RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with immune dysregulation, but epidemiologic data on the pattern of autoimmune comorbidity in people with AD are limited. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the risk of autoimmune conditions in people newly diagnosed with AD. METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis (January 2009 to December 2018), using the UK-based Oxford-Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre primary care database. We compared baseline prevalence and incidence after diagnosis of autoimmune conditions in 173,709 children and adults with new-onset AD and 694,836 age-, sex-, and general practitioner practice-matched controls. Outcomes were a composite of any autoimmune condition (Crohn disease, ulcerative colitis, celiac disease, pernicious anemia, type 1 diabetes, autoimmune hypothyroidism, Graves disease, psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren syndrome, vitiligo, alopecia areata, and multiple sclerosis) and each individual autoimmune condition. RESULTS: Preexisting autoimmune conditions were more common in people diagnosed with AD compared to controls (composite 5.8% vs 4.3%). Excluding people with preexisting autoimmune disease, there was an association between AD and incidence of new-onset autoimmune disease (composite adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-1.34). Risk was highest for more severe AD (aHR 1.99; 95% CI 1.77-2.23) than moderate AD (aHR 1.33; 95% CI 1.19-1.49) or mild AD (aHR 1.22; 95% CI 1.16-1.28). People with AD were at significantly increased risk of developing psoriatic arthritis, Sjögren syndrome, Crohn disease, vitiligo, alopecia areata, pernicious anemia, ulcerative colitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and hypothyroidism (aHR range 1.17-2.06), but not other autoimmune conditions. CONCLUSION: People with AD have an increased risk of multiple autoimmune conditions, especially those with more severe AD.
Asunto(s)
Alopecia Areata , Anemia Perniciosa , Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Colitis Ulcerosa , Enfermedad de Crohn , Dermatitis Atópica , Hipotiroidismo , Síndrome de Sjögren , Vitíligo , Adulto , Alopecia Areata/epidemiología , Anemia Perniciosa/complicaciones , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/epidemiología , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/etiología , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Colitis Ulcerosa/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Crohn/epidemiología , Dermatitis Atópica/complicaciones , Dermatitis Atópica/epidemiología , Humanos , Hipotiroidismo/complicaciones , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) have a suboptimal response to systemic therapy. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed predictors of nonresponse to dupilumab in patients with AD. METHODS: Data (April 2017 through June 2019) for patients aged 12 years and above with AD (International Classification of Diseases-9/10-Clinical Modification: 691.8/L20.x) who initiated dupilumab on or after April 1, 2017 (index date) were collected from an electronic health record and insurance claims database. Nonresponse indicators (dupilumab discontinuation, addition of another systemic therapy or phototherapy, addition of a high-potency topical corticosteroid, AD-related hospital visit, AD-related emergency department visit, incident skin infection) were predicted from available demographic and clinical variables using machine learning. RESULTS: Among 419 patients (mean age: 45 years), 145 (35%) experienced at least 1 indicator of nonresponse in the 6-month postindex period. In patients with at least 1 indicator, the most common was dupilumab discontinuation (47% [68/145]). Of note, this analysis could not capture nonmedical reasons for dupilumab discontinuation (eg, cost, access). The most common predictors of nonresponse were a claim for ibuprofen (in 69% of patients with a nonresponse indicator) and a Quan-Charlson Comorbidity Index value of 3 to 4 (59%). CONCLUSION: Systemic dupilumab therapy for AD can be associated with a relatively high prevalence of nonresponse indicators. Factors associated with these indicators-that is, predictors of nonresponse-may be used to optimize disease management.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Dermatitis Atópica/complicaciones , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Aprendizaje Automático , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The heterogeneous course of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis necessitates treatment flexibility. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the maintenance of abrocitinib-induced response with continuous abrocitinib treatment, dose reduction or withdrawal, and response to treatment reintroduction following flare (JAK1 Atopic Dermatitis Efficacy and Safety [JADE] REGIMEN: National Clinical Trial 03627767). METHODS: Patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis responding to open-label abrocitinib 200 mg monotherapy for 12 weeks were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to blinded abrocitinib (200 or 100 mg) or placebo for 40 weeks. Patients experiencing flare received rescue treatment (abrocitinib 200 mg plus topical therapy). RESULTS: Of 1233 patients, 798 responders to induction (64.7%) were randomly assigned. The flare probability during maintenance was 18.9%, 42.6%, and 80.9% with abrocitinib 200 mg, abrocitinib 100 mg, and placebo, respectively. Among patients with flare in the abrocitinib 200 mg, abrocitinib 100 mg, and placebo groups, 36.6%, 58.8%, and 81.6% regained investigator global assessment 0/1 response, respectively, and 55.0%, 74.5%, and 91.8% regained eczema area and severity index response, respectively, with rescue treatment. During maintenance, 63.2% and 54.0% of patients receiving abrocitinib 200 and 100 mg, respectively, experienced adverse events. LIMITATIONS: The definition of protocol-defined flare was not established, limiting the generalizability of findings. CONCLUSION: Induction treatment with abrocitinib was effective; most responders continuing abrocitinib did not flare. Rescue treatment with abrocitinib plus topical therapy effectively recaptured response.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Janus Quinasa 1 , Pirimidinas , Retratamiento , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Sulfonamidas , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Abrocitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, was effective and well tolerated in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in a phase 2b trial. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib monotherapy in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. METHODS: In this multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial (JADE MONO-1), patients (aged ≥12 years) with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (Investigator Global Assessment score ≥3, Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI] score ≥16, percentage of body surface area affected ≥10%, and Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale score ≥4) with a bodyweight of 40 kg or more, were enrolled at 69 sites in Australia, Canada, Europe, and the USA. Patients were randomly assigned (2:2:1) to oral abrocitinib 100 mg, abrocitinib 200 mg, or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Randomisation was done using an interactive response technology system, stratified by baseline disease severity and age. Patients, investigators, and the funder of the study were masked to study treatment. The coprimary endpoints were the proportion of patients who had achieved an Investigator Global Assessment response (score of 0 [clear] or 1 [almost clear] with a ≥2-grade improvement from baseline), and the proportion of patients who achieved at least a 75% improvement in EASI score from baseline (EASI-75) score, both assessed at week 12. Efficacy was assessed in the full analysis set, which included all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study medication. Safety was assessed in all randomised patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03349060. FINDINGS: Between Dec 7, 2017, and March 26, 2019, 387 patients were enrolled: 156 were assigned to abrocitinib 100 mg, 154 to abrocitinib 200 mg, and 77 to placebo. All enrolled patients received at least one dose of study treatment and thus were evaluable for 12-week efficacy. Of the patients with available data for the coprimary endpoints at week 12, the proportion of patients who had achieved an Investigator Global Assessment response was significantly higher in the abrocitinib 100 mg group than in the placebo group (37 [24%] of 156 patients vs six [8%] of 76 patients; p=0·0037) and in the abrocitinib 200 mg group compared with the placebo group (67 [44%] of 153 patients vs six [8%] of 76 patients; p<0·0001). Of the patients with available data for the coprimary endpoints at week 12, compared with the placebo group, the proportion of patients who had achieved an EASI-75 response was significantly higher in the abrocitinib 100 mg group (62 [40%] of 156 patients vs nine [12%] of 76 patients; p<0·0001) and abrocitinib 200 mg group (96 [63%] of 153 patients vs nine [12%] of 76 patients; p<0·0001). Adverse events were reported in 108 (69%) of 156 patients in the abrocitinib 100 mg group, 120 (78%) of 154 patients in the abrocitinib 200 mg group, and 44 (57%) of 77 patients in the placebo group. Serious adverse events were reported in five (3%) of 156 patients in the abrocitinib 100 mg group, five (3%) of 154 patients in the abrocitinib 200 mg group, and three (4%) of 77 patients in the placebo group. No treatment-related deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: Monotherapy with oral abrocitinib once daily was effective and well tolerated in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. FUNDING: Pfizer.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Eccema/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Australia/epidemiología , Canadá/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Dermatitis Atópica/patología , Método Doble Ciego , Eccema/patología , Etnicidad , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Janus Quinasa 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Placebos/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Seguridad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Whilst eczema is a common inflammatory skin condition, we lack contemporary estimates of disease incidence and prevalence across the lifespan. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence and prevalence of eczema in children and adults in England and variation by sociodemographic factors (sex, socio-economic status, ethnicity, and geography). METHODS: We used the Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre primary care research database of 3.85 million children and adults registered with participating general practitioner practices between 2009 and 2018 inclusive. Eczema incidence was defined as the first-ever diagnosis of eczema recorded in the primary care record, and eczema prevalence was defined as fulfilment of criteria for active eczema (two eczema records appearing in the primary care record within any one-year period). RESULTS: Eczema incidence was highest in infants younger than 1 year (15.0 per 100 person-years), lowest in adults aged 40-49 (0.35 p/100 person-years), and increased from middle age to a second smaller peak in people 80 years or older (0.79 p/100 person-years). Eczema prevalence was highest in children aged 2 (16.5%) and lowest in adults aged 30-39 (2.8%). Eczema incidence was higher in male infants (<2) and male adults older than 70; for all other ages, incidence was higher in females. Eczema was more common in Asian and black ethnic groups than in people of white ethnicity. Higher socio-economic status was associated with a greater incidence of eczema in infants younger than 2, but the reverse was seen for all other age groups. Both incidence and prevalence of eczema were greater in urban settings and in North-West England. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Eczema has a bimodal distribution across the lifespan. We observed differences in incidence and prevalence of eczema by ethnicity, geography, sex, and socio-economic status, which varied in magnitude throughout life.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Atención Primaria de Salud , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Survivors of a traumatic brain injury can deteriorate years later, developing brain atrophy and dementia. Traumatic brain injury triggers chronic microglial activation, but it is unclear whether this is harmful or beneficial. A successful chronic-phase treatment for traumatic brain injury might be to target microglia. In experimental models, the antibiotic minocycline inhibits microglial activation. We investigated the effect of minocycline on microglial activation and neurodegeneration using PET, MRI, and measurement of the axonal protein neurofilament light in plasma. Microglial activation was assessed using 11C-PBR28 PET. The relationships of microglial activation to measures of brain injury, and the effects of minocycline on disease progression, were assessed using structural and diffusion MRI, plasma neurofilament light, and cognitive assessment. Fifteen patients at least 6 months after a moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury received either minocycline 100 mg orally twice daily or no drug, for 12 weeks. At baseline, 11C-PBR28 binding in patients was increased compared to controls in cerebral white matter and thalamus, and plasma neurofilament light levels were elevated. MRI measures of white matter damage were highest in areas of greater 11C-PBR28 binding. Minocycline reduced 11C-PBR28 binding (mean Δwhite matter binding = -23.30%, 95% confidence interval -40.9 to -5.64%, P = 0.018), but increased plasma neurofilament light levels. Faster rates of brain atrophy were found in patients with higher baseline neurofilament light levels. In this experimental medicine study, minocycline after traumatic brain injury reduced chronic microglial activation while increasing a marker of neurodegeneration. These findings suggest that microglial activation has a reparative effect in the chronic phase of traumatic brain injury.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/tratamiento farmacológico , Microglía/efectos de los fármacos , Minociclina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastornos del Conocimiento/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastornos del Conocimiento/etiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador , Estudios Longitudinales , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Microglía/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas/inducido químicamente , Proteínas de Neurofilamentos/metabolismo , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Pirimidinas/farmacocinética , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a common disabling condition with limited treatment options. Diffusion tensor imaging measures recovery of axonal injury in white matter (WM) tracts after TBI. Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) after TBI may impair axonal and neuropsychological recovery, and serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) may mediate this effect. We conducted a longitudinal study to determine the effects of baseline serum IGF-I concentrations on WM tract and neuropsychological recovery after TBI. METHODS: Thirty-nine adults after TBI (84.6% male, median age = 30.5 years, 87.2% moderate-severe, median time since TBI = 16.3 months, n = 4 with GHD) were scanned twice, 13.3 months (range = 12.1-14.9) apart, and 35 healthy controls were scanned once. Symptom and quality of life questionnaires and cognitive assessments were completed at both visits (n = 33). Our main outcome measure was fractional anisotropy (FA), a measure of WM tract integrity, in a priori regions of interest: splenium of corpus callosum (SPCC) and posterior limb of internal capsule (PLIC). RESULTS: At baseline, FA was reduced in many WM tracts including SPCC and PLIC following TBI compared to controls, indicating axonal injury, with longitudinal increases indicating axonal recovery. There was a significantly greater increase in SPCC FA over time in patients with serum IGF-I above versus below the median for age. Only the higher IGF-I group had significant improvements in immediate verbal memory recall over time. INTERPRETATION: WM recovery and memory improvements after TBI were greater in patients with higher serum IGF-I at baseline. These findings suggest that the growth hormone/IGF-I system may be a potential therapeutic target following TBI. Ann Neurol 2017;82:30-43.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/patología , Factor I del Crecimiento Similar a la Insulina/metabolismo , Sustancia Blanca/patología , Adulto , Anisotropía , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Imagen de Difusión Tensora , Femenino , Hormona del Crecimiento/deficiencia , Humanos , Cápsula Interna/patología , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Neuroimagen , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Músculos Paraespinales/patología , Calidad de Vida , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Pituitary dysfunction is a recognised, but potentially underdiagnosed complication of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Post-traumatic hypopituitarism (PTHP) can have major consequences for patients physically, psychologically, emotionally and socially, leading to reduced quality of life, depression and poor rehabilitation outcome. However, studies on the incidence of PTHP have yielded highly variable findings. The risk factors and pathophysiology of this condition are also not yet fully understood. There is currently no national consensus for the screening and detection of PTHP in patients with TBI, with practice likely varying significantly between centres. In view of this, a guidance development group consisting of expert clinicians involved in the care of patients with TBI, including neurosurgeons, neurologists, neurointensivists and endocrinologists, was convened to formulate national guidance with the aim of facilitating consistency and uniformity in the care of patients with TBI, and ensuring timely detection or exclusion of PTHP where appropriate. This article summarises the current literature on PTHP, and sets out guidance for the screening and management of pituitary dysfunction in adult patients with TBI. It is hoped that future research will lead to more definitive recommendations in the form of guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/diagnóstico , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/terapia , Hipopituitarismo/diagnóstico , Hipopituitarismo/terapia , Tamizaje Masivo , Insuficiencia Suprarrenal/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Suprarrenal/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Suprarrenal/terapia , Adulto , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/fisiopatología , Diagnóstico Precoz , Intervención Médica Temprana , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hipopituitarismo/fisiopatología , Síndrome de Secreción Inadecuada de ADH/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Secreción Inadecuada de ADH/fisiopatología , Síndrome de Secreción Inadecuada de ADH/terapia , Masculino , Admisión del Paciente , Pruebas de Función Hipofisaria , Adenohipófisis/fisiopatología , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of long-term disability with variable recovery. Preclinical studies suggest that vitamin D status influences the recovery after TBI. However, there is no published clinical data on links between vitamin D status and TBI outcomes. The aim was to determine the (i) prevalence of vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency, and associations of vitamin D status with (ii) demographic factors and TBI severity, and with (iii) cognitive function, symptoms and quality of life, in adults after TBI. DESIGN: Retrospective audit of patients seen between July 2009 and March 2015. Serum vitamin D (25-hydroxy-cholecalciferol) was categorized as deficient (<40 nmol/l), insufficient (40-70 nmol/l) or replete (>70 nmol/l). PATIENTS: A total of 353 adults seen in tertiary hospital clinic (75·4% lighter skinned, 74·8% male, age median 35·1 year, range 26·6-48·3 year), 0·3-56·5 months after TBI (74·5% moderate-severe). MEASUREMENTS: Serum vitamin D concentrations; Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (ACE-R), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), SF-36 Quality of Life, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. RESULTS: In total, 46·5% of patients after TBI had vitamin D deficiency and 80·2% insufficiency/deficiency. Patients with vitamin D deficiency had lower ACE-R scores than those of vitamin D replete (mean effect size ± SEM 4·5 ± 2·1, P = 0·034), and higher BDI-II scores than those of vitamin D insufficient (4·5 ± 1·6, P = 0·003), correcting for age, gender, time since TBI and TBI severity. There was no association between vitamin D status and markers of TBI severity, sleep or quality of life. CONCLUSION: Vitamin D deficiency is common in patients after TBI and associated with impaired cognitive function and more severe depressive symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/etiología , Adulto , Disfunción Cognitiva/etiología , Depresión/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , SueñoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: PET can image neuroinflammation by targeting the translocator protein (TSPO), which is upregulated in activated microglia. The high nonspecific binding of the first-generation TSPO radioligand [11C]PK-11195 limits accurate quantification. [18F]GE-180, a novel TSPO ligand, displays superior binding to [11C]PK-11195 in vitro. Our objectives were to: (1) evaluate tracer characteristics of [18F]GE-180 in the brains of healthy human subjects; and (2) investigate whether the TSPO Ala147Thr polymorphism influences outcome measures. METHODS: Ten volunteers (five high-affinity binders, HABs, and five mixed-affinity binders, MABs) underwent a dynamic PET scan with arterial sampling after injection of [18F]GE-180. Kinetic modelling of time-activity curves with one-tissue and two-tissue compartment models and Logan graphical analysis was applied to the data. The primary outcome measure was the total volume of distribution (V T) across various regions of interest (ROIs). Secondary outcome measures were the standardized uptake values (SUV), the distribution volume and SUV ratios estimated using a pseudoreference region. RESULTS: The two-tissue compartment model was the best model. The average regional delivery rate constant (K 1) was 0.01 mL cm-3 min-1 indicating low extraction across the blood-brain barrier (1 %). The estimated median V T across all ROIs was also low, ranging from 0.16 mL cm-3 in the striatum to 0.38 mL cm-3 in the thalamus. There were no significant differences in V T between HABs and MABs across all ROIs. CONCLUSION: A reversible two-tissue compartment model fitted the data well and determined that the tracer has a low first-pass extraction (approximately 1 %) and low V T estimates in healthy individuals. There was no observable dependency on the rs6971 polymorphism as compared to other second-generation TSPO PET tracers. Investigation of [18F]GE-180 in populations with neuroinflammatory disease is needed to determine its suitability for quantitative assessment of TSPO expression.
Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Carbazoles/farmacocinética , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador/métodos , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Receptores de GABA/metabolismo , Adulto , Algoritmos , Simulación por Computador , Humanos , Aumento de la Imagen/métodos , Cinética , Tasa de Depuración Metabólica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Neurológicos , Imagen Molecular/métodos , Radiofármacos/farmacocinética , Receptores de GABA/genética , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
Two patients (68 and 71 years, both female) with sight threatening, active Graves orbitopathy but low clinical activity score underwent MRI scans before and after intravenous corticosteroid treatment. Two MRI techniques, short-term inversion recovery and nonechoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging, were used. Apparent diffusion coefficient values reduced in patient 1 who had successful medical treatment and remained elevated in patient 2 who had an inadequate treatment response. Nonechoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging provided a quantitative measure of treatment response by calculation of the apparent diffusion coefficient. The novel use of nonechoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging for monitoring treatment response in Graves orbitopathy is illustrated but requires further validation.
Asunto(s)
Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Oftalmopatía de Graves/diagnóstico , Órbita/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Oftalmopatía de Graves/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Pituitary dysfunction is a recognized consequence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) that causes cognitive, psychological, and metabolic impairment. Hormone replacement offers a therapeutic opportunity. Blast TBI (bTBI) from improvised explosive devices is commonly seen in soldiers returning from recent conflicts. We investigated: (1) the prevalence and consequences of pituitary dysfunction following moderate to severe bTBI and (2) whether it is associated with particular patterns of brain injury. METHODS: Nineteen male soldiers with moderate to severe bTBI (median age = 28.3 years) and 39 male controls with moderate to severe nonblast TBI (nbTBI; median age = 32.3 years) underwent full dynamic endocrine assessment between 2 and 48 months after injury. In addition, soldiers had structural brain magnetic resonance imaging, including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and cognitive assessment. RESULTS: Six of 19 (32.0%) soldiers with bTBI, but only 1 of 39 (2.6%) nbTBI controls, had anterior pituitary dysfunction (p = 0.004). Two soldiers had hyperprolactinemia, 2 had growth hormone (GH) deficiency, 1 had adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) deficiency, and 1 had combined GH/ACTH/gonadotrophin deficiency. DTI measures of white matter structure showed greater traumatic axonal injury in the cerebellum and corpus callosum in those soldiers with pituitary dysfunction than in those without. Soldiers with pituitary dysfunction after bTBI also had a higher prevalence of skull/facial fractures and worse cognitive function. Four soldiers (21.1%) commenced hormone replacement(s) for hypopituitarism. INTERPRETATION: We reveal a high prevalence of anterior pituitary dysfunction in soldiers suffering moderate to severe bTBI, which was more frequent than in a matched group of civilian moderate to severe nbTBI subjects. We recommend that all patients with moderate to severe bTBI should routinely have comprehensive assessment of endocrine function.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Explosión/complicaciones , Lesiones Encefálicas/complicaciones , Lesiones Encefálicas/etiología , Enfermedades de la Hipófisis/etiología , Adulto , Anisotropía , Lesiones Encefálicas/epidemiología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Conocimiento/etiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal Militar , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Enfermedades de la Hipófisis/epidemiología , Enfermedades de la Hipófisis/psicología , Prevalencia , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The clinical activity score (CAS) and European severity scale (ESS) are established clinical tools to assess thyroid eye disease (TED) but are limited in terms of subjectivity and their reliability in non-Caucasian individuals, and can underestimate significant disease in the posterior orbit. Preliminary data from pilot studies have shown that diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using extraocular muscle (EOM) apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements may provide complementary information in TED. This study expands on previous research to assess for correlations between clinical scores and EOM-ADCs in stratifying disease activity and severity in a large patient cohort from an ethnically diverse population. METHODS: A retrospective review of TED clinics between 2011 and 2021 identified 96 patients with a documented CAS and ESS and an orbital MRI that included DWI. From regions of interest manually placed on EOM bellies, the highest ADC was computed for each patient and analysed for correlations and associations with CAS and ESS using Spearman Rank correlation and Mann-Whitney U tests, and any potential discriminatory cut-offs using Receiver Operator Curve analyses. A p-value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. RESULTS: EOM-ADCs showed a positive association with CAS (p ≤ 0.001). EOM-ADCs were higher in sight-threatening compared to mild disease (p ≤ 0.01). A cut-off of 995 mm2/s achieved AUC = 0.7744, equating to 77% sensitivity and 67% specificity for discrimination between mild-moderate and sight-threatening disease. CONCLUSION: EOM-ADCs correlate with higher scores of disease severity and activity in TED. Besides providing quantitative data to support clinical tools, EOM-ADC cut-offs may identify patients at risk of developing sight-threatening diseases. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study critically evaluates the limitations of conventional clinical assessment tools for TED and demonstrates the utility of DWI scans with ADC measurements in identifying active disease, offering valuable insights to advance clinical radiology practice. KEY POINTS: Conventional tools for TED assessment have subjective limitations. ADCs from non-echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging correlate with clinical activity. Non-echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging offers quantitative assessment to aid clinical practice reliability.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Early prediction of abrocitinib efficacy in atopic dermatitis (AD) could help identify candidates for an early dose increase. A predictive model determined week 12 efficacy based on week 4 responses in patients receiving abrocitinib 100 mg/day and assessed the effect of an abrocitinib dose increase on platelet counts. METHODS: Analysis included the phase 3 trials JADE MONO-1 (NCT03349060), MONO-2 (NCT03575871), COMPARE (NCT03720470), and TEEN (NCT03796676). For platelet counts and simulations, a phase 2 psoriasis trial (NCT02201524) and phase 2b (NCT02780167) and phase 3 (MONO-1, MONO-2, and REGIMEN (NCT03627767)) abrocitinib trials were pooled. A training-and-validation framework assessed potential predictors of response at week 4: score and score change from baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), and Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS), and percentage change from baseline in EASI. The dependent variables at week 12 were ≥ 75% improvement in EASI (EASI-75) and IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and ≥ 2-point improvement from baseline. The probability of each variable to predict week 12 EASI-75 and IGA responses was calculated. RESULTS: In the training cohort (n = 453), 72% of the ≥ 50% improvement in EASI (EASI-50) at week 4 responders and 16% of the nonresponders with abrocitinib 100 mg achieved EASI-75 at week 12; 48% and 6% of the week 4 EASI-50 responders and nonresponders, respectively, achieved week 12 IGA response. Similar results occurred with week 4 IGA = 2, ≥ 4-point improvement from baseline in PP-NRS, or EASI = 8 responders/nonresponders. Platelet counts after an abrocitinib dose increase from 100 to 200 mg were similar to those seen with continuous dosing with abrocitinib 100 mg or 200 mg. CONCLUSION: Achieving week 4 clinical responses with abrocitinib 100 mg may be useful in predicting week 12 responses. Week 4 nonresponders may benefit from a dose increase to abrocitinib 200 mg, and those that receive this dose increase are likely to achieve treatment success at week 12, with no significant impact on platelet count recovery. Video abstract available for this article. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03349060, NCT03575871, NCT03720470, NCT03796676, NCT02201524, NCT02780167 and NCT03627767.
Abrocitinib is an approved treatment for people with moderate or severe atopic dermatitis. Abrocitinib tablets are available in two doses (100 and 200 mg) and are taken by mouth once daily. Some people with atopic dermatitis who are taking abrocitinib 100 mg may need to increase the dose to 200 mg to get adequate symptom relief. We studied whether people with atopic dermatitis who did or did not experience clear skin or itch relief after taking abrocitinib 100 mg for 4 weeks are likely or not likely to experience relief after 12 weeks of treatment. We also defined the level of response after 4 weeks of treatment that best differentiates people who did or did not experience symptom relief, and we identified who might benefit from increasing the abrocitinib dose from 100 to 200 mg. We found that people with atopic dermatitis who had symptom relief after 4 weeks of abrocitinib 100 mg treatment were much more likely to have greater relief after 12 weeks, and people who did not achieve symptom relief after 4 weeks may benefit from a dose increase at week 4. Some people who receive abrocitinib 200 mg may have a temporary decrease in the number of certain blood cells called platelets at week 4, but platelets return to near-normal levels by week 12. This analysis showed that increasing the abrocitinib dose from 100 to 200 mg at week 4 did not seem to affect the platelet numbers after week 4. Video abstract (MP4 174529 KB).
RESUMEN
Abrocitinib, an oral, once-daily, Janus kinase (JAK) 1-selective inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Abrocitinib has shown rapid and sustained efficacy in phase 3 trials and a consistent, manageable safety profile in long-term studies. Rapid itch relief and skin clearance are more likely to be achieved with a 200-mg daily dose of abrocitinib than with dupilumab. All oral JAK inhibitors are associated with adverse events of special interest and laboratory changes, and initial risk assessment and follow-up monitoring are important. Appropriate selection of patients and adequate monitoring are key for the safe use of JAK inhibitors. Here, we review the practical use of abrocitinib and discuss characteristics of patients who are candidates for abrocitinib therapy. In general, abrocitinib may be used in all appropriate patients with moderate-to-severe AD in need of systemic therapy, provided there are no contraindications, e.g., in patients with active serious systemic infections and those with severe hepatic impairment, as well as pregnant or breastfeeding women. For patients aged ≥ 65 years, current long-time or past long-time smokers, and those with risk factors for venous thromboembolism, major adverse cardiovascular events, or malignancies, a meticulous benefit-risk assessment is recommended, and it is advised to start with the 100-mg dose, when abrocitinib is the selected treatment option.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Abrocitinib, an oral, once-daily Janus kinase 1-selective inhibitor, improved itch severity, sleep, and work productivity versus placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate relationships among itch, sleep, and work productivity in the phase III JADE MONO-2 clinical trial. METHODS: A repeated-measures longitudinal model was used to examine relationships between itch (using the Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale [PP-NRS] or Nighttime Itch Scale [NTIS]) and sleep disturbance/loss (using the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure sleep item and SCORing AD Sleep Loss Visual Analog Scale) and, separately, between itch and work productivity (using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-Atopic Dermatitis Version 2.0 questionnaire). Mediation modelling was used to investigate the effect of treatment (abrocitinib vs placebo) on work impairment via improvements in itch and sleep. RESULTS: The relationships between itch/sleep and itch/work productivity were approximately linear. PP-NRS scores of 0, 4-6, and 10 were associated with 0 days, 3-4 days, and 7 days per week of disturbed sleep, respectively. PP-NRS or NTIS scores of 0-1, 4-5, and 10 were associated with 0-10%, 20-30%, and >50% overall work impairment, respectively. Seventy-five percent of the effect of abrocitinib on reducing work impairment was indirectly mediated by improvement in itch, followed by sleep. CONCLUSION: These results quantitatively demonstrate that reducing itch severity is associated with improvements in sleep and work productivity. Empirical evidence for the mechanism of action of abrocitinib showed that itch severity is improved, which reduces sleep loss/sleep disruption and, in turn, improves work productivity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03575871.
Atopic dermatitis (AD), also called atopic eczema, is a common skin disease that is associated with itch and reduced quality of life. Abrocitinib, a recently approved medicine for AD, was shown in clinical trials to improve itch, which is considered the most bothersome symptom to people with AD. Abrocitinib also improved sleep outcomes and work productivity in people with moderate or severe AD. It is unknown if improvement in itch can lead to improvement in sleep and work productivity. We analyzed data from the JADE MONO-2 study, which included 391 people who received treatment with abrocitinib or placebo for 12 weeks. We used mathematical modelling to study relationships between itch and sleep or work productivity. We also wanted to study if the improvements in itch and sleep with abrocitinib treatment had an impact on work productivity. We found that a relationship existed between itch, sleep disturbance, and work impairment; as itch improved, so too did sleep disturbance and work impairment. When people were treated with abrocitinib, they experienced relief from itch, which improved sleep, which in turn reduced work productivity loss. Larger and longer studies are needed to confirm these results. This analysis further informs the expectations of patients with moderate or severe AD as it relates to progression of symptom relief after treatment with abrocitinib.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus , Pirimidinas , Sulfonamidas , Humanos , Dermatitis Atópica/complicaciones , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Prurito/tratamiento farmacológico , Prurito/etiología , Sueño , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Método Doble CiegoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Differences in atopic dermatitis (AD) disease course and manifestation with age may extend to treatment response. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate response maintenance with continuous-/reduced-dose abrocitinib or withdrawal and response to treatment reintroduction after flare in adolescent and adult participants in JADE REGIMEN (NCT03627767). METHODS: Adolescents (12-17 years) and adults with moderate-to-severe AD responding to abrocitinib 200-mg induction were randomly assigned to 40-week maintenance with abrocitinib (200 mg/100 mg) or placebo. Patients who experienced flare during maintenance received rescue treatment. RESULTS: Of 246 adolescents and 981 adults, 145/246 (58.9%) and 655/981 (66.8%), respectively, responded to induction. Similar proportions of adolescents and adults experienced flare during maintenance with abrocitinib 200 mg (14.9%/16.9%), 100 mg (42.9%/38.9%), and placebo (75.5%/78.0%). From the abrocitinib 200-mg, 100-mg, and placebo arms, respectively, Eczema Area and Severity Index response was recaptured by 28.6%, 25.0%, and 52.9% of adolescents and 34.3%, 33.7%, and 58.0% of adults; Investigator's Global Assessment response, by 42.9%, 50.0%, and 73.5% of adolescents and 34.3%, 50.6%, and 74.1% of adults. Abrocitinib had a similar safety profile regardless of age; nausea incidence was higher in adolescents. LIMITATIONS: Adolescents represented 20% of the trial population. CONCLUSION: Abrocitinib was effective in preventing flare in adolescents and adults.Clinicaltrials.gov listing: NCT03627767.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego , Janus Quinasa 1 , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Abrocitinib, an oral Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, provided significant itch relief by week 2 in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in the phase III JADE COMPARE trial. OBJECTIVES: This post-hoc analysis of JADE COMPARE aimed to further characterize itch response and determined whether early itch relief could predict subsequent improvements in AD severity. METHODS: JADE COMPARE was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled trial. Adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with moderate-to-severe AD were randomly assigned to receive oral abrocitinib 200 mg or 100 mg once daily, subcutaneous dupilumab 300 mg every other week (after a 600-mg loading dose), or placebo, plus medicated topical therapy for 16 weeks. Assessments were ≥ 4-point improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS4) from days 2 to 15, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) response, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores at week 12. Association between week 2 PP-NRS4 and efficacy at week 12 was evaluated by chi-squared tests. The predictive value of early response for later efficacy was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: As early as day 4 after treatment, a significantly greater proportion of patients achieved PP-NRS4 response with abrocitinib 200 mg (18.6%) versus dupilumab (5.6%; p < 0.001) and placebo (6.0%; p < 0.003). A similar trend was observed with abrocitinib at the 100-mg dose, with significantly greater PP-NRS4 response rates versus placebo as early as day 9. With both doses of abrocitinib, week 12 IGA 0/1, EASI-75, EASI-90, and DLQI 0/1 response rates were greater in week 2 PP-NRS4 responders than nonresponders; no differences were observed between week 2 PP-NRS4 responders and nonresponders in the dupilumab and placebo groups. Early improvement in PP-NRS at week 2 was associated with skin clearance at week 12 in abrocitinib-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Abrocitinib resulted in rapid relief from itch in patients with moderate-to-severe AD, with significant improvement in itch as early as day 4 after treatment with abrocitinib 200 mg compared with dupilumab and placebo. Abrocitinib-induced itch relief by week 2 was associated with subsequent improvements at week 12. [Video abstract available.] TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03720470. Early itch response with abrocitinib is associated with later efficacy outcomes in patients withmoderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: subgroup analysis of the randomized phase III JADE COMPARE trial (MP4 335,375kb).
Atopic dermatitis (AD), also called atopic eczema, is a skin disease that affects people throughout their lives. About 10% of adults worldwide have AD. Itch is the most bothersome symptom reported by people with AD and scratching this itch can damage the skin, resulting in painful sores. It is unknown if relief from itch can influence other symptoms of AD. We analyzed data from the JADE COMPARE study, which included 837 people who received treatment with abrocitinib, dupilumab or placebo. We studied how fast itch relief occurred after people received these treatments. We also wanted to study if rapid itch relief was associated with improvement in other signs of AD later on with continued treatment. We found that as early as 4 days after treatment, abrocitinib 200 mg provided significant relief from itch compared with dupilumab or placebo. People who had rapid itch relief within 2 weeks of treatment with abrocitinib were more likely to have clear or almost clear skin and improved quality of life after 12 weeks of continued treatment with abrocitinib. Rapid itch relief did not appear to increase the likelihood of clear skin at week 12 in people who received dupilumab. Larger studies are needed to confirm this result. This study provides important evidence for physicians as they analyze itch relief and determine treatment options for people with AD.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Adulto , Humanos , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Prurito , Método Doble Ciego , Inmunoglobulina ARESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Traditional systemic immunosuppressants and advanced therapies improve signs and symptoms of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). However, data are limited in severe and/or difficult-to-treat AD. In the phase 3 JADE COMPARE trial of patients with moderate-to-severe AD receiving background topical therapy, once-daily abrocitinib 200 mg and 100 mg showed significantly greater reductions in the symptoms of AD than placebo and significantly greater improvement in itch response (with abrocitinib 200 mg) than dupilumab at week 2. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib and dupilumab in a subset of patients with severe and/or difficult-to-treat AD in a post hoc analysis of the JADE COMPARE trial. METHODS: Adults with moderate-to-severe AD received once-daily oral abrocitinib 200 mg or 100 mg, dupilumab 300 mg subcutaneous injection every 2 weeks, or placebo with concomitant medicated topical therapy. Severe and/or difficult-to-treat AD subgroups were classified by baseline characteristics [Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) 4, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) > 21, failure or intolerance to prior systemic agents (excluding patients who took only corticosteroids), percentage of body surface area (%BSA) > 50, upper quartiles of EASI (EASI > 38) and %BSA (%BSA > 65), and combined subgroup of IGA 4, EASI > 21, and %BSA > 50, and failure or intolerance to prior systemic agents (excluding patients who took only corticosteroids)]. Assessments included IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and a ≥ 2-point improvement from baseline, ≥ 75% and ≥ 90% improvement from baseline in EASI (EASI-75 and EASI-90), ≥ 4-point improvement from baseline in Peak Pruritus-Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS4), time to PP-NRS4, least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline in 14-day PP-NRS (days 2-15), Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) up to week 16. RESULTS: The proportion of patients achieving IGA 0/1, EASI-75, and EASI-90 responses was significantly greater with abrocitinib 200 mg than placebo (nominal p < 0.05) across all subgroups with severe and/or difficult-to-treat AD. Across most subgroups, PP-NRS4 response was significantly greater with abrocitinib 200 mg than placebo (nominal p < 0.01); the time to achieve this response was shorter with abrocitinib 200 mg (range 4.5-6.0 days) than abrocitinib 100 mg (range 5.0-17.0 days), dupilumab (range 8.0-11.0 days), and placebo (range 3.0-11.5 days). LSM change from baseline in POEM and DLQI was significantly greater with abrocitinib 200 mg than placebo (nominal p < 0.001) across all subgroups. Clinically meaningful differences were observed between abrocitinib and dupilumab for most evaluated endpoints across several subgroups, including in patients who failed or were intolerant to prior systemic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Abrocitinib provided rapid and substantially greater improvements in skin clearance and quality of life compared with placebo and dupilumab in subgroups of patients with severe and/or difficult-to-treat AD. These findings support the use of abrocitinib for severe and/or difficult-to-treat AD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03720470.
Atopic dermatitis (AD), also known as atopic eczema, is a skin disease that causes itchy and red skin patches. People can be diagnosed with severe and/or difficult-to-treat AD if their signs and symptoms of AD are extremely severe and their AD cannot be adequately treated by common medicines. Abrocitinib is a treatment that has been shown in clinical trials to improve the symptoms of AD. We analyzed data from the JADE COMPARE study, which included 837 people who were treated with abrocitinib, dupilumab (another treatment for AD), or placebo. Many of these people had severe symptoms when they entered the study. Some had AD signs and symptoms that did not improve after they took common medicines for AD. We studied how well abrocitinib worked in these people with severe and/or difficult-to-treat AD. We found that these people achieved clear skin and itch relief at week 16 after treatment with abrocitinib 200 mg compared with placebo (no drug control). Additionally, they achieved significant relief from itch faster with abrocitinib 200 mg compared with abrocitinib 100 mg, dupilumab, or placebo. People reported less severe AD and better quality of life after treatment with abrocitinib compared with placebo. Together, the findings of our study provide important evidence for healthcare providers as they determine a treatment plan for people with severe and/or difficult-to-treat AD.