Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 118
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
N Engl J Med ; 387(15): 1385-1394, 2022 10 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36027560

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Limited data suggest a benefit of population-based screening for cardiovascular disease with respect to the risk of death. METHODS: We performed a population-based, parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial involving men 65 to 74 years of age living in 15 Danish municipalities. The participants were randomly assigned in a 1:2 ratio to undergo screening (the invited group) or not to undergo screening (the control group) for subclinical cardiovascular disease. Randomization was based on computer-generated random numbers and stratified according to municipality. Only the control group was unaware of the trial-group assignments. Screening included noncontrast electrocardiography-gated computed tomography to determine the coronary-artery calcium score and to detect aneurysms and atrial fibrillation, ankle-brachial blood-pressure measurements to detect peripheral artery disease and hypertension, and a blood sample to detect diabetes mellitus and hypercholesterolemia. The primary outcome was death from any cause. RESULTS: A total of 46,611 participants underwent randomization. After exclusion of 85 men who had died or emigrated before being invited to undergo screening, there were 16,736 men in the invited group and 29,790 men in the control group; 10,471 of the men in the invited group underwent screening (62.6%). In intention-to-treat analyses, after a median follow-up of 5.6 years, 2106 men (12.6%) in the invited group and 3915 men (13.1%) in the control group had died (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 1.00; P = 0.06). The hazard ratio for stroke in the invited group, as compared with the control group, was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.86 to 0.99); for myocardial infarction, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.81 to 1.03); for aortic dissection, 0.95 (95% CI, 0.61 to 1.49); and for aortic rupture, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.49 to 1.35). There were no significant between-group differences in safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: After more than 5 years, the invitation to undergo comprehensive cardiovascular screening did not significantly reduce the incidence of death from any cause among men 65 to 74 years of age. (Funded by the Southern Region of Denmark and others; DANCAVAS ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN12157806.).


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Tamizaje Masivo , Humanos , Masculino , Calcio/análisis , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Incidencia , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/epidemiología , Anciano , Técnicas de Imagen Sincronizada Cardíacas , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología
2.
PLoS Med ; 21(5): e1004403, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38739644

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Danish cardiovascular screening (DANCAVAS) trial, a nationwide trial designed to investigate the impact of cardiovascular screening in men, did not decrease all-cause mortality, an outcome decided by the investigators. However, the target group may have varied preferences. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether men aged 65 to 74 years requested a CT-based cardiovascular screening examination and to assess its impact on outcomes determined by their preferences. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This is a post hoc study of the randomised DANCAVAS trial. All men 65 to 74 years of age residing in specific areas of Denmark were randomised (1:2) to invitation-to-screening (16,736 men, of which 10,471 underwent screening) or usual-care (29,790 men). The examination included among others a non-contrast CT scan (to assess the coronary artery calcium score and aortic aneurysms). Positive findings prompted preventive treatment with atorvastatin, aspirin, and surveillance/surgical evaluation. The usual-care group remained unaware of the trial and the assignments. The user-defined outcome was based on patient preferences and determined through a survey sent in January 2023 to a random sample of 9,095 men from the target group, with a 68.0% response rate (6,182 respondents). Safety outcomes included severe bleeding and mortality within 30 days after cardiovascular surgery. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-screen basis. Prevention of stroke and myocardial infarction was the primary motivation for participating in the screening examination. After a median follow-up of 6.4 years, 1,800 of 16,736 men (10.8%) in the invited-to-screening group and 3,420 of 29,790 (11.5%) in the usual-care group experienced an event (hazard ratio (HR), 0.93 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.88 to 0.98; p = 0.010); number needed to invite at 6 years, 148 (95% CI, 80 to 986)). A total of 324 men (1.9%) in the invited-to-screening group and 491 (1.7%) in the usual-care group had an intracranial bleeding (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.35; p = 0.029). Additionally, 994 (5.9%) in the invited-to-screening group and 1,722 (5.8%) in the usual-care group experienced severe gastrointestinal bleeding (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.11; p = 0.583). No differences were found in mortality after cardiovascular surgery. The primary limitation of the study is that exclusive enrolment of men aged 65 to 74 renders the findings non-generalisable to women or men of other age groups. CONCLUSION: In this comprehensive population-based cardiovascular screening and intervention program, we observed a reduction in the user-defined outcome, stroke and myocardial infarction, but entail a small increased risk of intracranial bleeding. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN12157806 https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12157806.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Tamizaje Masivo , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
3.
Scand J Public Health ; : 14034948231205822, 2024 Jan 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38179955

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation and flutter (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia with an increasing prevalence in Western countries. However, little is known about AF among immigrants compared to non-immigrants. AIM: To examine the incidence of hospital-diagnosed AF according to country of origin. METHOD: Immigrants were defined as individuals born outside Denmark by parents born outside Denmark. AF was defined as first-time diagnosis of AF. All individuals were followed from the age of 45 years from 1998 to 2017. The analyses were adjusted for sex, age, comorbidity, contact with the general practitioner and socioeconomic variables. Adjustment was conducted using standardised morbidity ratio weights, standardised to the Danish population in a marginal structural model. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 3,489,730 Danish individuals free of AF and 108,914 immigrants free of AF who had emigrated from the 10 most represented countries. A total of 323,005 individuals of Danish origin had an incident hospital diagnosis of AF, among the immigrants 7,300 developed AF. Adjusted hazard rate ratios (HRRs) of AF for immigrants from Iran (0.48 [95%CI:0.35;0.64]), Turkey (0.74 [95%CI:0.67;0.82]) and Bosnia-Herzegovina (0.42 [95%CI:0.22;0.79]) were low compared with Danish individuals. Immigrants from Sweden, Germany and Norway had an adjusted HRR of 1.13 [95%CI:1.03;1.23], 1.12 [95%CI:1.05;1.18] and 1.11 [95%CI:1.03;1.21], respectively (Danish individuals as reference). CONCLUSIONS: Substantial variation in the incidence of hospital-diagnosed AF according to country of origin was observed. The results may reflect true biological differences but could also reflect barriers to AF diagnosis for immigrants. Further efforts are warranted to determine the underlying mechanisms.

4.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 23(1): 139, 2023 03 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36927295

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A paradoxical protective effect of diabetes on the development and progression of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) has been known for years. This study aimed to investigate whether the protective role of diabetes on AAAs has evolved over the years. METHODS: A cross-sectional study, a systematic review and meta-analysis. This study was based on two large, population-based, randomised screening trials of men aged 65-74; VIVA (2008-2011) and DANCAVAS (2014-2018), including measurement of the abdominal aorta by ultrasound or CT, respectively. Analyses were performed using multiple logistic regressions to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) for AAAs in men with diabetes compared to those not having diabetes. Moreover, a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based screening studies of AAAs to visualise a potential change of the association between diabetes and AAAs. Studies reporting only on women or Asian populations were excluded. RESULTS: In VIVA, the prevalence of AAA was 3.3%, crude OR for AAA in men with diabetes 1.04 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.80-1.34), and adjusted OR 0.64 (CI 0.48-0.84). In DANCAVAS, the prevalence of AAA was 4.2%, crude OR 1.44 (CI 1.11-1.87), and adjusted OR 0.78 (CI 0.59-1.04). Twenty-three studies were identified for the meta-analysis (N = 224 766). The overall crude OR was 0.90 (CI 0.77-1.05) before 2000 and 1.16 (CI 1.03-1.30) after 1999. The overall adjusted OR was 0.63 (CI 0.59-0.69) before 2000 and 0.69 (CI 0.57-0.84) after 1999. CONCLUSION: Both the crude and adjusted OR showed a statistically non-significant trend towards an increased risk of AAA by the presence of diabetes. If this represents an actual trend, it could be due to a change in the diabetes population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DANCAVAS: Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN12157806. VIVA: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00662480.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Diabetes Mellitus , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/epidemiología , Ultrasonografía , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Tamizaje Masivo , Factores de Riesgo
5.
Eur Heart J ; 43(41): 4392-4402, 2022 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36029019

RESUMEN

AIMS: A recent trial has shown that screening of men for cardiovascular disease (CVD) may reduce all-cause mortality. This study assesses the cost effectiveness of such screening vs. no screening from the perspective of European healthcare systems. METHODS AND RESULTS: Randomized controlled trial-based cost-effectiveness evaluation with a mean 5.7 years of follow-up. Screening was based on low-dose computed tomography to detect coronary artery calcification and aortic/iliac aneurysms, limb blood pressure measurement to detect peripheral artery disease and hypertension, telemetric assessment of the heart rhythm to detect atrial fibrillation, and measurements of the cholesterol and HgbA1c levels. Censoring-adjusted incremental costs, life years (LY), and quality-adjusted LY (QALY) were estimated and used for cost-effectiveness analysis. The incremental cost of screening for the entire health care sector was €207 [95% confidence interval (CI) -24; 438, P = 0.078] per invitee for which gains of 0.019 LY (95% CI -0.007; 0.045, P = 0.145) and 0.023 QALY (95% CI -0.001; 0.046, P = 0.051) were achieved. The corresponding incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were of €10 812 per LY and €9075 per QALY, which would be cost effective at probabilities of 0.73 and 0.83 for a willingness to pay of €20 000. Assessment of population heterogeneity showed that cost effectiveness could be more attractive for younger men without CVD at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive screening for CVD is overall cost effective at conventional thresholds for willingness to pay and also competitive to the cost effectiveness of common cancer screening programmes. The screening target group, however, needs to be settled.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Masculino , Humanos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Dinamarca/epidemiología
6.
Eur J Clin Invest ; 52(11): e13843, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35924957

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We examined the associations between family income and educational attainment with incident atrial fibrillation (AF), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and cardiovascular (CV) death among patients with newly-diagnosed heart failure (HF). METHODS: In a nationwide Danish registry of HF patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2018, we established a cohort for each outcome. When examining AF, MI and stroke, respectively, patients with a history of these outcomes at diagnosis of HF were excluded. We used cause-specific proportional hazard models to estimate hazard ratios for tertile groups of family income and three levels of educational attainment. RESULTS: Among 27,947 AF-free patients, we found no association between income or education and incident AF. Among 27,309 MI-free patients, we found that lower income (hazard ratio 1.28 [95% CI 1.11-1.48] and 1.11 [0.96-1.28] for lower and medium vs. higher income) and education (1.23 [1.04-1.45] and 1.15 [0.97-1.36] for lower and medium vs. higher education) were associated with MI. Among 36,801 stroke-free patients, lower income was associated with stroke (1.38 [1.23-1.56] and 1.27 [1.12-1.44] for lower and medium vs. higher income) but not education. Lower income (1.56 [1.46-1.67] and 1.32 [1.23-1.42] for lower and medium vs. higher income) and education (1.20 [1.11-1.29] and 1.07 [0.99-1.15] for lower and medium vs. higher education) were associated with CV death. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with newly-diagnosed HF, lower family income was associated with higher rates of acute MI, stroke and cardiovascular death. Lower educational attainment was associated with higher rates of acute MI and cardiovascular death. There was no evidence of associations between income and education with incident AF.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Infarto del Miocardio , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología
7.
Eur J Neurol ; 29(1): 168-177, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34528344

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The distribution of the major modifiable risk factors for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) changes rapidly. These changes call for contemporary data from large-scale population-based studies. The aim of the present study was to examine trends in incidence, risk factors, and mortality in ICH patients from 2004 to 2017. METHODS: In a population-based cohort study, we calculated age- and sex-standardized incidence rates (SIRs), incidence rates (IRs) stratified by age and sex per 100,000 person-years, and trends in risk profiles. We estimated absolute mortality risk, and the Cox proportional hazards regression multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios for 30-day and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: We included 16,902 patients (53% men; median age 75 years) from 2004 to 2017. The SIR of ICH decreased from 33 (95% confidence interval [CI] 32-34) in 2004/2005 to 28 (95% CI 27-29) in 2016/2017. Among patients aged ≥70 years, the IR decreased from 137 (95% CI 130-144) in 2004/2005 to 112 (95% CI 106-117) in 2016/2017. The IR in patients aged <70 years was unchanged. From 2004 to 2017, the proportion of patients with hypertension increased from 49% to 66%, the use of oral anticoagulants increased from 7% to 18%, and the use of platelet inhibitors decreased from 40% to 28%. The adjusted hazard ratio for 30-day mortality in 2016/2017 was 0.94 (95% CI 0.89-1.01) and 1-year mortality was 0.98 (95% CI 0.93-1.04) compared with 2004/2005. CONCLUSION: The incidence of spontaneous ICH decreased from 2004 to 2017, with no clear trend in mortality. The risk profile of ICH patients changed substantially, with increasing proportions of hypertension and anticoagulant treatment. Given the high mortality rate of ICH, further advances in prevention and treatment are urgently needed.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Hemorragia Cerebral , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Hemorragia Cerebral/inducido químicamente , Estudios de Cohortes , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo
8.
Scand Cardiovasc J ; 56(1): 243-246, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35801631

RESUMEN

Current evidence base for atrial fibrillation (AF) screening is insufficient. An important finding in the STROKESTOP study was that non-participants had significantly worse outcomes. In a group of potentially non-participants feasibility of opportunistic screening in a domiciliary setting with municipality preventive home visits to citizens ≥75 years was investigated. Handheld ECG device was used by trained municipality caregivers followed by cardiologist assessment. Eighty-five percent consented to being screened, and seven of 477 screened were found with AF. Opportunistic screening in preventive home visits had a high participation rate and was feasible. Randomized trials are needed before making any firm conclusions.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Ciudades , Electrocardiografía , Estudios de Factibilidad , Visita Domiciliaria , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo
9.
J Clin Densitom ; 24(1): 55-66, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31668962

RESUMEN

Atherosclerosis and osteoporosis are both common and preventable diseases. Evidence supports a link between coronary artery disease (CAD) and low bone mineral density (BMD). This study aimed to assess the association between thoracic spine BMD and CAD in men and women with symptoms suggestive of CAD. This cross-sectional study included 1487 (mean age 57 years (range 40-80), 47% men) patients referred for cardiac computed tomography (CT). Agatston coronary artery calcium score (CACS), CAD severity (no, mild, moderate, and severe), vessel involvement (no, 1-, 2-, and 3/left main disease), and invasive measurements were evaluated. BMD of three thoracic vertebrae was measured using quantitative CT. We used the American college of radiology cut-off values for lumbar spine BMD to categorize patients into very low (<80 mg/cm3), low (80-120 mg/cm3), or normal BMD (>120 mg/cm3). BMD as a continuous variable was included in the linear regression analyses to assess associations between CACS (CACS=0, CACS 1- 399, and CACS ≥ 400) and BMD, and CAD severity and BMD. Significant lower BMD was present with increasing CACS and stenosis degree unadjusted. Multivariate linear regression analyses in women revealed a significant correlation between BMD and CACS groups (ß = -4.06, p<0.05), but no correlation between BMD and CAD severity (ß = -1.59, p = 0.14). No association was found between BMD and CACS (ß = -1.50, p = 0.36) and CAD severity (ß = 0.07, p = 0.94) in men. BMD is significantly correlated to CACS after adjusting for confounders in women, but not in men, suggesting a possible sex difference in pathophysiology.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Densidad Ósea , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Caracteres Sexuales , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
10.
Radiology ; 296(3): 499-508, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32662758

RESUMEN

Background Osteoporosis is a prevalent, under-diagnosed, and treatable disease associated with increased fracture risk. Bone mineral density (BMD) derived from cardiac CT may be used to determine fracture rate. Purpose To assess the association between fracture rate and thoracic BMD derived from cardiac CT. Materials and Methods This prospective cohort study included consecutive participants referred for cardiac CT for evaluation of ischemic heart disease between September 2014 and March 2016. End of follow-up was June 30, 2018. In all participants, volumetric BMD of three thoracic vertebrae was measured by using quantitative CT software. The primary and secondary outcomes were any incident fracture and any incident osteoporosis-related fracture registered in the National Patient Registry, respectively. Hazard ratios were assessed by using BMD categorized as very low (<80 mg/cm3), low (80-120 mg/cm3), or normal (>120 mg/cm3). The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02264717). Results In total, 1487 participants (mean age, 57 years ± 9; age range, 40-80 years; 52.5% women) were included, of whom 179 (12.0%) had very low BMD. During follow-up (median follow-up, 3.1 years; interquartile range, 2.7-3.4 years; range, 0.2-3.8 years), 80 of 1487 (5.3%) participants were diagnosed with an incident fracture and in 31 of 80 participants, the fracture was osteoporosis related. In unadjusted Cox regressions analyses, very low BMD was association with a greater rate of any fracture (hazard ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4, 4.7; P = .002) and any osteoporosis-related fracture (hazard ratio, 8.1; 95% CI: 2.4, 26.7; P = .001) compared with normal BMD. After adjusting for age and sex, very low BMD remained associated with any fracture (hazard ratio, 2.1; 95% CI: 1.1, 4.2) and any osteoporosis-related fracture (hazard ratio, 4.0; 95% CI: 1.1, 14.6). Conclusion Routine cardiac CT can be used to help measure thoracic bone mineral density (BMD) to identify individuals who have low BMD and a greater fracture rate. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Bredella in this issue.


Asunto(s)
Densidad Ósea/fisiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/epidemiología , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Técnicas de Imagen Cardíaca , Femenino , Corazón/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
11.
Med Care ; 58(3): 216-224, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31876644

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is a highly important preventive intervention, perhaps especially in those with comorbid depression, who have a worse prognosis. However, OAT may pose particular challenges in depressed patients. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether AF patients with depression have lower OAT uptake. METHODS: This nationwide register-based 2005-2016 cohort study of all Danes with AF and OAT indication (CHA2DS2VASc stroke risk score ≥2) assessed OAT initiation within 90 days in those with incident AF (N=147,162) and OAT prevalence in those with prevalent AF (N=192,656). The associations of depression with both outcomes were estimated in regression analyses with successive adjustment for socioeconomic characteristics and somatic and psychiatric comorbidity. RESULTS: Comorbid depression was significantly associated with lower frequency of OAT initiation in incident AF patients {adjusted proportion differences (aPDs): -6.6% [95% confidence interval (CI), -7.4 to -5.9]} and lower prevalence of OAT [aPD: -4.2% (95% CI, -4.7 to -3.8)] in prevalent AF patients. Yet, the OAT uptake increased substantially during the period, particularly in depressed patients [aPD for OAT prevalence in 2016: -0.8% (95% CI, -1.6 to -0.0)]. CONCLUSIONS: Comorbid depression was associated with a significantly lower OAT uptake in patients with AF, which questions whether depressed patients receive sufficient support to manage this consequential cardiac condition. However, a substantial increase in the overall OAT uptake and a decrease of the depression-associated deficit in OAT were seen over the period during which OAT was developed through the introduction of new oral anticoagulation therapy.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Depresión/psicología , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control
12.
J Clin Densitom ; 23(1): 117-127, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30665819

RESUMEN

Despite being a frequent and treatable disease, osteoporosis remains under-diagnosed worldwide. Our study aim was to characterize the bone mineral density (BMD) status in a group of patients with symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease (CAD) with low/intermediate risk profile undergoing routine cardiac computed tomography (CT) to rule out CAD. This cross-sectional study used prospectively acquired data from a large consecutively included cohort. Participants were referred for cardiac CT based on symptoms of CAD. Quantitative CT (QCT) dedicated software was used to obtain BMD measurements in 3 vertebrae starting from the level of the left main coronary artery. We used the American College of Radiology cut-off values for lumbar spine QCT to categorize patients into very low (<80 mg/cm3), low (80-120 mg/cm3), or normal BMD (>120 mg/cm3). Analyses included 1487 patients. Mean age was 57 years (range 40-80), and 52% were women. The number of patients with very low BMD was 105 women (14%, 105/773) and 74 men (10%, 74/714). The majority of patients with very low BMD was not previously diagnosed with osteoporosis (87%) and received no anti-osteoporotic treatment (90%). Opportunistic screening in patients referred for cardiac CT revealed a substantial number of patients with very low BMD. The majority of these patients was not previously diagnosed with osteoporosis and received no anti-osteoporotic treatment. Identification of these patients could facilitate initiation of anti-osteoporotic treatment and reduce the occurrence of osteoporosis-related complications.


Asunto(s)
Densidad Ósea , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Osteoporosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Torácicas/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis/diagnóstico , Osteoporosis/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagen
13.
Am Heart J ; 215: 114-128, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31323454

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the preferred primary diagnostic modality when examining patients with low to intermediate pre-test probability of coronary artery disease (CAD). Only 20-30% of these have potentially obstructive CAD. Because of the relatively poor positive predictive value of coronary CTA, unnecessary invasive coronary angiographies (ICAs) are conducted with the costs and risks associated with the procedure. Hence, an optimized diagnostic CAD algorithm may reduce the numbers of ICAs not followed by revascularization. The Dan-NICAD 2 study has 3 equivalent main aims: (1) To examine the diagnostic precision of a sound-based diagnostic algorithm, The CADScor®System (Acarix A/S, Denmark), in patients with a low to intermediate pre-test risk of CAD referred to a primary examination by coronary CTA. We hypothesize that the CADScor®System provides better stratification prior to coronary CTA than clinical risk stratification scores alone. (2) To compare the diagnostic accuracy of 3T cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (3T CMRI), 82rubidium positron emission tomography (82Rb-PET), and CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) in patients where obstructive CAD cannot be ruled out by coronary CTA using ICA fractional flow reserve (FFR) as reference standard. (3) To compare the diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) and ICA-FFR in patients with low to intermediate pre-test probability of CAD using 82Rb-PET as reference standard. METHODS: Dan-NICAD 2 is a prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study including approximately 2,000 patients with low to intermediate pre-test probability of CAD and without previous history of CAD. Patients are referred to coronary CTA because of symptoms suggestive of CAD, as evaluated by a cardiologist. Patient interviews, sound recordings, and blood samples are obtained in connection with the coronary CTA. If coronary CTA does not rule out obstructive CAD, patients will be examined by 3T CMRI 82Rb-PET, FFRCT, ICA, and FFR. Reference standard is ICA-FFR. Obstructive CAD is defined as an FFR ≤0.80 or as high-grade stenosis (>90% diameter stenosis) by visual assessment. Diagnostic performance will be evaluated as sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, calibration, and discrimination. Enrolment started January 2018 and is expected to be completed by June 2020. Patients are followed for 10 years after inclusion. DISCUSSION: The results of the Dan-NICAD 2 study are expected to contribute to the improvement of diagnostic strategies for patients suspected of CAD in 3 different steps: risk stratification prior to coronary CTA, diagnostic strategy after coronary CTA, and invasive wireless QFR analysis as an alternative to ICA-FFR.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada/métodos , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico/fisiología , Imagen por Resonancia Cinemagnética/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector/métodos , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Adulto , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Estudios Transversales , Dinamarca , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
14.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 57(3): 442-450, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30393062

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Adherence to antiplatelet and statin therapy in participants diagnosed with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) or peripheral arterial disease (PAD) was examined in a vascular screening trial. METHODS: This was a population based cohort study. The study population consisted of 65-74 year old men diagnosed with AAA or PAD in the Viborg Vascular (VIVA) multifaceted screening trial for CVD. Data from the VIVA screening cohort were linked to data from Danish registers from 2007 to 2016. Initiation of antiplatelet and statin treatment was measured within 120 days after screening. Persistence was defined as no treatment gap >100 days between two prescription renewals after screening. A proportion of days covered ≥80% over five years of follow up was used as a categorical cut off for adherence. RESULTS: Among the 18,748 screened participants, 618 with AAA and 2051 with PAD were identified. Among non-users at baseline, 65% and 62% initiated antiplatelet and statin treatment, 57% and 59% persisted with antiplatelet and statin use, and 60% and 57% were adherent, respectively. Among users at baseline, 73% and 69% had filled an antiplatelet or statin prescription, respectively, within 120 days after screening. Further, 79% and 73% persisted with their antiplatelet and statin treatment, and 89% and 83% were adherent, respectively. CONCLUSION: In a vascular screening trial, six of every 10 non-users initiated preventive treatment; among these, the adherence rate was 57-60%. Among users at baseline, the five year adherence to antiplatelet and statin treatment exceeded 80%. The effectiveness of screening initiatives might be improved by measures to improve the fulfilment of preventive medication.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Índice Tobillo Braquial , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Dinamarca , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sistema de Registros , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía
16.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 55(5): 721-729, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29625727

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effectiveness of systematic screening for multifaceted cardiovascular disease (CVD) in postmenopausal women on all cause mortality and, secondarily, on CVD morbidity. Effectiveness was also evaluated across age strata. METHODS: This was a population based, prospective, parallel cohort study. In total, 107,491 women born in 1936-1951 living in the Central Denmark region were identified in the Danish Civil Registration System. From this population, all women born in 1936, 1941, 1946, and 1951 (n = 1984) living in the Viborg municipality were invited to attend screening. Of those invited to the screening, 1474 (74.3%) attended. The control group included all women from the general population born in 1936-1951 and living in the Central Denmark Region, excluding those invited for the screening. Information on medication and comorbidities prior to inclusion and study outcomes were retrieved from national registries for both groups. The screening included examination for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), peripheral arterial disease (PAD), carotid plaque (CP), potential hypertension (HT), atrial fibrillation (AF), diabetes mellitus (DM), and dyslipidaemia. The adjusted Cox proportional hazards model with the intention to screen principle was used to assess effectiveness for the total population and across age groups. RESULTS: During follow up (median 3.3 years, IQR 2.9-3.9), the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for invited versus controls were the following: all cause mortality, 0.89 (95% CI 0.71-1.12); myocardial infarction (MI), 1.26 (95% CI 0.52-3.07); ischaemic heart disease (IHD), 0.72 (95% CI 0.49-1.05); PAD, 1.07 (95% CI 0.49-2.31); and ischaemic stroke, 1.20 (95% CI 0.78-1.85). A substantial number of women with AAA, PAD, and/or CP declined prophylactic therapy: 45% for antiplatelet and 35% for cholesterol lowering agents. CONCLUSIONS: This multifaceted screening offer to a general population sample of postmenopausal women had no effects on all cause mortality or hospital admission for MI, IHD, PAD, and stroke within a short-term follow up period.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Tamizaje Masivo , Posmenopausia , Anciano , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros
17.
Europace ; 20(7): 1078-1085, 2018 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28655151

RESUMEN

Aims: Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are increasingly used as thromboembolic prophylaxis in cardioversion. We examined the waiting time to cardioversion and the outcomes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) of > 48 h of duration who were treated with either NOACs or warfarin. Methods and results: Anticoagulation was handled in a structured, multidisciplinary AF-clinic. The objectives were the waiting time to cardioversion, and thromboembolism and major bleeding events within 60 days. In total, 2150 electrical cardioversions were performed; 684 (31.8%) of patients were on NOACs and 1466 (68.2%) were on warfarin. The waiting time to non-TOE-guided cardioversion was significantly shorter in the NOAC group compared with the warfarin group for all cardioversions (P < 0.001 for log-rank test) and for first-time cardioversions (P < 0.001 for log-rank test). For all non-TOE-guided cardioversions, 80% of procedures on NOACs and 67% of procedures on warfarin were performed within 25 days (P < 0.001). Thromboembolism occurred in one patient (0.15%) receiving NOAC and in two patients (0.14%) receiving warfarin (risk ratio (RR) 1.07; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10-11.81). Major bleeding events occurred in four patients (0.58%) in the NOAC group and 11 patients (0.75%) in the warfarin group (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.25-2.43). Conclusion: In a real-world clinical setting with anticoagulation handled in a structured multidisciplinary AF clinic, the waiting time to cardioversion was shorter with NOACs compared to warfarin. The rates of thromboembolism and major bleeding events were low, with NOACs shown to be as effective and safe as warfarin.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Vitamina K/antagonistas & inhibidores , Warfarina/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Tromboembolia/etiología , Tromboembolia/prevención & control , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Warfarina/efectos adversos
18.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 18(1): 20, 2018 02 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29402233

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Reducing women's cardiovascular risk and the economic costs associated with cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and diabetes (DM) continues to be a challenge. Whether a multifaceted CVD screening programme is beneficial as a preventive strategy in women remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of CVD and DM as well as the acceptability toward screening and preventive actions. METHODS: An observational study was performed among all women born in 1936, 1941, 1946 and 1951 living in Viborg Municipality, Denmark, from October 2011. In total, 1984 were invited to screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), peripheral arterial disease (PAD), carotid plaque (CP), hypertension (HT), atrial fibrillation (AF), DM and dyslipidaemia. Participants with positive tests were offered prophylactic intervention including follow-up consultations in case of AAA, PAD and/or CP. Participants with AAA ≥ 50 mm were referred to specialists in vascular surgery. Women with AF or potential familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) were referred to cardiology work-up. RESULTS: Among those invited, 1474 (74.3%) attended screening, but the attendees' share decreased with increasing age groups (p < 0.001). AAA was diagnosed in 10 (0.7%) women, PAD in 101 (6.9%) and CP in 602 (40.8%). The percentage of women with these conditions rose with increasing age group (p < 0.05). Unconfirmed potential HT was observed in 94 (6.4%), unknown AF in 6 (0.4%), DM in 14 (1%) and potential FH in 35 (2.4%). None of these findings differed across age groups. Among the 631 women diagnosed with AAA, PAD and/or CP, 182 (28.8%) were already in antiplatelet and 223 (35.3%) in lipid-lowering therapy prior to screening. Antiplatelet therapy was initiated in 215 (34.1%) and lipid-lowering therapy in 191 (30.3%) women. Initiation of antiplatelet and lipid-lowering therapy was further recommended to 134 (21.2%) and 141 (22.4%) women, respectively, who hesitated to follow the recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: The study recorded an acceptable total attendance rate, even though a significantly lower attendance rate was observed in the eldest women. The identified hesitation towards prophylactic therapy may affect the rationale and effectiveness of CVD screening, and hesitation seems a critical issue that should be addressed in the design of future screening programmes.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Posmenopausia , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Derivación y Consulta , Factores Sexuales
19.
J Clin Nurs ; 27(5-6): 939-948, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28815826

RESUMEN

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study explored nonattendees' perspectives on a screening programme for cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus among women aged 60-77 years. BACKGROUND: Nonattendance in screening is a common concern and has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Whether nonattendees need targeted information to participate in screening is unknown. Thus, it is important to explore the reasons for nonattendance, particularly as nonattendees' perspectives have not been fully explored. DESIGN: An interview study. METHODS: The data were obtained through semistructured interviews with 10 women sampled from a population who declined to participate in a women's screening programme for cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus. Additionally, reflective notes on the interview context were documented. The data were collected in 2013. Kvale and Brinkmann's method for data analysis was applied. RESULTS: All informants found the screening offer personally irrelevant, but this belief was changeable. The informants' perceptions of screening were based on subjective health and risk beliefs, personal knowledge of diseases and the screening programme, and distrust in the healthcare system. CONCLUSION: Personal experiences, beliefs and self-protective strategies influence individuals' subjective interpretations of a screening programme's relevance. The perception that screening is irrelevant seems to be rooted in nonattendees' personal health-related assessment and knowledge. Consequently, whether nonattendance is determined by an informed decision is questionable. Negative experiences with the healthcare system led to hesitation towards screening in general. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study is relevant to healthcare workers as well as decision-makers from a screening and preventive perspective. The findings highlight important issues that should be addressed to encourage invitees to accept screening invitations and to facilitate informed decision-making about screening participation.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Tamizaje Masivo/psicología , Pacientes no Presentados/psicología , Anciano , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Investigación Cualitativa
20.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 54(6): 772-777, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29100862

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aetiology of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is multifactorial, and many risk factors are shared with diverticular disease. It is unknown whether an independent association exists between these conditions. METHODS: Individuals enrolled in two Danish population based randomised AAA screening trials and assigned to cross sectional screening and evaluation of cardiovascular risk factors were identified. Diagnoses of diverticular disease were interrogated from a national patient registry covering the period from 1977 to the screening date. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% CI were calculated as risk measures. RESULTS: 24,632 individuals (median age, 69 years) were included. At screening, 687 patients had pre-existing diverticular disease. Patients with diverticular disease were more likely to have AAA at screening compared with those without diverticular disease (5.2% vs. 3.3%) (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.14-2.27). This association persisted after adjusting for potential confounders (aOR 1.49, 95% CI 1.04-2.12) and on sensitivity analyses. The association was most pronounced for those with a diagnosis of diverticular disease for at least 10 years (aOR 2.56, 95% CI 1.49-4.38). Following screening, 6.2% of patients with diverticular disease and AAA experienced aneurysm rupture, compared with 2.2% of patients with AAA without diverticular disease (aHR 4.1, 95% CI 1.6-10.8). CONCLUSION: An association was found between diverticular disease and AAA in a large population based cohort. Biological causality remains to be established, and a potential impact of diverticular disease on the natural history of AAA needs to be explored further.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/complicaciones , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Diverticulares/complicaciones , Enfermedades Diverticulares/diagnóstico , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Dinamarca , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA