questions about treatment choice and decision regret. RESULTS: One hundred twelve of 120 patients consented. Their median age was 72 years and median follow-up was 2.3 years. As per National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, 78% had intermediate risk and 20% high risk. Androgen deprivation was combined with radiation in 6 patients. Most patients (74%) reported that receiving SBRT significantly influenced their choice of treatment. Five men (4%) expressed "quite a lot" (n = 4) or "very much" regret (n = 1) regarding their choice of treatment, while 89% expressed "no regret." Similar to pretreatment levels, "quite a lot" or "very much" urinary or bowel bother was expressed in 8% and 6% of patients, respectively. Two patients experienced nadir +2 biochemical failure, both found to have bone metastases. A third patient underwent PSMA PET at nadir +1.7 and had disease at the penile bulb, which was out of field. Three year estimated freedom from biochemical failure was 99% for intermediate and 85% for high-risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated promising efficacy and low toxicity with PSMA/MRI-guided SBRT focal boost. Less than 5% of patients expressed significant decision regret for their choice of treatment.