Diagnosing anastomotic leak post-esophagectomy: a systematic review.

Esophagectomy is the gold-standard treatment for esophageal cancer; however, postoperative anastomotic leakage remains the primary concern for surgeons. No consensus exists on the optimal investigations to predict an anastomotic leak. This systematic review aims to identify a single test or combination of tests with acceptable sensitivity and specificity to identify anastomotic leak after esophagectomy and to formulate a diagnostic algorithm to facilitate surgical decision-making. A systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE databases was undertaken to evaluate diagnostic investigations for anastomotic leak post-esophagectomy. Each study was reviewed and where possible, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were extracted. The review identified 3,204 articles, of which 49 met the inclusion criteria. Investigations most commonly used for diagnosis of anastomotic leak were: C-reactive protein (CRP), oral contrast imaging, computed tomography (CT), pleural drain amylase concentration, and the 'NUn score'. The sensitivity of CRP for detecting anastomotic leak varied from 69.2% to 100%. Oral contrast studies sensitivities varied between 16% and 87.5% and specificity varied from 20% to 100%. Pleural drain amylase sensitivities ranged between 75% and 100% and specificity ranged from 52% to 95.5%. The NUn score sensitivities ranged from 0% to 95% and specificity from 49% to 94.4%. No single investigation was identified to rule out anastomotic leak in asymptomatic patients. However, the authors propose a diagnostic algorithm incorporating CRP, pleural drain amylase concentration, and CT with oral contrast to aid clinicians in predicting anastomotic leak to facilitate safe, timely discharge post-esophagectomy.

Once in a Bile - the Incidence of Bile Reflux Post-Bariatric Surgery.

PURPOSE: Excellent metabolic improvement following one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) remains compromised by the risk of esophageal bile reflux and theoretical carcinogenic potential. No 'gold standard' investigation exists for esophageal bile reflux, with diverse methods employed in the few studies evaluating it post-obesity surgery. As such, data on the incidence and severity of esophageal bile reflux is limited, with comparative studies lacking. This study aims to use specifically tailored biliary scintigraphy and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy protocols to evaluate esophageal bile reflux after OAGB, sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). METHODS: Fifty-eight participants underwent OAGB (20), SG (15) or RYGB (23) between November 2018 and July 2020. Pre-operative reflux symptom assessment and gastroscopy were performed and repeated post-operatively at 6 months along with biliary scintigraphy. RESULTS: Gastric reflux of bile was identified by biliary scintigraphy in 14 OAGB (70%), one RYGB (5%) and four SG participants (31%), with a mean of 2.9% (SD 1.5) reflux (% of total radioactivity). One participant (OAGB) demonstrated esophageal bile reflux. De novo macro- or microscopic gastroesophagitis occurred in 11 OAGB (58%), 8 SG (57%) and 7 RYGB (30%) participants. Thirteen participants had worsened reflux symptoms post-operatively (OAGB, 4; SG, 7; RYGB, 2). Scintigraphic esophageal bile reflux bore no statistical association with de novo gastroesophagitis or reflux symptoms. CONCLUSION: Despite high incidence of gastric bile reflux post-OAGB, esophageal bile reflux is rare. With scarce literature of tumour development post-OAGB, frequent low-volume gastric bile reflux likely bears little clinical consequence; however, longer-term studies are needed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number ACTRN12618000806268.

HIDA and Seek: Challenges of Scintigraphy to Diagnose Bile Reflux Post-Bariatric Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Oesophageal bile reflux after bariatric surgery may trigger development of Barrett's oesophagus. Gastro-oesophageal reflux of bile is captured by hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) scintigraphy; however, anatomical and physiological changes after bariatric surgery warrant protocol modifications to optimise bile reflux detection. METHODS: HIDA scintigraphy occurred 6 months after either sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or one-anastomosis gastric bypass. Standard HIDA scanning involves (i) 6-h fast and 24-h abstinence from opioids; (ii) IV administration of 99mTc di-isopropyl iminodiacetic acid; and (iii) dual anterior/posterior 60-min dynamic scanning of the duodenum, stomach and oesophagus. Three challenges were identified, and modifications were implemented, namely, (1) anatomical localisation of refluxed bile on planar scintigraphy was improved by adding a SPECT/CT for 3D imaging; (2) impaired cholecystokinin-controlled gallbladder emptying, following bypassed duodenum, was addressed by ingestion of a 'fatty meal'; and (3) intestinal hypomotility after gastric bypass was counteracted by longer scan duration (75-90 min) to allow bile to pass beyond the gastro-jejunal anastomosis. RESULTS: HIDA scan was undertaken in 18 patients, 13 of whom underwent the modified protocol. The tailored protocol ameliorated issues identified with the standard HIDA scan protocol; thus, accurate anatomical localisation was achieved in all patients, no delayed gallbladder emptying was observed, and bile was observed beyond the gastro-jejunal anastomosis in all gastric bypass patients. The modified technique was well tolerated by patients. CONCLUSION: A tailored HIDA scan protocol with addition of a SPECT-CT scan, ingestion of a fatty meal and prolonged scanning duration results in enhanced bile reflux detection in post-bariatric surgical patients.

Detecting Bile Reflux-the Enigma of Bariatric Surgery.

Duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux, or bile reflux, is a condition for which there is no diagnostic gold standard, and it remains controversial in terms of carcinoma risk. This is pertinent in the context of an increasingly overweight population who are undergoing weight-loss operations that theoretically further increase the risk of bile reflux. This article reviews investigations for bile reflux based on efficacy, patient tolerability, cost, and infrastructure requirements. At this time, whilst no gold standard exists, hepatobiliary scintigraphy is the least invasive investigation with good-patient tolerability, sensitivity, and reproducibility to be considered first-line for diagnosis of bile reflux. This review will guide clinicians investigating bile reflux.