Pulmonary rehabilitation in non-small cell lung cancer patients after completion of treatment.

OBJECTIVES: The functional status of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is often limited not only by cancer itself, but also by the different types of treatment and by comorbidities [eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure]. The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of an inpatient multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program on pulmonary function and exercise capacity of patients with NSCLC after completion of their treatment. METHODS: Forty-seven patients with NSCLC underwent a PR program after completing cancer treatment. Pulmonary function tests, arterial blood gases, 6-minute walk test, and dyspnea severity before and after PR were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: After undergoing PR, patients exhibited significantly higher forced expiratory volume in the first second (mean increase, 110 ± 240 mL; P=0.007), forced vital capacity (mean increase, 130 ± 290 mL; P=0.001), and 6-minute walk test distance (mean increase, 41 m; P<0.001). A statistically significant improvement in the severity of dyspnea (mean decrease in the Modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale: 0.26 ± 0.61; P=0.007) was observed. We observed that improvement in pulmonary function and exercise capacity was similar among patients with and without COPD and among patients who underwent thoracic surgery or not. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NSCLC who could accomplish PR program, after multidisciplinary treatment for the main disease, seem to benefit in terms of exercise capacity and pulmonary function. These benefits are independent of concurrent COPD and surgical treatment for lung cancer.

Assessment of respiratory mechanics by impulse oscillometry in orthopneic patients with acute left ventricular failure.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the respiratory function and mechanics of patients with orthopnea caused by acute left ventricular failure (ALVF). METHODS: The study comprised 40 patients with ALVF and 15 control subjects. All patients underwent lung function tests and impulse oscillometry in both sitting and supine positions. In a subgroup of 22 patients, isosorbide dinitrate was administered and impulse oscillometry was performed 15 minutes later in the supine position. RESULTS: No patient reported dyspnea while seated, and the orthopnea score was 2.9 ± 1.4. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 43% ± 10%. Patients demonstrated restrictive spirometric pattern in the sitting position, whereas functional residual capacity was comparable to that of the control group. In the supine position, all pulmonary volumes decreased, except inspiratory capacity which increased. Respiratory reactance (Xrs5) was higher in patients in both sitting (421.8 ± 630.6%pred vs 147.2 ± 72.8%pred, P = .01) and supine (699.8 ± 699.9%pred vs 251.2 ± 151.6%pred, P ≤ .001) positions. Respiratory resistance (Rrs5) (10.6% ± 17.8% mean decrease) and Xrs5 (17.2% ± 39.4% mean decrease) improved after nitrates administration. Orthopnea was better correlated with Xrs5%pred in the supine position (r = .42, P = .007). Ejection fraction was positively correlated with inspiratory capacity %pred (r = .42, P = .007) in the sitting position. CONCLUSION: Patients with ALVF demonstrated increased respiratory reactance that correlated with orthopnea severity and improved after nitrates administration.