Dosing of IV posaconazole to treat critically ill patients with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: a population pharmacokinetics modelling and simulation study.

BACKGROUND: Posaconazole is used for the prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal infections in critically ill patients. Standard dosing was shown to result in adequate attainment of the prophylaxis Cmin target (0.7 mg/L) but not of the treatment Cmin target (1.0 mg/L). OBJECTIVES: To provide an optimized posaconazole dosing regimen for IV treatment of patients with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in the ICU. METHODS: A population pharmacokinetics (popPK) model was developed using data from the POSA-FLU PK substudy (NCT03378479). Monte Carlo simulations were performed to assess treatment Cmin and AUC0-24 PTA. PTA ≥90% was deemed clinically acceptable. PopPK modelling and simulation were performed using NONMEM 7.5. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with intensive PK sampling were included in the PK substudy, contributing 532 posaconazole plasma concentrations. The popPK of IV posaconazole was best described by a two-compartment model with linear elimination. Interindividual variability was estimated on clearance and volume of distribution in central and peripheral compartments. Posaconazole peripheral volume of distribution increased with bodyweight. An optimized loading regimen of 300 mg q12h and 300 mg q8h in the first two treatment days achieved acceptable PTA by Day 3 in patients <100 kg and ≥100 kg, respectively. A maintenance regimen of 400 mg q24h ensured ≥90% Cmin PTA, whereas the standard 300 mg q24h was sufficient to achieve the AUC0-24 target throughout 14 days, irrespective of bodyweight. CONCLUSIONS: We have defined a convenient, optimized IV posaconazole dosing regimen that was predicted to attain the treatment target in critically ill patients with invasive aspergillosis.

Ceftriaxone dosing based on the predicted probability of augmented renal clearance in critically ill patients with pneumonia.

OBJECTIVES: PTA of protein-unbound ceftriaxone may be compromised in critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) with augmented renal clearance (ARC). We aimed to determine an optimized ceftriaxone dosage regimen based on the probability of developing ARC on the next day (PARC,d+1; www.arcpredictor.com). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients enrolled in a prospective cohort study were admitted to the ICU with severe CAP and treated with ceftriaxone 2 g once daily. Patients contributed 259 total ceftriaxone concentrations, collected during 1 or 2 days (±7 samples/day). Unbound fractions of ceftriaxone were determined in all peak and trough samples (n = 76). Population pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation were performed using NONMEM7.4. Target attainment was defined as an unbound ceftriaxone concentration >4 mg/L throughout the dosing interval. RESULTS: A two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model described the data well. The maximal protein-bound ceftriaxone concentration decreased with lower serum albumin. Ceftriaxone clearance increased with body weight and PARC,d+1 determined on the previous day. A high PARC,d+1 was identified as a clinically relevant predictor for underexposure on the next day (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.77). Body weight had a weak predictive value and was therefore considered clinically irrelevant. Serum albumin had no predictive value. An optimal PARC,d+1 threshold of 5.7% was identified (sensitivity 73%, specificity 69%). Stratified once- or twice-daily 2 g dosing when below or above the 5.7% PARC,d+1 cut-off, respectively, was predicted to result in 81% PTA compared with 47% PTA under population-level once-daily 2 g dosing. CONCLUSIONS: Critically ill patients with CAP with a high PARC,d+1 may benefit from twice-daily 2 g ceftriaxone dosing for achieving adequate exposure on the next day.

Liposomal amphotericin B exposure in critically ill patients: a prospective pharmacokinetic study.

Liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) is a broad-spectrum antifungal drug. Little is known about its pharmacokinetics (PK) in critically ill patients. The aim of this study was to document the PK of L-AmB in this population. It was also explored if covariates may be identified that influence its exposure. All adult, critically ill patients (at the intensive care unit or hematology ward) treated with L-AmB between October 2016 and January 2020 were eligible for this study. The administered dose was left at the discretion of the treating clinician. Plasma samples were collected at predose and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 h postdose at an early (day 2-3) and/or later (≥ day 6) treatment day. Additionally, daily trough concentrations were collected until day 14. Of 33 included patients, 31 were evaluable; their median [IQR] age and body weight was 59 [54-64] years and 68 [59-77] kg, respectively. L-AmB was administered at doses between 2.7 mg/kg and 12.3 mg/kg, with a median [IQR] trough concentration of 3.1 [2.0-4.7] mg/l. The overall median area under the 24 h concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax) were 169.0 [117.0-253.0] mg h/l and 23.2 [16.9-33.7] mg/l, respectively. A considerable intra- and interpatient PK variability for Cmax and AUC0-24 was observed but no explaining variables, except the administered dose, could be identified. The PK of L-AmB in critically ill patients was documented. A considerable variability in exposure was observed between and within patients; however, it was not associated with a multitude of patient-related characteristics.

L-AmB is marketed for decades to treat invasive fungal infections; however, not much is known about its exposure. We documented L-AmB exposure in 31 critically ill patients. Although median exposure was similar compared to noncritically ill patients, a considerable variability was observed.

Population pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in maternal and umbilical cord plasma, and simulated exposure in term neonates.

BACKGROUND: Intra-partum cefazolin is used to prevent group B Streptococcus (GBS) vertical transmission in mothers allergic to penicillin without a history of anaphylaxis. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the maternal cefazolin dose-exposure relationship and subsequent maternal and neonatal target attainment at delivery. METHODS: Data were obtained from 24 healthy, GBS-colonized pregnant women (20-41 years), undergoing vaginal delivery (gestational age ≥37 weeks). During labour, all women received a 2 g cefazolin IV infusion. Eight hours later, eight women received another 1 g in the event of delayed (>8 h) delivery. Next to maternal plasma concentrations (up to 10 per dosing interval, until delivery), venous and arterial umbilical cord concentrations were determined at delivery. Target attainment in maternal/neonatal plasma was set at 1 mg/L for 60% of the dosing interval (unbound cefazolin, worst-case clinical breakpoint). A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model was built (NONMEM 7.4). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01295606. RESULTS: At delivery, maternal blood and arterial umbilical cord unbound cefazolin concentrations were >1 mg/L in 23/24 (95.8%) and 11/12 (91.7%), respectively. The popPK of cefazolin in pregnant women was described by a two-compartment model with first-order elimination. Two additional compartments described the venous and arterial umbilical cord concentration data. Cefazolin target attainment was adequate in the studied cohort, where delivery occurred no later than 6.5 h after either the first or the second dose. PopPK simulations showed adequate maternal and umbilical cord exposure for 12 h following the first dose. CONCLUSIONS: PopPK simulations showed that standard pre-delivery maternal cefazolin dosing provided adequate target attainment up to the time of delivery.

A Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation Study of Posaconazole Oral Suspension in Immunocompromised Pediatric Patients: A Short Communication.

BACKGROUND: Posaconazole oral suspension emerged as a promising candidate for prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised children. Its pharmacodynamic advantages include a broad-spectrum activity and a favorable safety profile; however, they are overshadowed by its large pharmacokinetic (PK) variability, which might cause subtherapeutic exposure. The aim of this study was to develop a population (pop) PK model based on rich sampling data to better understand the PK of posaconazole oral suspension in pediatric patients. METHODS: Data were obtained from a prospective interventional study involving hospitalized pediatric patients with a hematologic malignancy and prophylactically treated with posaconazole oral suspension. After constructing the popPK model, the probability of target attainment (PTA; 100% T ≥ 0.7 mg/L) for prophylaxis under fixed, body weight-based, and body surface area-based dosing was evaluated using Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: Fourteen patients contributed 112 posaconazole plasma concentrations. The PK of posaconazole was adequately described by a 1-compartment model with lag time 2.71 hours [13%]; nonlinear bioavailability ED50 99.1 mg/m2 (fixed); first-order absorption rate constant 0.325 hour-1 [27%]; apparent volume of distribution 1150 L [34%]; and apparent clearance 15.4 L/h [24%] (∼70-kg individual). The bioavailability decreased in the presence of diarrhea and co-treatment with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI). The unexplained interindividual variability in posaconazole PK remained large. The PTA was <85%, irrespective of the simulated dosing strategy. Patients without diarrhea and not administered a PPI had the highest PTA (85% under the fixed 300-mg dosing 4 times per day). CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended during prophylactic posaconazole therapy in immunocompromised pediatric patients. Large-scale comparative studies are needed to characterize the PK variability between different posaconazole formulations in this cohort.

Concomitant use of isavuconazole and CYP3A4/5 inducers: Where pharmacogenetics meets pharmacokinetics.

BACKGROUND: Isavuconazole is a triazole antifungal drug, approved for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis. Isavuconazole is metabolised by CYP3A4 and CYP3A5, and it has been shown that the CYP3A inducer rifampin reduces isavuconazole exposure. By extrapolation, the concomitant use of isavuconazole with moderate and strong CYP450 inducers is contraindicated, although it is known that some CYP450 inducers are less potent in comparison with rifampin. OBJECTIVES: We aim to document exposure to isavuconazole in patients concomitantly treated with a CYP450 inducer that is less potent compared to rifampin. Moreover, although it is well known that CYP3A enzymes are important for the metabolism of isavuconazole, this induction effect has never been studied in combination with the patient's CYP3A genotype. PATIENTS: We report three patients treated with both isavuconazole and a CYP3A inducer that is less potent compared to rifampin (rifabutin or phenobarbital), in whom we determined isavuconazole concentrations. RESULTS: These cases suggest that the CYP3A4/5 genotype is an important determinant for isavuconazole exposure and that it might also influence the CYP450 induction interaction. CONCLUSIONS: CYP3A inducers that are less potent compared to rifampin, may be combined with isavuconazole in patients with loss of CYP3A5 activity (CYP3A5*3/*3). Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended during this combination. However, low-isavuconazole exposure was observed in the extensive metaboliser with CYP3A4*1/*1 and CYP3A5*1/*3 alleles.

Isavuconazole Exposure in Critically Ill Patients Treated with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Two Case Reports and a Narrative Literature Review.

Effective dosing of isavuconazole in patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is important due to the role of isavuconazole as a first-line treatment in patients with influenza- and COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis. To date, robust pharmacokinetic data in patients supported by ECMO are limited. Therefore, it is unknown whether ECMO independently impacts isavuconazole exposure. We measured isavuconazole plasma concentrations in two patients supported by ECMO and estimated individual pharmacokinetic parameters using non-compartmental analysis and two previously published population pharmacokinetic models. Furthermore, a narrative literature review on isavuconazole exposure in adult patients receiving ECMO was performed. The 24 h areas under the concentration-time curve and trough concentrations of isavuconazole were lower in both patients compared with exposure values published before. In the literature, highly variable isavuconazole concentrations have been documented in patients with ECMO support. The independent effect of ECMO versus critical illness itself on isavuconazole exposure cannot be deduced from our and previously published (case) reports. Pending additional data, therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended in critically ill patients, regardless of ECMO support.

Meropenem Target Attainment and Population Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Septic Patients with Preserved or Increased Renal Function.

PURPOSE: Critically ill patients with preserved or increased renal function have been shown to be at risk of underexposure to meropenem. Although many meropenem population pharmacokinetic (PK) models have been published, there is no large prospective population PK study with rich sampling focusing on patients most at risk of suboptimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate PK/PD target attainment and to perform a thorough covariate screening using population PK modelling of meropenem in septic patients with preserved or increased renal function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single-centre prospective observational PK study was performed in the intensive care unit (ICU) of the University Hospitals Leuven. Patients with severe sepsis or septic shock and treated with meropenem in the ICU were screened for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they received renal replacement therapy or had an estimated glomerular filtration rate according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology collaboration equation <70 mL/min/1.73m2 on the day of PK sampling. Successful PK/PD target attainment was defined as an unbound meropenem trough concentration above 2 mg/L or 8 mg/L. Population PK modelling was performed with NONMEM7.4. RESULTS: In total, 58 patients were included, contributing 345 plasma samples over 70 dosing intervals. The 2 mg/L and 8 mg/L targets were successfully attained in 46% and 11% of all dosing intervals, respectively. A two-compartment population PK model with linear elimination and interindividual variability on clearance best described meropenem PK. The estimated creatinine clearance according to the Cockcroft-Gault equation was the only covariate retained during population PK analysis. CONCLUSION: This study provided detailed insight into meropenem PK in critically ill patients with preserved or increased renal function. We observed poor PK/PD target attainment, for which renal function was the only significant covariate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03560557).