Appropriate concentration setting for the intraoperative administration of indocyanine green for fluorescence imaging to identify the sentinel lymph node in early gastric cancer: a clinical pilot study.

PURPOSE: Some prospective trials have demonstrated the feasibility of sentinel node (SN) biopsy in gastric cancer (GC) surgery. This study aimed to identify the appropriate concentration settings for the intraoperative injection of indocyanine green (ICG) for SN biopsy. METHODS: Before the clinical studies, porcine model experiments explored the optimal concentration of ICG injected intraoperatively. Next, nine GC patients were enrolled in the clinical research. ICG (0.5 ml) was injected intraoperatively into four quadrants of the submucosa around the tumor at various concentrations (0.5, 0.25, and 0.1 mg/ml). The lymphatic basin dissection method was applied to the ICG-positive lymphatic areas. The number and location of the lymphatic basins and positive nodes were recorded intraoperatively. RESULTS: In the porcine model, the visibility gradually became clear at an ICG concentration higher than 0.1 mg/ml. In the clinical study, the average number of detected lymphatic basins was 3.3, 1.7, and 1.7, respectively. The mean number of detected SNs was 14.7, 6.7, and 4.0, respectively. CONCLUSION: To improve the reproducibility of SN biopsy, it is essential to prepare the correct concentration setting of ICG. Under current conditions in which ICG is injected intraoperatively, a 0.1 mg/ml concentration setting of ICG may be necessary and sufficient for SN identification.

Prognostic significance of the preoperative C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index on outcomes after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: Systemic inflammatory response markers are reported to be prognostic for patients with cancer. The C-reactive protein (CRP)-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index has been established as an immuno-nutritional scoring system. The aim of this study was to clarify the impact of the preoperative CALLY index on the outcome of patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer. METHODS: We analyzed the data of 826 patients who underwent gastrectomy for stage I, II, or III gastric cancer between 2010 and 2017. The CALLY index was defined as (albumin × lymphocyte)/(CRP × 104). RESULTS: The cut-off of the CALLY index was 2. The 147 patients with a preoperative CALLY index < 2 had significantly worse overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) than those with a CALLY index ≥ 2 (P < 0.01, P < 0.01, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified that a CALLY index < 2 (P = 0.02), intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.01), and stage II or III disease (P < 0.01) were independent and significant predictors of worse RFS. A CALLY index < 2 (P = 0.01), intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.01), postoperative complications (P = 0.02), and stage II or III disease (P < 0.01) were independent and significant predictors of worse OS. CONCLUSION: The preoperative CALLY index was independently associated with a poor prognosis for patients after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

The incidences of metachronous multiple gastric cancer after various types of gastrectomy: analysis of data from a nationwide Japanese survey.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of metachronous multiple gastric cancer (MMGC) after gastrectomy remains unclear. This study evaluated the incidences of MMGC according to specific gastrectomy types, including pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG), proximal gastrectomy (PG), and function-preserving gastrectomy (FPG), which was categorized as segmental gastrectomy and local resection. METHODS: We conducted a questionnaire survey of the Japanese Society for Gastro-Surgical Pathophysiology members, who were asked to report their institutional numbers of radical gastrectomy cases for cancer between 2003 and 2012. The cases were categorized according to whether the remnant stomach's status was followed for > 5 years, confirmation of MMGC, time to diagnosis, and treatment for MMGC. We calculated the "precise incidence" of MMGC by dividing the number of MMGC cases by the number of cases in which the status of remnant stomach was followed up for > 5 years. RESULTS: The responses identified 33,731 cases of gastrectomy. The precise incidences of MMGC were 2.35% after distal gastrectomy (DG), 3.01% after PPG, 6.28% after PG (p < 0.001), and 8.21% after FPG (p < 0.001). A substantial proportion of MMGCs (36.4%) was found at 5 years after the initial surgery. The rates of MMGC treatment using endoscopic submucosal dissection were 31% after DG, 28.6% after PPG, 50.8% after PG (p < 0.001), and 67.9% after FPG (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of MMGC was 2.4% after DG, and higher incidences were observed for larger stomach remnants. However, the proportion of cases in which MMGC could be treated using endoscopic submucosal dissection was significantly higher after PG and FPG than after DG.

Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) in patients with advanced gastric cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to determine its safety and feasibility. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 51 patients who underwent gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer [cT3-4/N1-3 or macroscopic type 3 (> 80 mm) or type 4] following NAC between November 2009 and January 2018. After excluding two patients who underwent palliative surgery due to peritoneal dissemination, 49 patients were ultimately selected for this cohort study. The patients were then divided into the LG group and open gastrectomy (OG) group, after which the clinicopathological characteristics as well as short- and long-term outcomes were examined. RESULTS: Compared with the OG group, the LG group demonstrated a significantly lower amount of intraoperative blood loss and a shorter hospital stay. The overall complication rates were 10% (2 of 20 patients) and 24% (7 of 29 patients) in the LG and OG groups (P = 0.277), respectively. No significant differences in 5-year disease-free (LG 44.4% vs. OG 53.3%; P = 0.382) or overall survival rates (LG 46.9% vs. OG 54.0%; P = 0.422) were observed between the groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that the surgical procedure (LG vs. OG) was not an independent risk factor for disease-free (P = 0.645) or overall survival (P = 0.489). CONCLUSIONS: LG may be a potential therapeutic option for patients with gastric cancer following NAC considering its high success rates and acceptable short- and long-term outcomes.

What are the important prognostic factors in gastric cancer with positive duodenal margins? A multi-institutional analysis.

PURPOSE: Positive margins are reported in from 4.8 to 9.5% of all gastric cancer surgeries and they have a negative impact on the overall survival. Few cases with positive duodenal margins have been included in previous studies regarding the prognosis. METHODS: This multi-institutional retrospective study included 115 gastric cancer patients with positive duodenal margins following gastrectomy between January 2002 and December 2017. The association between clinicopathological factors and the overall survival was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The three-year overall survival was 22% and the median survival was 13 months. A multivariate analysis found that distant metastasis, no postoperative chemotherapy, and non-Type 4 disease were significantly associated with a poor survival. Patients without distant metastasis who received postoperative chemotherapy had a 3-year overall survival of 56% and a median survival of 44 months. CONCLUSION: The patients who underwent post-operative chemotherapy showed a significantly better OS compared with those who did not undergo post-operative chemotherapy, regardless of the existence of distant metastasis. Postoperative chemotherapy may, therefore, improve the prognosis of surgically treated gastric cancer patients with positive duodenal margins.

Sentinel Node Navigation Surgery for Early Gastric Cancer: Analysis of Factors Which Affect Direction of Lymphatic Drainage.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We started performing sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) for patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) using infrared ray electronic endoscopy (IREE) with indocyanine green injection from year 2000. The EGCs usually have complex lymphatic drainage, unidirectional or multidirectional lymphatic flow. In this study, we investigated and clarified factors that affect the direction of gastric lymphatic drainage. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Consecutive 60 patients with EGC who underwent SNNS by IREE from year 2006 to 2014 were enrolled to this study. Patients' age, gender, location of tumors, operative method, previous treatment by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), presence of pathological ulcerative scar and maximum tumor diameter were enrolled as parameters which may affect direction of lymphatic drainage and analyzed. RESULT: Bivariate analysis demonstrated that the presence of pathological ulcerative scar (P = 0.01), tumor location (g.c vs. a.w vs. p.w vs. l.c, P = 0.01), and maxim tumor diameter (P = 0.0003) were relevant to direction of gastric lymphatic drainage. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor location (g.c/a.w/p.w vs. l.c, odds ratio 8.227, P = 0.011) and the maximum tumor diameter (odds ratio 1.057, P = 0.037) are independent factors that affect direction of gastric lymphatic flow. Of tumors, 78% located at lesser curvature had unidirectional lymphatic drainage, and 93% of tumors whose diameter was 40 mm and more had multidirectional lymphatic drainage. CONCLUSION: Our investigation revealed that the tumor location and tumor diameter were the key factors which affect the direction of lymphatic drainage, which is useful fact to understand the complexity of gastric lymphatic drainage.

Comparison of the cost and outcomes following totally laparoscopic and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomies for gastric cancer: a single-institution comparison.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the short-term surgical outcomes and cost-benefits following totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for the treatment of gastric cancer. METHODS: Between April 2007 and December 2013, a total of 100 patients with gastric cancer underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. The patients were classified into two groups according to whether intracorporeal anastomosis or extracorporeal anastomosis had been performed. The comparison between the groups was based on clinicopathological characteristics and surgical and economic outcomes. RESULTS: There were 57 and 43 patients who underwent TLDG and LADG, respectively. The patients' demographics and tumor characteristics did not show any statistically significant differences with the exception for tumor location. In the LADG group, tumors were localized to relatively higher positions (p = 0.024) and received Roux-en-Y reconstruction more frequently (p < 0.001). There were no differences in the incidence of morbidity. Anastomotic leakage was not recorded in either group, although anastomotic stenosis occurred in one patient (1.8 %) after TLDG and in two patients (4.7 %) after LADG. Compared with the LADG group, the TLDG group was associated with significantly less operative blood loss (p < 0.001), a shorter time to oral intake (p = 0.012), and hospital stay (p = 0.018). The median operation costs were greater in the TLDG group than in the LADG group (¥982,000 in TLDG vs. ¥879,830 in LADG; p < 0.001), whereas the median total hospital costs were similar between the two groups (¥1302,665 in LADG vs. ¥1383,322 in TLDG: p = 0.119). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that TLDG is as technically feasible, safe, and effective as LADG for treating patients with gastric cancer. Furthermore, TLDG is associated with equivalent total hospital costs compared with LADG. The increased operation cost is offset by the decreased costs associated with longer periods of hospitalization.

Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in elderly patients in order to determine the safety, feasibility, and risk factors for postoperative complications associated with this procedure. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 208 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer between January 2007 and September 2014. After excluding 15 patients with unusual medical histories or surgical treatments, 193 were selected for this cohort study. We divided the patients into two cohorts: elderly patients (≥75 years old) and non-elderly patients (<74 years old). We compared these cohorts with respect to clinicopathological characteristics and intraoperative and postoperative parameters. RESULTS: The overall complication rates were 11.4% (8 of 70 patients) in the elderly cohort and 8.1% (10 of 123 patients) in the non-elderly cohort (P = 0.449). In a univariate analysis, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) of ≥3, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of 3, operative time of ≥330 min, and intraoperative blood loss of ≥50 ml were found to correlate significantly with postoperative complications. In a multivariate analysis, CCI of ≥3 (P = 0.034), ASA score of 3 (P = 0.019), and intraoperative blood loss of ≥50 ml (P = 0.016) were found to be independent risk factors of postoperative complications. In contrast, age was not found to significantly affect the risk of postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer can be successfully performed in elderly patients with an acceptable complication rate. This study suggested that high CCI, ASA score, and intraoperative blood loss volume were identified as independent predictors of postoperative complications after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

New Proposal Strategy of Sentinel Lymph Node Navigation Surgery for Endoscopic Curability C-2: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) followed by limited gastrectomy for early gastric cancer (EGC) with Endoscopic Curability C-2 (eCuraC-2). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2001 and 2018, 33 patients were included in this study. Following sentinel node (SN) biopsy using indocyanine green combined with an infrared ray laparoscopic system, limited gastrectomy (LG) [wedge resection (WR), or segmental gastrectomy (SG)] was performed without extended lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: SN detection rate was 97% (32/33). The mean number of SNs per case was 7.8. Three patients (9.1%) with lymph node metastasis (LNM) had a positive SN identified by intraoperative pathological examination. When intraoperative pathologic examination showed SN to be LNM negative, 11 patients underwent WR, and seven were subjected to SG. Postoperative pathological examinations showed no false negatives for LNM, and four patients (12%) had residual cancer in their resected stomachs. Overall survival and disease-specific survival five years after SNNS were 87.9% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: SNNS followed by LG with lymphatic basin resection may be one of the ideal procedures for patients with eCuraC-2 due to the accurate diagnosis of LNM and favorable disease-specific prognosis.

The impact on obesity-related quality of life and eating satisfaction in the early period after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity impairs patients' quality of life (QoL). Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a common procedure for patients with severe obesity; however, studies reporting changes in obesity-related QoL are limited. The aim of this study was to assess changes in obesity-related QoL and food tolerance in the early postoperative period. METHODS: We included 20 consecutive patients who underwent LSG between May 2021 and July 2023. We evaluated changes in obesity-related QoL 6 months after surgery using an obesity and weight loss QoL questionnaire (OWLQOL) and a weight related symptom measure (WRSM). Additionally, we assessed eating satisfaction and food tolerance after surgery. RESULTS: The percentages of total weight loss and excess weight loss were 28.5% and 79.1%, respectively. OWLQOL scores and WRSM changed from 36.5 to 73.0 points and from 44.0 to 15.0 points (p = .007, .007), respectively. The food tolerance score decreased from 25 to 21.2 points (p < .001), while eating satisfaction showed no significant change (p = .25). CONCLUSION: Obesity-related QoL is enhanced even in the early postoperative period, without sacrificing eating satisfaction. The findings of this study may provide valuable insights for patients when considering LSG.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy combined with Toupet fundoplication (T-sleeve): A short report of a Japanese obesity patient with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most frequently performed procedure in bariatric-metabolic surgery (BMS) worldwide, accounting for approximately 90% of BMS procedures in Japan. While numerous studies have reported on the safety and efficacy of LSG, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains a major postoperative complication. Although Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is preferred for severe obesity with GERD, it is less suitable for Japanese patients who have a higher risk of gastric cancer due to the remnant stomach which is difficult to observe with esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy. To address de novo and exacerbation GERD after LSG, we conducted LSG with Toupet fundoplication (T-sleeve) for Japanese patients with severe obesity. In our first T-sleeve case, the patient demonstrated sufficient weight loss and improved GERD following surgery. Hence, we suggest that T-sleeve is a feasible option for Japanese patients with obesity and concurrent GERD.

Long-term survival after multidisciplinary treatments for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer with multiple liver and lung metastases.

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab-based chemotherapy is a standard treatment regimen for human epithelial growth factor 2 (HER2)-positive gastric cancer. This is a case of a patient who has survived 12 years after being diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer with multiple liver and lung metastases. CASE PRESENTATION: A woman in her 70s underwent total gastrectomy, cholecystectomy, and left hepatic lobectomy for gastric cancer with liver metastasis. One month after the surgery, multiple liver metastases appeared. After two courses of S-1 + CDDP chemotherapy, the liver metastases disappeared, and new lung metastases occurred. Because the primary tumor was HER2 positive, S-1 + CDDP + trastuzumab chemotherapy was performed. After one course of chemotherapy, the blood test showed pancytopenia, and CDDP was discontinued. S-1 + trastuzumab chemotherapy was then initiated, and as a result, the lung metastases disappeared. The patient is alive without recurrence 12 years after the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We encountered a case of long-term survival after multidisciplinary treatments for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer with multiple liver and lung metastases.

Impact of Tumor Location on the Quality of Life of Patients Undergoing Total or Proximal Gastrectomy.

PURPOSE: Most studies have investigated the differences in postgastrectomy quality of life (QOL) based on the surgical procedure or reconstruction method adopted; only a few studies have compared QOL based on tumor location. This large-scale study aims to investigate the differences in QOL between patients with esophagogastric junction cancer (EGJC) and those with upper third gastric cancer (UGC) undergoing the same gastrectomy procedure to evaluate the impact of tumor location on postoperative QOL. METHODS: The Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45 (PGSAS-45) questionnaire was distributed in 70 institutions to 2,364 patients who underwent gastrectomy for EGJC or UGC. A total of 1,909 patients were eligible for the study, and 1,744 patients who underwent total gastrectomy (TG) or proximal gastrectomy (PG) were selected for the final analysis. These patients were divided into EGJC and UGC groups; thereafter, the PGSAS-45 main outcome measures (MOMs) were compared between the two groups for each type of gastrectomy. RESULTS: Among the post-TG patients, only one MOM was significantly better in the UGC group than in the EGJC group. Conversely, among the post-PG patients, postoperative QOL was significantly better in 6 out of 19 MOMs in the UGC group than in the EGJC group. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor location had a minimal effect on the postoperative QOL of post-TG patients, whereas among post-PG patients, there were definite differences in postoperative QOL between the two groups. It seems reasonable to conservatively estimate the benefits of PG in patients with EGJC compared to those in patients with UGC.

Taxane-based versus platinum-based chemotherapy in early recurrent gastric cancer after radical surgery with S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy: A multi-institutional retrospective analysis.

AIM: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of taxane-based and platinum-based regimens in patients with early recurrent gastric cancer after radical surgery with S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: The medical records of 118 patients from six institutes with early recurrent stage II/III gastric cancer, who developed recurrence during adjuvant S-1 or within 6 months after completion of adjuvant therapy between January 2006 and December 2017, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients treated with second line chemotherapy were enrolled and followed to the end of December 2019. The impact of two regimens, taxane-based (n = 46) versus platinum-based (n = 31), on treatment outcome were evaluated using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Median overall survival was 9.0 months and median progression-free survival was 4.1 months. No difference was observed in overall survival between taxane-based and platinum-based regimens (P = 0.64). Although not significant, the response rate of platinum-based regimens was better than that of taxane-based regimens (16% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.26). Multivariate analysis identified performance status (P = 0.040), multiorgan metastases (P = 0.029), and undifferentiated histological type (P = 0.018) as independent poor prognostic factors. In undifferentiated histological type, multiorgan metastases (P = 0.013) and taxane-based regimens (P = 0.018) were independent prognosis factors characterized by multivariate analysis. Conversion rate to third-line chemotherapy or more was 51% in undifferentiated histological type and 65% in differentiated histological type (P = 0.26). CONCLUSION: Platinum-based regimens may be recommended for undifferentiated early recurrent gastric cancer after S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy.

Prognosis of hemodialysis patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer: Results of a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the survival outcomes of and predictive factors for survival in hemodialysis patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective study from 9 institutions to investigate the survival outcomes of 75 hemodialysis patients with gastric cancer. Patient characteristics included demographic data, hemodialysis- and gastric cancer-related variables. Multivariate Cox hazards models were applied to determine independent predictors of poor overall survival and non-gastric cancer related death. RESULTS: Stage I disease was predominant (58.7%) in our series. The overall morbidity and the 30-day mortality rates were 25.3% and 1.3%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates of patients with pStages I, II, III, and IV disease were 59.2%, 42.9%, 32.3%, and 0%, respectively. Eleven (14.7%) patients died of gastric cancer, whereas many more (40.0%) died owing to causes other than gastric cancer. Non-gastric cancer-related death was especially prevalent in patients with pStages I (95.2%) and II (75.0%) disease. Multivariable analysis revealed advanced age, long duration of hemodialysis (> 5 years), total gastrectomy, and pStage IV disease to be independently associated with poor overall survival. Notably, advanced age, long duration of hemodialysis, and the presence of cardiovascular disease were all independent predictors of non-gastric cancer-related death. Patients with all 3 factors had very poor survival outcomes (3-year overall survival; 14.3%). CONCLUSION: The survival outcomes of hemodialysis patients with gastric cancer, especially those with early-stage gastric cancer, were clearly poor, largely owing to the increased risk of non-gastric cancer-related death. Preoperative comorbidities and hemodialytic features were useful for predicting long-term outcomes of this vulnerable population.

The new prognostic score for unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer treated with nivolumab: A multi-institutional cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Real-world outcomes of nivolumab treatment for gastric cancer and associated prognostic factors remain unclear; the present study aimed to evaluate both items. METHODS: A total of 278 consecutive patients treated with nivolumab for gastric cancer during 2017-2019 were enrolled in this multi-institutional retrospective cohort study. The impact of laboratory findings, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and clinicopathological factors on long-term survival was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The response rate was 11.7% in patients with measurable lesions. The overall and progression-free survival estimates were 6.77 and 2.53 months, respectively. The incidence of irAEs was 30.6% (6.8% for grade ≥3). There were no treatment-related deaths. Multivariate analysis revealed that C-reactive protein level of ≤0.5 mg/dL (hazard ratio = 0.476, P < .001), irAE occurrence (hazard ratio = 0.544, P < .001), albumin level of >3.5 g/dL (hazard ratio = 0.688, P = .045), performance status 0 (hazard ratio = 0.711, P = .028), lymphocyte count >1000/µL (hazard ratio = 0.686, P = .027), and differentiated histological type (hazard ratio = 0.740, P = .046) were independently associated with improved survival. The median survival of patients with four or more good prognostic factors was 18.3 months. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab showed safety and survival benefits in patients with previously treated unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer. Low C-reactive protein level, irAE occurrence, high albumin level, high lymphocyte count, and differentiated histological type may affect outcomes. The presence of four or more good prognostic factors may help identify likely long-term survivors.

Prognostic Significance of ZKSCAN3 (ZNF306) Expression in Gastric Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Zinc finger protein ZKSCAN3 (ZNF306) is a promising oncogene candidate in colon, bladder, breast, uterine cervical, and prostate cancers. The present study aimed to investigate ZKSCAN3 protein expression in gastric carcinoma patient tissues and to evaluate oncological outcomes in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ZKSCAN3 was detected using the anti-ZKSCAN3 rabbit polyclonal antibody. For immunohistochemical examination, we used paraffin-embedded specimens from 87 consecutive patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy. We investigated ZKSCAN3 expression in relation with patient prognosis and clinicopathological factors. RESULTS: ZKSCAN3 was detected in 28 (32.2%) tumour specimens, with significant association with lymphatic system invasion and distant metastasis. Patients with ZKSCAN3-positive tumours had worse overall survival (OS) than those with ZKSCAN3-negative tumours based on log-rank testing. Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed that ZKSCAN3 was an independent prognostic parameter for OS (hazard ratio: 2.6379, p=0.0164). CONCLUSION: ZKSCAN3 is a potential novel prognostic factor in gastric cancer patients.

Prediction of lymph node metastasis and sentinel node navigation surgery for patients with early-stage gastric cancer.

Accurate prediction of lymph node (LN) status is crucially important for appropriate treatment planning in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). However, consensus on patient and tumor characteristics associated with LN metastasis are yet to be reached. Through systematic search, we identified several independent variables associated with LN metastasis in EGC, which should be included in future research to assess which of these variables remain as significant predictors of LN metastasis. On the other hand, even if we use these promising parameters, we should realize the limitation and the difficulty of predicting LN metastasis accurately. The sentinel LN (SLN) is defined as first possible site to receive cancer cells along the route of lymphatic drainage from the primary tumor. The absence of metastasis in SLN is believed to correlate with the absence of metastasis in downstream LNs. In this review, we have attempted to focus on several independent parameters which have close relationship between tumor and LN metastasis in EGC. In addition, we evaluated the history of sentinel node navigation surgery and the usefulness for EGC.

[A metastatic rectal carcinoma originating from the uterine cervix].

A 40-year-old woman underwent radical hysterectomy and postoperative radiotherapy for uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) 6 years previously. She was referred to our department for the treatment of a rectal lesion located in the posterior wall approximately 8 cm from the anal verge. She underwent low anterior resection because the lesion was diagnosed as SCC by preoperative endoscopic biopsy. Pathological examination of the resected lesion demonstrated a 3 × 3-cm solid tumor expanding mainly in the muscularis propria layer and infiltrating the mucosal layer without lymph node involvement. Moreover, it was diagnosed as metastatic SCC from the uterine cervical tumor. No recurrence has been detected over 5 years after resection. The prognosis of SCC of the rectum without lymph node metastasis has been considered similar to that of node-negative adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Thus, if there is no distant metastasis and/or peritoneal dissemination, aggressive surgical resection should be performed to ensure a good prognosis.