Detalles de la búsqueda
1.
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry.
Neurosurg Focus
; 54(1): E2, 2023 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36587409
2.
Developing nonlinear k-nearest neighbors classification algorithms to identify patients at high risk of increased length of hospital stay following spine surgery.
Neurosurg Focus
; 54(6): E7, 2023 06.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37283368
3.
Three-level ACDF versus 3-level laminectomy and fusion: are there differences in outcomes? An analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database cervical spondylotic myelopathy cohort.
Neurosurg Focus
; 55(3): E2, 2023 Sep.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37657103
4.
Which supervised machine learning algorithm can best predict achievement of minimum clinically important difference in neck pain after surgery in patients with cervical myelopathy? A QOD study.
Neurosurg Focus
; 54(6): E5, 2023 06.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37283449
5.
Greater improvement in Neck Disability Index scores in women after surgery for cervical myelopathy: an analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Neurosurg Focus
; 55(5): E7, 2023 11.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37913530
6.
Quality Outcomes Database Spine Care Project 2012-2020: milestones achieved in a collaborative North American outcomes registry to advance value-based spine care and evolution to the American Spine Registry.
Neurosurg Focus
; 48(5): E2, 2020 05 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32357320
7.
Correlation of return to work with patient satisfaction after surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis: an analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Neurosurg Focus
; 48(5): E5, 2020 05 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32357321
8.
Predictive model for long-term patient satisfaction after surgery for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Neurosurg Focus
; 46(5): E12, 2019 05 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31042653
9.
A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Neurosurg Focus
; 46(5): E13, 2019 05 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31042655
10.
Women fare best following surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparison of the most and least satisfied patients utilizing data from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Neurosurg Focus
; 44(1): E3, 2018 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29290130
11.
Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Neurosurg Focus
; 44(1): E2, 2018 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29290132
12.
Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Neurosurg Focus
; 43(2): E11, 2017 Aug.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28760035
13.
Less invasive surgery for treating adult spinal deformities: ceiling effects for deformity correction with 3 different techniques.
Neurosurg Focus
; 36(5): E12, 2014 May.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24785477
14.
Complications in adult spinal deformity surgery: an analysis of minimally invasive, hybrid, and open surgical techniques.
Neurosurg Focus
; 36(5): E15, 2014 May.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24785480
15.
The minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery algorithm: a reproducible rational framework for decision making in minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery.
Neurosurg Focus
; 36(5): E6, 2014 May.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24785488
16.
Staged Versus Same-Day Surgery in Circumferential Minimally Invasive Deformity Correction.
Neurosurgery
; 2024 May 24.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38785441
17.
Is Upper Extremity or Lower Extremity Function More Important for Patient Satisfaction? An Analysis of 24-Month Outcomes from the QOD Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Cohort.
Clin Spine Surg
; 37(4): 188-197, 2024 May 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38706113
18.
Impact of educational background on preoperative disease severity and postoperative outcomes among patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis: a Quality Outcomes Database study.
J Neurosurg Spine
; : 1-12, 2024 May 31.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38820603
19.
What is the effect of preoperative depression on outcomes after minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity? A prospective cohort analysis.
J Neurosurg Spine
; 40(5): 602-610, 2024 May 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38364229
20.
What factors influence surgical decision-making in anterior versus posterior surgery for cervical myelopathy? A QOD analysis.
J Neurosurg Spine
; 40(2): 206-215, 2024 Feb 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37948703