Phase I study targeting newly diagnosed grade 4 astrocytoma with bispecific antibody armed T cells (EGFR BATs) in combination with radiation and temozolomide.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the safety, feasibility, and immunologic responses of treating grade 4 astrocytomas with multiple infusions of anti-CD3 x anti-EGFR bispecific antibody (EGFRBi) armed T cells (EGFR BATs) in combination with radiation and chemotherapy. METHODS: This phase I study used a 3 + 3 dose escalation design to test the safety and feasibility of intravenously infused EGFR BATs in combination with radiation and temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with newly diagnosed grade 4 astrocytomas (AG4). After finding the feasible dose, an expansion cohort with unmethylated O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) tumors received weekly EGFR BATs without TMZ. RESULTS: The highest feasible dose was 80 × 109 EGFR BATs without dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in seven patients. We could not escalate the dose because of the limited T-cell expansion. There were no DLTs in the additional cohort of three patients with unmethylated MGMT tumors who received eight weekly infusions of EGFR BATs without TMZ. EGFR BATs infusions induced increases in glioma specific anti-tumor cytotoxicity by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (p < 0.03) and NK cell activity (p < 0.002) ex vivo, and increased serum concentrations of IFN-γ (p < 0.03), IL-2 (p < 0.007), and GM-CSF (p < 0.009). CONCLUSION: Targeting AG4 with EGFR BATs at the maximum feasible dose of 80 × 109, with or without TMZ was safe and induced significant anti-tumor-specific immune responses. These results support further clinical trials to examine the efficacy of this adoptive cell therapy in patients with MGMT-unmethylated GBM. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT03344250.

Systematic review of the management of brain metastases from hormone receptor positive breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Brain metastases are a common cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with breast cancer. Local central nervous system (CNS) directed therapies are usually the first line treatment for breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM), but those must be followed by systemic therapies to achieve long-term benefit. Systemic therapy for hormone receptor (HR+) breast cancer has evolved in the last 10 years, but their role when brain metastases occur is uncertain. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature focused on management of HR+ BCBM by searching Medline/PubMed, EBSCO, and Cochrane databases. The PRISMA guidelines were used for systematic review. RESULTS: Out of 807 articles identified, 98 fulfilled the inclusion criteria in their relevance to the management of HR+ BCBM. CONCLUSIONS: Similar to brain metastases from other neoplasms, local CNS directed therapies are the first line treatment for HR+ BCBM. Although the quality of evidence is low, after local therapies, our review supports the combination of targeted and endocrine therapies for both CNS and systemic management. Upon exhaustion of targeted/endocrine therapies, case series and retrospective reports suggest that certain chemotherapy agents are active against HR+ BCBM. Early phase clinical trials for HR+ BCBM are ongoing, but there is a need for prospective randomized trials to guide management and improve patients' outcome.

MRI features predict tumor grade in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma.

PURPOSE: Nearly all literature for predicting tumor grade in astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma pre-dates the molecular classification system. We investigated the association between contrast enhancement, ADC, and rCBV with tumor grade separately for IDH-mutant astrocytomas and molecularly-defined oligodendrogliomas. METHODS: For this retrospective study, 44 patients with IDH-mutant astrocytomas (WHO grades II, III, or IV) and 39 patients with oligodendrogliomas (IDH-mutant and 1p/19q codeleted) (WHO grade II or III) were enrolled. Two readers independently assessed preoperative MRI for contrast enhancement, ADC, and rCBV. Inter-reader agreement was calculated, and statistical associations between MRI metrics and WHO grade were determined per reader. RESULTS: For IDH-mutant astrocytomas, both readers found a stepwise positive association between contrast enhancement and WHO grade (Reader A: OR 7.79 [1.97, 30.80], p = 0.003; Reader B: OR 6.62 [1.70, 25.82], p = 0.006); both readers found that ADC was negatively associated with WHO grade (Reader A: OR 0.74 [0.61, 0.90], p = 0.002); Reader B: OR 0.80 [0.66, 0.96], p = 0.017), and both readers found that rCBV was positively associated with WHO grade (Reader A: OR 2.33 [1.35, 4.00], p = 0.002; Reader B: OR 2.13 [1.30, 3.57], p = 0.003). For oligodendrogliomas, both readers found a positive association between contrast enhancement and WHO grade (Reader A: OR 15.33 [2.56, 91.95], p = 0.003; Reader B: OR 20.00 [2.19, 182.45], p = 0.008), but neither reader found an association between ADC or rCBV and WHO grade. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast enhancement predicts WHO grade for IDH-mutant astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas. ADC and rCBV predict WHO grade for IDH-mutant astrocytomas, but not for oligodendrogliomas.

The landscape of brain tumor mimics in neuro-oncology practice.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Differentiating neoplastic and non-neoplastic brain lesions is essential to make management recommendations and convey prognosis, but the distinction between brain tumors and their mimics in practice may prove challenging. The aim of this study is to provide the incidence of brain tumor mimics in the neuro-oncology setting and describe this patient subset. METHODS: Retrospective study of adult patients referred to the Division of Neuro-oncology for a presumed diagnosis of brain tumor from January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2017, who later satisfied the diagnosis of a non-neoplastic entity based on neuroimaging, clinical course, and/or histopathology evaluation. We classified tumor mimic entities according to clinical, radiologic, and laboratory characteristics that correlated with the diagnosis. RESULTS: The incidence of brain tumor mimics was 3.4% (132/3897). The etiologies of the non-neoplastic entities were vascular (35%), inflammatory non-demyelinating (26%), demyelinating (15%), cysts (10%), infectious (9%), and miscellaneous (5%). In our study, 38% of patients underwent biopsy to determine diagnosis, but in 26%, the biopsy was inconclusive. DISCUSSION: Brain tumor mimics represent a small but important subset of the neuro-oncology referrals. Vascular, inflammatory, and demyelinating etiologies represent two-thirds of cases. Recognizing the clinical, radiologic and laboratory characteristics of such entities may improve resource utilization and prevent unnecessary as well as potentially harmful diagnostic and therapeutic interventions.

Systemic coagulation is activated in patients with meningioma and glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: Up to 30% of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) develop venous thromboembolism (VTE) over the course of the disease. Although not as high, the risk for VTE is also increased in patients with meningioma. Direct measurement of peak thrombin generation (TG) allows quantitative assessment of systemic coagulation activation in patients with GBM and meningioma. Our aim was to determine the extent of systemic coagulation activation induced by brain tumors, to measure the shift between pre- and post-operative peak TG in patients with GBM, and to assess the relationship between pre-surgical peak TG and pre-operative brain tumor volume on imaging. METHODS: Pre- and post-surgical plasma samples were obtained from successive patients with GBM and once from patients with meningioma and healthy age- and sex-matched blood donor controls. TG was measured using the calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT) assay, and tumor volumes were measured in pre-surgical MRI scans. RESULTS: Pre-surgical peak TG was higher in patients with GBM than in controls (288.6 ± 54.1 nM vs 187.1 ± 41.7 nM, respectively, P < 0.001), and, in the nine patients with GBM and paired data available, peak TG was significantly reduced after surgery (323 ± 38 nM vs 265 ± 52 nM, respectively, P = 0.007). Similarly, subjects with meningioma demonstrated higher peak TG compared to controls (242.2 ± 54.9 nM vs 177.7 ± 57.0 nM, respectively, P < 0.001). There was no association between peak TG and pre-operative tumor volume or overall survival. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that systemic coagulation activation occurs with both meningioma and GBM, but to a greater degree in the latter. Preoperative peak TG did not correlate with tumor volume, but removal of GBM caused a significant decrease in coagulation activation.

Fluid attenuation in non-contrast-enhancing tumor (nCET): an MRI Marker for Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation in Glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: The WHO 2016 update classifies glioblastomas (WHO grade IV) according to isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) gene mutation status. We aimed to determine MRI-based metrics for predicting IDH mutation in glioblastoma. METHODS: This retrospective study included glioblastoma cases (n = 199) with known IDH mutation status and pre-operative MRI (T1WI, T2WI, FLAIR, contrast-enhanced T1W1 at minimum). Two neuroradiologists determined the following MRI metrics: (1) primary lobe of involvement (frontal or non-frontal); (2) presence/absence of contrast-enhancement; (3) presence/absence of necrosis; (4) presence/absence of fluid attenuation in the non-contrast-enhancing tumor (nCET); (5) maximum width of peritumoral edema (cm); (6) presence/absence of multifocal disease. Inter-reader agreement was determined. After resolving discordant measurements, multivariate association between consensus MRI metrics/patient age and IDH mutation status was determined. RESULTS: Among 199 glioblastomas, 16 were IDH-mutant. Inter-reader agreement was calculated for contrast-enhancement (ĸ = 0.49 [- 0.11-1.00]), necrosis (ĸ = 0.55 [0.34-0.76]), fluid attenuation in nCET (ĸ = 0.83 [0.68-0.99]), multifocal disease (ĸ = 0.55 [0.39-0.70]), and primary lobe (ĸ = 0.85 [0.80-0.91]). Mean difference for peritumoral edema width between readers was 0.3 cm [0.2-0.5], p < 0.001. Multivariate analysis uncovered significant associations between IDH-mutation and fluid attenuation in nCET (OR 82.9 [19.22, ∞], p < 0.001), younger age (OR 0.93 [0.86, 0.98], p = 0.009), frontal lobe location (OR 11.08 [1.14, 352.97], p = 0.037), and less peritumoral edema (OR 0.15 [0, 0.65], p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Conventional MRI metrics and patient age predict IDH-mutation status in glioblastoma. Among MRI markers, fluid attenuation in nCET represents a novel marker with high inter-reader agreement that is strongly associated with Glioblastoma, IDH-mutant.

MRI and CT Identify Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH)-Mutant Lower-Grade Gliomas Misclassified to 1p/19q Codeletion Status with Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization.

Background Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a standard method for 1p/19q codeletion testing in diffuse gliomas but occasionally renders erroneous results. Purpose To determine whether MRI/CT analysis identifies isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant gliomas misassigned to 1p/19q codeletion status with FISH. Materials and Methods Data in patients with IDH-mutant lower-grade gliomas (World Health Organization grade II/III) and 1p/19q codeletion status determined with FISH that were accrued from January 1, 2010 to October 1, 2017, were included in this retrospective study. Two neuroradiologist readers analyzed the pre-resection MRI findings (and CT findings, when available) to predict 1p/19q status (codeleted or noncodeleted) and provided a prediction confidence score (1 = low, 2 = moderate, 3 = high). Percentage concordance between the consensus neuroradiologist 1p/19q prediction and the FISH result was calculated. For gliomas where (a) consensus neuroradiologist 1p/19q prediction differed from the FISH result and (b) consensus neuroradiologist confidence score was 2 or greater, further 1p/19q testing was performed with chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). Nine control specimens were randomly chosen from the remaining study sample for CMA. Percentage concordance between FISH and CMA among the CMA-tested cases was calculated. Results A total of 112 patients (median age, 38 years [interquartile range, 31-51 years]; 57 men) were evaluated (112 gliomas). Percentage concordance between the consensus neuroradiologist 1p/19q prediction and the FISH result was 84.8% (95 of 112; 95% confidence interval: 76.8%, 90.9%). Among the 17 neuroradiologist-FISH discordances, there were nine gliomas associated with a consensus neuroradiologist confidence score of 2 or greater. In six (66.7%) of these nine gliomas, the 1p/19q codeletion status as determined with CMA disagreed with the FISH result and agreed with the consensus neuroradiologist prediction. For the nine control specimens, there was 100% agreement between CMA and FISH for 1p/19q determination. Conclusion MRI and CT analysis can identify diffuse gliomas misassigned to 1p/19q codeletion status with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Further molecular testing should be considered for gliomas with discordant neuroimaging and FISH results. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Intracranial disease control for EGFR-mutant and ALK-rearranged lung cancer with large volume or symptomatic brain metastases.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are commonly employed for patients with brain metastases from lung cancer and specific driver mutations. We sought to identify the correlation between intracranial tumor burden and outcomes in patients with brain metastases treated with TKIs. MATERIALS/METHODS: We identified and retrospectively reviewed cases of EGFR-mutant or ALK-rearranged lung cancer with brain metastases at any time during their cancer course. Clinical characteristics and treatment information were abstracted from the medical records. Brain metastases were contoured to calculate total volume of disease at diagnosis and after initial therapy. High intracranial burden was defined as either > 10 brain metastases, volume of brain metastases > 15 cc, or largest lesion > 3 cm. Intracranial response was determined according to Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria on the patient level. We determined the correlation between clinical and imaging characteristics and intracranial progression free survival (IC-PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients with EGFR (n = 49) and ALK (n = 8) alterations were identified. Median follow-up from initial brain metastasis diagnosis was 17 months. Neurological symptoms were present in 54% at brain metastasis diagnosis. For those receiving TKIs alone or TKIs with radiation, at least a partial intracranial response (≥ 65% volume reduction) at 3 months from starting therapy was achieved in 94% and 58%. Progressive intracranial disease at 3 months occurred in 6.3% and 8.3%. Patients with high intracranial burden (n = 21) had a median 17 brain metastases, 6.5 cc volume, and 1.9 cm maximal tumor diameter. Median IC-PFS and OS for patients with high intracranial burden was 13.9 and 35.4 months. Patients with high intracranial burden and neurological symptoms at diagnosis had similar IC-PFS and OS compared to those with low burden and absence of neurological symptoms (p > 0.05 for each). CONCLUSION: Most patients receiving TKIs as part of their initial therapy achieve an early and durable volumetric intracranial response, irrespective of presenting disease burden or neurologic symptoms.

Adaptive dose-finding based on safety and feasibility in early-phase clinical trials of adoptive cell immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Dose feasibility is a challenge that may arise in the development of adoptive T cell therapies for cancer. In early-phase clinical trials, dose is quantified either by a fixed or per unit body weight number of cells infused. It may not be feasible, however, to administer a patient's assigned dose due to an insufficient number of cells harvested or functional heterogeneity of the product. The study objective becomes to identify the maximum tolerated dose with high feasibility of being administered. This article describes a new dose-finding method that adaptively accounts for safety and feasibility endpoints in guiding dose allocation. METHODS: We propose an adaptive dose-finding method that integrates accumulating feasibility and safety data to select doses for participant cohorts in early-phase trials examining adoptive cell immunotherapy. We sequentially model the probability of dose-limiting toxicity and the probability of feasibility using independent beta-binomial models. The probability model for toxicity borrows information across all dose levels using isotonic regression, allowing participants infused at a lower dose than his or her planned dose to contribute safety data to the dose-finding algorithm. We applied the proposed methodology in a single simulated trial and evaluated its operating characteristics through extensive simulation studies. RESULTS: In simulations conducted for a phase I study of adoptive immunotherapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma, the proposed method demonstrates the ability to identify accurately the feasible maximum tolerated doses and to treat participants at and around these doses. Over 10 hypothesized scenarios studied, the percentage of correctly selecting the true feasible and maximum tolerated dose ranged from 50% to 90% with sample sizes averaging between 21 and 24 participants. A comparison to the only known existing method accounting for safety and feasibility yields competitive performance. CONCLUSION: We have developed a new practical adaptive dose-finding method to assess feasibility in early-phase adoptive cell therapy trials. A design that incorporates feasibility, as a function of the quantity and quality of the product manufactured, in addition to safety will have an impact on the recommended phase II doses in studies that evaluate patient outcomes.

Oligodendroglioma confers higher risk of radiation necrosis.

BACKGROUND: Radiation therapy (RT) remains a mainstay for the treatment of lower grade gliomas. Radiation neurotoxicity is a serious complication, carrying high morbidity in the absence of tumor progression. The incidence remains poorly categorized and known risk factors identified are related to the radiation modality. We hypothesized that patients with oligodendroglioma have a higher risk of radiation necrosis (RN) as compared to patients with astrocytoma. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of adults with lower grade diffuse gliomas over a 10-year span. The primary outcome was RN, either pathologically confirmed or clinically diagnosed. Cases without pathological confirmation must have been symptomatic, requiring administration of bevacizumab or high-dose steroids. Cox proportional hazard ratios were used for multivariate analyses. RESULTS: In 319 patients, we identified RN in 41 patients (12.9%): 28 patients (21.3%) with oligodendroglioma and 13 (6.9%) with astrocytoma (HR 3.42, p < 0.001). Patients with oligodendroglioma who received > 54 Gy had a higher incidence (31.2%) than those receiving ≤ 54 Gy (14.3%, HR 6.9, p = 0.002). There was no similar correlation among patients with astrocytoma. There was no difference in incidence based on use of concomitant temozolomide. Radiation necrosis appeared within 24 months from radiation in 80.5% of patients. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that patients with oligodendroglioma are at higher risk of developing RN. The incidence increases with increasing radiation dose in patients with oligodendroglioma but not with astrocytoma. RN usually appears within 24 months from RT. Patients with oligodendroglioma receiving > 54 Gy are at highest risk.

Tumor pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

INTRODUCTION: We conducted a phase Ib study (NCT02345824) to determine whether ribociclib, an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6), penetrates tumor tissue and modulates downstream signaling pathways including retinoblastoma protein (Rb) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). METHODS: Study participants received ribociclib (600 mg QD) for 8-21 days before surgical resection of their recurrent GBM. Total and unbound concentrations of ribociclib were measured in samples of tumor tissue, plasma, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). We analyzed tumor specimens obtained from the first (initial/pre-study) and second (recurrent/on-study) surgery by immunohistochemistry for Rb status and downstream signaling of CDK4/6 inhibition. Participants with Rb-positive recurrent tumors continued ribociclib treatment on a 21-day-on, 7-day-off schedule after surgery, and were monitored for toxicity and disease progression. RESULTS: Three participants with recurrent Rb-positive GBM participated in this study. Mean unbound (pharmacologically active) ribociclib concentrations in plasma, CSF, MRI-enhancing, MRI-non-enhancing, and tumor core regions were 0.337 µM, 0.632 µM, 1.242 nmol/g, 0.484 nmol/g, and 1.526 nmol/g, respectively, which exceeded the in vitro IC50 (0.04 µM) for inhibition of CDK4/6 in cell-free assay. Modulation of pharmacodynamic markers of ribociclib CDK 4/6 inhibition in tumor tissues were inconsistent between study participants. No participants experienced serious adverse events, but all experienced early disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that ribociclib penetrated recurrent GBM tissue at concentrations predicted to be therapeutically beneficial. Our study was unable to demonstrate tumor pharmacodynamic correlates of drug activity. Although well tolerated, ribociclib monotherapy seemed ineffective for the treatment of recurrent GBM.

Palliative care education in U.S. adult neuro-oncology fellowship programs.

INTRODUCTION: Palliative care (PC) for patients with neuro-oncological diseases positively impacts morbidity and mortality. No studies have evaluated whether neuro-oncology fellows receive formal PC education during fellowship. The purpose of this study was to describe the PC education and identify education needs of US neuro-oncology fellowship programs. METHODS: Program directors (PDs) of US neuro-oncology fellowships were surveyed. The electronic survey included qualitative and quantitative questions. RESULTS: Of 26 programs with fellows, 17 completed surveys (65% response rate) of which 3 (18%) offered no formal PC education. The methods most utilized were formal didactics (seminars/conferences) and self-directed reading materials. One-third of programs have developed their own teaching materials. Communication was the domain identified as most important, the domain fellows were most well-trained in, and the domain PDs felt most comfortable providing for their own patients. Addressing spiritual distress and initiating life-prolonging therapies were the domains PDs identified as being least important, fellows were least well trained in, and PDs were least comfortable providing for their own patients. Most programs (83%) were satisfied with the PC education available at their program. Time for teaching and faculty availability were the most common barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Neuro-oncology PDs recognize the need for PC education, which is currently offered in some form by most programs, but the content and methods of delivery are heterogenous. Interdisciplinary educational teams and nationally-available PC educational material may improve implementation of PC education in neuro-oncology.

A machine learning classifier trained on cancer transcriptomes detects NF1 inactivation signal in glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: We have identified molecules that exhibit synthetic lethality in cells with loss of the neurofibromin 1 (NF1) tumor suppressor gene. However, recognizing tumors that have inactivation of the NF1 tumor suppressor function is challenging because the loss may occur via mechanisms that do not involve mutation of the genomic locus. Degradation of the NF1 protein, independent of NF1 mutation status, phenocopies inactivating mutations to drive tumors in human glioma cell lines. NF1 inactivation may alter the transcriptional landscape of a tumor and allow a machine learning classifier to detect which tumors will benefit from synthetic lethal molecules. RESULTS: We developed a strategy to predict tumors with low NF1 activity and hence tumors that may respond to treatments that target cells lacking NF1. Using RNAseq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we trained an ensemble of 500 logistic regression classifiers that integrates mutation status with whole transcriptomes to predict NF1 inactivation in glioblastoma (GBM). On TCGA data, the classifier detected NF1 mutated tumors (test set area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) mean = 0.77, 95% quantile = 0.53 - 0.95) over 50 random initializations. On RNA-Seq data transformed into the space of gene expression microarrays, this method produced a classifier with similar performance (test set AUROC mean = 0.77, 95% quantile = 0.53 - 0.96). We applied our ensemble classifier trained on the transformed TCGA data to a microarray validation set of 12 samples with matched RNA and NF1 protein-level measurements. The classifier's NF1 score was associated with NF1 protein concentration in these samples. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that TCGA can be used to train accurate predictors of NF1 inactivation in GBM. The ensemble classifier performed well for samples with very high or very low NF1 protein concentrations but had mixed performance in samples with intermediate NF1 concentrations. Nevertheless, high-performing and validated predictors have the potential to be paired with targeted therapies and personalized medicine.

Immune modulation associated with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) blockade in patients with glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), in addition to being pro-angiogenic, is an immunomodulatory cytokine systemically and in the tumor microenvironment. We previously reported the immunomodulatory effects of radiation and temozolomide (TMZ) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. This study aimed to assess changes in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) populations, plasma cytokines, and growth factor concentrations following treatment with radiation, TMZ, and bevacizumab (BEV). METHODS: Eleven patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were treated with radiation, TMZ, and BEV, following surgery. We measured immune-related PBMC subsets using multi-parameter flow cytometry and plasma cytokine and growth factor concentrations using electrochemiluminescence-based multiplex analysis at baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: The absolute number of peripheral blood regulatory T cells (Tregs) decreased significantly following treatment. The lower number of peripheral Tregs was associated with a CD4+ lymphopenia, and thus, the ratio of Tregs to PBMCs was unchanged. The addition of bevacizumab to standard radiation and temozolomide led to the decrease in the number of circulating Tregs when compared with our prior study. There was a significant decrease in CD8+ cytotoxic and CD4+ recent thymic emigrant T cells, but no change in the number of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Significant increases in plasma VEGF and placental growth factor (PlGF) concentrations were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with radiation, TMZ, and BEV decreased the number but not the proportion of peripheral Tregs and increased the concentration of circulating VEGF. This shift in the peripheral immune cell profile may modulate the tumor environment and have implications for combining immunotherapy with anti-angiogenic therapy.

Implementation of a Molecular Tumor Board: The Impact on Treatment Decisions for 35 Patients Evaluated at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center.

BACKGROUND: Although genetic profiling of tumors is a potentially powerful tool to predict drug sensitivity and resistance, its routine use has been limited because clinicians are often unfamiliar with interpretation and incorporation of the information into practice. We established a Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) to interpret individual patients' tumor genetic profiles and provide treatment recommendations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: DNA from tumor specimens was sequenced in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified laboratory to identify coding mutations in a 50-gene panel (n = 34) or a 255-gene panel (n = 1). Cases were evaluated by a multidisciplinary MTB that included pathologists, oncologists, hematologists, basic scientists, and genetic counselors. RESULTS: During the first year, 35 cases were evaluated by the MTB, with 32 presented for recommendations on targeted therapies, and 3 referred for potential germline mutations. In 56.3% of cases, MTB recommended treatment with a targeted agent based on evaluation of tumor genetic profile and treatment history. Four patients (12.5%) were subsequently treated with a MTB-recommended targeted therapy; 3 of the 4 patients remain on therapy, 2 of whom experienced clinical benefit lasting >10 months. CONCLUSION: For the majority of cases evaluated, the MTB was able to provide treatment recommendations based on targetable genetic alterations. The most common reasons that MTB-recommended therapy was not administered stemmed from patient preferences and genetic profiling at either very early or very late stages of disease; lack of drug access was rarely encountered. Increasing awareness of molecular profiling and targeted therapies by both clinicians and patients will improve acceptance and adherence to treatments that could significantly improve outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Case evaluation by a multidisciplinary Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) is critical to benefit from individualized genetic data and maximize clinical impact. MTB recommendations shaped treatment options for the majority of cases evaluated. In the few patients treated with MTB-recommended therapy, disease outcomes were positive and support genetically informed treatment.

A phase 2 trial of verubulin for recurrent glioblastoma: a prospective study by the Brain Tumor Investigational Consortium (BTIC).

Treatment options are limited for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). Verubulin is a microtubule destabilizer and vascular disrupting agent that achieve high brain concentration relative to plasma in animals. Adults with recurrent GBM who failed prior standard therapy were eligible. The primary endpoint was 1-month progression-free survival (PFS-1) for bevacizumab refractory (Group 2) and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS-6) for bevacizumab naïve patients (Group 1). Verubulin was administered at 3.3 mg/m(2) as a 2-h intravenous infusion once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks in a 4-week cycle. The planned sample size was 34 subjects per cohort. 56 patients (37 men, 19 women) were enrolled, 31 in Group 1 and 25 in Group 2. The PFS-6 for Group 1 was 14% and the PFS-1 for Group 2 was 20%. Median survival from onset of treatment was 9.5 months in Group 1 and 3.4 months in Group 2. Best overall response was partial response (n = 3; 10% in Group 1; n = 1; 4.2% in Group 2) and stable disease (n = 7; 23% in Group 1; n = 5; 21% in Group 2). In Group 1, 38.7% of patients experienced a serious adverse event; however only 3.2% were potentially attributable to study drug. In Group 2, 44% of patients experienced a serious adverse event although none were attributable to study drug. Accrual was terminated early for futility. Single agent verubulin, in this dose and schedule, is well tolerated, associated with moderate but tolerable toxicity but has limited activity in either bevacizumab naïve or refractory recurrent GBM.

A phase II trial of oral gimatecan for recurrent glioblastoma.

Gimatecan is a lipophilic oral camptothecin analogue with preclinical activity in glioma models. We conducted a multicenter phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of gimatecan in adults with recurrent glioblastoma. Eligibility criteria included ≤1 prior treatment for recurrent disease, age ≥18, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, and normal organ function. Patients taking enzyme-inducing anti-seizure medications were excluded. Gimatecan 1.22 mg/m(2) was given orally once daily for 5 consecutive days during each 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 6 months. A Simon 2-stage optimal design was used in which 19 patients were evaluated in the 1st stage, with an additional 36 patients accrued if >4 patients in stage 1 achieved PFS at 6 months. 29 patients were enrolled in the study, with median age of 58 years (range, 25-77 years); 58.6 % female. All patients received prior surgery, radiation therapy, and at least one chemotherapy regimen. The daily dose was reduced to 1.0 mg/m(2) after four of the first 10 patients experienced grade 4 hematologic toxicity. Treatment-related grade 3/4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia (17.2 %), leukopenia (17.2 %) and neutropenia (10.3 %). None of the 19 patients treated at 1.0 mg/m(2)/day experienced grade 4 hematologic toxicity. One patient had a partial radiographic response by modified Macdonald criteria. Only 3 patients (12 %) were progression-free at 6 months. Median time to progression was 12.0 weeks (7.0, 17.0).Treatment with gimatecan 1.0 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days, repeated every 28-days showed minimal efficacy.

Effect of duloxetine on pain, function, and quality of life among patients with chemotherapy-induced painful peripheral neuropathy: a randomized clinical trial.

IMPORTANCE: There are no known effective treatments for painful chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of duloxetine, 60 mg daily, on average pain severity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial at 8 National Cancer Institute (NCI)-funded cooperative research networks that enrolled 231 patients who were 25 years or older being treated at community and academic settings between April 2008 and March 2011. Study follow-up was completed July 2012. Stratified by chemotherapeutic drug and comorbid pain risk, patients were randomized to receive either duloxetine followed by placebo or placebo followed by duloxetine. Eligibility required that patients have grade 1 or higher sensory neuropathy according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and at least 4 on a scale of 0 to 10, representing average chemotherapy-induced pain, after paclitaxel, other taxane, or oxaliplatin treatment. INTERVENTIONS: The initial treatment consisted of taking 1 capsule daily of either 30 mg of duloxetine or placebo for the first week and 2 capsules of either 30 mg of duloxetine or placebo daily for 4 additional weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary hypothesis was that duloxetine would be more effective than placebo in decreasing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathic pain. Pain severity was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form "average pain" item with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing as bad as can be imagined. RESULTS: Individuals receiving duloxetine as their initial 5-week treatment reported a mean decrease in average pain of 1.06 (95% CI, 0.72-1.40) vs 0.34 (95% CI, 0.01-0.66) among those who received placebo (P = .003; effect size, 0.513). The observed mean difference in the average pain score between duloxetine and placebo was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.26-1.20). Fifty-nine percent of those initially receiving duloxetine vs 38% of those initially receiving placebo reported decreased pain of any amount. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with painful chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, the use of duloxetine compared with placebo for 5 weeks resulted in a greater reduction in pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00489411.

Relevance of the Updated Recursive Partitioning Analysis (U-RPA) Classification in the Contemporary Care of Patients with Brain Metastases.

Patients with brain metastases (BMETS) need information about the prognosis and potential value of treatment options to make informed therapeutic decisions, but tools to predict survival in contemporary practice are scarce. We propose an Updated Recursive Partitioning Analysis (U-RPA) instrument to predict survival and benefit from brain-directed treatment (BDT) of contemporary patients. This was a retrospective analysis of patients with BMETS treated between 2017 and 2019. With survival as the primary endpoint, we calculated the U-RPA and generated estimates using Kaplan-Meier curves and hazard ratios. Of 862 eligible patients, 752 received BDT and 110 received best supportive care (BSC). Median overall survival with BDT and BSC was 9.3 and 1.3 months, respectively. Patients in RPA class 1, 2A, 2B and 3 who underwent BDT had median survival of 28.1, 14.7, 7.6 and 3.3 months, respectively. The median survival for patients in RPA 3 who received BDT (n = 147), WBRT (n = 79) and SRS (n = 54) was 3.3, 2.9 and 4.1 months, respectively. The U-RPA defines prognosis estimates, independent of tumor type and treatment modality, which can assist to make value-based care treatment decisions. The prognosis for patients in U-RPA class 2B and 3 remains poor, with consideration for early palliative care involvement in these cases.

Alliance A071401: Phase II Trial of Focal Adhesion Kinase Inhibition in Meningiomas With Somatic NF2 Mutations.

PURPOSE: Patients with progressive or recurrent meningiomas have limited systemic therapy options. Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) inhibition has a synthetic lethal relationship with NF2 loss. Given the predominance of NF2 mutations in meningiomas, we evaluated the efficacy of GSK2256098, a FAK inhibitor, as part of the first genomically driven phase II study in recurrent or progressive grade 1-3 meningiomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients whose tumors screened positively for NF2 mutations were treated with GSK2256098, 750 mg orally twice daily, until progressive disease. Efficacy was evaluated using two coprimary end points: progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6) and response rate by Macdonald criteria, where PFS6 was evaluated separately within grade-based subgroups: grade 1 versus 2/3 meningiomas. Per study design, the FAK inhibitor would be considered promising in this patient population if either end point met the corresponding decision criteria for efficacy. RESULTS: Of 322 patients screened for all mutation cohorts of the study, 36 eligible and evaluable patients with NF2 mutations were enrolled and treated: 12 grade 1 and 24 grade 2/3 patients. Across all grades, one patient had a partial response and 24 had stable disease as their best response to treatment. In grade 1 patients, the observed PFS6 rate was 83% (10/12 patients; 95% CI, 52 to 98). In grade 2/3 patients, the observed PFS6 rate was 33% (8/24 patients; 95% CI, 16 to 55). The study met the PFS6 efficacy end point both for the grade 1 and the grade 2/3 cohorts. Treatment was well tolerated; seven patients had a maximum grade 3 adverse event that was at least possibly related to treatment with no grade 4 or 5 events. CONCLUSION: GSK2256098 was well tolerated and resulted in an improved PFS6 rate in patients with recurrent or progressive NF2-mutated meningiomas, compared with historical controls. The criteria for promising activity were met, and FAK inhibition warrants further evaluation for this patient population.