Efficacy of a dopamine-somatostatin chimeric molecule, BIM-23A760, in the control of cell growth from primary cultures of human non-functioning pituitary adenomas: a multi-center study.

Dopamine D2 and somatostatin receptors (sstrs) were reported to affect non-functioning pituitary adenoma (NFPA) proliferation in vitro. However, the reported results differ according to the experimental conditions used. We established an experimental protocol allowing reproducible evaluation of NFPA cell proliferation in vitro, to test and compare the antiproliferative effects of dopamine and somatostatin analogs (alone or in combination) with the activity of the dopamine-somatostatin chimeric molecule BIM-23A760. The protocol was utilized by four independent laboratories, studying 38 fibroblast-deprived NFPA cell cultures. Cells were characterized for GH, POMC, sstr1-sstr5, total dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) (in all cases), and D2 receptor long and short isoforms (in 15 out of 38 cases) mRNA expression and for alpha-subunit, LH, and FSH release. D2R, sstr3, and sstr2 mRNAs were consistently observed, with the dominant expression of D2R (2.9+/-2.6 copy/copy beta-glucuronidase; mean+/-s.e.m.), when compared with sstr3 and sstr2 (0.6+/-1.0 and 0.3+/-0.6 respectively). BIM-23A760, a molecule with high affinity for D2R and sstr2, significantly inhibited [3H]thymidine incorporation in 23 out of 38 (60%) NFPA cultures (EC50=1.2 pM and Emax=-33.6+/-3.7%). BIM-23A760 effects were similar to those induced by the selective D2R agonist cabergoline that showed a statistically significant inhibition in 18 out of 27 tumors (compared with a significant inhibition obtained in 17 out of 27 tumors using BIM-23A760, in the same subgroup of adenomas analyzed), while octreotide was effective in 13 out of 27 cases. In conclusion, superimposable data generated in four independent laboratories using a standardized protocol demonstrate that, in vitro, chimeric dopamine/sstr agonists are effective in inhibiting cell proliferation in two-thirds of NFPAs.

Involvement of the pituitary-specific transcription factor pit-1 in somatolactotrope cell growth and death: an approach using dominant-negative pit-1 mutants.

The anterior pituitary-specific transcription factor Pit-1 was initially identified and cloned as a transactivator of the prolactin (PRL) and GH genes and later as a regulator of the TSHb gene. It was found to be a major developmental regulator, because natural Pit-1 gene mutations cause a dwarf phenotype in mice and cause combined pituitary hormone deficiency associated with pituitary hypoplasia in humans. To further investigate the growth-promoting effects of Pit-1, we used a strategy based on the use of dominant-negative Pit-1 mutants as an alternative means of inactivating endogenous Pit-1 functions. R271W, a Pit-1 mutant identified in one allele in patients with severe combined pituitary hormone deficiency, and Pit-1Delta1-123, a deletion mutant in which only the DNA binding domain of Pit-1 is conserved, were generated, and their ability to abolish the effects of the endogenous native Pit-1 in the differentiated proliferating somatolactotrope GH4C1 cell line was investigated. Enforced expression of the dominant-negative mutants in GH4C1 cells using recombinant lentiviral vectors decreased the levels of expression of known Pit-1 target genes such as PRL and GH, abolished the hormone release, and reduced cell viability by decreasing the growth rate and inducing apoptosis via a caspase-independent pathway. These results show for the first time that the growth-promoting effects of Pit-1 are at least partly due to the fact that this transcription factor prevents apoptotic cell death.

The analysis of quantitative expression of somatostatin and dopamine receptors in gastro-entero-pancreatic tumours opens new therapeutic strategies.

OBJECTIVE: Somatostatin (sst) are present in the majority of gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) tumours. Effects of somatostatin receptor (sst) analogues are partial and of limited duration. Cell lines derived from GEP express dopaminergic receptors D(2). New chimeric analogues simultaneously recognising sst(2) and sst(5) or sst(2) and D(2) have additive effects in inhibition of GH and prolactin secretion in pituitary adenomas. Our aim was to quantify the expression of sst and D(2) mRNA in human GEP tumours. DESIGN AND METHODS: mRNA expression of sst(1), sst(2), sst(3) and sst(5) as well as D(2), was analysed using real-time PCR (TaqMan probe) in a series of 35 patients with GEP tumours (pancreas (n = 19) and intestinal (n = 16)). Levels of expression were compared with a group of 13 somatotroph adenomas. RESULTS: All GEP tumours express sst(1), sst(2) and D(2). Expression of sst(3) and sst(5) was observed in 89 and 76% of tumours respectively with highly variable levels. sst(2) mRNA expression was higher in nonfunctional tumours (P < 0.009) and sst5 was higher in pancreatic than in intestinal tumours (P < 0.02). Whereas sst(2) levels were similar between GEP and somatotroph tumours, levels of sst(5) and D(2) were higher in the former (394.9 +/- 156.1 x 10(-2) vs 69.7 +/- 19.5 x 10(-2) copy/copy beta-Gus (P < 0.0036) and 519.6 +/- 121.2 x 10(-2) vs 50.0 +/- 21.6 x 10(-2) copy/copy beta-Gus (P < 0.0001) respectively). In small tumours ( < 30 mm), sst(2) density appeared as a crucial parameter in somatostatin receptor scintigraphy results, whereas in big tumours, a consistent bias in SRS results was introduced by the size. In pancreatic GEP, high-level sst(3) expression was found in tumours with more active angiogenesis (higher microvessel density and vascular endothelial growth factor expression (P < 0.03)). CONCLUSIONS: GEP tumours co-express sst(2) and D(2) in 100% of cases and sst(5) in 89% thus supporting the testing of bi-specific agonists (sst(2)/sst(5) or sst(2)/D(2)) in these tumours.

Regulation of prolactin, GH, and Pit-1 gene expression in anterior pituitary by Pitx2: An approach using Pitx2 mutants.

The transcription factor Pitx2 is required for the morphogenesis of anterior structures such as the eye, teeth, and anterior pituitary. We investigated the functional properties of Pitx2 missense mutants previously reported in Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome, using reporter genes under the control of pituitary target gene [human (h)PRL, hGH, hPit-1] promoters transfected in nonpituitary and pituitary cell lines. The five mutants appeared to be transcriptionally defective despite conserved DNA-binding in CV1 cells. In addition, one mutation, R91P, almost completely blocked the wt-Pitx2-induced activation of the target promoters, prevented the Pitx2/Pit-1 synergistic activation of the hPRL promoter, and was able to counteract the Pitx1-driven transactivation effects. The dominant negative properties of this mutant were further established in cells endogenously expressing Pitx2 because transfection of R91P in GH4C1 somatolactotroph cells resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of basal activities of the pituitary promoters. These results, which show that Pitx2 mutants are defective in activating pituitary target genes, confirm the critical role of this homeodomain factor in the differentiated functions of the pituitary somatolactotroph cells. Furthermore, these results might form the basis for future experiments because dominant negative forms of Pitx2 such as R91P might provide instructive tools to further delineate the detailed mechanisms mediating Pitx2 functions in cell proliferation and differentiation.

Macroprolactinemia revisited: a study on 106 patients.

The predominance of high molecular weight PRL, or macroprolactinemia, has long been known in hyperprolactinemic patients with maintained fertility. Among 1,106 consecutive patients investigated for hyperprolactinemia in our center over a 10-yr period, serum PRL chromatography was performed in 368 cases because of discordant clinical, biological, or neuroradiological findings. We prospectively studied the 106 patients with macroprolactinemia (96 women, 6 men, 4 children) and compared them with the 262 hyperprolactinemic patients with a normal PRL elution pattern. We concluded the following: 1) the incidence of macroprolactinemia in our hyperprolactinemic population was at least 10%; 2) despite preserved fertility with uneventful pregnancies, some of the usual symptoms of hyperprolactinemia were present; 3) mean PRL values were 61 +/- 66 microg/liter (range, 20-663) and exceeded 100 microg/liter in 8.5% of patients; 4) PRL levels usually remained stable over time; 5) on dopaminergic therapy, PRL returned to normal in 21 of 45 treated patients; 6) during follow-up of 7 pregnancies, PRL increased to supraphysiological levels in 5; and 7) pituitary magnetic resonance imaging was normal in 78% of patients or revealed diverse pituitary lesions, including adenomas (n = 5). A diagnostic method for macroprolactinemia should be available to all centers to avoid unnecessary hormonal or radiological investigations and treatments.

Somatostatinergic ligands in dopamine-sensitive and -resistant prolactinomas.

OBJECTIVE: Ten percent of patients with prolactinoma fail to respond with normalization of prolactin (PRL) and tumor shrinkage under dopamine agonist (DA) therapy. The resistance to treatment is linked to a loss of dopamine receptor 2 (D2DR). Prolactinomas express somatostatin (SST) receptor subtypes, SSTR1, 2, and 5. The aim of this study was to determine whether different SST compounds could overcome the resistance to DA in prolactinomas. DESIGN AND METHODS: The efficacy of SSTR1, SSTR2, and SSTR5 ligands; the universal SST ligand, SOM230; and the chimeric SST-DA compound, BIM-23A760, was compared with cabergoline in suppressing PRL secretion from primary cultures of ten prolactinomas (six DA responders and four DA resistant). Receptor mRNAs were assessed by quantitative PCR. RESULTS: The mean mRNA levels for D2DR, SSTR1, SSTR2, and SSTR5 were 92.3+/-47.3, 2.2+/-1.4, 1.1+/-0.7, and 1.6+/-0.6 copy/copy beta-glucuronidase (beta-Gus) respectively. The SSTR1 agonist, BIM-23926, did not suppress PRL in prolactinomas. In a DA-resistant prolactinoma, it did not inhibit [(3)H]thymidine incorporation. The SSTR5 compound, BIM-23206, produced a dose-dependent inhibition of PRL release similar to that of cabergoline in three DA-sensitive prolactinomas. BIM-23A760 produced a maximal PRL inhibition superimposable to that obtained with cabergoline with a lower EC(50) (0.5+/-0.1 vs 2.5+/-1.5 pmol/l). In DA-resistant prolactinomas, BIM-23206 and SOM230 were ineffective. Cabergoline and BIM-23A760 produced a partial inhibition of PRL secretion (19+/-6 and 21+/-3% respectively). CONCLUSION: Although the SSTRs are expressed in prolactinomas, the somatostatinergic ligands analyzed do not appear to be highly effective in suppressing PRL. D2DR remains the primary target for effective treatment of prolactinomas.

Somatostatin receptor sst2 decreases cell viability and hormonal hypersecretion and reverses octreotide resistance of human pituitary adenomas.

In human somatotroph adenomas, growth hormone (GH) hypersecretion can be inhibited by somatostatin analogues such as octreotide. Unfortunately, serum GH levels reach normal values in only 60% of treated patients. The decreased sensitivity to octreotide is strongly related to a lower expression of somatostatin receptor sst2. In this present study, the sst2 gene was transferred by an adenoviral vector (Ad-sst2) in human somatotroph (n = 7) and lactotroph (n = 2) adenomas in vitro. Sst2 mRNA levels and sst2 immunostaining dramatically increased after infection. Ten days after infection at 20 multiplicity of infection (MOI), sst2 gene transfer decreased cell viability from 19% to 90% by caspase-dependent apoptosis. At low viral doses (5 MOI), Ad-sst2 decreased GH or prolactin (PRL) basal secretion and mRNA expression. Somatotroph tumors were classified in three groups according to their octreotide sensitivity. Four days after infection by 5 MOI Ad-sst2, the maximal GH suppression by octreotide increased from 31% to 57% in the octreotide partially resistant group and from 0% to 27% in the resistant ones. In the octreotide-sensitive group, EC(50) values significantly decreased from 1.3 x 10(-11) to 6.6 x 10(-13) mol/L without improving maximal GH suppression. Finally, lactotroph tumors, nonresponding to octreotide in basal conditions, became octreotide sensitive with a maximal PRL suppression of 43% at 10(-8) mol/L. Therefore, sst2 reexpression is able to improve octreotide sensitivity. Sst2 gene transfer may open new therapeutic strategies in treatment combined with somatostatin analogues.

Somatostatin and dopamine-somatostatin multiple ligands directed towards somatostatin and dopamine receptors in pituitary adenomas.

AIM: We report the comparative efficacy of octreotide, cabergoline and multiple ligands directed towards the different somatostatin subtypes (ssts), such as BIM-23A779 and SOM-230, and of chimeric analogs which bind both somatostatin and the dopamine D2 receptors (D2R), such as BIM-23A760 and BIM-23A781, in cell cultures from human growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenomas. PROCEDURES: RT-PCR analysis of the quantitative expression of the different ssts and D2R mRNAs was performed on tumor fragments of 22 GH-secreting adenomas collected after surgery. Pharmacological studies, using the different ligands, were performed on cell cultures of such tumors. RESULTS: sst2, sst5 and D2R were constantly coexpressed in all tumors, in variable amounts. The levels of expression of sst2 and D2R mRNAs were significantly correlated with the maximal GH suppression by either octreotide or cabergoline (p < 0.001). In each tumor tested, 3 patterns of response, in terms of GH suppression, were observed. GH secretion was preferentially inhibited by the sst2 preferential compound octreotide in 61% of the tumors. In 19% of the tumors, the maximal inhibition of GH release was achieved with the sst5 preferential compound BIM-23268. The dopamine analog cabergoline was the most effective inhibitor of GH secretion in 21% of cases. Among the compounds tested, the most potent inhibitors of GH secretion were the sst2, sst5, D2R chimeric compound BIM-23A760, followed by the sst universal ligand SOM-230. CONCLUSIONS: The variable patterns of response to sst2, sst5 and dopamine D2 analogs may explain the greater efficacy of drugs which bind to the 3 receptors in suppressing GH secretion. The biological potency (EC50) and efficacy of the chimeric compound BIM-23A760 on GH secretion can be partly explained by its high affinity for sst2. The effect of multiple receptor activation on the functions of other pituitary tumor types, such as prolactinomas and corticotropinomas, is not presently analyzed, and the efficacy of multireceptor ligands remains to be elucidated.

Pitx factors are involved in basal and hormone-regulated activity of the human prolactin promoter.

The pituitary-specific POU homeodomain factor Pit-1 likely interacts with other factors for cell-specific expression of prolactin. Here we identify the paired-like homeobox transcription factors Pitx1 and Pitx2 as factors functionally activating the proximal human prolactin promoter (hPRL-164luc). Using in vitro binding assays and a series of site-specific mutations of the proximal hPRL promoter, we mapped the B1 and B2 bicoid sites involved in Pitx-mediated transactivation of the hPRL-164luc construct. In somatolactotroph GH4C1 cells, basal proximal hPRL promoter activity was inhibited by a Pitx2 dominant-negative form in a dose-dependent manner, whereas binding disruptive mutations in the Pitx sites significantly reduced basal activity of the promoter. We also show that synergistic activation of hPRL-164luc by Pitx2 and Pit-1 requires the integrity of the B2 Pitx binding site, and at least one of the P1 and P2 Pit-1 response elements. In addition, mutation in the B2 Pitx site results in attenuation of the promoter's responsiveness to forskolin, thyrotropin-releasing hormone, and epidermal growth factor. Conversely, Pitx1 or Pitx2 overexpression in GH4C1 cells leads to an enhancement of the drugs stimulatory effects. Altogether, these results suggest that full responsiveness to several signaling pathways regulating the hPRL promoter requires the B2 Pitx binding site and that Pitx factors may be part of the proteic complex involved in these regulations. Finally, in situ hybridization analysis showing coexpression of the PRL and Pitx2 genes in rat and human lactotroph cells corroborates the physiological relevance of these results.