RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Increasing indications for cellular therapy collections have stressed our healthcare system, with autologous collections having a longer than desired wait time until apheresis collection. This quality improvement initiative was undertaken to accommodate more patients within existing resources. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with multiple myeloma who underwent autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection from October 2022 to April 2023 were included. Demographic, mobilization, laboratory, and apheresis data were retrospectively collected from the medical record. RESULTS: This cohort included 120 patients (49.2% male), with a median age of 60 years. All received G-CSF and 95% received pre-emptive Plerixafor approximately 18 hours pre-collection. Most (79%) had collection goals of at least 8 × 106/kg CD34 cells, with 63% over 70 years old having this high collection goal (despite 20 years of institutional data showing <1% over 70 years old have a second transplant). With collection efficiencies of 55.9%, 44% of patients achieved their collection goal in a single day apheresis collection. A platelet count <150 × 103/µL on the day of collection was a predictor for poor mobilization; among 27 patients with a low baseline platelet count, 17 did not achieve the collection goal and 2 failed to collect a transplantable dose. CONCLUSIONS: With minor collection goal adjustments, 15% of all collection appointments could have been avoided over this 6-month period. Other strategies to accommodate more patients include mobilization modifications (Plerixafor timing or substituting a longer acting drug), utilizing platelet counts to predict mobilization, and modifying apheresis collection volumes or schedule templates.
Asunto(s)
Bencilaminas , Ciclamas , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética , Mieloma Múltiple , Trasplante Autólogo , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Ciclamas/farmacología , Ciclamas/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/administración & dosificación , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética/métodos , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Eliminación de Componentes Sanguíneos/métodos , Compuestos Heterocíclicos/administración & dosificación , Compuestos Heterocíclicos/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre Periférica/métodos , Recuento de PlaquetasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Plerixafor is a recently Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved CXCR4 antagonist, which is combined with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to facilitate stem cell mobilization of lymphoma and myeloma patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To evaluate the effectiveness and the related costs of a "just-in-time" strategy of plerixafor administration, we performed a retrospective cohort study comparing 148 consecutive lymphoma and myeloma patients in whom mobilization was attempted during 2008 before the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of plerixafor with 188 consecutive patients mobilized during 2009 after FDA approval. RESULTS: Plerixafor was administered to 64 of 188 patients considered to be at risk for mobilization failure due to either their medical history ("high risk," n = 23) or the occurrence of peripheral blood CD34+ count of fewer than 15 × 10(6) cells/L with a white blood cell count of greater than 10 × 10(9) cells/L after at least 5 days of G-CSF administration (just-in-time, n = 41). The success rates of collecting a minimum transplant CD34+ cell dose (≥2 × 10(6) cells/kg) or target cell dose (≥5 × 10(6) lymphoma or ≥10 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg myeloma) in the just-in-time patients compared favorably with the 36 poor mobilizers collected with G-CSF alone: 93% versus 72% and 42% versus 22%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of plerixafor in selected high-risk patients and poor mobilizers did not increase the total charges associated with stem cell collection when compared with poor mobilizers treated with G-CSF alone. The targeted use of plerixafor increased the overall success rate of mobilizing a minimum number of CD34+ cells from 93% to 98% in patients with hematologic malignancies scheduled for autotransplant and increased the overall charges associated with stem cell collection in all patients by an average of 17%.
Asunto(s)
Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética/métodos , Compuestos Heterocíclicos/administración & dosificación , Linfoma/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre Periférica/métodos , Receptores CXCR4/antagonistas & inhibidores , Terapia Recuperativa , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antígenos CD34/sangre , Bencilaminas , Eliminación de Componentes Sanguíneos , Estudios de Cohortes , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Ciclamas , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/administración & dosificación , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética/economía , Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos de los fármacos , Compuestos Heterocíclicos/farmacología , Humanos , Linfoma/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/sangre , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre Periférica/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Trasplante Autólogo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A study was undertaken to investigate whether granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) injection in lower adipose tissue-containing sites (arms and legs) would result in a lower exposure and reduced stem cell collection efficiency compared with injection into abdominal skin. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We completed a prospective randomized study to determine the efficacy and tolerability of different injection sites for patients with multiple myeloma or lymphoma undergoing stem cell mobilization and apheresis. Primary endpoints were the number of CD34+ cells collected and the number of days of apheresis. Forty patients were randomly assigned to receive cytokine injections in their abdomen (Group A) or extremities (Group B). Randomization was stratified based on diagnosis (myeloma, n=29 vs. lymphoma, n=11), age, and mobilization strategy and balanced across demographic factors and body mass index. RESULTS: Thirty-five subjects were evaluable for the primary endpoint: 18 in Group A and 17 in Group B. One evaluable subject in each group failed to collect a minimum dose of at least 2.0×10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. The mean numbers of CD34+ cells (±SD) collected were not different between Groups A and B (9.15×10(6)±4.7×10(6) /kg vs. 9.85×10(6) ±5×10(6) /kg, respectively; p=NS) after a median of 2 days of apheresis. Adverse events were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The site of G-CSF administration does not affect the number of CD34+ cells collected by apheresis or the duration of apheresis needed to reach the target cell dose.
Asunto(s)
Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética/métodos , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre Periférica/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Vías de Administración de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Linfoma/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Proteínas Recombinantes , Trasplante Autólogo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Postchemotherapy mobilization results were reviewed in patients undergoing apheresis before planned autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) transplantation to improve the timing of collection procedures. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 135 attempts to collect autologous HPC were studied in 132 unique patients with lymphoid malignancies (non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and Hodgkin's disease). Chemotherapy mobilization regimens included cyclophosphamide (n = 59), ICE (n = 46), or other regimens (n = 30). Granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (CSF) was administered once daily at a dose of 5 microg per kg starting 2 days after the last dose of chemotherapy; granulocyte-macrophage-CSF was added at a daily dose of 5 microg per kg 6 days later. Apheresis was initiated when the blood CD34+ content was more than 20 per microL. RESULTS: In an initial cohort of 37 patients, 27 percent required apheresis during the weekend. An optimized timing for chemotherapy mobilization was developed based on retrospective data; prospective implementation of the new algorithm reduced the incidence of weekend apheresis to 13 percent in the subsequent 98 consecutive patients (p < 0.05). A median of 9 x 10(6) (range, 0.4 x 10(6)-96 x 10(6)) CD34+ cells per kg was collected from the entire cohort of 135 patients after a mean of 1.8 days of apheresis. Apheresis was initiated following a median (+/-SD) of 10 +/- 2.7 days of cytokines. CONCLUSION: In the majority of patients, the first day of apheresis occurred 11 to 13 days after the last dose of chemotherapy with a variety of different chemotherapy regimens. Administering the last dose of chemotherapy on Thursday or Friday versus Monday, Tuesday, or Wednesday was associated with a 77 percent lower incidence in the frequency of weekend apheresis collections (p < 0.001).