Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: a useful test for monitoring ototoxicity induced by pegylated interferon and ribavirin treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Pegylated-interferon (peg-IFN) and ribavirin combination therapy for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is well known to be associated with significant adverse effects. Several studies have investigated a possible auditory pathway involvement during IFN therapy, but a method to monitor the potential auditory involvement during treatment has not yet been described. The aim of this study is to evaluate possible modifications of the outer hair cell (OHC) function in HCV patients receiving peg-IFN and ribavirin combination therapy. Thirteen adult HCV patients (8 F/5 M, mean age 52∓12 years) treated with peg-IFN and ribavirin combination therapy underwent Pure Tone Audiogram and Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission (DPOAE) tests. We compared mean auditory thresholds (PTA) and mean DPOAE amplitude before, at month 3 during, and at the end of treatment (T0, T3, and Tend, respectively), and 3 months after treatment discontinuation (Tfu). No significant differences were found in hearing levels at the different time points analyzed. During treatment, three patients developed tinnitus, which in 2 cases resolved spontaneously after the end of therapy. Compared to T0 (19.5±0.83), a statistically significant DPOAE increase at T3 (30±1,26) and Tend (28.6±2.16) was found (p<0.05 at both time points), while DPOAEs returned to pre-treatment levels at Tfu (19.3±1.3). In our group, none of the patients reported a permanent auditory impairment, excluding one patient with persistent tinnitus. Peg-IFN could produce an increase of motility of the OHCs by means of intracellular pathways. DPOAE test could be considered a new method for monitoring ototoxicity induced by IFN. On the basis of recent literature and our audiological results, physicians should be aware of the possible ototoxic effects of peg-IFN, requiring appropriate surveillance, and the patient should be informed of the potential side effects of IFN therapy on the auditory pathway.

Double-blind, randomised, multi-centre clinical study evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of nimesulide in comparison with etodalac in patients suffering from osteoarthritis of the knee.

In a double-blind study, the efficacy and tolerability of nimesulide 200mg/day, administered orally, was compared with etodolac 600mg/day in the treatment, for 3 months, of 200 patients suffering from osteoarthritis of the knee. Although spontaneous pain showed a significant improvement during the course of the study, there was no difference in the efficacy of either compound. Similarly, there was a progressive and significant reduction in the Lequesne functional index although no statistical difference was found between nimesulide and etodolac. The physician's overall assessment of efficacy was significantly in favour of nimesulide but the same assessment for patients who completed all 12 weeks showed no such bias. Adverse events (AEs) were generally mild or moderate and were commonly gastrointestinal in origin. There was no difference in the rate of incidence of AEs and, with the exception of week 8 where etodolac was apparently better tolerated, there were no statistical differences in tolerability between the two therapies.

5-Fluorouracil-interferon-alpha 2b adjuvant treatment of Dukes C colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine whether interferon: alpha 2b can improve results of 5-fluorouracil adjuvant treatment of Dukes C colorectal cancer patients, we compared the outcome of patients receiving a fluorouracil-interferon combination to that of historic controls treated with fluorouracil alone. METHODS: Fifty-seven Dukes C colorectal cancer patients were given 5-fluorouracil-interferon-alpha 2b adjuvant treatment from October 1986 to September 1990. The results were compared with those obtained in 51 consecutive patients treated at the same institutions with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) alone (used at the same doses and schedule) between 1983 and 1986. The main prognostic variables were similar in the two groups. RESULTS: No life-threatening toxicity occurred in either group. The addition of interferon (IFN) slightly impaired tolerance to the treatment; however, the dose of IFN had to be reduced only in five patients and discontinued in one patient. Grade 3 and 4 myelotoxicity was rare and not substantially different in the two groups. Interferon-related side effects (fever, flu-like syndrome, malaise, etc.) were frequent, but, in general, mild or moderate. At the time of this analysis (July 1992), median follow-up was 49 (range, 20-70) months in the group of patients treated with 5-FU+IFN, and 86 (range, 68-103) months in the group receiving 5-FU alone. There were 17 recurrences and 15 cancer-related deaths among patients receiving combined treatment, and 27 deaths in the group treated with 5-FU alone. Both five-year relapse-free survival (65 percent vs. 47 percent; P = 0.043) and cause-specific survival (64 percent vs. 46 percent; P = 0.038) were significantly better in the patients receiving combined treatment. After correction for the influence of prognostic pretreatment variables, 5-FU+IFN again afforded a significant advantage in terms of both relapse-free (P < 0.01) and overall survival (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: 5-FU-IFN-alpha 2b treatment seems to improve the prognosis in Dukes C colorectal cancer patients.