[Incidental and "leave me alone" findings in the GI tract-part 1 : Intestinal lumen and intestinal wall]. / Inzidentelle und Leave-me-alone-Befunde des GI-Trakts ­ Teil 1 : Darmlumen und Darmwand.

CLINICAL PROBLEM: Due to the widespread use of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) asymptomatic incidental findings of the gastrointestinal tract (GI) are increasingly being recognized. Incidental findings are frequently not part of the primary inquiry from referring physicians but it is obligatory to make a diagnosis and to stipulate the need for further clarification. RADIOLOGICAL STANDARD PROCEDURES: A multitude of incidental findings in the intestinal lumen, in the intestinal wall and in the adjacent mesenterium or subperitoneal space are shown in CT and MRI. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS AND ASSESSMENT: The first part of the two-part overview addresses the intestinal incidental findings in the lumen, such as coproliths, invaginations, mucoceles and chronic dilatations. In the intestinal wall, thickenings of neoplastic and nonneoplastic origins are discussed. Many of the findings can be classified as benign and as "leave me alone lesions" do not necessitate any further clarification but in contrast others need a definitive clarification. The most important incidental findings in the GI tract are systematically classified, illustrated and evaluated with respect to the clinical relevance, depending on the localization (e.g. stomach, small and large intestines).

[Incidental and "leave me alone" findings of the GI tract-part 2 : Intestinal wall and mesentery]. / Inzidentelle und Leave-me-alone-Befunde des GI-Trakts ­ Teil 2 : Darmwand und Mesenterium.

Due to the widespread use of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) asymptomatic incidental findings of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract are increasingly being recognized. Incidental findings are frequently not part of the primary inquiry from referring physicians but it is obligatory to make a diagnosis and to stipulate the need for further clarification. A multitude of incidental findings in the intestinal lumen, in the intestinal wall and in the adjacent mesentery or subperitoneal space are shown in CT and MRI of the GI tract. The last part of the two-part review addresses the gastrointestinal incidental findings in the intestinal wall and the adjacent sections. Extramural incidental findings occur as mesenteric inflammation, tumors and cysts. Many of the findings can be classified as benign and as "leave me alone lesions" do not necessitate any further clarification but in contrast others need a definitive clarification. The most important incidental findings in the GI tract are systematically classified, illustrated and evaluated with respect to the clinical relevance, depending on the localization (e.g. stomach, small and large intestines).

[Incidental and leave me alone findings of abdominal organs-part 2 : Spleen, kidneys and adrenal glands and efferent urinary tracts]. / Inzidentelle und Leave-me-alone-Befunde der abdominellen Organe ­ Teil 2 : Milz, Niere und Nebennieren sowie ableitende Harnwege.

For masses of the spleen, which are mostly benign, accessory spleens, cysts and hemangiomas should be radiologically described; however, if confirmed further follow-up control is unnecessary. In the case of disseminated small masses, chronic inflammation and granulomatous diseases, such as tuberculosis and sarcoidosis should be considered in the differential diagnostics. Solid masses in the kidneys should always be further clarified, with the exception of a fat-rich angiomyolipoma. For cystic masses of the kidneys, the modified Bosniak classification for computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging should be used. Masses of the adrenal glands greater than 10mm in size should be clarified further as well as those where fat is not detected, independent of the size and evidence of malignancy.

[Incidental and "leave me alone" findings of abdominal organs-part 1 : Liver, gall ducts and pancreas]. / Inzidentelle und Leave-me-alone-Befunde der abdominellen Organe ­ Teil 1 : Leber, Gallenwege und Pankreas.

Incidentalomas of the parenchymal organs of the abdomen, i.e. radiological findings in these organs that are not the primary focus of the clinical question, are frequent in this region of the body. In particular, findings presumed to be unimportant, such as cystic masses in the liver, the bile duct system or the pancreas, initially appear to be irrelevant in the diagnosis. For the liver we define the mostly clearly diagnosable simple cysts and hemangiomas as leave me alone lesions. Otherwise, we recommend a classification of incidentalomas into the three major categories (<0.5 cm, 0.5-1.5 cm and >1.5 cm) as well as an assessment with respect to clearly benign and suspect imaging characteristics in the context of a classification of patients into three different risk groups.

[Acute pancreatitis : Typical findings in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging]. / Akute Pankreatitis : Typische Befunde in Computer- und Magnetresonanztomographie.

CLINICAL PROBLEM: Imaging plays a major role to differentiate interstitial edematous from necrotic pancreatitis and to describe relevant local complications for proper patient management and decision-making in acute pancreatitis. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES: The revised Atlanta classification 2012 of acute pancreatitis divides patients into mild, moderately severe and severe groups. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are well established for diagnosis and follow-up of acute pancreatitis and its complications METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS AND ASSESSMENT: Based on the revised Atlanta classification, CT and MRI allow for adequate categorization of interstitial edematous and necrotic pancreatitis. Imaging and standardized reporting nomenclature enable confident differentiation of early and late complications in acute pancreatitis. RECOMMENDATIONS: The aim of this review article is to present an image-rich overview of different morphologic characteristics of acute pancreatitis and associated local complications by CT or MRI using case examples.

[Guideline-based diagnosis of pancreatitis]. / Leitliniengerechte Diagnostik der Pankreatitis.

BACKGROUND: There is currently no S3 guideline that contains statements on the diagnosis and treatment of acute, chronic and autoimmune pancreatitis in a single guideline. OBJECTIVES: This article presents the most relevant recommendations relating to radiological imaging from the new "S3 guideline for pancreatitis". MATERIALS AND METHODS: The guideline was developed by the DGVS (German Society for Digestive and Metabolic Diseases). After an online-based Delphi survey, the statements were discussed by an interdisciplinary expert team at a 3-day consensus conference and then agreed upon. The level of evidence scheme (version 2) of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine was used. RESULTS: The new German "S3 guideline pancreatitis" comprises for the first time all entities of pancreatitis, acute, chronic and autoimmune pancreatitis and contains a large number of innovations with regard to diagnostic imaging and therapy. In addition to the evidence-based recommendations for diagnosis and therapy, a German-language glossary of the revised Atlanta classification on acute pancreatitis was adopted by consensus of the interdisciplinary guideline expert team. Furthermore, protocol recommendations for the performance of computed tomography (CT) are provided for the first time. In this article we introduce the key recommendations and innovations in the field of diagnostic radiologic imaging for acute, chronic and autoimmune pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS: In the future, every radiologist should have deep knowledge of the recommended time intervals for radiological imaging in acute pancreatitis and know the German terms for the description of acute pancreatitis; furthermore they should be able to classify the morphologies to the appropriate stages.

[Criteria for resectability of pancreatic cancer and postoperative imaging]. / Resektabilitätskriterien beim Pankreaskarzinom und postoperative Bildgebung.

By improving the techniques of pancreatic surgery, the mortality and morbidity for pancreatic carcinoma could be significantly reduced. For radiologists a profound knowledge of the surgical techniques is of decisive importance. Based on this knowledge postoperative complications can be reliably uncovered and local recurrences can be detected at an early stage. The complications resulting from pancreatic surgery can be severe and often necessitate a radiological intervention. As pancreatic cancer itself is a severe disease with a poor 5­year survival, which can only be improved by an R0 resection, it is crucial to identify using imaging those patients who are primarily operable or who can potentially achieve an operable condition through neoadjuvant chemotherapy (borderline) and inoperable patients to avoid postoperative complications which would additionally weaken them and result in unnecessary delays in initiating palliative therapy. Thus, familiarity with the clinical criteria of resectability and also inoperability in pancreatic cancer nowadays represents an essential basic knowledge for every oncological radiologist.

[Hepatopancreaticobiliary diseases in IgG4-associated autoimmune diseases]. / Pankreatikohepatobiliäre Erkrankungen bei IgG4­assoziierten Autoimmunerkrankungen.

BACKGROUND: IgG4-related diseases are rare systemic multiorgan diseases and can thus affect any organ system. The incidence of diagnosis has significantly increased due to increasing awareness. OBJECTIVE: In the abdomen the hepatopancreaticobiliary system provides an essential organ system for the expression of IgG4-associated autoimmune diseases. The focus here is autoimmune pancreatitis type 1 but IgG4-associated sclerosing cholangitis and IgG4-associated hepatopathy, which can also occur in combination are less well-known. METHODS: Various mostly Asiatic, histologically-based diagnostic systems, such as HISORt or international consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) are available for the diagnostics of hepatopancreaticobiliary IgG4-related autoimmune diseases, in which imaging techniques playing an increasingly important role. RESULTS: In addition to generalized organ swelling further morphological and also functional imaging criteria have become increasingly well-known for autoimmune pancreatitis, such as late enhancement or the imaging response to steroid therapy. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERP) can provide valuable information for the diagnostics of IgG4-related diseases in the hepatopancreaticobiliary system. CONCLUSION: IgG4-related autoimmune diseases of the hepatopancreaticobiliary system are a rare group of diseases in which increasing knowledge of the radiological appearance also leads to an increasingly frequency of diagnosis. IgG4-related diseases must be distinguished from non-necrotizing pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer, which is often difficult but has significant therapeutic consequences for the patients.

[Pancreatitis: An update]. / Pankreatitis : Ein Update.

BACKGROUND: Acute and chronic pancreatitis are becoming increasingly more severe diseases in the western world with far-reaching consequences for the individual patient as well as the socioeconomic situation. This article gives an overview of the contribution of radiological imaging to the diagnostics and therapy of both forms of the disease. RESULTS: Acute pancreatitis can be subdivided into severe (20%) and mild manifestations. The diagnostics should be performed with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing necrosis or potential infections only in severe forms of pancreatitis. In chronic pancreatitis transabdominal ultrasound should initially be adequate for assessment of the pancreas. For the differential diagnosis between pancreatic carcinoma and chronic pancreatitis, MRI with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) followed by an endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration is the method of choice. CONCLUSION: For the primary diagnosis for acute and chronic pancreatitis ultrasound examination is the modality of first choice followed by radiological CT and MRI with MRCP examinations.

Diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune pancreatitis types 1 and 2.

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is characterized by diffuse or focal swelling of the pancreas. AIP has been divided into types 1 and 2. The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the clinicopathological characteristics, therapy and outcome of patients with AIP. METHODS: The medical records of patients diagnosed with AIP between January 2003 and July 2011 were reviewed. Characteristics of patients with AIP types 1 and 2 were compared with those of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). RESULTS: AIP was classified as type 1 in 40 patients and type 2 in 32 according to the HISORt (Histology, Imaging, Serology, Other organ involvement, Response to therapy) criteria. Patients with histologically confirmed AIP type 2 were younger than those with type 1 (P = 0·005). Some 30 of 32 patients with AIP type 2 were found to have a localized tumour-like pancreatic mass and underwent pancreatectomy, compared with only 16 of 40 with type 1 (P < 0·001). Three of 25 patients with AIP type 2 presented with raised serum levels of IgG4 compared with 21 of 38 with type 1 (P < 0·001). There was no difference in symptoms and involvement of other organs between AIP types 1 and 2. Presentation with weight loss was more common among patients with PDAC than those with AIP, but there was no difference in pain or jaundice between the groups. Raised serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels were more prevalent in patients with PDAC. CONCLUSION: Patients with AIP type 2 frequently present with abdominal pain and a tumour-like mass. Differentiating AIP from PDAC is difficult, so making the clinical decision regarding operative versus conservative management is challenging.

Preoperative therapy of esophagogastric cancer: the problem of nonresponding patients.

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative treatment is nowadays standard for locally advanced esophagogastric cancer in Europe. Surprisingly, little attention has been paid to nonresponders so far. The aim of our retrospective exploratory study was the comparison of responder, nonresponder, and primary resected patients in respect of outcome considering the tumor entity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2001-2011, 607 patients with locally advanced esophagogastric carcinoma (adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), n = 293; squamous cell cancer (SCC), n = 111; gastric cancer, n = 203) after preoperative treatment (n = 281) or primary resection (n = 326) were included. Histopathological response evaluation (Becker criteria) was available for 263. RESULTS: A total of 76/263 (28.9 %) were responders (<10 % residual tumor). There was an association of response with increased R0 resections (p < 0.001) but also with a higher complication rate (p = 0.008) compared to nonresponse and primary surgery. Mortality was not influenced. Increased R0 resections after response were confirmed in every tumor entity (AEG, p = 0.010; SCC, p = 0.023; gastric cancer, p = 0.006). Median survival was best for responders with 43.5 months [95 % confidence interval (CI), 27.9-59.1], followed by nonresponders with 24.3 months (95 % CI, 21.6-27.0) and primary resected patients with 20.8 months (95 % CI, 17.7-23.9; p = 0.002). AEG (p = 0.012) and gastric cancer (p = 0.017) revealed identical results, but in the subgroup of SCC, the survival of nonresponders (median, 11.6 months; 95 % CI, 6.9-16.3) was even worse than for primary resected patients (median, 23.8 months; 95 % CI, 1.7-46.0; p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: The histopathological response rate was low. Generally, nonresponding patients with AEG or gastric cancer seem not to have a disadvantage compared to primary resected patients, but nonresponders with SCC have a worse prognosis, which strengthens the demand for a critical patient selection in surgery for this tumor entity.

[Autoimmune pancreatitis versus pancreatic cancer]. / Autoimmunpankreatitis versus Pankreaskarzinom.

CLINICAL ISSUE: Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is classified as a distinct form of pancreatitis according to the guidelines. It is characterized by imaging morphologic and histologic features and is associated with extrapancreatic manifestations in type 1 IgG 4-associated disease. Symptoms and findings almost always improve with administration of steroids. Differentiation from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is required, particularly in the presence of AIP with focal parenchymal involvement. STANDARD RADIOLOGIC PROCEDURES: If AIP is suspected, abdominal ultrasound and/or endosonography, computed tomography (CT), and preferably magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are indicated. A distinction is made between parenchymal and ductal changes that specifically indicate the presence of AIP. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS AND EVALUATION: The diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis should be made based on the International Consensus Criteria (ICDC), in which the five main features (imaging, serology, histology, other organ involvement, response to steroid medication) are assessed. In type 1 AIP, typical imaging changes are sufficient to establish the diagnosis even with negative histology, whereas for type 2 AIP, histologic evidence is required. Imaging changes help in the differential diagnosis from pancreatic cancer. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: The following article addresses and evaluates crucial imaging diagnostic CT and MRI criteria for correct classification of findings, description of results, and differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer.

[Compatibility of family and profession. Survey of radiologists and medical technical personnel in clinics with different organizations]. / Vereinbarkeit von Familie und Beruf. Umfrage unter Radiologen und medizinisch-technischen Angestellten in Kliniken unterschiedlicher Ausrichtung.

PURPOSE: The compatibility of family and profession is especially difficult for employees in medical professions because of shift work and overtime. It seems that in the future women are going to represent the majority of medical professionals in Germany. Hence, with the forthcoming lack of physicians in Germany social aspects will also play a greater role in the choice of the place of employment. Therefore a statistical survey was made among employees on how they judge the compatibility of family and job and what they would like to improve. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From autumn 2009 until spring 2010 a total of 115 questionnaires were distributed to 8 different academic radiology departments. The anonymous questionnaire with partially open, partially graded questions and partially multiple answer questions was designed with the help of an expert for statistics and analytics and included questions about the employment and family situation, plans for the future, requested flexible working hours and childcare models, as well as ideas for improvement. Of the questionnaires 87 were analyzed with a specially designed access database using, for example descriptive statistics and histogram analyses. RESULTS: Of the interviewees 68% were female and 31% were male (1% not significant n.s.), 46% had children and 49% were childless (5% n.s.), 63% were medical doctors, 33% radiographers (3% other) and 82% worked full-time. Of the male respondents with children 42% indicated that their spouse was at home, 18% of female respondents with children indicated that their spouse was at home and only mothers worked part-time. Of the male respondents 73% would like to take parental leave, 44% of all respondents (70% of the male respondents and 34% of the female respondents) agreed that radiology is more compatible with family than other medical disciplines and 87% would like to have a childcare possibility in close proximity to the working place. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: In most of the families the classic role model prevails, although women are well-educated and men also set a high value on the compatibility of family and profession and would like to take parental leave and work flexible working hours. This is a chance especially for radiology.

[Diagnostic Imaging of pancreatic carcinoma-Update of the new guideline]. / Diagnostik beim Pankreaskarzinom ­ Update in der neuen Leitlinie.

The new German S3 guidelines on ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma were published for the first time on the homepage of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) in December 2021 as a new update and thus the second update (first update 2013) and contain a large number of innovations in terms of diagnostics and treatment. The guidelines were organized and led by the German Society for Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (DGVS). In this article we would like to present the central content and innovations related to the radiological diagnostics of ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The most important innovations are the highest recommendation strength in favor of computed tomography (CT) when assessing tumor spread as well as the adaptation of the European guidelines for cystic tumors by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) as the method of first choice. A further innovation is the implementation of a structured reporting of CT findings for describing the anatomical tumor resectability on the basis of the publication presented by the Abdominal Imaging Working Group and the Oncological Imaging Working Group of the German Radiological Society. There is no evidence for the implementation of radiological imaging in the field of aftercare or in the field of screening.

[Diffuse and vascular hepatic diseases]. / Diffuse und vaskuläre Lebererkrankungen.

In addition to focal liver lesions, diffuse and vascular disorders of the liver represent a wide spectrum of liver diseases which are from the radiological point of view often difficult or nearly impossible to diagnose. Classical diagnostic methods are computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in addition to ultrasound. Diffuse parenchymal damage caused by diseases of various etiologies is therefore difficult to evaluate because it often lacks characteristic morphological features. For hepatic steatosis, hemochromatosis/siderosis as an example of a diffuse storage disease and sarcoidosis and candidiasis as infectious/inflammatory diseases, an image-based diagnosis is appropriate in some cases. For most diffuse liver diseases, however only nonspecific changes are visualized. Vascular pathologies of the liver, such as the Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis, however, can usually be diagnosed very clearly using radiology and there is also a very effective interventional radiological treatment. Chronic diseases very often culminate in liver cirrhosis which is highly associated with an increased risk of liver cancer.

[Diffusion-weighted imaging of the pancreas]. / Diffusionsbildgebung des Pankreas.

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has increasingly gained in importance over the last 10 years especially in cancer imaging for differentiation of malignant and benign lesions. Through development of fast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences DWI is not only applicable in neuroradiology but also in abdominal imaging. As a diagnostic tool of the pancreas DWI enables a differentiation between normal tissue, cancer and chronic pancreatitis. The ADC values (apparent diffusion coefficient, the so-called effective diffusion coefficient) reported in the literature for healthy pancreatic tissue are in the range from 1.49 to 1.9×10(-3) mm(2)/s, for pancreatic cancer in the range from 1.24 to 1.46×10(-3) mm(2)/s and for autoimmune pancreatitis an average ADC value of 1.012×10(-3) mm(2)/s. There are controversial data in the literature concerning the differentiation between chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Using DWI-derived IVIM (intravoxel incoherent motion) the parameter f (perfusion fraction) seems to be advantageous but it is important to use several b values. In the literature the mean f value in chronic pancreatitis is around 16%, in pancreatic cancer 8% and in healthy pancreatic tissue around 25%. So far, DWI has not been helpful for differentiating cystic lesions of the pancreas. There are many references with other tumor entities and in animal models which indicate that there is a possible benefit of DWI in monitoring therapy of pancreatic cancer but so far no original work has been published.

Multidetector CT evaluation of the course of nonresectable pancreatic carcinomas with neoadjuvant therapy.

OBJECTIVE: A prospective study to determine the value of multidetector CT (MD-CT) in assessing the course of nonresectable pancreatic carcinoma during therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 26 patients with nonresectable pancreatic carcinoma underwent MD-CT before and after therapy. The examinations were evaluated with regard to tumor size and vascular invasion using an invasion score (IS) by 2 radiologists independently (kappa analysis). Diagnosis was confirmed surgically, by biopsy or clinical course. RESULTS: Sensitivity for the assessment of irresectability was 100%. Following therapy, 54% of all the tumors were smaller (14/26), 42% had increased in volume (11/26), and one tumor remained stable (1/26). The IS (veins) during follow-up changed in 26 patients (portal vein: 5 higher (mean score 10.4/16.2), 4 lower (mean score 17.5/11.5); superior mesenteric vein: 12 higher (11/14.4), 5 lower (16.2/14.6); p = 0.026). The IS (arteries) changed in 13 patients (celiac trunk: 3 higher (3.3/10); hepatic artery: 4 higher (5.7/10.2), 3 lower (11.6/10.3); superior mesenteric artery: 2 higher (4.5/9.5), 1 lower (12/11)). The kappa values were calculated between 0.56 and 0.87. CONCLUSION: MD-CT is suitable for evaluating tumor spread during therapy for nonresectable pancreatic carcinoma. The IS is useful for assessing the degree of change in vessel invasion.

[Computed tomography of pancreatic tumors]. / Computertomographie bei Pankreastumoren.

Computed tomography (CT) and in particular multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT), also known as multislice CT (MSCT), is ideally suited for detecting pancreatic tumors because of the high spatial resolution.The method of choice is hydro-CT which involves distension of the stomach and duodenum by administration of 1-1.5 l water as a negative contrast medium under medically induced hypotension by administration of buscopan. The patient is laid on the right side at an angle of 30-45 degrees in order to obtain an artefact-free image of the close anatomical relationship around the pancreas head. In addition, curved MPRs or in rare cases 3D reconstructions could be very helpful in identifying the critical anatomic tumor site in the neighbourhood of the visceral vessel system. After the correct diagnosis of an adenocarcinoma has been made only 20% of all patients are shown to have a surgically resectable disease, but the overall survival rate is significantly higher after resection in combination with a multimodal tumor therapy strategy. The reason is that the correct diagnosis of the resectability of the tumor is one of the main criteria for overall survival of these patients. Currently practically all pancreatic tumors can be detected using MDCT and the detection rate varies between 70% and 100% (most recent literature references give a sensitivity of 89% and specificity up to 99%). In some rare cases the differentiation between focal necrotizing pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma can be difficult even with sophisticated protocols. Resectability can be correctly diagnosed with MDCT with a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 89%. MDCT is an ideal tool for the detection of neuroendocrine tumors, metastases and for the differentiation of cystic pancreatic lesions such as pseudocysts, microcystic adenomas or intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN). Particularly, the differentiation of the latter into benign, borderline or malignant transformation is not always possible, but indirect signs, such as small nodules adjacent to the ductal wall, the diameter of the pancreatic duct, or a direct communication between cystic lesions and duct can be detected because of the high spatial resolution and is comparable to the findings in MRI. Moreover MD-CT is an ideal procedure for the differentiation of local tumor stages in patients under neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy.

[Invasive diagnostic procedures for insulinomas of the pancreas]. / Invasive Diagnostik bei Insulinomen des Pankreas.

Insulinomas are the most common cause for hypoglycemia with endogenous hyperinsulinism. Insulinomas are the most frequent endocrine tumor of the pancreas and 10% occur as multiple tumors (e.g. multiple endocrine neoplasia type I) or in rare cases as islet cell hyperplasia. A further 10-15% of insulinomas are malignant. Non-invasive imaging modalities, such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasonography (US) and somatoreceptor scintigraphy (SRN) show a lower sensitivity for detection and localization of tumors, because in many cases insulinomas are smaller than 2 cm in size. Invasive pre-operative diagnostic procedures, such as transhepatic peripancreatic venous blood sampling (TPVB) and the intra-arterial calcium stimulation test (ASVS) are much more time-intensive compared to CT, MRI and US with an examination time of 2-3 h but achieve a more exact pre-operative detection and localization with sensitivities mostly greater than 95% and are therefore the diagnostic methods of choice.