Rates and Quality of Preinterventional Reperfusion in Patients With Direct Access to Endovascular Treatment.

Background and Purpose- Preinterventional reperfusion before endovascular treatment (ET) is a benefit of bridging with intravenous tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator). However, detailed data on reperfusion quality and rates of obviating ET in a cohort of patients with immediate access to ET is lacking. Purpose of this analysis was to evaluate prevalence and quality of preinterventional reperfusion in mothership patients. Methods- All mothership patients (n=627) from a prospective registry subjected to angiography with an intention to perform ET were reviewed. Preinterventional change of occlusion site (COS) was categorized into COS with Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 0/1, COS with TICI ≥2a, COS with TICI ≥2b, and COS with perfusion worsening. Predictors and clinical relevance were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and results are displayed as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results- Prevalence of COS in all patients was 10.7% (95% CI, 8.3%-13.1%), subdividing into 2.7% COS with TICI 0/1, 6.2% COS with ≥TICI 2a (including 2.9% with TICI ≥2b), and 1.8% COS with perfusion worsening. Factors related to COS with ≥TICI 2a were intravenous tPA (aOR, 11.98; 95% CI, 4.5-31.6), cardiogenic thrombus origin (aOR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1-4.6), and thrombus length (aOR per 1 mm increase 0.926; 95% CI, 0.87-0.99). Additional ET was performed despite COS with ≥TICI 2a in 51.3%. COS with ≥TICI 2a showed a tendency for favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale, ≤2; aOR, 2.65; 95% CI, 0.98-7.17). Rates of COS with ≥TICI 2a were particularly low in internal carotid artery and proximal M1 occlusions (2.2%; 95% CI, 0.9%-5%), where intravenous tPA was associated with perfusion worsening (aOR, 4.33; 95% CI, 1.12-16.80). Conclusions- Prevalence of preinterventional reperfusion is non-negligible in patients with direct access to ET and is clearly favored by intravenous tPA treatment. However, it is often incomplete and often requires additional ET. Preinterventional reperfusion of internal carotid artery and proximal M1 occlusions is rare and usually of low quality, where intravenous tPA may also promote perfusion worsening.

Multivessel Occlusion in Patients Subjected to Thrombectomy: Prevalence, Associated Factors, and Clinical Implications.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with embolic large-vessel occlusion may present with additional coincidental acute occlusions within or distant from the involved territory, referred to as multivessel occlusion (MVO). Purpose of this study was to assess prevalence of MVO, associated factors, and clinical relevance in patients undergoing endovascular stroke treatment. METHODS: Image data of consecutive endovascular candidates (n=720) with direct access to angiography were extracted from a prospective registry. Prevalence of MVO was assessed with multimodal magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography and confirmed by intra-arterial angiography. Explorative analysis of associated factors and clinical relevance was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression including variables with P<0.15 in univariate comparison. Good functional outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 at day 90. RESULTS: MVO was present in 10.7% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.4%-13.0%). Two, 3, and 4 concomitant occlusions were found in 80.5%, 16.9%, and 2.6% of MVO cases, respectively. Detection rate on initial radiological report was 54.5%. Downstream MVO was present in around one third of MVO (n=27/77, 35.1%), whereas all other MVO (n=50/77, 64.9%) occurred in different territories. Independent factors related to MVO were statin treatment (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.477; 95% CI, 0.276-0.827), higher systolic blood pressure (aOR per mm Hg increase, 1.014; 95% CI, 1.005-1.023), and primary occlusion site M2 (aOR, 1.870; 95% CI, 1.103-3.170). MVO was related to lower rates of successful reperfusion (aOR, 0.549; 95% CI, 0.316-0.953) and lower rates of good functional outcome (aOR, 0.437; 95% CI, 0.207-0.923). CONCLUSIONS: Every tenth patient subjected to angiography for endovascular stroke treatment experienced MVO in our series, and only half were prospectively identified on preinterventional diagnostic imaging. Patients with MVO had higher baseline systolic blood pressure and were less often medicated with statins, an observation that warrants external validation and evaluation regarding causality. Occurrence of MVO has implication for treatment decisions, negatively affects endovascular treatment success, and is predictive of worse clinical outcome.